SwordofDamocles
Active Member
- Dec 9, 2010
- 161
- 11
- 31
Michael Moore = fat retarded, liberal sludge with a little money. 'nuff said.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Y'know, pretending the law doesn't exist doesn't really make it not there.Oh, look! Another leftist claiming that possession of stolen property isn't a crime!
Possession of stolen information is NOT a crime. There is quite a bit of precedence to show it. But of course you've ignored that.
18 U.S.C. § 793 : US Code - Section 793: Gathering, transmitting or losing defense informationWell, looky there. You're wrong.
(e) Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or
control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch,
photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model,
instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or
information relating to the national defense which information the
possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the
United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully
communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated,
delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver,
transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the
same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains
the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the
United States entitled to receive it; or
...
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten
years, or both.
That only applies if Assange is a journalist.Y'know, pretending the law doesn't exist doesn't really make it not there.Possession of stolen information is NOT a crime. There is quite a bit of precedence to show it. But of course you've ignored that.
18 U.S.C. § 793 : US Code - Section 793: Gathering, transmitting or losing defense informationWell, looky there. You're wrong.
(e) Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or
control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch,
photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model,
instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or
information relating to the national defense which information the
possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the
United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully
communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated,
delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver,
transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the
same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains
the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the
United States entitled to receive it; or
...
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten
years, or both.
Wow, you know that's the same section of law that Michell used to attempt to stop the NY Times from publishing the Pentagon Papers? Remember how the Supreme Court ruled in that one?
If not, I'll remind you:
FindLaw | Cases and Codes
Post your address. I mean, people know where you live, right?You're an idiot...but it's my fault?
http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...e-gives-20k-for-assange-bail.html#post3087353
And these places are secret and nobody knows where they are?? Yeah, right....
That only applies if Assange is a journalist.Y'know, pretending the law doesn't exist doesn't really make it not there.
18 U.S.C. § 793 : US Code - Section 793: Gathering, transmitting or losing defense informationWell, looky there. You're wrong.
(e) Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or
control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch,
photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model,
instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or
information relating to the national defense which information the
possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the
United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully
communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated,
delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver,
transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the
same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains
the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the
United States entitled to receive it; or
...
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten
years, or both.
Wow, you know that's the same section of law that Michell used to attempt to stop the NY Times from publishing the Pentagon Papers? Remember how the Supreme Court ruled in that one?
If not, I'll remind you:
FindLaw | Cases and Codes
He's not.
That only applies if Assange is a journalist.
He's not.
Not to change the subject,but $20K does seem pretty stingy considering how wealthy Moore is. He couldn't come up with more than that? What's that sound a bird makes?
That only applies if Assange is a journalist.Wow, you know that's the same section of law that Michell used to attempt to stop the NY Times from publishing the Pentagon Papers? Remember how the Supreme Court ruled in that one?
If not, I'll remind you:
FindLaw | Cases and Codes
He's not.
You don't get to decide who's a journalist and who's not. For all intents and purposes, he is.
That only applies if Assange is a journalist.
He's not.
You don't get to decide who's a journalist and who's not. For all intents and purposes, he is.
Julian Asswipe is about as much a journalist as Opie dope is a centrist.
Wow - did you see the celebrity homes section?Moore is not worth anything near that much. Where are you getting your numbers?This is what I find interesting. Assanges bail is under 500,000 and Moore who is conservatively worth over 100 million only offers a pithy 20 grand? That's almost an insult or is he really just that cheap a bastard?
He's worths 25 million
Michael Moore Net Worth | Celebrity Net Worth
You don't get to decide who's a journalist and who's not. For all intents and purposes, he is.
Julian Asswipe is about as much a journalist as Opie dope is a centrist.
Troll fail.
Apparently, you are mistaken.Moore is not worth anything near that much. Where are you getting your numbers?This is what I find interesting. Assanges bail is under 500,000 and Moore who is conservatively worth over 100 million only offers a pithy 20 grand? That's almost an insult or is he really just that cheap a bastard?
He's not worth a squirt of piss. His assets are worth well over 100 million.
Apparently, you are mistaken.Moore is not worth anything near that much. Where are you getting your numbers?
He's not worth a squirt of piss. His assets are worth well over 100 million.
If you are part of the I hate America club,then you are a hero to the left.
For exposing dirty work and dishonesty, yeah he should be punished for exposing what our elected officials do dishonestly.
Good to know that the lives of Americans - particularly those who live outside US borders - and our troops are less important to you than a bunch of stupid shit.
I'm currently outside of the US and I am not at any risk because of what wikileaks posted. And don't ever again accuse me of thinking that lives of American troops are less important, besides Flaylo, I have other relatives that are in the military and I'm a military vet myself and like I said and will repeat it again, nothing released so far has put troops at risk, the only reason politicians are complaining is because they're afraid their own dirty actions might come to light.
You don't get to decide who's a journalist and who's not. For all intents and purposes, he is.
Julian Asswipe is about as much a journalist as Opie dope is a centrist.
Troll fail.
Julian Asswipe is about as much a journalist as Opie dope is a centrist.
Troll fail.
Assange might call himself a journalist. I could call myself the Queen of England - wouldn't make it true. Assange is not a journalist. He has no degree in journalism, he has not worked as a journalist.... in fact, between him and me, I'd be more accurately described as a journalist than him. But don't let facts get in your way.