Sunsettommy
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2018
- 15,130
- 12,708
- 2,400
I love it.. Tacking on an instrument record of yearly point plots to a record that has 250 year point plots to give the illusion of an emergency.So the OP uses a TWEET as his source.
WTF!
Where are you Right Wing Critics/Geniuses?
You accept that from your side you FILTHY HYPOCRITES?
Climate Change: Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide
Author: Rebecca Lindsey
August 1, 2018 Climate.gov NOAA
Climate Change: Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide | NOAA Climate.gov
The global average atmospheric carbon dioxide in 2017 was 405.0 parts per million (ppm for short), with a range of uncertainty of plus or minus 0.1 ppm. Carbon dioxide levels today are higher than at any point in at least the past 800,000 years.
Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations in parts per million (ppm) for the past 800,000 years, based on EPICA (ice core) data. The peaks and valleys in carbon dioxide levels track the coming and going of ice ages (low carbon dioxide) and warmer interglacials (higher levels). Throughout these cycles, atmospheric carbon dioxide was Never Higher than 300 ppm; in 2017, it reached 405.0 ppm (black dot).
NOAA Climate.gov, based on EPICA Dome C data (Lüthi, D., et al., 2008) provided by NOAA NCEI Paleoclimatology Program.
In fact, the last time the atmospheric CO2 amounts were this high was more than 3 million years ago, when temperature was 2°–3°C (3.6°–5.4°F) higher than during the pre-industrial era, and Sea Level was 15–25 meters (50–80 feet) higher than today....
Then of course, there's the IDIOTIC GIANT FALLACY that because nature did it before, man can't be doing it now.
Missing the whole point of the debate.
DUH!
`
`
You are aware that our current rise has indeed happened before but due to its length (less than 150 years) can not be seen in the spatial resolution of the plot, dont you?
More Micheal Mann style fraud, deceptions and lies.. How about you average today's rise into the 250 year plot point and see what happens to your emergency. Miss Lindsay is using the same statisticians parlor trick Mann did and its outright deception.
I see that Mensa child, still triggered with his overuse of the funny button and bypasses debate, It is to be expected from people who are cut and paste artists, which is how they try to avoid debate at all, take note of his parting words in his latest post:
"Then of course, there's the IDIOTIC GIANT FALLACY that because nature did it before, man can't be doing it now.
Missing the whole point of the debate.
DUH!"
The debate free child once again runs away from making a coherent point ...................., Mensa my ass!
I personally know a few people who are certified Mensa, who can post better than this pretender Mensa child does, in their sleep.
Last edited: