Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Please quote the passage that allows the federal government the ability to limit immigration.Slavery is never mentioned in the Constitution, even though it is clearly there. The census requirement does not mention slaves although that is clearly whom they have in mind. It is a basic principle of the Constitution so your objection is unfounded.
So slavery is "clearly"(though not written) in the Constitution, yet the ability to limit immigration(which is written in the Constitution) is not.
Thats some logic you ave going on there.
Mark
Article 1, Section 8,
"To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization..."
He is NOT talking about naturalization he is talking about IMMIGRATION
Immigration matters remain within each state jurisdiction. In 1787 the states were SOVEREIGN.
.
It remained in States hands only till 1808. Article 1, Section 9, Clause 1
Please quote the passage that allows the federal government the ability to limit immigration.So slavery is "clearly"(though not written) in the Constitution, yet the ability to limit immigration(which is written in the Constitution) is not.
Thats some logic you ave going on there.
Mark
Article 1, Section 8,
"To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization..."
He is NOT talking about naturalization he is talking about IMMIGRATION
Immigration matters remain within each state jurisdiction. In 1787 the states were SOVEREIGN.
.
You didn't really just say that, right?...LMAO!!!
You didn't really just say that, right?...LMAO!!!
Stupid retard
Search and find out if James Madison and Thomas Jefferson believed that "naturalization" and "immigration" were the same thing.
have some pride, use your fucking brain for a change
.
Please quote the passage that allows the federal government the ability to limit immigration.So slavery is "clearly"(though not written) in the Constitution, yet the ability to limit immigration(which is written in the Constitution) is not.
Thats some logic you ave going on there.
Mark
Article 1, Section 8,
"To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization..."
He is NOT talking about naturalization he is talking about IMMIGRATION
Immigration matters remain within each state jurisdiction. In 1787 the states were SOVEREIGN.
.
It remained in States hands only till 1808. Article 1, Section 9, Clause 1
Congress enacted an immigration Law which expired in 1800 after Madison and Jefferson objected.
There was NO immigration Law until the 1890's when the SCOTUS concluded that the Chinese presence in our midst constituted an emergency.
.
Please quote the passage that allows the federal government the ability to limit immigration.
Article 1, Section 8,
"To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization..."
He is NOT talking about naturalization he is talking about IMMIGRATION
Immigration matters remain within each state jurisdiction. In 1787 the states were SOVEREIGN.
.
You didn't really just say that, right?...LMAO!!!
You didn't really just say that, right?...LMAO!!!
Stupid retard
Search and find out if James Madison and Thomas Jefferson believed that "naturalization" and "immigration" were the same thing.
have some pride, use your fucking brain for a change
.
Where do you people come up with this shit?...lol!
"im·mi·gra·tion
ˌiməˈɡrāSH(ə)n/
noun
"nat·u·ral·ize
- the action of coming to live permanently in a foreign country."
ˈnaCH(ə)rəˌlīz/
verb
past tense: naturalized; past participle: naturalized
- 1.
admit (a foreigner) to the citizenship of a country."
Please quote the passage that allows the federal government the ability to limit immigration.
Article 1, Section 8,
"To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization..."
He is NOT talking about naturalization he is talking about IMMIGRATION
Immigration matters remain within each state jurisdiction. In 1787 the states were SOVEREIGN.
.
It remained in States hands only till 1808. Article 1, Section 9, Clause 1
Congress enacted an immigration Law which expired in 1800 after Madison and Jefferson objected.
There was NO immigration Law until the 1890's when the SCOTUS concluded that the Chinese presence in our midst constituted an emergency.
.
There's nothing in The Constitution that prohibits the government from passing laws limiting, or even prohibiting immigration.
Please quote the passage that allows the federal government the ability to limit immigration.So slavery is "clearly"(though not written) in the Constitution, yet the ability to limit immigration(which is written in the Constitution) is not.
Thats some logic you ave going on there.
Mark
Article 1, Section 8,
"To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization..."
He is NOT talking about naturalization he is talking about IMMIGRATION
Immigration matters remain within each state jurisdiction. In 1787 the states were SOVEREIGN.
.
It remained in States hands only till 1808. Article 1, Section 9, Clause 1
Congress enacted an immigration Law which expired in 1800 after Madison and Jefferson objected.
There was NO immigration Law until the 1890's when the SCOTUS concluded that the Chinese presence in our midst constituted an emergency.
.
Please quote the passage that allows the federal government the ability to limit immigration.
Article 1, Section 8,
"To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization..."
He is NOT talking about naturalization he is talking about IMMIGRATION
Immigration matters remain within each state jurisdiction. In 1787 the states were SOVEREIGN.
.
It remained in States hands only till 1808. Article 1, Section 9, Clause 1
Congress enacted an immigration Law which expired in 1800 after Madison and Jefferson objected.
There was NO immigration Law until the 1890's when the SCOTUS concluded that the Chinese presence in our midst constituted an emergency.
.
Actually the early laws only delta with naturalization, not immigration. Some States passed some immigration laws after the civil war, but SCOTUS said immigration was the authority of the feds.
History of laws concerning immigration and naturalization in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article 1, Section 8,
"To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization..."
He is NOT talking about naturalization he is talking about IMMIGRATION
Immigration matters remain within each state jurisdiction. In 1787 the states were SOVEREIGN.
.
It remained in States hands only till 1808. Article 1, Section 9, Clause 1
Congress enacted an immigration Law which expired in 1800 after Madison and Jefferson objected.
There was NO immigration Law until the 1890's when the SCOTUS concluded that the Chinese presence in our midst constituted an emergency.
.
Actually the early laws only delta with naturalization, not immigration. Some States passed some immigration laws after the civil war, but SCOTUS said immigration was the authority of the feds.
History of laws concerning immigration and naturalization in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
SCOTUS has NO authority to amend the Constitution.
The ONLY reason SCOTUS ruled that way was to stick it to the Chinese.
The ONLY reason you would accept SCOTUS ruling is because it conforms with your racist views.
.
Article 1, Section 8,
"To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization..."
He is NOT talking about naturalization he is talking about IMMIGRATION
Immigration matters remain within each state jurisdiction. In 1787 the states were SOVEREIGN.
.
It remained in States hands only till 1808. Article 1, Section 9, Clause 1
Congress enacted an immigration Law which expired in 1800 after Madison and Jefferson objected.
There was NO immigration Law until the 1890's when the SCOTUS concluded that the Chinese presence in our midst constituted an emergency.
.
There's nothing in The Constitution that prohibits the government from passing laws limiting, or even prohibiting immigration.
You are not referring to the US Constitution (1787) you are referring to KKK bylaws.
.
Anyone styling himself a constitutional conservative must support open borders. Those who do not are merely statists as the fed.gov has no power to regulate borders.
No you dont get it. The Constitution grants powers to Congress, period. If the power isnt granted, they dont have it. And there is nowhere that immigration is a power of the government.He is NOT talking about naturalization he is talking about IMMIGRATION
Immigration matters remain within each state jurisdiction. In 1787 the states were SOVEREIGN.
.
It remained in States hands only till 1808. Article 1, Section 9, Clause 1
Congress enacted an immigration Law which expired in 1800 after Madison and Jefferson objected.
There was NO immigration Law until the 1890's when the SCOTUS concluded that the Chinese presence in our midst constituted an emergency.
.
There's nothing in The Constitution that prohibits the government from passing laws limiting, or even prohibiting immigration.
You are not referring to the US Constitution (1787) you are referring to KKK bylaws.
.
I'm referring to Article 1, where there is nothing prohibiting Congress from passing laws regulating immigration.
No you dont get it. The Constitution grants powers to Congress, period. If the power isnt granted, they dont have it. And there is nowhere that immigration is a power of the government.It remained in States hands only till 1808. Article 1, Section 9, Clause 1
Congress enacted an immigration Law which expired in 1800 after Madison and Jefferson objected.
There was NO immigration Law until the 1890's when the SCOTUS concluded that the Chinese presence in our midst constituted an emergency.
.
There's nothing in The Constitution that prohibits the government from passing laws limiting, or even prohibiting immigration.
You are not referring to the US Constitution (1787) you are referring to KKK bylaws.
.
I'm referring to Article 1, where there is nothing prohibiting Congress from passing laws regulating immigration.
Please quote the passage that allows the federal government the ability to limit immigration.
Article 1, Section 8,
"To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization..."
Anyone styling himself a constitutional conservative must support open borders. Those who do not are merely statists as the fed.gov has no power to regulate borders.
No you dont get it. The Constitution grants powers to Congress, period. If the power isnt granted, they dont have it. And there is nowhere that immigration is a power of the government.It remained in States hands only till 1808. Article 1, Section 9, Clause 1
Congress enacted an immigration Law which expired in 1800 after Madison and Jefferson objected.
There was NO immigration Law until the 1890's when the SCOTUS concluded that the Chinese presence in our midst constituted an emergency.
.
There's nothing in The Constitution that prohibits the government from passing laws limiting, or even prohibiting immigration.
You are not referring to the US Constitution (1787) you are referring to KKK bylaws.
.
I'm referring to Article 1, where there is nothing prohibiting Congress from passing laws regulating immigration.
I see we have another PhD candidate with us.No you dont get it. The Constitution grants powers to Congress, period. If the power isnt granted, they dont have it. And there is nowhere that immigration is a power of the government.Congress enacted an immigration Law which expired in 1800 after Madison and Jefferson objected.
There was NO immigration Law until the 1890's when the SCOTUS concluded that the Chinese presence in our midst constituted an emergency.
.
There's nothing in The Constitution that prohibits the government from passing laws limiting, or even prohibiting immigration.
You are not referring to the US Constitution (1787) you are referring to KKK bylaws.
.
I'm referring to Article 1, where there is nothing prohibiting Congress from passing laws regulating immigration.
Just because some freak of nature like you believes it to be true, doesn't make it true.
We are a sovereign state and congress proved that way back in 1812 when the British showed up to wage war with us.
Anyone styling himself a constitutional conservative must support open borders. Those who do not are merely statists as the fed.gov has no power to regulate borders.
I've been saying that you're nothing but a Democrat. Thanks for showing it once again.
Anyone styling himself a constitutional conservative must support open borders. Those who do not are merely statists as the fed.gov has no power to regulate borders.
I've been saying that you're nothing but a Democrat. Thanks for showing it once again.
HUH?
WTF
Are you saying that only democrats support the Constitution (1787)?
.
Are you saying that only democrats support the Constitution (1787)?
