Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
?
Why would they mention it if it meant losing their job or why would you mention it if they felt threatened?
Why are only blogging sites reporting it? Fox News wouldn't be afraid to report it. Why aren't they reporting it?
Ask CNN, they made the claim.
You are a fucking fabricator. They did no such thing and you know it.
A talking head made a remark (allegedly- it's not on the video)
LIAR
LIAR
LIAR
At exactly 0:30 in the video she makes the claim.....
You have been discredited.
GTFO!
In a New York Times article dated 23 August 1933, Duranty wrote, "Any report of a famine in Russia is today an exaggeration or malignant propaganda. The food shortage, however, which has affected the whole population in the last year and particularly in the grain-producing provinces—the Ukraine, North Caucasus, the Lower Volga—has, however, caused heavy loss of life." Duranty concluded "it is conservative to suppose" that, in certain provinces with a total population of over 40 million, mortality had "at least trebled." [7]
On March 31, 1933, Walter Duranty denounced the famine stories and Gareth Jones in The New York Times. In the piece, he described the situation under the title "Russians Hungry, But Not Starving" as follows: "In the middle of the diplomatic duel between Great Britain and the Soviet Union over the accused British engineers, there appears from a British source a big scare story in the American press about famine in the Soviet Union, with 'thousands already dead and millions menaced by death from starvation." Malcolm Muggeridge, a correspondent for The Manchester Guardian, called Duranty a "liar".
The duel in the press over the famine stories did not damage esteem for Duranty—whose reporting The Nation had described as "the most enlightened, dispassionate dispatches from a great nation in the making which appeared in any newspaper in the world."[8] Following sensitive negotiations in November 1933 that resulted in the establishment of relations between the U.S. and the U.S.S.R., a dinner was given for Soviet Foreign Minister Maxim Litvinov in New York City's Waldorf-Astoria Hotel. Each of the attendees' names was read in turn, politely applauded by the guests, until Duranty's. Whereupon, Alexander Woollcott wrote, "the one really prolonged pandemonium was evoked.... Indeed, one quite got the impression that America, in a spasm of discernment, was recognizing both Russia and Walter Duranty
The Holodomor (Ukrainian: Голодомор, "Extermination by hunger" or "Hunger-extermination";[2] derived from 'Морити голодом', "Starving someone" [3]) was a man-made famine in the Ukrainian SSR and adjacent Cossack territories in 1932 and 1933. During the famine, which is also known as the "Terror-Famine in Ukraine" and "Famine-Genocide in Ukraine",[4][5][6] millions of Ukrainians and Cossacks died of starvation in a peacetime catastrophe unprecedented in the history of Ukraine.[7]
The estimates of the death toll by scholars varied greatly. Recent research has narrowed the estimates to between 1.8[8] and 5[9] million, with modern consensus for a likely total of 3–3.5 million.[10] According to the decision of Kyiv Appellation Court, the demographic losses due to the famine amounted to 10 million, with 3.9 million famine deaths, and a 6.1 million birth deficit.[11]
Outside of you saying something against a PROTECTED group. How exactly can he fire you from a job within the private sector?
[youtube]EKdiB4YerR8[/youtube]
[youtube]kJOEmokI7jg[/youtube]
[youtube]CbqNug74d2E[/youtube]
[youtube]EKdiB4YerR8[/youtube]
[youtube]kJOEmokI7jg[/youtube]
[youtube]CbqNug74d2E[/youtube]
And the evil bastards like pogo could not possibly give a shit less.
And the fact remains, a single person is not the institution of CNN, Obama's people are not O'bama, a single person is not "all" those at CNN, and a conditional remark made by that one person does not constitute "regularly".
Not only did you make all that up, you did it twice in two different threads within ten minutes of each other--
You've had this explained to your sorry ass eight times... and you go on posting it. That's the definition of abject stupidity.
Lying dumbass mental midget.
What's wrong with taking a gun into a bank?
-Geaux
One person is a whole network. Who knew?
The whole tone of the Obama Administration has been hostility to anyone who criticizes the president in any manner, shape or form.
A couple of weeks ago a report was published entitled "The Obama Administration and the Press". It speaks of journalists' increasing difficulty to do investigative reporting and the general attitude of Obama and his people towards the press.
""But his administration’s actions have too often contradicted Obama’s stated intentions. “Instead,” New York Times public editor Margaret Sullivan wrote earlier this year, “it’s turning out to be the administration of unprecedented secrecy and unprecedented attacks on a free press.”" (page 4)
"The administration’s war on leaks and other efforts to control information are the most aggressive I’ve seen since theNixon administration, when I was one of the editors involved in The Washington Post’s investigation of Watergate. The 30 experienced Washington journalists at a variety of news organizations whom I interviewed for this report could not remember any precedent." (page 4)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/r/201...al-Politics/Graphics/CPJ-ObamaAndThePress.pdf
This report should be read by everyone.
In the Obama administration’s Washington, government officials are increasingly afraid to talk to the press. Those suspected of discussing with reporters anything that the government has classified as secret are subject to investigation, including lie-detector tests and scrutiny of their telephone and e-mail records. An “Insider Threat Program” being implemented in every government department requires all federal employees to help prevent unauthorized disclosures of information by monitoring the behavior of their colleagues.
Six government employees, plus two contractors including Edward Snowden, have been subjects of felony criminal prosecutions since 2009 under the 1917 Espionage Act, accused of leaking classified information to the press— compared with a total of three such prosecutions in all previous U.S. administrations. Still more criminal investigations into leaks are under way. Reporters’ phone logs and e-mails were secretly subpoenaed and seized by the Justice Department in two of the investigations, and a Fox News reporter was accused in an affidavit or one of those subpoenas of being “an aider, abettor and/or conspirator” of an indicted leak defendant, exposing him to possible prosecution for doing his job as a journalist. In another leak case, a New York Times reporter has been ordered to testify against a defendant or go to jail.
Compounding the concerns of journalists and the government officials they contact, news stories based on classified documents obtained from Snowden have revealed extensive surveillance of Americans’ telephone and e-mail traffic by the National Security Agency. Numerous Washington-based journalists told me that officials are reluctant to discuss even unclassified information with them because they fear that leak investigations and government surveillance make it more difficult for reporters to protect them as sources. “I worry now about calling somebody because the contact can be found out through a check of phone records or e-mails,” said veteran national security journalist R. Jeffrey Smith of the Center for Public Integrity, an influential nonprofit government accountability news organization in Washington. “It leaves a digital trail that makes it easier for the government to monitor those contacts,” he said.
Not to mention you've morphed the words of a CNN anchor into the institution of CNN itself, while simultaneously morphing the subject of what she said from "Obama's people" to O'bama himself.
And then multiplied the fantasy event by multiples... "regularly". Which doesn't exist.
Will said that the Obama administration consistently goes after people who criticizes them, and the anchor agreed saying he had a point. That is about as clear as a person can make it, and Obamas supporters do not do things he does not want, and CNN's ideological nutbags do not let journalists remain that don't tote the management and ownerships story line.
Everything the OP has said is plainly true while you lie like the putrid scum you are based on the assumption that most wont actually watch the video but only read the discussion.
Lie much?
Yep, deny everything, admit nothing and make counter accusations.
That is the motto of ass kissing thugs like you throughout history.
Your day will come to answer for your lies, and I look forward to it.
One person is a whole network. Who knew?
Don't be a stupid fool.
If you would bother to watch the fucking video you would see that there was a consensus among everyone there, and that shit doesn't happen at Big Media networks unless the top brass has signed off on it.
Not to mention you've morphed the words of a CNN anchor into the institution of CNN itself, while simultaneously morphing the subject of what she said from "Obama's people" to O'bama himself.
And then multiplied the fantasy event by multiples... "regularly". Which doesn't exist.
Will said that the Obama administration consistently goes after people who criticizes them, and the anchor agreed saying he had a point. That is about as clear as a person can make it, and Obamas supporters do not do things he does not want, and CNN's ideological nutbags do not let journalists remain that don't tote the management and ownerships story line.
Everything the OP has said is plainly true while you lie like the putrid scum you are based on the assumption that most wont actually watch the video but only read the discussion.
Lie much?
Yep, deny everything, admit nothing and make counter accusations.
That is the motto of ass kissing thugs like you throughout history.
Your day will come to answer for your lies, and I look forward to it.
You're like a baboon, only less clever. Learn to read, dumbass.
One reporter (not the entirety of CNN) makes a remark that Obama's people (meaning some local staff who handles the press, far removed from the White House), were heavyhanded.
One person is a whole network. Who knew?
Don't be a stupid fool.
If you would bother to watch the fucking video you would see that there was a consensus among everyone there, and that shit doesn't happen at Big Media networks unless the top brass has signed off on it.
Number one, that's not a scripted segment. Nobody "signs off" on squat.
Number two, the two guests are not CNN personnel. There's a total of one, count 'em, one CNN person speaking in the entire video. Not "everybody at CNN" and not "regularly".
Dumbass.
What's more, I think I know where 2A cut and pasted this entire OP from -- BOTH of them- verbatim.
We can't link other message boards here but I'm looking right at it. A clown called "Ninth Amendment". You can Google the title of this one and find it.
Apparently not only didn't this Ninth Amendment bother to watch the video either and just passed on what he was told, but 2A here didn't even bother to vet 9A either and did the same thing.
He's like a disease "carrier".
Unless of course they are the same person, posting the same fallacy on multiple message boards in a desperate attempt to create a story that doesn't exist.
Moral: always vet your stuff. Or you end up looking like 2A / 9A.
Like it or lump it, jerkweed. I'm looking right at it. Posted at 02:49:39 PM yesterday, then carried to USMB and plopped into two different threads.
Two different threads on the same fake story, posted by a moron who got all in the face of another poster threatening to report him for using a bold font.
Did you get that? He pulls the same bogus story from another message board to here, posts it twice in different forums (maybe more, I haven't looked) and then threatens somebody else with "reporting".
Apparently this is the crowd you hang out with. Why am I not surprised...
