$3 trillion per year to 2050 to reduce CO2 from the historic 7,000 PPM according to U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen

[otto105]

China has double our CO2 and pays nothing???

You see why we question your “science”

China is trying to build a whole new electric technology system which in includes power generation and EVs at lower cost.

And what do you mean pays nothing?

 

[Frankeneinstein]

U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said on Saturday that the global transition to a low-carbon economy requires $3 trillion in new capital each year through 2050, far above current annual financing, but that filling the gap is the biggest economic opportunity of the 21st century

TRANSLATION: "This is what we need to keep socialist economies around the world afloat"...
...the obscene price tag is what "climate change" is really all about.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

China is trying to build a whole new electric technology system which in includes power generation and EVs at lower cost.

And what do you mean pays nothing?

So we have to pay for China why you should be chaining yourself to their Embassy in protest?

Not only don’t they have to make an effort to reduce their CO2 as the US has already done, but we have to pay their share?

That’s ridiculous!

 

[healthmyths]

CO2 in our atmosphere caused by the burning of fossil fuels.

Don't disagree with that.
BUT who was burning the fossil fuels when CO2 had a 7,000 ppm, 500 million years ago?

 

[otto105]

So we have to pay for China why you should be chaining yourself to their Embassy in protest?

Not only don’t they have to make an effort to reduce their CO2 as the US has already done, but we have to pay their share?

That’s ridiculous!

What the fuck are you posting about?

U.S. and China on Climate: How the World’s Two Largest Polluters Stack Up (Published 2023)

 

[otto105]

Don't disagree with that.
BUT who was burning the fossil fuels when CO2 had a 7,000 ppm, 500 million years ago?

It doesn't matter as that world was very different than the one, YOU'RE on now.

Why do you think it matters? Does it slow our CO2 pollution?

 

[healthmyths]

Again, if you're so invested in that deflection why is no scientific organization taking that view? Why did the scientists at Exxon Mobil come to that conclusion in the 1970's. They correctly predicted the planet would warm as CO2 accumulated in our atmosphere from burning their product.

What can you show that proves CO2 has nothing to do with our current rapid warming. Surely Lord Muckington has something for you.

A typical passenger vehicle emits about 4.6 metric tons of carbon dioxide per year.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions from a Typical Passenger Vehicle | US EPA

This page answers questions about GHG emissions from passenger vehicles and how these emissions are measured and calculated.

www.epa.gov

 

[CrusaderFrank]

What the fuck are you posting about?

U.S. and China on Climate: How the World’s Two Largest Polluters Stack Up (Published 2023)

China produces almost DOUBLE our CO2 output

 

[otto105]

China produces almost DOUBLE our CO2 output

Yet, we have produced twice as much overall CO2. And per capita currently produce more.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Yet, we have produced twice as much overall CO2. And per capita currently produce more.

So only American CO2 is raising temperatures?? Is it a different isotope?

 

[otto105]

So only American CO2 is raising temperatures?? Is it a different isotope?

Is that what I posted? I posted context to your repeated pointing out of current CO2 pollution.

Both nations need to greatly reduce their emissions.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Is that what I posted? I posted context to your repeated pointing out of current CO2 pollution.

Both nations need to greatly reduce their emissions.

I thought CO2 was going to kill all mankind no matter which nation produced it?

 

[otto105]

I thought CO2 was going to kill all mankind no matter which nation produced it?

Just throwing shit around now eh Frank.

Have people been talkin about it on the internets?