Contumacious
Radical Freedom
- Thread starter
- #41
...or he was talking to someone who was being spied on. WHO? Trump needs to come clean.
What do you have against Attorney Larry Klayman and Judicial Watch?
.
First of all, Larry Klayman left Judicial Watch more than a decade ago.
Secondly, he's a known liar, and a piece of shit.
I notice you didn't bother mentioning who Klayman's "source" is.
First of all Mr Klayman , an attorney , was able to get two injunctions against the NSA
Klayman v. Obama
This case is yet the latest chapter in the Judiciary's continuing challenge to balance the national security interests of the United States with the individual liberties of our citizens. The Government, in its understandable zeal to protect our homeland, has crafted a counterterrorism program with respect to telephone metadata that strikes the balance based in large part on a thirty-four year old Supreme Court precedent, the relevance of which has been eclipsed by technological advances and a cell phone-centric lifestyle heretofore inconceivable. In the months ahead, other Article III courts, no doubt, will wrestle to find the proper balance consistent with our constitutional system. But in the meantime, for all the above reasons, I will grant Larry Klayman's and Charles Strange's requests for an injunction and enter an order that (1) bars the Government from collecting, as part of the NSA's Bulk Telephony Metadata Program, any telephony metadata associated with their personal Verizon accounts and (2) requires the Government to destroy any such metadata in its possession that was collected through the bulk collection program."
Secondly, if he is a known liar it was incumbent upon the US Attorney to bring that to the Court's attention , he either failed or refused to do so or
3) You are the one who is full of shit. Mr Klayman has NOT Been disbarred
.