Crowdstrike

[jc456]

one can't transmit the files, they are too large. You can't piece meal them, that's impossible, they are data files.

You think you can't ftp large data files?

BTW, there is still a physical server for a virtual machine to store data on.

No but hard drive space is partitioned somewhere in storage, which is what the images were copied from. The CPU and main memory do not exist in the real world or tradition box computer, those resources are allocated from the CPU and memory pool. Which is why making a copy of the main memory was crucial.

still a physical hard drive partitioned as the cloud. yep!!! still means one must retrieve it from its file location, and without someone copying the files to the FTP account you mentioned, it ain't going anywhere remotely. just isn't.

The hacker didn't make copies of the hard drives. Ftp is a protocol and a hacker wouldn't use an ftp account or third party software.

I didn't say they made copies of the hard drives, i said the files. And yes they could have installed third party sw and loaded to that, and pulled it off that way, then that would mean there is sw physically on and would identify the source. with an IP address. so again, why wasn't the FBI allowed to look at the server. still comes back to that. hmmmmmmmm round and round circular world the monkey chases the weasel

but that didn't happen. Seth Rich happened.

 

[bendog]

One of the glaring problems with this message board is that people can break the rules and get
banned for saying a bad word or two.....but pushing bullshit like this OP is considered "politics".

The board gives "power" to people who think they need "power."

But the funny thing about the thread is if you really want to admit Trump committed an impeachable offense, argue crowdstrike legitimizes the call. LOL

 

[The Breeze]

One of the glaring problems with this message board is that people can break the rules and get
banned for saying a bad word or two.....but pushing bullshit like this OP is considered "politics".

Do you need a tissue?

 

[BlindBoo]

one can't transmit the files, they are too large. You can't piece meal them, that's impossible, they are data files.

You think you can't ftp large data files?

BTW, there is still a physical server for a virtual machine to store data on.

No but hard drive space is partitioned somewhere in storage, which is what the images were copied from. The CPU and main memory do not exist in the real world or tradition box computer, those resources are allocated from the CPU and memory pool. Which is why making a copy of the main memory was crucial.

still a physical hard drive partitioned as the cloud. yep!!! still means one must retrieve it from its file location, and without someone copying the files to the FTP account you mentioned, it ain't going anywhere remotely. just isn't.

The hacker didn't make copies of the hard drives. Ftp is a protocol and a hacker wouldn't use an ftp account or third party software.

I didn't say they made copies of the hard drives, i said the files. And yes they could have installed third party sw and loaded to that, and pulled it off that way, then that would mean there is sw physically on and would identify the source. with an IP address. so again, why wasn't the FBI allowed to look at the server. still comes back to that. hmmmmmmmm round and round circular world the monkey chases the weasel

but that didn't happen. Seth Rich happened.

Crowdstrike didn't take possession of the servers. Why are you even bothering with why the FBI did anything? You've already said that you believe they were in on the plot too. Why else would they not ask to take position of those virtual servers and allow that guy to get "Clinton'd" and all.....

 

[Pogo]

Crowdstrike gave the FBI and others a copy of the server.... to verify it themselves.... And the FBI did just that..... And more....

They followed the hackers, gathered how and who did it, who paid for it and how it was paid for, how the info also got to Wikileaks etc.... And had enough evidence to charge the perps who directed the theft at the Russian GRU.

got a link??

Did the OP?

Read the transcript...it's out there!

Whelp --- apparently not.

/thread

it doesnt have anything to do with my request

I used your request to take down the OP. Thanks for that.
In other words you were a tool. And a very handy one.

opinions vary,,
and both can be true,,,

The fact that somebody made an ass-sertion and didn't bother to link it is not an "opinion". It's a quantifiable fact.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Crowdstrike gave the FBI and others a copy of the server.... to verify it themselves.... And the FBI did just that..... And more....

They followed the hackers, gathered how and who did it, who paid for it and how it was paid for, how the info also got to Wikileaks etc.... And had enough evidence to charge the perps who directed the theft at the Russian GRU.

Gave them altered versions they inserted

 

[jc456]

one can't transmit the files, they are too large. You can't piece meal them, that's impossible, they are data files.

You think you can't ftp large data files?

BTW, there is still a physical server for a virtual machine to store data on.

No but hard drive space is partitioned somewhere in storage, which is what the images were copied from. The CPU and main memory do not exist in the real world or tradition box computer, those resources are allocated from the CPU and memory pool. Which is why making a copy of the main memory was crucial.

still a physical hard drive partitioned as the cloud. yep!!! still means one must retrieve it from its file location, and without someone copying the files to the FTP account you mentioned, it ain't going anywhere remotely. just isn't.

The hacker didn't make copies of the hard drives. Ftp is a protocol and a hacker wouldn't use an ftp account or third party software.

I didn't say they made copies of the hard drives, i said the files. And yes they could have installed third party sw and loaded to that, and pulled it off that way, then that would mean there is sw physically on and would identify the source. with an IP address. so again, why wasn't the FBI allowed to look at the server. still comes back to that. hmmmmmmmm round and round circular world the monkey chases the weasel

but that didn't happen. Seth Rich happened.

Crowdstrike didn't take possession of the servers. Why are you even bothering with why the FBI did anything? You've already said that you believe they were in on the plot too. Why else would they not ask to take position of those virtual servers and allow that guy to get "Clinton'd" and all.....

virtual servers are still hardware. give them to the FBI and the DNC server. why the need to cover them up? or hide them? what was the concern, if there isn't anything in them, why are you afraid to have them looked at? hmmmmmm?

 

[francoHFW]

OP-another dupe baffled by bulshit....every Republican and Democrat on intelligence committees agree the Russians hacked the DNC computer, gave it to WikiLeaks who gave it to Fox and we ended up with media spending 60% of their time arguing a ridiculous email Scandal for a year and wrecked the election. Our punditocracy is a total disgrace. Fox CNN MSNBC and all your demagogue talk radio swine included. So much easier to have talking heads and going out and finding the news and the truth, incredibly divisive. But at least MSNBC has journalists not propagandists working for them....

 

[jc456]

OP-another dupe baffled by bulshit....every Republican and Democrat on intelligence committees agree the Russians hacked the DNC computer, gave it to WikiLeaks who gave it to Fox and we ended up with media spending 60% of their time arguing a ridiculous email Scandal for a year and wrecked the election. Our punditocracy is a total disgrace. Fox CNN MSNBC and all your demagogue talk radio swine included. So much easier to have talking heads and going out and finding the news and the truth, incredibly divisive. But at least MSNBC has journalists not propagandists working for them....

nope, how can you always miss the facts.

 

[BlindBoo]

You think you can't ftp large data files?

No but hard drive space is partitioned somewhere in storage, which is what the images were copied from. The CPU and main memory do not exist in the real world or tradition box computer, those resources are allocated from the CPU and memory pool. Which is why making a copy of the main memory was crucial.

still a physical hard drive partitioned as the cloud. yep!!! still means one must retrieve it from its file location, and without someone copying the files to the FTP account you mentioned, it ain't going anywhere remotely. just isn't.

The hacker didn't make copies of the hard drives. Ftp is a protocol and a hacker wouldn't use an ftp account or third party software.

I didn't say they made copies of the hard drives, i said the files. And yes they could have installed third party sw and loaded to that, and pulled it off that way, then that would mean there is sw physically on and would identify the source. with an IP address. so again, why wasn't the FBI allowed to look at the server. still comes back to that. hmmmmmmmm round and round circular world the monkey chases the weasel

but that didn't happen. Seth Rich happened.

Crowdstrike didn't take possession of the servers. Why are you even bothering with why the FBI did anything? You've already said that you believe they were in on the plot too. Why else would they not ask to take position of those virtual servers and allow that guy to get "Clinton'd" and all.....

virtual servers are still hardware. give them to the FBI and the DNC server. why the need to cover them up? or hide them? what was the concern, if there isn't anything in them, why are you afraid to have them looked at? hmmmmmm?

That would be called a dedicated server. However Virtual Servers can be turned off and not re-provisioned so as to keep the information for verification purposes.

 

[jc456]

still a physical hard drive partitioned as the cloud. yep!!! still means one must retrieve it from its file location, and without someone copying the files to the FTP account you mentioned, it ain't going anywhere remotely. just isn't.

The hacker didn't make copies of the hard drives. Ftp is a protocol and a hacker wouldn't use an ftp account or third party software.

I didn't say they made copies of the hard drives, i said the files. And yes they could have installed third party sw and loaded to that, and pulled it off that way, then that would mean there is sw physically on and would identify the source. with an IP address. so again, why wasn't the FBI allowed to look at the server. still comes back to that. hmmmmmmmm round and round circular world the monkey chases the weasel

but that didn't happen. Seth Rich happened.

Crowdstrike didn't take possession of the servers. Why are you even bothering with why the FBI did anything? You've already said that you believe they were in on the plot too. Why else would they not ask to take position of those virtual servers and allow that guy to get "Clinton'd" and all.....

virtual servers are still hardware. give them to the FBI and the DNC server. why the need to cover them up? or hide them? what was the concern, if there isn't anything in them, why are you afraid to have them looked at? hmmmmmm?

That would be called a dedicated server. However Virtual Servers can be turned off and not re-provisioned so as to keep the information for verification purposes.

virtual servers still have physical hard drives. the data isn't stored in space.

 

[progressive hunter]

got a link??

Did the OP?

Read the transcript...it's out there!

Whelp --- apparently not.

/thread

it doesnt have anything to do with my request

I used your request to take down the OP. Thanks for that.
In other words you were a tool. And a very handy one.

opinions vary,,
and both can be true,,,

The fact that somebody made an ass-sertion and didn't bother to link it is not an "opinion". It's a quantifiable fact.

I never said it wasnt,,,in fact thats exactly what I did with the hookers comment,,,

 

[BlindBoo]

The hacker didn't make copies of the hard drives. Ftp is a protocol and a hacker wouldn't use an ftp account or third party software.

I didn't say they made copies of the hard drives, i said the files. And yes they could have installed third party sw and loaded to that, and pulled it off that way, then that would mean there is sw physically on and would identify the source. with an IP address. so again, why wasn't the FBI allowed to look at the server. still comes back to that. hmmmmmmmm round and round circular world the monkey chases the weasel

but that didn't happen. Seth Rich happened.

Crowdstrike didn't take possession of the servers. Why are you even bothering with why the FBI did anything? You've already said that you believe they were in on the plot too. Why else would they not ask to take position of those virtual servers and allow that guy to get "Clinton'd" and all.....

virtual servers are still hardware. give them to the FBI and the DNC server. why the need to cover them up? or hide them? what was the concern, if there isn't anything in them, why are you afraid to have them looked at? hmmmmmm?

That would be called a dedicated server. However Virtual Servers can be turned off and not re-provisioned so as to keep the information for verification purposes.

virtual servers still have physical hard drives. the data isn't stored in space.

The servers could still be in an inactive state and copies of the drives could still be made.

 

[francoHFW]

OP-another dupe baffled by bulshit....every Republican and Democrat on intelligence committees agree the Russians hacked the DNC computer, gave it to WikiLeaks who gave it to Fox and we ended up with media spending 60% of their time arguing a ridiculous email Scandal for a year and wrecked the election. Our punditocracy is a total disgrace. Fox CNN MSNBC and all your demagogue talk radio swine included. So much easier to have talking heads and going out and finding the news and the truth, incredibly divisive. But at least MSNBC has journalists not propagandists working for them....

nope, how can you always miss the facts.

Such as, super duper? LOL hilariously ironic. Have you figured out that there are Republicans on these impeachment inquiry committees? you usually fall back into your misinformation....

 

[JustAGuy1]

Crowdstrike gave the FBI and others a copy of the server.... to verify it themselves.... And the FBI did just that..... And more....

They followed the hackers, gathered how and who did it, who paid for it and how it was paid for, how the info also got to Wikileaks etc.... And had enough evidence to charge the perps who directed the theft at the Russian GRU.

Cite your source.

 

[JustAGuy1]

OP-another dupe baffled by bulshit....every Republican and Democrat on intelligence committees agree the Russians hacked the DNC computer, gave it to WikiLeaks who gave it to Fox and we ended up with media spending 60% of their time arguing a ridiculous email Scandal for a year and wrecked the election. Our punditocracy is a total disgrace. Fox CNN MSNBC and all your demagogue talk radio swine included. So much easier to have talking heads and going out and finding the news and the truth, incredibly divisive. But at least MSNBC has journalists not propagandists working for them....

nope, how can you always miss the facts.

Such as, super duper? LOL hilariously ironic. Have you figured out that there are Republicans on these impeachment inquiry committees? you usually fall back into your misinformation....

Have you figured out why Schitt is directing witnesses not to answer their questions?

 

[francoHFW]

OP-another dupe baffled by bulshit....every Republican and Democrat on intelligence committees agree the Russians hacked the DNC computer, gave it to WikiLeaks who gave it to Fox and we ended up with media spending 60% of their time arguing a ridiculous email Scandal for a year and wrecked the election. Our punditocracy is a total disgrace. Fox CNN MSNBC and all your demagogue talk radio swine included. So much easier to have talking heads and going out and finding the news and the truth, incredibly divisive. But at least MSNBC has journalists not propagandists working for them....

nope, how can you always miss the facts.

Such as, super duper? LOL hilariously ironic. Have you figured out that there are Republicans on these impeachment inquiry committees? you usually fall back into your misinformation....

Have you figured out why Schitt is directing witnesses not to answer their questions?

that would be Republican swine trying to find out who the whistleblower is, super duper. Funny what your propaganda machine leaves out every time isn't it?

 

[Rambunctious]

Who could be in Durham’s investigative crosshairs? Obama-era figures have reason to sweat

 

[Rambunctious]

 

[JustAGuy1]

OP-another dupe baffled by bulshit....every Republican and Democrat on intelligence committees agree the Russians hacked the DNC computer, gave it to WikiLeaks who gave it to Fox and we ended up with media spending 60% of their time arguing a ridiculous email Scandal for a year and wrecked the election. Our punditocracy is a total disgrace. Fox CNN MSNBC and all your demagogue talk radio swine included. So much easier to have talking heads and going out and finding the news and the truth, incredibly divisive. But at least MSNBC has journalists not propagandists working for them....

nope, how can you always miss the facts.

Such as, super duper? LOL hilariously ironic. Have you figured out that there are Republicans on these impeachment inquiry committees? you usually fall back into your misinformation....

Have you figured out why Schitt is directing witnesses not to answer their questions?

that would be Republican swine trying to find out who the whistleblower is, super duper. Funny what your propaganda machine leaves out every time isn't it?

Ummmmm, he was "testifying" in front of them, they are in a SCIF , they KNOW who he is.
You really are an idiot.

Speaking to reporters on Capitol Hill, House Minority Whip Steve Scalise, R-La., slammed the hidden process claiming Schiff was instructing witnesses testifying behind the closed doors of the SCIF not to answer questions asked by Republican members.


“He’s directing witnesses not to answer questions that he doesn’t want the witness to answer if they’re asked by Republicans,” Scalise charged. “He’s not cut off one Democrat. He’s not interrupted one Democrat and told a witness not to answer Democrat members’ questions but today he started telling witnesses not to answer questions by certain Republicans.”"

Schiff Directing Witnesses Not To Answer GOP Questions