$3 trillion per year to 2050 to reduce CO2 from the historic 7,000 PPM according to U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen

500 million years ago the first land plants would not appear for another 25 million years. There were all manner of life in the oceans but nothing on dry land. And of the many species in that ocean, not one lives today. Are you sure you want to use that as an example of a human-friendly environment?
Prokaryotes still exist;
A prokaryote (/proʊˈkærioʊt, -ət/, less commonly spelled procaryote)[1] is a single-cell organism whose cell lacks a nucleus and other membrane-bound organelles.[2]
...
The oldest known fossilized prokaryotes were laid down approximately 3.5 billion years ago, only about 1 billion years after the formation of the Earth's crust. Eukaryotes only appear in the fossil record later, and may have formed from endosymbiosis of multiple prokaryote ancestors. The oldest known fossil eukaryotes are about 1.7 billion years old. However, some genetic evidence suggests eukaryotes appeared as early as 3 billion years ago.[43]
...
330px-Tree_of_Living_Organisms_2.png

465px-Celltypes.svg.png


The eukaryotes (/juːˈkærioʊts, -əts/ yoo-KARR-ee-ohts, -⁠əts)[5] constitute the domain of Eukarya or Eukaryota, organisms whose cells have a membrane-bound nucleus. All animals, plants, fungi, and many unicellular organisms are eukaryotes. They constitute a major group of life forms alongside the two groups of prokaryotes: the Bacteria and the Archaea. Eukaryotes represent a small minority of the number of organisms, but given their generally much larger size, their collective global biomass is much larger than that of prokaryotes.
...
The origin of the eukaryotic cell, or eukaryogenesis, is a milestone in the evolution of life, since eukaryotes include all complex cells and almost all multicellular organisms. The last eukaryotic common ancestor (LECA) is the hypothetical origin of all living eukaryotes,[69] and was most likely a biological population, not a single individual.[70] The LECA is believed to have been a protist with a nucleus, at least one centriole and flagellum, facultatively aerobic mitochondria, sex (meiosis and syngamy), a dormant cyst with a cell wall of chitin or cellulose, and peroxisomes.[71][72][73]
...
495px-Symbiogenesis_2_mergers.svg.png


The presence of steranes, eukaryotic-specific biomarkers, in Australian shales previously indicated that eukaryotes were present in these rocks dated at 2.7 billion years old,[22][84] but these Archaean biomarkers have been rebutted as later contaminants.[85] The oldest valid biomarker records are only around 800 million years old.[86] In contrast, a molecular clock analysis suggests the emergence of sterol biosynthesis as early as 2.3 billion years ago.[87] The nature of steranes as eukaryotic biomarkers is further complicated by the production of sterols by some bacteria.[88][89]

Whenever their origins, eukaryotes may not have become ecologically dominant until much later; a massive increase in the zinc composition of marine sediments 800 million years ago has been attributed to the rise of substantial populations of eukaryotes, which preferentially consume and incorporate zinc relative to prokaryotes, approximately a billion years after their origin (at the latest).[90]
...
................
When you claim "And of the many species in that ocean, not one lives today." the above two examples would suggest you are in error.
 
Money is just a measure of time. Is there anything more important than time spent to ensure that our earth continues to stay livable?
We really need a "bullshit" emoji for that "thanks" bar selection.
Money is not a measure of time, unless it holds carbon 14 ...
Money is a device or tool for measuring wealth and to circumvent cumbersome batter systems.
 
Our current 442ppm is the highest recorded in 3 million years.

And any self-respecting climate scientist that denies a human caused CO2 rise isn't the catalyst for our current warming should have head examined.
If you had a brain and intelligence, you might be dangerous.

This chart shows you are a bit wrong (as is your later #17 post here)

iu
 
Yeah, the oceans BS.

Idiot
Ever hear of plate tectonics and magma up-welling at the expansion zones ?
....
Divergent boundaries (constructive boundaries or extensional boundaries). These are where two plates slide apart from each other. At zones of ocean-to-ocean rifting, divergent boundaries form by seafloor spreading, allowing for the formation of new ocean basin, e.g. the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and East Pacific Rise. As the ocean plate splits, the ridge forms at the spreading center, the ocean basin expands, and finally, the plate area increases causing many small volcanoes and/or shallow earthquakes. At zones of continent-to-continent rifting, divergent boundaries may cause new ocean basin to form as the continent splits, spreads, the central rift collapses, and ocean fills the basin, e.g., the East African Rift, the Baikal Rift, the West Antarctic Rift, the Rio Grande Rift.
375px-Continental-continental_constructive_plate_boundary.svg.png

....
Tectonic plates are able to move because of the relative density of oceanic lithosphere and the relative weakness of the asthenosphere. Dissipation of heat from the mantle is the original source of the energy required to drive plate tectonics through convection or large scale upwelling and doming. As a consequence, a powerful source generating plate motion is the excess density of the oceanic lithosphere sinking in subduction zones. When the new crust forms at mid-ocean ridges, this oceanic lithosphere is initially less dense than the underlying asthenosphere, but it becomes denser with age as it conductively cools and thickens. The greater density of old lithosphere relative to the underlying asthenosphere allows it to sink into the deep mantle at subduction zones, providing most of the driving force for plate movement. The weakness of the asthenosphere allows the tectonic plates to move easily towards a subduction zone.[19]
...
450px-Global_plate_motion_2008-04-17.jpg


450px-Tectonic_plates_%282022%29.svg.png


Divergent Zones are where the heat from magma rises. We also find many volcanoes near divergent zones
 
If you had a brain and intelligence, you might be dangerous.

This chart shows you are a bit wrong (as is your later #17 post here)

iu
The chart in the quote suggests that Earth has had significantly higher average temperatures and also much higher levels of CO2.
However the size of the graph scale compresses things a lot, blurring the finer "peaks" and "valleys" during the timeline.

This following one should be more concerning. three out of the four past inter-glacials ~ Warm periods, were slightly higher in temperatures than what we experience now.

Ice_ages2.gif


Also, the time duration of two out of four of those inter-glacials was shorter than the one we are in now. Would suggest we might be on the threshold of another plunge into a glaciation=Ice Age.

Tinkering with the environment to geo-engineer counter "global warming"(AGW) could backfire the planet into the next Ice Age.

Given depth of human ignorance on all factors of "climate" would suggest we don't try fixing what might not be broke.
 
Money is just a measure of time. Is there anything more important than time spent to ensure that our earth continues to stay livable?
On average, how much time would you say you spend each day ensuring the earth continues to stay liveable?
 
Prokaryotes still exist;
A prokaryote (/proʊˈkærioʊt, -ət/, less commonly spelled procaryote)[1] is a single-cell organism whose cell lacks a nucleus and other membrane-bound organelles.[2]
...
The oldest known fossilized prokaryotes were laid down approximately 3.5 billion years ago, only about 1 billion years after the formation of the Earth's crust. Eukaryotes only appear in the fossil record later, and may have formed from endosymbiosis of multiple prokaryote ancestors. The oldest known fossil eukaryotes are about 1.7 billion years old. However, some genetic evidence suggests eukaryotes appeared as early as 3 billion years ago.[43]
...
330px-Tree_of_Living_Organisms_2.png

465px-Celltypes.svg.png


The eukaryotes (/juːˈkærioʊts, -əts/ yoo-KARR-ee-ohts, -⁠əts)[5] constitute the domain of Eukarya or Eukaryota, organisms whose cells have a membrane-bound nucleus. All animals, plants, fungi, and many unicellular organisms are eukaryotes. They constitute a major group of life forms alongside the two groups of prokaryotes: the Bacteria and the Archaea. Eukaryotes represent a small minority of the number of organisms, but given their generally much larger size, their collective global biomass is much larger than that of prokaryotes.
...
The origin of the eukaryotic cell, or eukaryogenesis, is a milestone in the evolution of life, since eukaryotes include all complex cells and almost all multicellular organisms. The last eukaryotic common ancestor (LECA) is the hypothetical origin of all living eukaryotes,[69] and was most likely a biological population, not a single individual.[70] The LECA is believed to have been a protist with a nucleus, at least one centriole and flagellum, facultatively aerobic mitochondria, sex (meiosis and syngamy), a dormant cyst with a cell wall of chitin or cellulose, and peroxisomes.[71][72][73]
...
495px-Symbiogenesis_2_mergers.svg.png


The presence of steranes, eukaryotic-specific biomarkers, in Australian shales previously indicated that eukaryotes were present in these rocks dated at 2.7 billion years old,[22][84] but these Archaean biomarkers have been rebutted as later contaminants.[85] The oldest valid biomarker records are only around 800 million years old.[86] In contrast, a molecular clock analysis suggests the emergence of sterol biosynthesis as early as 2.3 billion years ago.[87] The nature of steranes as eukaryotic biomarkers is further complicated by the production of sterols by some bacteria.[88][89]

Whenever their origins, eukaryotes may not have become ecologically dominant until much later; a massive increase in the zinc composition of marine sediments 800 million years ago has been attributed to the rise of substantial populations of eukaryotes, which preferentially consume and incorporate zinc relative to prokaryotes, approximately a billion years after their origin (at the latest).[90]
...
................
When you claim "And of the many species in that ocean, not one lives today." the above two examples would suggest you are in error.
I knew someone probably wouldn't read what I said.

500 million years ago the first land plants would not appear for another 25 million years. There were all manner of life in the oceans but nothing on dry land. And of the many species in that ocean, not one lives today. Are you sure you want to use that as an example of a human-friendly environment?
 

Forum List

Back
Top