Dagosa
Gold Member
- Oct 22, 2012
- 21,290
- 5,729
You’re right. I can’t answer a stoooopid question from an ignoramus that makes no sense.You're infantile, you can't answer the question? LOL!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You’re right. I can’t answer a stoooopid question from an ignoramus that makes no sense.You're infantile, you can't answer the question? LOL!
You’re right. I can’t answer a stoooopid question from an ignoramus that makes no sense.
That is infantile.Bullshit .
just sitting there jacking off and calling it critical thinking means nothing. All science is based upon trials and related activities. It isn’t a mind game stupid.
Ha haYou are using consensus to determine whether consensus is a legitimate argument in favor of a scientific theory: circular logic.
Sure I can, because I know what Consensus means. Every accredited university in the world, thousands of them, are in general agreement about AGW. The. consensus of enlightened posters here is, you’re crazy.Your all important consensus.....you can't even specify what it concerns?
LOL!
Pussy.
If you're going to argue the evidence, then argue the evidence. If your going to argue it's true because all these people say it's true, then you're arguing consensus, and that's a fallacy.Dufus, no one said it was “trials“ fool. Consensus is just grneral agreement and scientist aren’t in genera agreement off the top of their head. That’s what you illiterates do. It comes about when other researchers also test the evidence and finding of others. Take a “reading for understanding” course. Look up , the “ scientific method”….along with potential energy and quit making up shitz.
I know what consensus means, and that's what you're arguing, dumbass.Ha ha
look up what consensus means. It’s not magic. It’s general agreement. Now, a. consensus of Humpers means nothing; they’re al, idiots.
See, you're arguing consensus again. You're also appealing to authority.Sure I can, because I know what Consensus means. Every accredited university in the world, thousands of them, are in general agreement about AGW. The. consensus of enlightened posters here is, you’re crazy.
I try to NEVER argue evidence. Why ? Because every accredited university already has and is in consensus about AGW.If you're going to argue the evidence, then argue the evidence. If your going to argue it's true because all these people say it's true, then you're arguing consensus, and that's a fallacy.
So you always resort to logical fallacy.I try to NEVER argue evidence. Why ? Because every accredited university already has and is in consensus about AGW.
Nope, I’m going along with a plethora of qualified smart people working at all the universities and agencies and corporations and not you ignorant a-holes. Name one climate related institute that agrees with you.See, you're arguing consensus again. You're also appealing to authority.
Consensus, in other words, and also appeal to authority.Nope, I’m going along with a plethora of qualified smart people working at all the universities and agencies and corporations and not you ignorant a-holes. Name one climate related institute that agrees with you.
So you always resort to logical fallacy.
I've noticed.
Sure I can, because I know what Consensus means. Every accredited university in the world, thousands of them, are in general agreement about AGW. The. consensus of enlightened posters here is, you’re crazy.
You don't read the threads you post onSeems that’s you! You’re reluctant to post that name. I don’t read minds
Nope, science is critical thinking and as such, never can be consensusDufus, no one said it was “trials“ fool. Consensus is just grneral agreement and scientist aren’t in genera agreement off the top of their head. That’s what you illiterates do. It comes about when other researchers also test the evidence and finding of others. Take a “reading for understanding” course. Look up , the “ scientific method”….along with potential energy and quit making up shitz.
Consultant? What a load of crap..."a former consultant to the World Meteorological Organisation’s Commission for Climatology and former head of the Australian Government’s National Climate Centre."
Apparently he's a bit more than a "weatherman".
I saw no nameYou don't read the threads you post on
You saying you don’t know what a consultant is? HahahaConsultant? What a load of crap...
Don’t make infantile comments about something you know little about, science.That is infantile.