Comey is NO "hero," regardless of yesterday's testimony...

[nat4900]

Of course I was very happy that in yesterday's testimony, Comey (and the Sessions' DOJ) CLEARLY and SPECIFICALLY confirmed TWO important issues:

That Trump was full of shit in his accusations of Obama's wiretapping, and
That there is an ongoing [possibly criminal] investigation of the Trump administration's ties with Russia.

HOWEVER, it is equally difficult to overlook what Comey did and di not do last year.....

Comey, with just over a week of Nov. 8th, CHOSE to undermine Clinton's campaign by stating that she was ......again....under a possible investigation based on an aide's emails......

BUT.......Comey also chose to NOT reveal that Trump was ALSO under investigation for his Russian ties since last July (this was fully revealed only yesterday)

What would have happened last year IF voters were equally aware that BOTH candidates were under FBI investigations?

Comey's current Act of Contrition is interesting, but still flawed.

 

[Timmy]

It's obvious that law enforcement wants to control things . They don't like Hillary so they sabotaged her run. Trump insulted them, now he's going to pay .

 

[Compost]

Who said Comey was a hero?

 

[Muhammed]

Of course I was very happy that in yesterday's testimony, Comey (and the Sessions' DOJ) CLEARLY and SPECIFICALLY confirmed TWO important issues:

That Trump was full of shit in his accusations of Obama's wiretapping, and
That there is an ongoing [possibly criminal] investigation of the Trump administration's ties with Russia.

HOWEVER, it is equally difficult to overlook what Comey did and di not do last year.....

Comey, with just over a week of Nov. 8th, CHOSE to undermine Clinton's campaign by stating that she was ......again....under a possible investigation based on an aide's emails......

BUT.......Comey also chose to NOT reveal that Trump was ALSO under investigation for his Russian ties since last July (this was fully revealed only yesterday)

What would have happened last year IF voters were equally aware that BOTH candidates were under FBI investigations?

Comey's current Act of Contrition is interesting, but still flawed.

Trump win.

 

[Redfish]

poor gnat. dumb as a sack of frog feet.

 

[theHawk]

Of course I was very happy that in yesterday's testimony, Comey (and the Sessions' DOJ) CLEARLY and SPECIFICALLY confirmed TWO important issues:

That Trump was full of shit in his accusations of Obama's wiretapping, and
That there is an ongoing [possibly criminal] investigation of the Trump administration's ties with Russia.

HOWEVER, it is equally difficult to overlook what Comey did and di not do last year.....

Comey, with just over a week of Nov. 8th, CHOSE to undermine Clinton's campaign by stating that she was ......again....under a possible investigation based on an aide's emails......

BUT.......Comey also chose to NOT reveal that Trump was ALSO under investigation for his Russian ties since last July (this was fully revealed only yesterday)

What would have happened last year IF voters were equally aware that BOTH candidates were under FBI investigations?

Comey's current Act of Contrition is interesting, but still flawed.

Trump was never under investigation, nor is he now.

You lose again.

 

[easyt65]

You would be 'happy' with what Comey 'revealed', snowflake.

1. 'That there is an ongoing [possibly criminal] investigation of the Trump administration's ties with Russia.'
TRANSLATION: There is no evidence to support the conspiracy theory that Trump colluded with Russia...so the 'Fishing expedition' continues.

2. 'That Trump was full of shit in his accusations of Obama's wiretapping'
- I find it interesting that when no evidence of collusion is found the snowflakes want to continue digging, but when no direct evidence exists that wire-tapping occurred the snowflakes want to DROP that investigation - no more digging.

- I find it interesting as well that despite multiple investigations of Trump/his family/his team, dating back to 2009 (according to NSA documents that also happen to mention 'electronic surveillance'), the snowflakes insist that the administration that illegally spied on US citizens, reporters, the media, and even CONGRESS never utilized the technique of 'wire-tapping'. Sorry - doesn't pass the common sense test or the 'BS' test.


Here's another interesting 'fact':

In order to have an investigation you have to have a crime. Democrats 1st claimed the Russians had 'Hacked The Election'....WTF is THAT? No one knows - not even the snowflakes parroting it. The FBI has already declared there was no altering of votes, and the Russians did not hack the state election processes/systems. In fact, the ONLY ones who tried to hack the state election systems were OBAMA and his DHS, while trying to seize federal control of all state election processes - claiming he needed to for national security because someone (like him) might try to hack into and control the election systems. (He failed, BTW, in his more than a dozen attempts to hack Indian's and Georgia's systems.)

What the 'crime' boils down to is that the DNC's embarrassing e-mails and dirty little secrets were hacked and released. THAT'S IT! They were exposed as Primary riggers, debate cheaters, racists, sexists, homophobes, and anti-Semites...basically nothing everyone didn't already know. From THIS came the LIE / Conspiracy Theory that Trump had colluded with Russians to 'steal the election'...when the only thing stolen were some embarrassing e-mails.

So why Trump - why go after him?
- Hillary lost - he beat her.
- He had made the stupid comment about encouraging Russia to hack Hillary...That is important because he encouraged (jokingly) Russia to hack HILLARY...not the DNC...but it was the DNC that was hacked. Hillary didn't get hacked. So if Trump WAS colluding with Russians, they sure weren't listening to him.

Better choice to go after were:

Tony Podesta, the brother of Hillary's campaign manager. Tony worked for the KGB Bank, closely tied to Vladimir Putin and the Russian Spy agency that just so happened to be the ones who hacked the DNC. What a freakin' coincidence.

Then there's the Democrats - specifically Debbie Wasserman Schultz - who hired the 3 Pakistani Brother IT Spy ring - who potentially killed their father, held their mother hostage, was spending their father's money, were taking money from terrorists, and 1 brother had a criminal record before being hired. They were allowed to have un-authorized access to classified information in the House. oh ,but it gets better - AFTER the brothers had been BANNED from the House and AFTER a criminal investigation had begun on the them, Debbie WS IGNORED the investigation and IGNORED the House BAN - she hired one of the brothers, had him come work for her, NAD GAVE HIM ACCESS TO DNC E-MAILS, USERNAMES, AND PASSWORDS. The 'kicker'? These were the same DNC e-mails that were hacked.

One of the pieces of evidence snowflakes point to that it was the Russians who did the hacking was an out-dated soviet code / malware that facilitated the hacking. The only problem with this theory, especially knowing Debbie's blunder gave the Pakistani access t those e-mails is the fact that this Russian code was found on-line where anyone could download and use it. So who is to say that the Pakistanis - who proved they were doing anything for money - did not gain access to the files/e-mails and upload the malware they got off-line?
*** This is what the courts called 'reasonable doubt'...that the Russians hacked the DNC's e-mails at all.

And let's not forget Bill Clinton taking $50k a speech from Vlad's buddies - ex-KGB.

It is clear that Democrats have more on them regarding collusion / connection with Russians than Trump; however, while Comey has announced that the 'fishing expedition' on Trump continues, it appears no one is investigating Tony Podesta, Bill Clinton, and / or Debbie Wasserman Schultz....or making a huge effore to go after the Obama holdovers who committed ESPIONAGE.

 

[nat4900]

Trump was never under investigation, nor is he now.

You lose again.

Go back to bed.......LOL

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Of course I was very happy that in yesterday's testimony, Comey (and the Sessions' DOJ) CLEARLY and SPECIFICALLY confirmed TWO important issues:

That Trump was full of shit in his accusations of Obama's wiretapping, and
That there is an ongoing [possibly criminal] investigation of the Trump administration's ties with Russia.

HOWEVER, it is equally difficult to overlook what Comey did and di not do last year.....

Comey, with just over a week of Nov. 8th, CHOSE to undermine Clinton's campaign by stating that she was ......again....under a possible investigation based on an aide's emails......

BUT.......Comey also chose to NOT reveal that Trump was ALSO under investigation for his Russian ties since last July (this was fully revealed only yesterday)

What would have happened last year IF voters were equally aware that BOTH candidates were under FBI investigations?

Comey's current Act of Contrition is interesting, but still flawed.

Trump was never under investigation, nor is he now.

You lose again.

Yesterday never happened.

 

[Kirwood Derby]

F.B.I. Fumble, Bungle, Ignore...but Trump is going down.

 

[nat4900]

It's obvious that law enforcement wants to control things . They don't like Hillary so they sabotaged her run. Trump insulted them, now he's going to pay .

Trump and his lap dogs have taken on the intelligence communities, the media, the courts and most foreign governments (except for Russia, of course) and we have what we have with Trump at 38-39% approval ratings.....

 

[theHawk]

Of course I was very happy that in yesterday's testimony, Comey (and the Sessions' DOJ) CLEARLY and SPECIFICALLY confirmed TWO important issues:

That Trump was full of shit in his accusations of Obama's wiretapping, and
That there is an ongoing [possibly criminal] investigation of the Trump administration's ties with Russia.

HOWEVER, it is equally difficult to overlook what Comey did and di not do last year.....

Comey, with just over a week of Nov. 8th, CHOSE to undermine Clinton's campaign by stating that she was ......again....under a possible investigation based on an aide's emails......

BUT.......Comey also chose to NOT reveal that Trump was ALSO under investigation for his Russian ties since last July (this was fully revealed only yesterday)

What would have happened last year IF voters were equally aware that BOTH candidates were under FBI investigations?

Comey's current Act of Contrition is interesting, but still flawed.

Trump was never under investigation, nor is he now.

You lose again.

Yesterday never happened.

Yesterday was a lot of political theatre, as Democrats had to rant about idiotic shit.

But we did get Comey to testify that the only people that have access to unmask US citizens in FISA wiretaps were 20 in the NSA, more in the FBI, and Obama political appointees like Lynch, Yates, and Rice. I'm sure you'll be quick to blame intel officers before your beloved Obama admin hacks when it comes to that little felony.

 

[theHawk]

It's obvious that law enforcement wants to control things . They don't like Hillary so they sabotaged her run. Trump insulted them, now he's going to pay .

Trump and his lap dogs have taken on the intelligence communities, the media, the courts and most foreign governments (except for Russia, of course) and we have what we have with Trump at 38-39% approval ratings.....

We're not worried about CNN provided "approval ratings". His ratings are higher than Hillary's or the media's.
After bitch slapping the media, progressives, globalists, Islamists and illegal aliens for 3 years, he'll be in a great position for re-election.

 

[Penelope]

Of course I was very happy that in yesterday's testimony, Comey (and the Sessions' DOJ) CLEARLY and SPECIFICALLY confirmed TWO important issues:

That Trump was full of shit in his accusations of Obama's wiretapping, and
That there is an ongoing [possibly criminal] investigation of the Trump administration's ties with Russia.

HOWEVER, it is equally difficult to overlook what Comey did and di not do last year.....

Comey, with just over a week of Nov. 8th, CHOSE to undermine Clinton's campaign by stating that she was ......again....under a possible investigation based on an aide's emails......

BUT.......Comey also chose to NOT reveal that Trump was ALSO under investigation for his Russian ties since last July (this was fully revealed only yesterday)

What would have happened last year IF voters were equally aware that BOTH candidates were under FBI investigations?

Comey's current Act of Contrition is interesting, but still flawed.

Trump was never under investigation, nor is he now.

You lose again.

Of course he is.

 

[nat4900]

We're not worried about CNN provided "approval ratings"

Actually it was Gallup....But do carry on with your delusions.....LOL

 

[Timmy]

Of course I was very happy that in yesterday's testimony, Comey (and the Sessions' DOJ) CLEARLY and SPECIFICALLY confirmed TWO important issues:

That Trump was full of shit in his accusations of Obama's wiretapping, and
That there is an ongoing [possibly criminal] investigation of the Trump administration's ties with Russia.

HOWEVER, it is equally difficult to overlook what Comey did and di not do last year.....

Comey, with just over a week of Nov. 8th, CHOSE to undermine Clinton's campaign by stating that she was ......again....under a possible investigation based on an aide's emails......

BUT.......Comey also chose to NOT reveal that Trump was ALSO under investigation for his Russian ties since last July (this was fully revealed only yesterday)

What would have happened last year IF voters were equally aware that BOTH candidates were under FBI investigations?

Comey's current Act of Contrition is interesting, but still flawed.

Trump was never under investigation, nor is he now.

You lose again.

Yesterday never happened.

Yesterday was a lot of political theatre, as Democrats had to rant about idiotic shit.

But we did get Comey to testify that the only people that have access to unmask US citizens in FISA wiretaps were 20 in the NSA, more in the FBI, and Obama political appointees like Lynch, Yates, and Rice. I'm sure you'll be quick to blame intel officers before your beloved Obama admin hacks when it comes to that little felony.

Shut it! The GOP created all this gov spying overreach after 911. And they also re-upped the patriot act .

Chickens come home to roost .

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Of course I was very happy that in yesterday's testimony, Comey (and the Sessions' DOJ) CLEARLY and SPECIFICALLY confirmed TWO important issues:

That Trump was full of shit in his accusations of Obama's wiretapping, and
That there is an ongoing [possibly criminal] investigation of the Trump administration's ties with Russia.

HOWEVER, it is equally difficult to overlook what Comey did and di not do last year.....

Comey, with just over a week of Nov. 8th, CHOSE to undermine Clinton's campaign by stating that she was ......again....under a possible investigation based on an aide's emails......

BUT.......Comey also chose to NOT reveal that Trump was ALSO under investigation for his Russian ties since last July (this was fully revealed only yesterday)

What would have happened last year IF voters were equally aware that BOTH candidates were under FBI investigations?

Comey's current Act of Contrition is interesting, but still flawed.

Trump was never under investigation, nor is he now.

You lose again.

Yesterday never happened.

Yesterday was a lot of political theatre, as Democrats had to rant about idiotic shit.

But we did get Comey to testify that the only people that have access to unmask US citizens in FISA wiretaps were 20 in the NSA, more in the FBI, and Obama political appointees like Lynch, Yates, and Rice. I'm sure you'll be quick to blame intel officers before your beloved Obama admin hacks when it comes to that little felony.

Harping on the leaks was the political theater. It's was the only sliver of defensible ground for the Republicans on the committee.

 

[nat4900]

Harping on the leaks was the political theater. It's was the only sliver of defensible ground for the Republicans on the committee.

Good ol Trey Gowdy needed some reason for his failed existence after being smacked around by Hillary during the Benghazi hearings.....

(BTW, we had SEVEN Benghazi hearings over TWO years at the cost of TEN million dollars, thanks to folks like Gowdy....)

 

[theHawk]

Of course I was very happy that in yesterday's testimony, Comey (and the Sessions' DOJ) CLEARLY and SPECIFICALLY confirmed TWO important issues:

That Trump was full of shit in his accusations of Obama's wiretapping, and
That there is an ongoing [possibly criminal] investigation of the Trump administration's ties with Russia.

HOWEVER, it is equally difficult to overlook what Comey did and di not do last year.....

Comey, with just over a week of Nov. 8th, CHOSE to undermine Clinton's campaign by stating that she was ......again....under a possible investigation based on an aide's emails......

BUT.......Comey also chose to NOT reveal that Trump was ALSO under investigation for his Russian ties since last July (this was fully revealed only yesterday)

What would have happened last year IF voters were equally aware that BOTH candidates were under FBI investigations?

Comey's current Act of Contrition is interesting, but still flawed.

Trump was never under investigation, nor is he now.

You lose again.

Yesterday never happened.

Yesterday was a lot of political theatre, as Democrats had to rant about idiotic shit.

But we did get Comey to testify that the only people that have access to unmask US citizens in FISA wiretaps were 20 in the NSA, more in the FBI, and Obama political appointees like Lynch, Yates, and Rice. I'm sure you'll be quick to blame intel officers before your beloved Obama admin hacks when it comes to that little felony.

Harping on the leaks was the political theater. It's was the only sliver of defensible ground for the Republicans on the committee.

The leaks are the only crime that we know happened.

So far there is zero evidence for any Trump-Russia "collusion". But hey, I'm sure if you keep holding your breath, it's surely going to pop up one of these days.

 

[theHawk]

Harping on the leaks was the political theater. It's was the only sliver of defensible ground for the Republicans on the committee.

Good ol Trey Gowdy needed some reason for his failed existence after being smacked around by Hillary during the Benghazi hearings.....

(BTW, we had SEVEN Benghazi hearings over TWO years at the cost of TEN million dollars, thanks to folks like Gowdy....)

Thank God we did. The American people learned the truth about Benghazi and what a heartless bitch Hillary was. That was a big reason she lost the election.