Crazy Candace Owens breaks social media by not disavowing Hitler when asked about him

as a general rule, if you're considering using Hitler for your political metaphor or analogy, don't. If you're considering justifying any action of Hitler's to make a broader philosophical point, don't.

Just as the popular corollary to Godwin's law dictates, the first person to mention Hitler in an online argument loses by default.

Few hills are worth dying on, but none more so than Hitler as a philosophical justification.
 
This painting PROVES that Donald Trump is literally Hitler.

DyvHMMTX0AATgxO.jpg


It proves the artist is a fucking asshole motherfucker.
 
my friends, we don't have to retrain the dregs of our supposed political tribes. The Right absolutely should purge out "the parasitic cant that defaces" conservatism, as the great William F. Buckley put it. And when grifters and hacks tell us who they are, we should believe them.
 
as a general rule, if you're considering using Hitler for your political metaphor or analogy, don't. If you're considering justifying any action of Hitler's to make a broader philosophical point, don't.

Just as the popular corollary to Godwin's law dictates, the first person to mention Hitler in an online argument loses by default.

Few hills are worth dying on, but none more so than Hitler as a philosophical justification.



That asshole that takes a comment about Hitler out of context and lies about it,


that asshole's actions are on them.


Don't give assholes a pass for being assholes.
 
my friends, we don't have to retrain the dregs of our supposed political tribes. The Right absolutely should purge out "the parasitic cant that defaces" conservatism, as the great William F. Buckley put it. And when grifters and hacks tell us who they are, we should believe them.


Owens did nothing wrong.
 
she blew the answer by not saying explicitly he was evil incarnate

SHE BLEW IT!
He was less evil than many 20th Century COMMUNIST leaders.

Our own FDR was "evil incarnate" but the left idolized the guy.

Hitler learned much from the American left (Margaret Sanger -- hint, hint)
 
Knowledge of history matters, especially when it comes to a topic as important as Nazi Germany. Sadly, Owens offered little contrition for her stupid remarks in a follow up video. Explaining what she meant to say, Owens concluded, "I stand by my statements." Here we see true arrogance and ignorance together: utter confidence that, having now said what she meant to say originally, Owens' historical analysis is accurate.
 
Knowledge of history matters, especially when it comes to a topic as important as Nazi Germany. Sadly, Owens offered little contrition for her stupid remarks in a follow up video. Explaining what she meant to say, Owens concluded, "I stand by my statements." Here we see true arrogance and ignorance together: utter confidence that, having now said what she meant to say originally, Owens' historical analysis is accurate.


She did nothing wrong.
 
Knowledge of history matters, especially when it comes to a topic as important as Nazi Germany. Sadly, Owens offered little contrition for her stupid remarks in a follow up video. Explaining what she meant to say, Owens concluded, "I stand by my statements." Here we see true arrogance and ignorance together: utter confidence that, having now said what she meant to say originally, Owens' historical analysis is accurate.


She did nothing wrong.
i agree. having an absurd opinion is not a crime
 
Knowledge of history matters, especially when it comes to a topic as important as Nazi Germany. Sadly, Owens offered little contrition for her stupid remarks in a follow up video. Explaining what she meant to say, Owens concluded, "I stand by my statements." Here we see true arrogance and ignorance together: utter confidence that, having now said what she meant to say originally, Owens' historical analysis is accurate.
We don't agree with you. Choose another battle. You lost this one
 
Knowledge of history matters, especially when it comes to a topic as important as Nazi Germany. Sadly, Owens offered little contrition for her stupid remarks in a follow up video. Explaining what she meant to say, Owens concluded, "I stand by my statements." Here we see true arrogance and ignorance together: utter confidence that, having now said what she meant to say originally, Owens' historical analysis is accurate.
We don't agree with you. Choose another battle. You lost this one
ok
 
as a general rule, if you're considering using Hitler for your political metaphor or analogy, don't. If you're considering justifying any action of Hitler's to make a broader philosophical point, don't.

Just as the popular corollary to Godwin's law dictates, the first person to mention Hitler in an online argument loses by default.

Few hills are worth dying on, but none more so than Hitler as a philosophical justification.



That asshole that takes a comment about Hitler out of context and lies about it,


that asshole's actions are on them.


Don't give assholes a pass for being assholes.

I like the cut of your jibe


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Hi guys I’m new on this thread let me introduce my I hate a filthy liberal/socialist I think they’re lower than pond scum. Nice meeting you guys [emoji631]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
No they are not actually.
That’s why I include a link.
We had a Nazi running right here in Illinois. As a Republican, obviously.
Which does not prove or support your idiotic assertions
The fact that Nazi's are running as Republicans verifies our worst fears.
 
No they are not actually.
That’s why I include a link.
We had a Nazi running right here in Illinois. As a Republican, obviously.
Which does not prove or support your idiotic assertions
The fact that Nazi's are running as Republicans verifies our worst fears.

Please get you “Facts” straight you sound like one of the many wack-a-doodle.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
JGalt said:
Actually Hitler was the best thing to happen for post-Weimar Germany. Unfortunately for him, the Germans, and the rest of the world, he decided to militarize and re-claim some land that Germany once owned.
Including All Of Czechoslovakia
Without War
Then he further expanded by invading Czechoslovakia, Poland, and other countries.
Territories Into Eastern Russia
Were On The List For Lebensraum
It Was Never A Secret For Readers Of His Book
 
On the “We could evenly distribute the wealth in this country and every man, woman and child would get $55,000 a year.” Isn’t that called stealing?

When the poor steal, it's called crime.
When the rich steal, it's called Profits
When the government steals, it's called taxes.

Happy to have cleared that up for you, Rookie.
 
Knowledge of history matters, especially when it comes to a topic as important as Nazi Germany. Sadly, Owens offered little contrition for her stupid remarks in a follow up video. Explaining what she meant to say, Owens concluded, "I stand by my statements." Here we see true arrogance and ignorance together: utter confidence that, having now said what she meant to say originally, Owens' historical analysis is accurate.


She did nothing wrong.
i agree. having an absurd opinion is not a crime


What was absurd about her opinion? Be specific.
 

Forum List

Back
Top