Congressman Mike Capuano (D MA-07) Loses Primary

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Still a Democrat right?

How is that a defeat for us?

Because a Republican can run next time and beat them.

If Democrats can run in red districts and try to win against fairly moderate Republicans, Republicans can run in blue districts and expect to win against extremist Democrat candidates. The center left and center right will beat the far left every time.

Yes, they sure can try!

Let me know when it works out for them!

Considering that Cortez is probably going to lose in a district that was thought to be beyond safe for Democrats, I would say that I am letting you know right now.

Cortez will win easily. The Republican running against her is a figurehead with no real interest in winning. I guess they wanted somebody's name to be on the ballot.

The candidate we are discussing in this thread has already won as the Republicans didn't bother to field a candidate,

 

[Harpy Eagle]

The election is less than 2 months away, it is not even possible for that to happen!

Completely? Hmm, something's wrong with that system.

Not at all. Every state has deadlines that have to be meet, keeps them from reprinting ballots 20 times

Though I guess they could do a write in campaign and see if that works.

So a write-in is possible, correct? (Seems highly unlikely, but whatever)

I assume that a write in is always possible. You willing to bet your house on the chances of a write in winning?

I have to admit it is a trick bet, I do not own a house right now! So I cannot lose either way!

 

[Marion Morrison]

The election is less than 2 months away, it is not even possible for that to happen!

Completely? Hmm, something's wrong with that system.

Not at all. Every state has deadlines that have to be meet, keeps them from reprinting ballots 20 times

Though I guess they could do a write in campaign and see if that works.

So a write-in is possible, correct? (Seems highly unlikely, but whatever)

I assume that a write in is always possible. You willing to bet your house on the chances of a write in winning?

I do believe I've already clarified my position on that. Something wrong with your reading comprehension?

If you wanna put your house up against my $10, sure.

 

[ptbw forever]

Because a Republican can run next time and beat them.

If Democrats can run in red districts and try to win against fairly moderate Republicans, Republicans can run in blue districts and expect to win against extremist Democrat candidates. The center left and center right will beat the far left every time.

Yes, they sure can try!

Let me know when it works out for them!

Considering that Cortez is probably going to lose in a district that was thought to be beyond safe for Democrats, I would say that I am letting you know right now.

Cortez will win easily. The Republican running against her is a figurehead with no real interest in winning. I guess they wanted somebody's name to be on the ballot.

The candidate we are discussing in this thread has already won as the Republicans didn't bother to field a candidate,

Crowley is splitting the vote.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

The election is less than 2 months away, it is not even possible for that to happen!

Completely? Hmm, something's wrong with that system.

Not at all. Every state has deadlines that have to be meet, keeps them from reprinting ballots 20 times

Though I guess they could do a write in campaign and see if that works.

So a write-in is possible, correct? (Seems highly unlikely, but whatever)

I assume that a write in is always possible. You willing to bet your house on the chances of a write in winning?

I do believe I've already clarified my position on that. Something wrong with your reading comprehension?

If you wanna put your house up against my $10, sure.

Sorry, I missed the 2nd line of your post! my bad!

But yeah, since I do not own a house right now, I still cannot lose!

 

[Harpy Eagle]

If Democrats can run in red districts and try to win against fairly moderate Republicans, Republicans can run in blue districts and expect to win against extremist Democrat candidates. The center left and center right will beat the far left every time.

Yes, they sure can try!

Let me know when it works out for them!

Considering that Cortez is probably going to lose in a district that was thought to be beyond safe for Democrats, I would say that I am letting you know right now.

Cortez will win easily. The Republican running against her is a figurehead with no real interest in winning. I guess they wanted somebody's name to be on the ballot.

The candidate we are discussing in this thread has already won as the Republicans didn't bother to field a candidate,

Crowley is splitting the vote.

And that still might not be enough. Crowley is just a sore loser.

 

[BrokeLoser]

Republicans aren’t moving right.

Where have you been living?

Name an issue that Republicans have moved right on since Goldwater ran for president.

Immigration for one.

Anything else you need cleared up for you?

Wrong.

So, The party of Trump hasn’t moved to the right of Reagan on immigration?



You’re not very good at this, kid.

Name an issue that Republicans have moved right on since Goldwater ran for president.

Immigration for one.

Anything else you need cleared up for you?

Wrong.

So, The party of Trump hasn’t moved to the right of Reagan on immigration?



You’re not very good at this, kid.

TBF, trump has mentioned amnesty for millions of people.

I agree. But how can anyone who has been paying attention to politics over the last 20, 30 years honestly say the Republican Party hasn’t moved right on any issue? Especially on immigration.

The American people decided it was time to start aggressively enforcing our immigration laws which have been on the books for years. Good Americans are smart enough to see that the browner this nation becomes the more of a nasty shithole it becomes. They decided to end the free for all for obvious reasons.
Do you always consider the enforcement of law as a move toward the Right?

 

[jc456]

When the positions held by a candidate align with the views of the majority of people in the nation, it is weird to say that they are too far left.

Medicare for all.
Campaign finance reform.
Comprehensive immigration reform.
Expanding SS.
Believing climate scientists.

These are mainstream issues.

it takes but one question, where does the funding come from? I'll wait.

 

[An@lDestroyer]

Where have you been living?

Name an issue that Republicans have moved right on since Goldwater ran for president.

Immigration for one.

Anything else you need cleared up for you?

Wrong.

So, The party of Trump hasn’t moved to the right of Reagan on immigration?



You’re not very good at this, kid.

Reagan was a moderate governor of California(a real moderate, not a fairly far left liberal actor turned Republican like Arnold), and I specifically mentioned Goldwater, not Reagan.

Yeah, you know Reagan came after Goldwater, don’t you? Do you?

So, SINCE Goldwater, the Republican Party has moved further right on at least immigration.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Yeah, you know Reagan came before Goldwater, don’t you? Do you?

So, SINCE Goldwater, the Republican Party has moved further right on at least immigration.

When was Barry Goldwater after Reagan?

 

[jc456]

When the positions held by a candidate align with the views of the majority of people in the nation, it is weird to say that they are too far left.

Medicare for all.
Campaign finance reform.
Comprehensive immigration reform.
Expanding SS.
Believing climate scientists.

These are mainstream issues.

it takes but one question, where does the funding come from? I'll wait.

BTW, are the leftists so stupid they don't ask that question before voting? Truly insanity to not know an answer to such an obvious question, when stupid such as these leftists communists speak. Just saying. I'm her opponent, I would ask she explain where the funding comes from in a debate and let's hear her answer. I'll wait.

 

[An@lDestroyer]

Where have you been living?

Name an issue that Republicans have moved right on since Goldwater ran for president.

Immigration for one.

Anything else you need cleared up for you?

Wrong.

So, The party of Trump hasn’t moved to the right of Reagan on immigration?



You’re not very good at this, kid.

Immigration for one.

Anything else you need cleared up for you?

Wrong.

So, The party of Trump hasn’t moved to the right of Reagan on immigration?



You’re not very good at this, kid.

TBF, trump has mentioned amnesty for millions of people.

I agree. But how can anyone who has been paying attention to politics over the last 20, 30 years honestly say the Republican Party hasn’t moved right on any issue? Especially on immigration.

The American people decided it was time to start aggressively enforcing our immigration laws which have been on the books for years. Good Americans are smart enough to see that the browner this nation becomes the more of a nasty shithole it becomes. They decided to end the free for all for obvious reasons.
Do you always consider the enforcement of law as a move toward the Right?

Who pulled your string, stormfront reject?

My opinion on immigration is not the issue. PmsForever claimed that the Republican Party hasn’t moved to the right on any issue since Goldwater. He’s wrong.

Carry on, clown.

 

[An@lDestroyer]

Yeah, you know Reagan came before Goldwater, don’t you? Do you?

So, SINCE Goldwater, the Republican Party has moved further right on at least immigration.

When was Barry Goldwater after Reagan?

Typo. I fixed it. Thanks for noticing, though

 

[Marion Morrison]

Yeah, you know Reagan came before Goldwater, don’t you? Do you?

So, SINCE Goldwater, the Republican Party has moved further right on at least immigration.

When was Barry Goldwater after Reagan?

Typo. I fixed it. Thanks for noticing, though

What about Billy Clinton? He was pretty right on immigration, no?


He was more right than H.W. Bush who did jack shit!

 

[BrokeLoser]

Name an issue that Republicans have moved right on since Goldwater ran for president.

Immigration for one.

Anything else you need cleared up for you?

Wrong.

So, The party of Trump hasn’t moved to the right of Reagan on immigration?



You’re not very good at this, kid.

Wrong.

So, The party of Trump hasn’t moved to the right of Reagan on immigration?



You’re not very good at this, kid.

TBF, trump has mentioned amnesty for millions of people.

I agree. But how can anyone who has been paying attention to politics over the last 20, 30 years honestly say the Republican Party hasn’t moved right on any issue? Especially on immigration.

The American people decided it was time to start aggressively enforcing our immigration laws which have been on the books for years. Good Americans are smart enough to see that the browner this nation becomes the more of a nasty shithole it becomes. They decided to end the free for all for obvious reasons.
Do you always consider the enforcement of law as a move toward the Right?

Who pulled your string, stormfront reject?

My opinion on immigration is not the issue. PmsForever claimed that the Republican Party hasn’t moved to the right on any issue since Goldwater. He’s wrong.

Carry on, clown.

Easy now ButtholeBandit...I simply pointed out your extreme ignorance. Everybody sane knows the GOP has done nothing but move toward center over the last several years. You filthy fucks don’t see it as you move to the extreme Left. In your twisted tiny little fucked up head you see the enforcement of law as a move Right. I exposed your warped logic and embarrassed your dumbass in public...now you’re pissing your pants.
What else can I teach you?

 

[ptbw forever]

If Democrats can run in red districts and try to win against fairly moderate Republicans, Republicans can run in blue districts and expect to win against extremist Democrat candidates. The center left and center right will beat the far left every time.

Yes, they sure can try!

Let me know when it works out for them!

Considering that Cortez is probably going to lose in a district that was thought to be beyond safe for Democrats, I would say that I am letting you know right now.

Cortez will win easily. The Republican running against her is a figurehead with no real interest in winning. I guess they wanted somebody's name to be on the ballot.

The candidate we are discussing in this thread has already won as the Republicans didn't bother to field a candidate,

Crowley is splitting the vote.

And that still might not be enough. Crowley is just a sore loser.

She only got 16,000 votes.

Her ceiling is extremely low.

 

[evenflow1969]

Ocasio-Cortez-backed Dem defeats 10-term congressman in primary, calls it fight for party's 'soul'
Ayanna Pressley, Dem backed by Ocasio-Cortez, upsets Michael Capuano in Massachusetts House primary

Boston city councilor Ayanna Pressley unseated 10-term U.S. Rep. Michael Capuano in a Democratic primary Tuesday in the latest shakeup of the House Democratic caucus by a far-left challenger.

Capuano conceded defeat to Pressley in the race to represent Massachusetts' 7th District approximately 30 minutes before The Associated Press formally called the race. With 69 percent of precincts reporting late Tuesday, Pressley had the lead by 10,682 votes.

Not lookin' good, Libtards, unless you're a left wing socialist wacko.

Neither side is defeated in a primary! Wake the fuck up!

 

[ptbw forever]

Name an issue that Republicans have moved right on since Goldwater ran for president.

Immigration for one.

Anything else you need cleared up for you?

Wrong.

So, The party of Trump hasn’t moved to the right of Reagan on immigration?



You’re not very good at this, kid.

Reagan was a moderate governor of California(a real moderate, not a fairly far left liberal actor turned Republican like Arnold), and I specifically mentioned Goldwater, not Reagan.

Yeah, you know Reagan came after Goldwater, don’t you? Do you?

So, SINCE Goldwater, the Republican Party has moved further right on at least immigration.

No, because Goldwater himself was more right wing on immigration than Reagan.

Both parties used to be against non-white immigration and against substantial European immigration.

We have moved a great deal to the left since the founding of the Republican Party.

 

[jc456]

Name an issue that Republicans have moved right on since Goldwater ran for president.

Immigration for one.

Anything else you need cleared up for you?

Wrong.

So, The party of Trump hasn’t moved to the right of Reagan on immigration?



You’re not very good at this, kid.

Wrong.

So, The party of Trump hasn’t moved to the right of Reagan on immigration?



You’re not very good at this, kid.

TBF, trump has mentioned amnesty for millions of people.

I agree. But how can anyone who has been paying attention to politics over the last 20, 30 years honestly say the Republican Party hasn’t moved right on any issue? Especially on immigration.

The American people decided it was time to start aggressively enforcing our immigration laws which have been on the books for years. Good Americans are smart enough to see that the browner this nation becomes the more of a nasty shithole it becomes. They decided to end the free for all for obvious reasons.
Do you always consider the enforcement of law as a move toward the Right?

Who pulled your string, stormfront reject?

My opinion on immigration is not the issue. PmsForever claimed that the Republican Party hasn’t moved to the right on any issue since Goldwater. He’s wrong.

Carry on, clown.

on what have they moved. the correct response would have included an example of something. We have plenty on the left, just ask JFK, 'ask not what your country can do for you but what you can do for your country." Sad. or even Clinton's state of the union speech concerning borders and immigration. shit just ask hitlery about her campaign and where you are today with immigration. wow. but seriously, name something the right has moved further right of.

 

[An@lDestroyer]

Everybody sane knows the GOP has done nothing but move toward center over the last several years.

What?