Could Jack Smith seize millions of Trump's fraudulent campaign donations?

[jbrownson0831]

No we don't. Why didn't the media report about the congressional hearing of the IRS witnesses? I watched it live on YouTube. Not a word on the evening network news.

Dimmers hate facts, proof, and evidence. They avoid it like a job.

 

[Marener]

No we don't. Why didn't the media report about the congressional hearing of the IRS witnesses? I watched it live on YouTube. Not a word on the evening network news.

I read about it in The NY Times.

But the hearings really aren’t all that groundbreaking. It’s really just IRS agents who disagree with the decisions made by prosecutors.

Almost all of it occurred under Trump’s administration anyway.

 

[BS Filter]

I read about it in The NY Times.

But the hearings really aren’t all that groundbreaking. It’s really just IRS agents who disagree with the decisions made by prosecutors.

Almost all of it occurred under Trump’s administration anyway.

Wrong. You should have watched. Then you would be informed. The NY Times isn't going to give you the facts.

 

[Marener]

Wrong. You should have watched. Then you would be informed. The NY Times isn't going to give you the facts.

If I’m wrong, tell me how.

Just saying “wrong” doesn’t prove anything.

 

[BS Filter]

If I’m wrong, tell me how.

Just saying “wrong” doesn’t prove anything.

You're wrong because you didn't watch the hearing. You trusted someone else to tell you what happened. If you would have watched the hearing you would be informed.

 

[Marener]

You're wrong because you didn't watch the hearing. You trusted someone else to tell you what happened. If you would have watched the hearing you would be informed.

Informed about what specifically? What do you think I’m unaware of?

 

[BS Filter]

Informed about what specifically? What do you think I’m unaware of?

The truth, obviously.

 

[ActionJackson]

BREAKING: Donald Trump gets the worst news to date about Jack Smith's investigation as legal experts announce that the Special Counsel might seize millions of dollars from his presidential campaign — a death knell for his White House run.

This one is just too perfect...

According to NBC News national security analyst Frank Figliuzzi — who was a former top FBI official — the Justice Department might seize huge amounts of money from Trump's campaign because much of it was raised off of fraudulent claims after the 2020 election.

The January 6th Committee revealed that the Trump campaign raked in $250 million in donations after the Capitol insurrection, claiming that the money would go to a legal fund to overturn the 2020 election. That fund was never created and instead the money was funneled to the Save America PAC.

"This isn’t over yet," said Figliuzzi. "When you raise millions based on a fraudulent claim, you’ve committed a crime. And, you just might have to give those millions back."

His remarks come in the wake of a new report from Politico which revealed that at least one of the interviews the Special Counsel conducted recently was "focused on fundraising and spending by Trump’s political action committee."

Bernard Kerk, the former NYPD commissioner who has been a longtime associate of Rudy Giuliani, was interviewed by investigators and "asked multiple questions about the Save America PAC’s enormous fundraising haul in the weeks between Election Day and the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol."

NYU Law School professor Andrew Weissmann appears to agree with Figliuzzi. He said that there could be a "criminal case about the Trump PAC and forfeiture allegations/seizures." Better still, the case would not even have to reach all the way up to Trump before Smith would be able to seize assets.

What do you think? Should the Justice Department seize Donald Trump's ill-gotten cash?



Sounds reasonable to me since Trump raised millions of dollars under false pretenses - based on the BIG LIE. What do you think?

If he's a Demwit working in the Washington Swamp he can steal whatever he wants. Just ask Joe and Hillary how.

 

[Marener]

The truth, obviously.

Sounds like you don’t really know anything.

I asked for anything specific and you can’t tell me a single thing.

 

[BS Filter]

Sounds like you don’t really know anything.

I asked for anything specific and you can’t tell me a single thing.

Watch the hearing and we can discuss it. Until then, you're just playing games.

 

[Marener]

Watch the hearing and we can discuss it. Until then, you're just playing games.

Ha! You don’t have a clue what you’re talking about, otherwise you wouldn’t be running away from a simple question.

 

[BS Filter]

Ha! You don’t have a clue what you’re talking about, otherwise you wouldn’t be running away from a simple question.

You're the one running. The entire hearing is on YouTube.

 

[Marener]

You're the one running. The entire hearing is on YouTube.

I’m well aware. Congressional hearings are theatre. I rarely listen to them. It’s better to have the details synthesized into actual interesting parts. I can’t sit around listening to 7 hours of Republicans running their mouths. What is it that you think I didn’t get from it?

 

[BS Filter]

I’m well aware. Congressional hearings are theatre. I rarely listen to them. It’s better to have the details synthesized into actual interesting parts. I can’t sit around listening to 7 hours of Republicans running their mouths. What is it that you think I didn’t get from it?

IRS testimony of evidence of Biden corruption and bribes.

 

[Marener]

IRS testimony of evidence of Biden corruption and bribes.

Nope. The IRS agents did not testify that they had evidence of that.

 

[BS Filter]

Nope. The IRS agents did not testify that they had evidence of that.

How do you know? The NY Times tell you that? Money was paid to Hunter. Hunter cut out Joe's portion and put it the bank. No direct payments to Joe. Duh!!

 

[Lakhota]

 

[ThisIsMe]

again, as I posted earlier, this issue may be a non starter anyway, apparently the emails he sent out had the disclaimer in the fine print that large portions of the donations may go to his pac. So, legally, he may be covered.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Communists all of you…

According to you ding bats, anyone who does not liss Trumps ass is a Communist. Brilliant!

 

[Billo_Really]

Soar?

He does do that.

Hey, there's one thing we can agree on!