abu afak
ALLAH SNACKBAR!
- Mar 3, 2006
- 7,236
- 2,569
- 315
Ignore ReinyDays posts. They are all ONE LINE put downs/Chirps.
He has NO substance.
He's Jealous of people who can write a paragraph, or post a Link/excerpt in this section
Actually I stopped SunsetMommy from using his OLD Marcott citations with MY lastest ones.
Then he STFU and went away... as he does whenever I reappear.. he Disappears.
He then KNOWINGLY REPEATS LIES because he's an OCD RW conspiracist.
Remember Sunsetboy?
and here is what Marcott Said Most Recently for the Fifth or Sixth Time.
So you are knowingly LYING hoping I'm not around.[/b]
Yes and I REFUTED you AS ALWAYS re Marcott as you were using OBSOLETE Citations.
How about Marcott 2021 ? (not 2013, NOT pre 2009 decades)
[......]
Interviewee: Shaun Marcott
"..The past record provides perspective. Papers like this basically point out, just at the very basic level, what has happened before and where we are in that context and where we’re heading towards. In a Prior paper that we had, we said statistically we don’t really know if today is any warmer than what we call the warm period of the last 10,000 years.
This paper has said actually, We’ve Left what was Normal.
That’s an important perspective to have when you think about where We’re off to, considering these Temperatures that we’re Trajecting towards, as far we know, we Haven’t seen in 50 Million years or so, and the world was a lot Different then."".
[......]
Nature
Climate special: the past and future of the Earth's climate
- - - -
Sunset Tommy cannot even debate Climate!
He Dumps an article from somewhere (like WTFUWT) and says: ""You must refute this paper or you lose.""
WUWT Tommy himself is NOT EVEN CONVERSANT on the topic, and unlike me cannot lay out his position AND/OR why.
He put me on IGNORE after my SIX attempts to make him explain his position on warming and whether and if it was even warming at all.
He could Not!!
He prefers the motor mouth Crick who Unlike me doesn't Crush him with 100%/180° Rebuttal as I just did above AGAIN using his own source: Marcott.
(He Fallaciously/ posted COLD WEATHER DAYS in Skooker's anti-Science "Skeptics Winning" thread as if it was Not warming, but in fact cooling.)
So here Again: ANOTHER SUNSET for TOMMY.
`
He has NO substance.
He's Jealous of people who can write a paragraph, or post a Link/excerpt in this section
Actually I stopped SunsetMommy from using his OLD Marcott citations with MY lastest ones.
Then he STFU and went away... as he does whenever I reappear.. he Disappears.
He then KNOWINGLY REPEATS LIES because he's an OCD RW conspiracist.
Remember Sunsetboy?
Here is what Marcott said More Recently for the 20th Time.
and here is what Marcott Said Most Recently for the Fifth or Sixth Time.
So you are knowingly LYING hoping I'm not around.[/b]
Yes and I REFUTED you AS ALWAYS re Marcott as you were using OBSOLETE Citations.
How about Marcott 2021 ? (not 2013, NOT pre 2009 decades)
- NATURE PODCAST
10 November 2021 Nature
Climate special: the past and future of the Earth's climate
Reassessing 24,000 years of global temperatures, and on the ground at COP26.[......]
Interviewee: Shaun Marcott
"..The past record provides perspective. Papers like this basically point out, just at the very basic level, what has happened before and where we are in that context and where we’re heading towards. In a Prior paper that we had, we said statistically we don’t really know if today is any warmer than what we call the warm period of the last 10,000 years.
This paper has said actually, We’ve Left what was Normal.
That’s an important perspective to have when you think about where We’re off to, considering these Temperatures that we’re Trajecting towards, as far we know, we Haven’t seen in 50 Million years or so, and the world was a lot Different then."".
[......]
Nature
Climate special: the past and future of the Earth's climate
- - - -
Sunset Tommy cannot even debate Climate!
He Dumps an article from somewhere (like WTFUWT) and says: ""You must refute this paper or you lose.""
WUWT Tommy himself is NOT EVEN CONVERSANT on the topic, and unlike me cannot lay out his position AND/OR why.
He put me on IGNORE after my SIX attempts to make him explain his position on warming and whether and if it was even warming at all.
He could Not!!
He prefers the motor mouth Crick who Unlike me doesn't Crush him with 100%/180° Rebuttal as I just did above AGAIN using his own source: Marcott.
(He Fallaciously/ posted COLD WEATHER DAYS in Skooker's anti-Science "Skeptics Winning" thread as if it was Not warming, but in fact cooling.)
So here Again: ANOTHER SUNSET for TOMMY.
`
Last edited:
