And, as has been pointed out to you before, your 'logic' is in error. IF CO2 levels are the only variable in climate effects, your point MIGHT have merit.
-------------------------------
I don't think YOUR logic holds much water. CO2 DOES NOT have to be the only climate factor in order for my point to be accurate. So what if there are other factors? We're trying to figure out the contribution of man in all this and to say it's not possible, is TOTALLY illogical. Ever hear of the straw that broke the camel's back? It wasn't just straw or the "other variables" the camel may be carrying, it's the straw that tipped the balance that's the concern.
-------------------------------
I don't think YOUR logic holds much water. CO2 DOES NOT have to be the only climate factor in order for my point to be accurate. So what if there are other factors? We're trying to figure out the contribution of man in all this and to say it's not possible, is TOTALLY illogical. Ever hear of the straw that broke the camel's back? It wasn't just straw or the "other variables" the camel may be carrying, it's the straw that tipped the balance that's the concern.