then I think you need to read the list some more .it is your argument that is unsound. one could have a army of educated and experienced and simply dismiss it all to no end using your logic .we counted on these men and woman to head are uranium enrichment projects .lead NASA projects commanding generals,milatery crash experts, top level CIA and FBI agents etc etc.. and there's not just one or two of them they have served with honor through multiple administrations i really don't believe they are all mentally ill or in a conspiracy with a agenda they have little if anything to gain and much to lose and the most disturbing part of it all to you should be why are you getting this info from eots., I have viewed independent films that feature these statements and they state this is the only voice they have ,they cant get a 5 min interview in the controlled media..no Glen Beck no Oriely or Anderson Cooper. they only want to talk to easy to dismiss celebrity's and shills that claim to represent those calling for a real investigation to come and talk about holograms..doesn't this raise a red flag for you..don't you question...why
http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/
Of course I want to know the truth. By I'm also objective enough to see that those claiming to want the truth really aren't after that. They and you simply want some form of public affirmation that there is some conspiracy afoot. I know this isn't the only conspiracy you believe in. I bet we could back through pages of history and I bet you would have issues with any number of issues with the 'official' history of events. That screams lack of credibility. The evidence that you aren't interested in truth is in this very thread. I tried to have a real objective conversation about the questions you and your ilk have and you completely dismiss it.
We can sit here an debate how the towers fell or whatever, but neither of us are engineers and at the end of the day there are as many people with credentials backing one side as the other. Your main argument over and over has been these people have credentials. Clearly you have to resort to that because you probably don't have the engineering, physics or chemistry knowledge yourself to refute the 'official' story.
You say knock of the popular mechanics bit. Why? Why do you believe whole heartedly in one thing, but complete dismiss another? Those aren't teh actions of someone interested in trruth. You have yet to explain why the side that pokes big huge holes in the conspiracy theories shouldn't be given the time of day.
Are there questions we don't have sufficient answers to everything that happened or didnt happen that day? No. But again you can't seem to make the very basic distinciton between the goal of finding the truth and your horse with blinders on attempt to prove a conspiracy. there is a very real difference.