Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
The bigger question is there a republican who can beat either one of them?
It does not matter who the GOP puts up as long as they are overburdened with the kind of retards who only know how to post unflattering pictures of Clinton or call Warren names like Fauxcahontas, and not debate with any substance, believing they are the epitome of clever.
The GOP can put up the next Reagan (there isn't one, and they would hate him anyway), but as long as they are saddled with these losers, they will be defeated. Again.
Again, what positive thing for our country has Hillary accomplished that makes her deserving of the nomination? I say nothing, which speaks poorly for the gullible idiots who will vote for her!
Again, what positive thing for our country has Hillary accomplished that makes her deserving of the nomination? I say nothing, which speaks poorly for the gullible idiots who will vote for her!
The bigger question is there a republican who can beat either one of them?
It does not matter who the GOP puts up as long as they are overburdened with the kind of retards who only know how to post unflattering pictures of Clinton or call Warren names like Fauxcahontas, and not debate with any substance, believing they are the epitome of clever.
The GOP can put up the next Reagan (there isn't one, and they would hate him anyway), but as long as they are saddled with these losers, they will be defeated. Again.
The bigger question is there a republican who can beat either one of them?
It does not matter who the GOP puts up as long as they are overburdened with the kind of retards who only know how to post unflattering pictures of Clinton or call Warren names like Fauxcahontas, and not debate with any substance, believing they are the epitome of clever.
The GOP can put up the next Reagan (there isn't one, and they would hate him anyway), but as long as they are saddled with these losers, they will be defeated. Again.
The bigger question is there a republican who can beat either one of them?
It does not matter who the GOP puts up as long as they are overburdened with the kind of retards who only know how to post unflattering pictures of Clinton or call Warren names like Fauxcahontas, and not debate with any substance, believing they are the epitome of clever.
The GOP can put up the next Reagan (there isn't one, and they would hate him anyway), but as long as they are saddled with these losers, they will be defeated. Again.
Interesting question.
Could Elizabeth Warren beat Hillary Clinton? - The Washington Post
By Ezra Klein November 11, 2013
The question in the background of Noam Scheiber's exploration of whether Elizabeth Warren could challenge Hillary Clinton in 2016 is whether, come 2015, Democrats will care very much about cracking down harder on Wall Street.
<more>
Hillary is the best the left has to offer? She's a total failure as Secretary of State. She parties in Columbia and her detail gets nailed for screwing bookers. First time she had crisis she falls down and gets a concussion. She had problems standing up for any period of time because of poor health.
As soon as she quits she starts kissing the LGBT community's collective asses. Women say they want to vote Hillary because it will be historic. We already did that bull with Obama, and we all know how that turned it, don't we.
They need a martyr and there is no other black Democrat that can convince the public that Obama was just a fluke. Maybe if you guys can find a black female tranny named Julio Sanchez that knows how to read the teleprompter as well as Obama, then you'll have all of your base represented.
Interesting question.
Could Elizabeth Warren beat Hillary Clinton? - The Washington Post
By Ezra Klein November 11, 2013
The question in the background of Noam Scheiber's exploration of whether Elizabeth Warren could challenge Hillary Clinton in 2016 is whether, come 2015, Democrats will care very much about cracking down harder on Wall Street.
<more>
Plus, beneath every gravestone lies a Democrat voter.Could Elizabeth Warren beat Hillary Clinton?
No, there would never be enough money.
Warren stands up for the average employee. I'll give her that. In a day and age where the middle class is squeezed this is going to garner her a lot of attention over other candidates who don't support the middle class.
What's especially funny is Romney proved he'd make a better president than the bystander in chief.
Really, when did he do that?
When he pissed off our biggest ally by saying that their Olympics weren't as cool as his?
Or when he insulted half the country by calling them welfare collectors?
Or when he talked about how he liked to fire people?
I personally think that his putting women in binders was a great moment.
Perhaps the point is maybe you libs should find someone qualified that's not a screwup instead of these token candidates that can't stop making major blunders in domestic and foreign policy.Muddy's Obama Derangement Syndrome is starting to morph into Hillary Derangement Syndrome. It probably went into remission in 2000, but it's back with a vengeance now.
Just another example of the distortions that the left likes to practice. Everyone knows exactly what he said and what he meant, and yet the left with their media minions twisted it into some ridiculous BS. They did the same when they misquoted him when he said that he was concerned about security at the Olympics, when he said that he likes to be able to fire folks that aren't doing their jobs, and his comment on the 47% who don't pay taxes. Hillary and Obama are both compulsive liars and perpetual fuckups, yet you people actually trust them more than any Republican. I can't even believe you asshats are bragging about Hillary fucken Clinton being your best candidate. It's too funny.those Mormons are a lot kinkier than you'd give them credit for.
Perhaps the point is maybe you libs should find someone qualified that's not a screwup instead of these token candidates that can't stop making major blunders in domestic and foreign policy.
