Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
From wiki:Yes, because if you state you do not believe in God, since you have no evidence, then you have belief.
Way it is, sunshine.
I know it bugs non-believers, but there it is, what can you do?
No. It MAY be faith--IF the belief is unfounded in valid logic applied to verifiable evidence. IF the strength of denial of valid logic and verifiable evidence is the validating criteria of the belief, THEN it is faith.So if you do not believe in God, and you can't prove it, then you have faith, ...
Otherwise, not so much.
Yes. If you have a belief, then you have a belief. This is not at issue. What is your point?Yes, because if you state you do not believe in God, since you have no evidence, then you have belief.
Way it is, sunshine.
I know it bugs non-believers, but there it is, what can you do?
No. It MAY be faith--IF the belief is unfounded in valid logic applied to verifiable evidence. IF the strength of denial of valid logic and verifiable evidence is the validating criteria of the belief, THEN it is faith.So if you do not believe in God, and you can't prove it, then you have faith, ...
Otherwise, not so much.
As usual, you make nonsensical claims that only serve to expose your profound ignorance. It is not "evolutionist" who claim human DNA is very similar to certain primates but biologists, chemists and researchers.Here ya go but I suggest you getting his book.
Lee Spetner/Edward Max Dialogue
Dr. Lee Spetner
continuing an exchange with Dr. Edward E. Max
© 2001 L.M. Spetner. All Rights Reserved.
--ANOTHER RETARDED COPY/PAST VOMIT PILE SNIPPED--
Dr. Lee Spetner's continued exchange with Dr. Edward E. Max
"So to summarize, although Spetner's arguments are superficially plausible, a deeper look with some knowledge of biochemistry shows massive flaws. Spetner is wrong in the details of the biology, ligand specificity is not directly governed by binding string length as required by Spetner's theory, and ligand binding is not an "all or nothing affair". This invalidates his analyses. Even then, Spetner's own examples do not support his claims. Furthermore, when using his metrics Spetner swaps metrics when one shows inconvenient changes." LINK
Evolutionist claim we humans Dna is 98% similar to a chimp.
Did we evolve from a ape, from a mouse, or maybe a banana ? they say our Dna is 98% similar to a chimp,96% of a mouse and 50% of a banana.
Nature magazine increases the Dna difference to atleast 7.7% between humans and chimps may 27-2004 pages 382-388.
Each cell contains 3 billion base pairs of genetic information if you take that 7.7 % of 3 billion base pairs of Dna you would need 231,000,000 information adding beneficial mutations to turn a chimp into a human. since there are so many harmful mutations you could not get 231,000,000 consectutive beneficial mutations with out interruptions from harmful mutations.
Yes. If you have a belief, then you have a belief. This is not at issue. What is your point?Yes, because if you state you do not believe in God, since you have no evidence, then you have belief.
Way it is, sunshine.
I know it bugs non-believers, but there it is, what can you do?
No. It MAY be faith--IF the belief is unfounded in valid logic applied to verifiable evidence. IF the strength of denial of valid logic and verifiable evidence is the validating criteria of the belief, THEN it is faith.
Otherwise, not so much.
Not this guy. Sorry about your luck.Loki, ima, and holli: if you have a belief that god does not exist, then yes you have faith.Yes. If you have a belief, then you have a belief. This is not at issue. What is your point?Yes, because if you state you do not believe in God, since you have no evidence, then you have belief.
Way it is, sunshine.
I know it bugs non-believers, but there it is, what can you do?
Red-herring."so to summarize, although spetner's arguments are superficially plausible, a deeper look with some knowledge of biochemistry shows massive flaws. Spetner is wrong in the details of the biology, ligand specificity is not directly governed by binding string length as required by spetner's theory, and ligand binding is not an "all or nothing affair". This invalidates his analyses. Even then, spetner's own examples do not support his claims. Furthermore, when using his metrics spetner swaps metrics when one shows inconvenient changes." link
evolutionist claim we humans dna is 98% similar to a chimp.
Did we evolve from a ape, from a mouse, or maybe a banana ? They say our dna is 98% similar to a chimp,96% of a mouse and 50% of a banana.
Nature magazine increases the dna difference to atleast 7.7% between humans and chimps may 27-2004 pages 382-388.
Each cell contains 3 billion base pairs of genetic information if you take that 7.7 % of 3 billion base pairs of dna you would need 231,000,000 information adding beneficial mutations to turn a chimp into a human. Since there are so many harmful mutations you could not get 231,000,000 consectutive beneficial mutations with out interruptions from harmful mutations.
Well, so far every single example (without exception) you've summoned up to illustrate this point of yours has revealed instead the actual reality of the situation is quite the opposite.Everything you posted above there Youwerecreated, .... utter crap.
"If there were any creationists who were actually doing creation science in any industry, or if there were any fruits to be derived from the science of creationism, the usual websites would be delighted to point it out. They routinely proclaim that evolution is dead, and creationism is the future, yet they are strangely silent about their failure to penetrate results-oriented industries."
Oh but they are and they are by looking at the same evidence the evolutionist are looking at and exposing the lies of secularism and natutralism in the fields of science.
Why is that?
While this superficially appears to be true, what you, yourself have demonstrated is that the superstitious routinely purposely lie and fabricate evidence.In the New York Times nov/21/2006 Nobel prize winner in 1979 won it from the field of Physics said anything that we scientists can do to weaken the hold of religion should be done,that sounds like they would purposely lie and fabricate evidence.
Yes, because if you state you do not believe in God, since you have no evidence, then you have belief.
Way it is, sunshine.
I know it bugs non-believers, but there it is, what can you do?
No. It MAY be faith--IF the belief is unfounded in valid logic applied to verifiable evidence. IF the strength of denial of valid logic and verifiable evidence is the validating criteria of the belief, THEN it is faith.So if you do not believe in God, and you can't prove it, then you have faith, ...
Otherwise, not so much.
Not this guy. Sorry about your luck.Loki, ima, and holli: if you have a belief that god does not exist, then yes you have faith.Yes. If you have a belief, then you have a belief. This is not at issue. What is your point?
As usual, you make nonsensical claims that only serve to expose your profound ignorance. It is not "evolutionist" who claim human DNA is very similar to certain primates but biologists, chemists and researchers."So to summarize, although Spetner's arguments are superficially plausible, a deeper look with some knowledge of biochemistry shows massive flaws. Spetner is wrong in the details of the biology, ligand specificity is not directly governed by binding string length as required by Spetner's theory, and ligand binding is not an "all or nothing affair". This invalidates his analyses. Even then, Spetner's own examples do not support his claims. Furthermore, when using his metrics Spetner swaps metrics when one shows inconvenient changes." LINK
Evolutionist claim we humans Dna is 98% similar to a chimp.
Did we evolve from a ape, from a mouse, or maybe a banana ? they say our Dna is 98% similar to a chimp,96% of a mouse and 50% of a banana.
Nature magazine increases the Dna difference to atleast 7.7% between humans and chimps may 27-2004 pages 382-388.
Each cell contains 3 billion base pairs of genetic information if you take that 7.7 % of 3 billion base pairs of Dna you would need 231,000,000 information adding beneficial mutations to turn a chimp into a human. since there are so many harmful mutations you could not get 231,000,000 consectutive beneficial mutations with out interruptions from harmful mutations.
I think that many of the posters here understand your efforts to promote conspiracy theories wherein much of the science community is spending a great of time trying to discredit the creation ministries and Harun Yahya but these efforts are wasted. People like you and Harun Yahya do a workman-like job discrediting yourselves.
What "alternative theory to evolution" are you talking about? The one you propose that is founded upon magic?Well, so far every single example (without exception) you've summoned up to illustrate this point of yours has revealed instead the actual reality of the situation is quite the opposite.Oh but they are and they are by looking at the same evidence the evolutionist are looking at and exposing the lies of secularism and natutralism in the fields of science.
Why is that?
While this superficially appears to be true, what you, yourself have demonstrated is that the superstitious routinely purposely lie and fabricate evidence.In the New York Times nov/21/2006 Nobel prize winner in 1979 won it from the field of Physics said anything that we scientists can do to weaken the hold of religion should be done,that sounds like they would purposely lie and fabricate evidence.
No these people will do what it takes to destroy the alternative theory to evolution. Falsely fabricating evidence,and purposely dismissing evidence that contradicts their theory.
Wrong. The nonsense that is being used to brainwash young people is the nonsense retards like you fabricate from your dishonest quote-mining efforts, obvious distortions of science, intentional application of logical fallacy, and shameless disinformation. No one is impressed that you can demonstrate that the nonsense you have concocted is nonsense. And your retarded victory dances are all just laughable.Unfortunately young people are brainwashed with this nonsense and that is a fact now and then some do work in the field that allows them to see the nonsense. The honest in the fields science sometimes openly admits to the truth. I knew a teacher that announced to his class that by laws and his profession I am forced to teach a theory I no longer believe.
No faith is required at all for atheism. None.Yes, because if you state you do not believe in God, since you have no evidence, then you have belief.
Way it is, sunshine.
I know it bugs non-believers, but there it is, what can you do?
No. It MAY be faith--IF the belief is unfounded in valid logic applied to verifiable evidence. IF the strength of denial of valid logic and verifiable evidence is the validating criteria of the belief, THEN it is faith.
Otherwise, not so much.
To atheist atheism is a theory but it is a belief built on faith because they lack evidence to prove the theory correct same with macro evolution.
No Cupcake, I'm not the man behind the curtain.Yup, you are the man behind the curtain.
Can't hide, sunshine.
Not this guy. Sorry about your luck.Loki, ima, and holli: if you have a belief that god does not exist, then yes you have faith.
Using Google as a vehicle to cut and paste huge volumes of material you don't understand is an exercise in wasting time. Your cut and paste referencing Spetner has already been shown to be manufactured and flawed.As usual, you make nonsensical claims that only serve to expose your profound ignorance. It is not "evolutionist" who claim human DNA is very similar to certain primates but biologists, chemists and researchers.Evolutionist claim we humans Dna is 98% similar to a chimp.
Did we evolve from a ape, from a mouse, or maybe a banana ? they say our Dna is 98% similar to a chimp,96% of a mouse and 50% of a banana.
Nature magazine increases the Dna difference to atleast 7.7% between humans and chimps may 27-2004 pages 382-388.
Each cell contains 3 billion base pairs of genetic information if you take that 7.7 % of 3 billion base pairs of Dna you would need 231,000,000 information adding beneficial mutations to turn a chimp into a human. since there are so many harmful mutations you could not get 231,000,000 consectutive beneficial mutations with out interruptions from harmful mutations.
I think that many of the posters here understand your efforts to promote conspiracy theories wherein much of the science community is spending a great of time trying to discredit the creation ministries and Harun Yahya but these efforts are wasted. People like you and Harun Yahya do a workman-like job discrediting yourselves.
Please you have the ability to google,please provide evidence and rebuttal what I say don't make these blanket statments of rhetoric.
Magic?Funny, the mouse Dna is 96% similar to human Dna further showing the only way we are related is by God being the designer of both.
Funny, the mouse Dna is 96% similar to human Dna further showing the only way we are related is by God being the designer of both.
Funny, the mouse Dna is 96% similar to human Dna further showing the only way we are related is by God being the designer of both.
What "alternative theory to evolution" are you talking about? The one you propose that is founded upon magic?Well, so far every single example (without exception) you've summoned up to illustrate this point of yours has revealed instead the actual reality of the situation is quite the opposite.
Why is that?
While this superficially appears to be true, what you, yourself have demonstrated is that the superstitious routinely purposely lie and fabricate evidence.
No these people will do what it takes to destroy the alternative theory to evolution. Falsely fabricating evidence,and purposely dismissing evidence that contradicts their theory.
Wrong. The nonsense that is being used to brainwash young people is the nonsense retards like you fabricate from your dishonest quote-mining efforts, obvious distortions of science, intentional application of logical fallacy, and shameless disinformation. No one is impressed that you can demonstrate that the nonsense you have concocted is nonsense. And your retarded victory dances are all just laughable.Unfortunately young people are brainwashed with this nonsense and that is a fact now and then some do work in the field that allows them to see the nonsense. The honest in the fields science sometimes openly admits to the truth. I knew a teacher that announced to his class that by laws and his profession I am forced to teach a theory I no longer believe.
Yet toddlers are susceptible to your anti-rational fairy tales, and the consequence is that they become intellectually-defective, and morally-incompetent retards like you.
