CNN on Benghazi committee: Immediate headline "GOP committee finds no wrongdoing by Clinton"

Convict who for Benghazi? For malfeasance?
It's the fbi criminal investigation of Hillary that might catch her, though this doj would more than likely refuse to indict...

You know, you want mto blame Reps when she brought ALL of this on herself. By not ,minding state dept business and thinking she could slide around the law on her email business, even though she herself fired an Ambassador just for using private email! Not having their own server.
Clinton State Department Ousted Ambassador Using Private Email
but its ok for the queen, in her eyes.

It is kind of hard not to believe that the Benghazi investigations are not purely political theater if Congress does nothing to try and prevent this from occurring again.

At least the Republican report suggest changes, right?
They are suggesting that evidence actual evidence not be required to convict a targeted Democrat...they feel this is best....
13501806_10206502210255774_6613300894480355228_n.jpg
 
Conservatives across the country should be required to each pay $10 into a GoFundMe account to reimburse the $20 million, or whatever it is that was spent on the Ben Gassy political turd laying, to the American taxpayer. We'll settle up on the other crap 'investigations' the Republicant's have run the last few years.

Benghazi-Hypocrisy_zpsxjcygey7.png
They spent $60 million investigating a blow job

Why should anyone be surprised

Benghazi Comm. cost less than 7 mill. Not only do Democraps lie about the cost, they lie about the findings! It actually is cheap by Democrap spending habits........

WaPo fact check rebukes Dem claim over cost of Benghazi select committee - Hot Air
What wrongdoings did the investigation uncover?
What was uncoverd? Grossly incompetent leaders.we now know that one rescue team changed their uniforms for combat 4 times.
The whole thing was a huge cluster fuck,then the video lie.
Yep that's outstanding leadership all right.

On a foot note,how is that country doing lately? Come on Clinton people how's I'd that country doing,and explain the video lie,why would they do that?
The chain of command was confused for sure.

Leadership failed because those at the top did not want it to be a terrorist attack, they wanted it to be a demonstration. Plus contractors were acting on their own outside of that chain of command.

The poll that I hate the most is the one that asks if we approve of the direction the country is taking.

That means something different to everyone. To GOP publicists like Fox News...it will mean we hate Obama and Hillary...To DNC publicists like MSNBC, it'll mean we hate the Republicans in Congress.

This is all phony outrage
 
The 4 dead guys were already turned up and what you claim is a lie is only a claim. 17 investigations later and you still have shit but rumors and allegations.

Maybe you guys just suck that bad where you cant lay a glove on her :dunno:
Glad to see you support corruption. It will weaken your position in future.


Again, your sheer declaration means nothing. You need more than pointing to your butt and going "owee"
The point should be clear. Obama refuses to follow the law. It is obvious from this report that he is covering it up. Plenty of evidence was found to support a prosecution of the guilty, but that won't happen. Obama is breaking his oath to enforce the law. That is corruption.

And you support it.

Anyone who supports corruption in any form, and knows it, is corrupt themselves.

So what we are seeing is a government that is intentionally screwing this country up. That's why they were allowed to win. The only type of person that will be allowed to be in charge of this country, in this type of corrupt environment, is someone who will intentionally screw up the economy. That's what Globalists want. They're making billions off of failing economies.

And you support it because of your inherent racism.

Obama refuses to follow the law?????

Then why doesn't the Republican Congress recommend he be prosecuted?


You heard Mud. Its OBVIOUS he's breaking the law they are just unable to make a case against the OBVIOUS. Why?

:desk:


Because what he says is obvious is only obvious bullshit
I think it's the GOP’S fault cuz they keep cutting funding. Obama needs money to enforce the law, and the GOP said he can't have any for that.

So he doesn't.

He has plenty of cash to bring Muslims here, but nothing to enforce the law. Plenty of cash for parties and golf. Nothing for law enforcement.

:dunno:
 
Glad to see you support corruption. It will weaken your position in future.


Again, your sheer declaration means nothing. You need more than pointing to your butt and going "owee"
The point should be clear. Obama refuses to follow the law. It is obvious from this report that he is covering it up. Plenty of evidence was found to support a prosecution of the guilty, but that won't happen. Obama is breaking his oath to enforce the law. That is corruption.

And you support it.

Anyone who supports corruption in any form, and knows it, is corrupt themselves.

So what we are seeing is a government that is intentionally screwing this country up. That's why they were allowed to win. The only type of person that will be allowed to be in charge of this country, in this type of corrupt environment, is someone who will intentionally screw up the economy. That's what Globalists want. They're making billions off of failing economies.

And you support it because of your inherent racism.

Obama refuses to follow the law?????

Then why doesn't the Republican Congress recommend he be prosecuted?
The only way Obama would be prosecuted is if they conducted a coup.....and that would probably end up with most of them in jail. So instead of wasting time fighting corrupt Democrats and using the law to go after a lawless president, they chose to just let him leave office.

How typical and cowardly. It's amazing any of you got through the Revolutionary war at all.
Some of them didn't

Some of them were hung.

BTW, you must be a foreigner. That explains some of the stupidity in your posts.
 
Last edited:
Wow. The bias is so pathetic it's sickening. The Benghazi committee press conference was finishing and the theme was "read the report". Trey Gowdy, when asked if Clinton was at fault, implied she was but rather answered "just read the report".

When he walked off stage...CNN IMMEDIATELY ran the headline "GOP led committee finds no wrongdoing by Hillary".

God damn....CNN must have a staff of alien speed readers!!!! They read the report, 800 pages long, in less than 2 seconds!!!!!

there was no wrongdoing found.

and there was nothing found that we didn't already know.

poor loony wingers
 
Glad to see you support corruption. It will weaken your position in future.


Again, your sheer declaration means nothing. You need more than pointing to your butt and going "owee"
The point should be clear. Obama refuses to follow the law. It is obvious from this report that he is covering it up. Plenty of evidence was found to support a prosecution of the guilty, but that won't happen. Obama is breaking his oath to enforce the law. That is corruption.

And you support it.

Anyone who supports corruption in any form, and knows it, is corrupt themselves.

So what we are seeing is a government that is intentionally screwing this country up. That's why they were allowed to win. The only type of person that will be allowed to be in charge of this country, in this type of corrupt environment, is someone who will intentionally screw up the economy. That's what Globalists want. They're making billions off of failing economies.

And you support it because of your inherent racism.

Obama refuses to follow the law?????

Then why doesn't the Republican Congress recommend he be prosecuted?


You heard Mud. Its OBVIOUS he's breaking the law they are just unable to make a case against the OBVIOUS. Why?

:desk:


Because what he says is obvious is only obvious bullshit
I think it's the GOP’S fault cuz they keep cutting funding. Obama needs money to enforce the law, and the GOP said he can't have any for that.

So he doesn't.

He has plenty of cash to bring Muslims here, but nothing to enforce the law. Plenty of cash for parties and golf. Nothing for law enforcement.

:dunno:

:cuckoo:
 
Again, your sheer declaration means nothing. You need more than pointing to your butt and going "owee"
The point should be clear. Obama refuses to follow the law. It is obvious from this report that he is covering it up. Plenty of evidence was found to support a prosecution of the guilty, but that won't happen. Obama is breaking his oath to enforce the law. That is corruption.

And you support it.

Anyone who supports corruption in any form, and knows it, is corrupt themselves.

So what we are seeing is a government that is intentionally screwing this country up. That's why they were allowed to win. The only type of person that will be allowed to be in charge of this country, in this type of corrupt environment, is someone who will intentionally screw up the economy. That's what Globalists want. They're making billions off of failing economies.

And you support it because of your inherent racism.

Obama refuses to follow the law?????

Then why doesn't the Republican Congress recommend he be prosecuted?
The only way Obama would be prosecuted is if they conducted a coup.....and that would probably end up with most of them in jail. So instead of wasting time fighting corrupt Democrats and using the law to go after a lawless president, they chose to just let him leave office.

How typical and cowardly. It's amazing any of you got through the Revolutionary war at all.
Some of the didn't

Some of them were hung.

BTW, you must be a foreigner. That explains some of the stupidity in your posts.

LOL,
Again, your sheer declaration means nothing. You need more than pointing to your butt and going "owee"
The point should be clear. Obama refuses to follow the law. It is obvious from this report that he is covering it up. Plenty of evidence was found to support a prosecution of the guilty, but that won't happen. Obama is breaking his oath to enforce the law. That is corruption.

And you support it.

Anyone who supports corruption in any form, and knows it, is corrupt themselves.

So what we are seeing is a government that is intentionally screwing this country up. That's why they were allowed to win. The only type of person that will be allowed to be in charge of this country, in this type of corrupt environment, is someone who will intentionally screw up the economy. That's what Globalists want. They're making billions off of failing economies.

And you support it because of your inherent racism.

Obama refuses to follow the law?????

Then why doesn't the Republican Congress recommend he be prosecuted?
The only way Obama would be prosecuted is if they conducted a coup.....and that would probably end up with most of them in jail. So instead of wasting time fighting corrupt Democrats and using the law to go after a lawless president, they chose to just let him leave office.

How typical and cowardly. It's amazing any of you got through the Revolutionary war at all.
Some of the didn't

Some of them were hung.

BTW, you must be a foreigner. That explains some of the stupidity in your posts.

Nope, not a foreigner, but I did live in London for a couple years. My family has been in America since before the Revolutionary War.
 
The point should be clear. Obama refuses to follow the law. It is obvious from this report that he is covering it up. Plenty of evidence was found to support a prosecution of the guilty, but that won't happen. Obama is breaking his oath to enforce the law. That is corruption.

And you support it.

Anyone who supports corruption in any form, and knows it, is corrupt themselves.

So what we are seeing is a government that is intentionally screwing this country up. That's why they were allowed to win. The only type of person that will be allowed to be in charge of this country, in this type of corrupt environment, is someone who will intentionally screw up the economy. That's what Globalists want. They're making billions off of failing economies.

And you support it because of your inherent racism.

Obama refuses to follow the law?????

Then why doesn't the Republican Congress recommend he be prosecuted?
The only way Obama would be prosecuted is if they conducted a coup.....and that would probably end up with most of them in jail. So instead of wasting time fighting corrupt Democrats and using the law to go after a lawless president, they chose to just let him leave office.

How typical and cowardly. It's amazing any of you got through the Revolutionary war at all.
Some of the didn't

Some of them were hung.

BTW, you must be a foreigner. That explains some of the stupidity in your posts.

LOL,
The point should be clear. Obama refuses to follow the law. It is obvious from this report that he is covering it up. Plenty of evidence was found to support a prosecution of the guilty, but that won't happen. Obama is breaking his oath to enforce the law. That is corruption.

And you support it.

Anyone who supports corruption in any form, and knows it, is corrupt themselves.

So what we are seeing is a government that is intentionally screwing this country up. That's why they were allowed to win. The only type of person that will be allowed to be in charge of this country, in this type of corrupt environment, is someone who will intentionally screw up the economy. That's what Globalists want. They're making billions off of failing economies.

And you support it because of your inherent racism.

Obama refuses to follow the law?????

Then why doesn't the Republican Congress recommend he be prosecuted?
The only way Obama would be prosecuted is if they conducted a coup.....and that would probably end up with most of them in jail. So instead of wasting time fighting corrupt Democrats and using the law to go after a lawless president, they chose to just let him leave office.

How typical and cowardly. It's amazing any of you got through the Revolutionary war at all.
Some of the didn't

Some of them were hung.

BTW, you must be a foreigner. That explains some of the stupidity in your posts.

Nope, not a foreigner, but I did live in London for a couple years. My family has been in America since before the Revolutionary War.
I lived in Germany for a couple of years, but I don't sound like a retard like you.
 
Obama refuses to follow the law?????

Then why doesn't the Republican Congress recommend he be prosecuted?
The only way Obama would be prosecuted is if they conducted a coup.....and that would probably end up with most of them in jail. So instead of wasting time fighting corrupt Democrats and using the law to go after a lawless president, they chose to just let him leave office.

How typical and cowardly. It's amazing any of you got through the Revolutionary war at all.
Some of the didn't

Some of them were hung.

BTW, you must be a foreigner. That explains some of the stupidity in your posts.

LOL,
Obama refuses to follow the law?????

Then why doesn't the Republican Congress recommend he be prosecuted?
The only way Obama would be prosecuted is if they conducted a coup.....and that would probably end up with most of them in jail. So instead of wasting time fighting corrupt Democrats and using the law to go after a lawless president, they chose to just let him leave office.

How typical and cowardly. It's amazing any of you got through the Revolutionary war at all.
Some of the didn't

Some of them were hung.

BTW, you must be a foreigner. That explains some of the stupidity in your posts.

Nope, not a foreigner, but I did live in London for a couple years. My family has been in America since before the Revolutionary War.
I lived in Germany for a couple of years, but I don't sound like a retard like you.

LOL, you should listen to yourself sometime. I thought you were an escapee from nurse Ratched.
 
Stevens and Smith were, even though they didn't yet know it, but not Woods and Doherty. They weren't killed for hours later.
Yet the two year old Benghazi committee had nothing new to add after spending $7 million dollars. You should be shocked, dismayed and outraged.

$7 million doing the job they are elected to do. A mere pittance compared to the $500 million Obama gave to bankrupt Solyndra.

The only difference is that the government was able to recoup all of the $536 million dollar loan to Solyndra - not so much in the case of Gowdy's clown court.

How did it "recoup" the money from this loan?

Do you ever tire of always being a day late and a dollar short?

Who are you talking to fool?
 
Headline: Benghazi report finds Hillary knowingly misled public. OH SNAP!
What did she do, tell the public that Saddam had mobile WMDs that could be launched in 40 minutes?

Did she out a CIA agent?

Did she approve torture, against international law and treaties?

What?
No just turned a country into a worse shit hole and untold people killed.
ISIS has a safe place,and oil for money.
Now before you invoke the BUSH syndrome,wr are talking Clinton.
 
Quit your lies.
The following facts are among the many new revelations in Part I:

Despite President Obama and Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta’s clear orders to deploy military assets, nothing was sent to Benghazi, and nothing was en route to Libya at the time the last two Americans were killed almost 8 hours after the attacks began. [pg. 141]With Ambassador Stevens missing, the White House convened a roughly two-hour meeting at 7:30 PM, which resulted in action items focused on a YouTube video, and others containing the phrases “f any deployment is made,” and “Libya must agree to any deployment,” and “[w]ill not deploy until order comes to go to either Tripoli or Benghazi.” [pg. 115]The Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff typically would have participated in the White House meeting, but did not attend because he went home to host a dinner party for foreign dignitaries. [pg. 107]A Fleet Antiterrorism Security Team (FAST) sat on a plane in Rota, Spain, for three hours, and changed in and out of their uniforms four times. [pg. 154]None of the relevant military forces met their required deployment timelines. [pg. 150]The Libyan forces that evacuated Americans from the CIA Annex to the Benghazi airport was not affiliated with any of the militias the CIA or State Department had developed a relationship with during the prior 18 months. Instead, it was comprised of former Qadhafi loyalists who the U.S. had helped remove from power during the Libyan revolution. [pg. 144]

That isn't new and was covered in many other reports. The airbase in Italy was too far and they had a refueling problem they could not respond for lack of logistical support.

They had a QRT twenty minutes away. They just never got the order to go.
Link?

Couldn't find the link but found this one. Rescue was on the way but was turned back.

Its up to you to believe it. Or not.
Report: U.S. Rescue Team Was on its Way to Benghazi, But Was Turned Back
They were dead before anyone could have rescued anybody.
That's not the point, Jake. If the SOBPOTUS wouldn't micro manage a damn war and let the Generals run it, help would have been there even if it was too late. But there was plenty of time to get troops there and get into the fight. The whole thing was hinged on the election and Political Correctness. The SOS was in charge of the local scene and the SOBPOTUS was in overall charge. Both were criminally derelict and they selfishly let people die and they both should be hanged.
 
The only way Obama would be prosecuted is if they conducted a coup.....and that would probably end up with most of them in jail. So instead of wasting time fighting corrupt Democrats and using the law to go after a lawless president, they chose to just let him leave office.

How typical and cowardly. It's amazing any of you got through the Revolutionary war at all.
Some of the didn't

Some of them were hung.

BTW, you must be a foreigner. That explains some of the stupidity in your posts.

LOL,
The only way Obama would be prosecuted is if they conducted a coup.....and that would probably end up with most of them in jail. So instead of wasting time fighting corrupt Democrats and using the law to go after a lawless president, they chose to just let him leave office.

How typical and cowardly. It's amazing any of you got through the Revolutionary war at all.
Some of the didn't

Some of them were hung.

BTW, you must be a foreigner. That explains some of the stupidity in your posts.

Nope, not a foreigner, but I did live in London for a couple years. My family has been in America since before the Revolutionary War.
I lived in Germany for a couple of years, but I don't sound like a retard like you.

LOL, you should listen to yourself sometime. I thought you were an escapee from nurse Ratched.
I sound like that to an extremist.

Rational thought and logic are pretty strange to them.
 
How typical and cowardly. It's amazing any of you got through the Revolutionary war at all.
Some of the didn't

Some of them were hung.

BTW, you must be a foreigner. That explains some of the stupidity in your posts.

LOL,
How typical and cowardly. It's amazing any of you got through the Revolutionary war at all.
Some of the didn't

Some of them were hung.

BTW, you must be a foreigner. That explains some of the stupidity in your posts.

Nope, not a foreigner, but I did live in London for a couple years. My family has been in America since before the Revolutionary War.
I lived in Germany for a couple of years, but I don't sound like a retard like you.

LOL, you should listen to yourself sometime. I thought you were an escapee from nurse Ratched.
I sound like that to an extremist.

Rational thought and logic are pretty strange to them.
\Sure, I understand how you think Nurse Ratched would be an extremist.
 
That isn't new and was covered in many other reports. The airbase in Italy was too far and they had a refueling problem they could not respond for lack of logistical support.

They had a QRT twenty minutes away. They just never got the order to go.
Link?

Couldn't find the link but found this one. Rescue was on the way but was turned back.

Its up to you to believe it. Or not.
Report: U.S. Rescue Team Was on its Way to Benghazi, But Was Turned Back
They were dead before anyone could have rescued anybody.
That's not the point, Jake. If the SOBPOTUS wouldn't micro manage a damn war and let the Generals run it, help would have been there even if it was too late. But there was plenty of time to get troops there and get into the fight. The whole thing was hinged on the election and Political Correctness. The SOS was in charge of the local scene and the SOBPOTUS was in overall charge. Both were criminally derelict and they selfishly let people die and they both should be hanged.
I wouldn't go that far,bit should never hold a national office again.
Dog catcher back in some Arkansas hollow might be ok
 
The Report outlines how 4 Americans died at the hands of the terrorists - Al Qaeida - with whom Obama and Hillary allied themselves with and who they helped take over their own country by dragging the US into the middle of a civil war by using our military without Congressional approval to do so. Furthermore, the report details how ex-Qaddafi Generals, who Hillary and Obama called our 'enemies' and used our military to overthrow - not Hillary or Obama or anything they did - stepped in to save the lives of the other Americans in Benghazi FROM Barry and Hillary's allies - again, Al Qaeida.

The report and testimony shows both Hillary and Barry were both caught completely unprepared for the terrorist attack, despite numerous warnings and previous terrorist attacks, had no clue what to do, had a response team sitting on a runway for 6 hours changing between combat gear and civilian clothes because they could not make up their mind whether US military personnel should wear combat gear or civilian clothes when heading into battle for fear offending the attacking terrorists....

...and this is what Barry, Hillary, and Liberals believe is considered being 'exonerated' of any wrong-doing.

If it was not for the fact that 4 Americans needlessly lost their lives due to the criminal incompetence and poor decision-making of the Secretary of State and the President, this would be funny.
 
Last edited:
If they had an ounce of truth they would have paraded it in front of the press and waved it in front of everyone's eyes. They didn't because they have nothing and never did. This was nothing more than a attempt to influence the election and if Democrats had not presented their report yesterday, you wouldn't have seen the Republican version for two or three more months.

At this point what does the death of an American Ambassador and three other Americans make?
Did I get that right?
How does that compare to the 5000+ dead U.S. military because of Bush's lies?

How many women have lost their lives due to Texas' unconstitutional extreme anti-abortion tactics? Should Texas officials be prosecuted for murder?

Maybe those 5,000 lives lost were about these lies.

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003 | Source

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002 | Source
Obviously, the chicken had to lay the egg first, shorty! What was the SOURCE from which Kerry and Clinton got that information, hmmmmm?

"There is already a mountain of evidence that Saddam Hussein is gathering WMDs for the purpose of using them. And adding additional information is like adding a foot to Mount Everest."
--Ari Fleischer, Sept. 6, 2002 ~~http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/Condoleezza_Rice_War_+_Peace.htm~~

"We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud."
--Condoleezza Rice, Sept. 8, 2002 ~~Ibid~~

"There's no debate in the world as to whether they have these weapons. We all know that. A trained ape knows that."
--Donald Rumsfeld, Sept. 13, 2002 ~~Ibid~~

"Knowing these realities, America must not ignore the threat gathering against us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof -- the smoking gun -- that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud."
--President George W. Bush, Oct 6, 2002 CNN.com - Bush: Don't wait for mushroom cloud - Oct. 6, 2002

Bush, Cheney & Co. were on a very hard push in the early fall of 2002 to falsify a basis for an Iraq invasion to get the desired WPA AUMF out of Congress to do a little Nation building, shorty! That propaganda was fed directly to Senators like Kerry, Clinton, et al. If Congress, both House and Senate, believed the lies from the Bush administration, well that only proves the Bush/Cheney cabal were fucking good liars.

You are totally full of nonsense. Kerry and Clinton got their intel from the CIA, FBI and several other foreign intelligence agencies. The same place that Bush got his intel. I have several dozen more quotes from Democrats that say the same thing.
 
The Report outlines how 4 Americans died at the hands of the terrorists - Al Qaeida - with whom Obama and Hillary allied themselves with and who they helped take over their own country by dragging the US into the middle of a civil war by using our military without Congressional approval to do so. Furthermore, the report details how ex-Qaddafi Generals, who Hillary and Obama called our 'enemies' and used our military to overthrow - not Hillary or Obama or anything they did - stepped in to save the lives of the other Americans in Benghazi FROM Barry and Hillary's allies - again, Al Qaeida.

The report and testimony shows both Hillary and Barry were both caught completely unprepared for the terrorist attack, despite numerous warnings and previous terrorist attacks, had no clue what to do, had a response team sitting on a runway for 6 hours changing between combat gear and civilian clothes because they could not make up their mind whether US military personnel should wear combat gear or civilian clothes when heading into battle for fear offending the attacking terrorists....

...and this is what Barry, Hillary, and Liberals believe is considered being 'exonerated' of any wrong-doing.

If it was not for the fact that 4 Americans needlessly lost their lives for the criminal incompetence and poor decision-making of the Secretary of State and the President, this would be funny.

What's funny is how you take the evidence of two congressional investigations that prove you wrong, toss them into the waste can and then pretend that the Benghazi investigation is still going on. It's not, It's done its work it is over.
 
I wouldn't go that far,bit should never hold a national office again. Dog catcher back in some Arkansas hollow might be ok

Personally I would like to see Barry and Hillary sent to the same Benghazi compound under the same exact conditions with the exact same number of security personnel Ambassador Stephens has - after the State Dept stripped him of 14 members of his security team after 2 terrorist attacks, for a month or two.

Such conditions were perfectly fine for Ambassador Stephens and the other Americans left there, after every nation pulled their people out, so it should be good enough for Barry and Hillary.

Of course they would NEVER EVER consider volunteering for such a stay.....
 
What's funny is how you take the evidence of two congressional investigations that prove you wrong, toss them into the waste can and then pretend that the Benghazi investigation is still going on. It's not, It's done its work it is over.
The Democrats' Benghazi report does not dispute what I posted, about how Al Qaeida - who Obama and Hillary sided with - was responsible for the attack and how Qaddafi's ex-forces had to rescue the Americans in Benghazi.

They do not dispute the fact that the vide , as Obama finally admitted, played no part in instigating the attack.

The Democrats' report's sole focus was on proclaiming Obama and Hillary did not do anything wrong. They failed to present any evidence, however, that they did anything RIGHT, either. That's hard to do when your 'allies' murder 4 Americans, to include the 1st US Ambassador to be murdered in over 30 years and when your Secretary of State fails so miserably to successfully accomplish her job of protecting the US Ambassador and other Americans.
 

Forum List

Back
Top