Conservative Sues Joy Reid for speech

[BULLDOG]

Accusing someone of Child Abuse is a very serious thing. She could have gone with exploiting them, or using them as props. Using the term child abuse is a legal accusation, and as such can be actionable if found to be untrue.

 

[Devils_Advocate]

View attachment 639860

House floor has different rules and you know this nimrod!

 

[martybegan]

View attachment 639860

Didn't make a direct accusation against a specific person.

There is a difference. Try again.

 

[Papageorgio]

While Conservative-Marxists applaud Musk over the guise of "restoring" free speech on Twitter, they simultaneously want to throw people in jail for tweets and practicing that same freespeech. The definition of Hypocrite in the dictionary absolutely has to be "Republican".

Ex-NFL player threatens to sue Joy Reid over 'child abuse' tweet

Former NFL star Jack Brewer may sue Joy Reid for defamation after she accused him of perpetrating 'child abuse' by allowing his after-school club to attend the signing of an anti-CRT bill.

www.google.com

Threatening to sue is now a free speech issue? How? You have no right to defame a person and are open to a lawsuit.

No one is wanting anyone thrown in jail for using Twitter, that is just plain drama and emotion.

 

[ThomasSowellsFro]

View attachment 639860

Gawt Em

 

[Penelope]

While Conservative-Marxists applaud Musk over the guise of "restoring" free speech on Twitter, they simultaneously want to throw people in jail for tweets and practicing that same freespeech. The definition of Hypocrite in the dictionary absolutely has to be "Republican".

Ex-NFL player threatens to sue Joy Reid over 'child abuse' tweet

Former NFL star Jack Brewer may sue Joy Reid for defamation after she accused him of perpetrating 'child abuse' by allowing his after-school club to attend the signing of an anti-CRT bill.

www.google.com

Freedon of speech comes to mind, but its not for democrats, its only for republicans.

 

[Papageorgio]

View attachment 639860

Who specifically did she target? Who did she specifically slander?

 

[Devils_Advocate]

Gawt Em

No, House Floor has different rules and if she had said that on FOX News and directed it at you then it would be different…

 

[Papageorgio]

Freedon of speech comes to mind, but its not for democrats, its only for republicans.

Whose free speech is being violated?

 

[ThomasSowellsFro]

defamation isn’t protected free speech

Abortions are a protected killing. Yet you are still against it and see it as unconstitutional.

 

[ThomasSowellsFro]

Your freedom of speech has limits and this has been shown many times, so why don’t you show where you can slander someone without any repercussions?

Throwing people in jail for a thought crime is communism. You are a communist.

 

[Viktor]

Defamation of character is grounds for legal action.... always has been....

Copies of her accusation have been sent to Ron Desantis. She has money and can easily be sued.

 

[GHook20]

Roe v Wade has always been there lol. Using law to censor speech, still means you're censoring speech. You Conservative Communists simply want to have your cake and eat it too. We really need to bring back McCarthyism and cleanse American soil of Communist filth.

Learn the law asshole… there have always been limits on constitutional amendments. For example:
Free Speech: You can yell fire in a burning building; you can make direct threats of violence, you can defame someone and you can use obscenity!

Free Press: You can’t use slander or libel; false light laws; use obscenity; or willful insight violence…

Free religion: you can take illegal drugs as part of your religion; you can commit rape or murder as part of your religion

Second Amendment: You don’t have the right to bring guns on private property if the owner does allow it (unless you are a police officer; you don’t have a right to a fully automatic weapon.

So get a clue fucko

 

[Papageorgio]

Abortions are a protected killing. Yet you are still against it and see it as unconstitutional.

Seriously? No one is as stupid in logic, you are making it all up, no one is as dumb as what you are trying to pretend to be.

 

[GHook20]

Throwing people in jail for a thought crime is communism. You are a communist.

Lol the leftist scumbag calls someone a liar… I bet you support hate crimes… those crimes can be completely verbal and they can toss a person in jail for those thought crimes

 

[BULLDOG]

House floor has different rules and you know this nimrod!

You can always count on MTG to not limit her crazy remarks to one venue. She generally repeats her latest crazy remarks in all venues until she finds another crazy remark to replace it. She made that same statement multiple places. You don't doubt that, do you?

 

[BULLDOG]

Didn't make a direct accusation against a specific person.

There is a difference. Try again.

Nit picking.

 

[Godboy]

While Conservative-Marxists applaud Musk over the guise of "restoring" free speech on Twitter, they simultaneously want to throw people in jail for tweets and practicing that same freespeech. The definition of Hypocrite in the dictionary absolutely has to be "Republican".

Ex-NFL player threatens to sue Joy Reid over 'child abuse' tweet

Former NFL star Jack Brewer may sue Joy Reid for defamation after she accused him of perpetrating 'child abuse' by allowing his after-school club to attend the signing of an anti-CRT bill.

www.google.com

You cant be sued for exercising your free speech, retard.

 

[Penelope]

Abortions are a protected killing. Yet you are still against it and see it as unconstitutional.

Abortion are not people, there are laws against infant crimes.

 

[ThomasSowellsFro]

Seriously? No one is as stupid in logic, you are making it all up, no one is as dumb as what you are trying to pretend to be.

I'm right and you know it lol. You're using a legal argument to rationalize censorship of speech. If you can do it with speech, the libs can do it with Abortion, and any time you try and say that abortion is wrong, I will use the same argument you are and tell you its legal precedent, therefore, it is permissible. You can't have it both ways, of course. Slavery was also totally legal as well. But we all know it's wrong. Fuc atta here with your hypocrisy. Typical Conservative Marxsists.