Deatails on Democratic Plans to Stage Violent Protests at Trump Rallies and Blame Trump for Violence

JimBowie1958

Old Fogey
Sep 25, 2011
63,590
16,767
2,220
The public isnt so stupid that they cant figure this shit out. Now that we have the proof, the Clinton Media is simply ignoring it to talk about Trumps nonexistent threat to have Hillary assassinated.

Just look at hat slide the sent each other to see how duplicitous these lying fucks really are.

Left Planned to Stage Violence to Bring Down Trump

Much of the mainstream media, following the Clinton campaign’s talking points, have accused Donald Trump of suggesting that Second Amendment supporters assassinate Hillary Clinton.
In deflecting that false charge, Trump’s own spokesperson, Katrina Pierson, made an interesting observation: that it has been the Democrats’ strategy all along to associate Trump with violence.

And for that purpose, it did not matter whether the violence was caused by Trump supporters, or by his opponents....

And for the left, that was precisely the point: creating violence is a no-lose strategy. If protesters can provoke Trump supporters to be violent, they embarrass Trump and cast him as a fascist. And if the protesters themselves are violent, voters will understand that a Trump victory will be met with violent mob resistance.

The left has recruited some Beltway Republicans — the NeverTrump faction — as a willing echo chamber for this meme. Mere hours before the San Jose riot, David French — then considering a third-party run for president to undermine Trump and give the election to Hillary Clinton — accused Trump of inciting violence.

Trump’s primary opponents, too, blamed Trump for the riot that closed down his Chicago rally in April — rather than blaming the organized left-wing groups that created the chaos.

All of that has helped the left establish the predicate for future spin, so that when Donald Trump cites the familiar refrain that gun owners will defend their rights, he is accused of wanting to assassinate Hillary Clinton, and large portions of the media — including conservative media — believe it.
.
 
The public isnt so stupid that they cant figure this shit out. Now that we have the proof, the Clinton Media is simply ignoring it to talk about Trumps nonexistent threat to have Hillary assassinated.

Just look at hat slide the sent each other to see how duplicitous these lying fucks really are.

Left Planned to Stage Violence to Bring Down Trump

Much of the mainstream media, following the Clinton campaign’s talking points, have accused Donald Trump of suggesting that Second Amendment supporters assassinate Hillary Clinton.
In deflecting that false charge, Trump’s own spokesperson, Katrina Pierson, made an interesting observation: that it has been the Democrats’ strategy all along to associate Trump with violence.

And for that purpose, it did not matter whether the violence was caused by Trump supporters, or by his opponents....

And for the left, that was precisely the point: creating violence is a no-lose strategy. If protesters can provoke Trump supporters to be violent, they embarrass Trump and cast him as a fascist. And if the protesters themselves are violent, voters will understand that a Trump victory will be met with violent mob resistance.

The left has recruited some Beltway Republicans — the NeverTrump faction — as a willing echo chamber for this meme. Mere hours before the San Jose riot, David French — then considering a third-party run for president to undermine Trump and give the election to Hillary Clinton — accused Trump of inciting violence.

Trump’s primary opponents, too, blamed Trump for the riot that closed down his Chicago rally in April — rather than blaming the organized left-wing groups that created the chaos.

All of that has helped the left establish the predicate for future spin, so that when Donald Trump cites the familiar refrain that gun owners will defend their rights, he is accused of wanting to assassinate Hillary Clinton, and large portions of the media — including conservative media — believe it.
.
Good old Breitbart! A gold medalist at getting the excuses out there ahead of the event. Makes it a lot easier to swallow when it precedes the facts. A tactic worthy of a Putin. But have you noticed that much of the Never Trump crowd are not pro-Hillary as much as anti-Trump?
 
Good old Breitbart! A gold medalist at getting the excuses out there ahead of the event.
More libtard stupid bullshit, not even realizing that he is committing a classic fallacy of attacking the messenger rather than the facts brought by the messenger.
 
Good old Breitbart! A gold medalist at getting the excuses out there ahead of the event.
More libtard stupid bullshit, not even realizing that he is committing a classic fallacy of attacking the messenger rather than the facts brought by the messenger.
Touchy! Touchy! Breitbart places blame on someone he hates for a future event and I called you on it for unquestioning belief. But it IS a good ploy. As I said, tried and true. It gives you credibility to complain about any protest and disregard the protesters without a second thought. Disagreeing with Breitbart, whoever THAT is, is not attacking the messenger.
 
The public is getting wise to this tactic especially when Trump supporters are attacked just going about their lives.

If it is this bad now, when Trump wins the left will be in open rebellion.
 
The public is getting wise to this tactic especially when Trump supporters are attacked just going about their lives.

If it is this bad now, when Trump wins the left will be in open rebellion.
If 'the left' didn't rise up over the Bush 2K fiasco, they'll survive Trump. Besides, there are enough Republicans who see him as a babbling frothing danger, so the left can just stay home and watch the show.
 
the only meaningful conclusion that can be drawn from this: hillary cannot get elected without the support of the ''never trump'' republicans.
 
The 'Never Trump' crowd needs no encouragement from the Democrats. Trump's continued insane comments are enough to keep them thinking that way.

One has to wonder how anyone can think that alienating Hispanics, Blacks, Asians, Native Americans, and women can lead to an election victory? Not only that, but also alienating the media, academics, and anyone with more than a graded school education. All he has now is stupid angry old white men. The rest of Americans hold the man in contempt.
 
It is not the liberals on this board that are constantly wishing for the chance to shoot their fellow Americans. It is the 'Conservatives' constantly making that statement. It was not Clinton stating that Trump should be shot, it was and is Trump and his minions.
 

Forum List

Back
Top