Crying over the election

[The Great Goose]

emilynghiem they could have dragged up any old unknown and trotted them about.

 

[emilynghiem]

a massive mental disorder

captured nicely on film

Dear jon_berzerk
I'd much rather people internalize the reality that other people don't agree with Statist politics abusing federal govt to mandate social agenda.
And NOT take out this "cognitive dissonance" by imposing anger or projected need for control and security outwardly through more dogma legislated through govt and media attacking other beliefs as invalid.

People need to grieve when their reality is shattered. Why not support people in building a more inclusive and sustainable reality that doesn't deny the equal political beliefs of others in NOT depending on govt for social programming?

 

[emilynghiem]

emilynghiem they could have dragged up any old unknown and trotted them about.

No because like Sanders, Stein and the Greens -- it takes Years to assimilate the truly sustainable democratic models into proven programs or you can't sell them to the public. Sanders and others come across as depending on govt to "impose" worker owned coops through govt as "socialism."

To teach people how to build and manage their own programs can take generations. So no leader can represent this "overnight" taking an "unknown" and expecting to promote these concepts.

The Great Goose I've been sharing model programs and resources for Years and even my fellow progressives don't believe they have ability to do this. Only recently after this election has there been serious interest in taking this route. It's not an overnight change.

For the real progressive ideals to be promoted, the best way is proving they work by example. It would take as many years as Clinton invested for people to associate a real progressive leader with workable solutions.

 

[The Great Goose]

emilynghiem they could have dragged up any old unknown and trotted them about.

No because like Sanders, Stein and the Greens -- it takes Years to assimilate the truly sustainable democratic models into proven programs or you can't sell them to the public. Sanders and others come across as depending on govt to "impose" worker owned coops through govt as "socialism."

To teach people how to build and manage their own programs can take generations. So no leader can represent this "overnight" taking an "unknown" and expecting to promote these concepts.

The Great Goose I've been sharing model programs and resources for Years and even my fellow progressives don't believe they have ability to do this. Only recently after this election has there been serious interest in taking this route. It's not an overnight change.

For the real progressive ideals to be promoted, the best way is proving they work by example. It would take as many years as Clinton invested for people to associate a real progressive leader with workable solutions.

So if someone leads by example you use them?

 

[jon_berzerk]

a massive mental disorder

captured nicely on film

Dear jon_berzerk
I'd much rather people internalize the reality that other people don't agree with Statist politics abusing federal govt to mandate social agenda.
And NOT take out this "cognitive dissonance" by imposing anger or projected need for control and security outwardly through more dogma legislated through govt and media attacking other beliefs as invalid.

People need to grieve when their reality is shattered. Why not support people in building a more inclusive and sustainable reality that doesn't deny the equal political beliefs of others in NOT depending on govt for social programming?

i didnt say the emotions are invalid i said it is a disorder