Oldstyle
Platinum Member
- Jul 19, 2011
- 31,206
- 4,935
Oh nice, I hadn't seen that the NFL made an official statement on the matter. Would you mind linking to it?
Is that your explanation for the 11 deflated balls? Are you saying there was not a rule? I cannot tell.
Again, this has nothing to with the result of the game. It has to do with violating the rules. Patriots did it.
Their press conferences yesterday should have been boiled down to one statement.
"I do not know."
Could have saved us a lot of time.
This whole thing is going to fall on some scapegoat. I am predicting the ball boy.
ESPN has reported that during New England’s 45-7 victory against the Indianapolis Colts in the AFC Championship Game at Gillette Stadium, 11 of the Patriots’ 12 game balls were under-inflated by 2 pounds of air pressure. Rules call for 12.5 to 13.5 pounds per square inch when the officials gauge the balls two hours and 15 minutes prior to kickoff and any other time during the game.
Former NFL official Gerry Austin told ESPN yesterday that the Patriots’ 12th ball was also under-inflated but not by 2 pounds. Austin also said all 12 of the Colts’ balls were properly inflated when they were measured at halftime.
Maybe to you, that is not official.
ESPN and a former NFL official? Nope, that is not, in fact, an official statement from the NFL, as far as I'm concerned. It shouldn't be as far as you're concerned either.
Ahhhh, so are you saying they did not have deflated balls, and are you saying there is no rule and the referees did not replace them at half time?
Is, this your claim? It is only being reported and so therefore it did not actually happen until the NFL acknowledges that it happened?
Or.....
Are you all saying if it is true, then it is not a big deal? I personally think that is what you are saying. That would of course mean a baseball player ought to be able to alter their bats and cork them. I think pitchers ought to be able to whatever they want to do with the balls. I mean so long as we think altering official balls and changing it from the stated standard is no big deal, then why not?
Or is it that you think like many think that this all about picking the poor Patriots?
Should golfers be able to alter their equipment? I mean, why have any rules if the rules are not really a big deal.
----------
Pats fans are funny. Were the Saints picked on when they suspended their coach for a year? Were the Ravens picked on after the commissioner decided to suspend Ray Rice indefinitely after he had already decided on the punishment?
The Pats were not "picked on" for spy gate. They are not being "picked on" now. There are rules, they violated them deliberately. Period. There is no gray area. It is black and white.
I actually wasn't saying any of those things. Full disclosure: I don't think it's a big deal and I think that this week has been a fucking joke.
What I was saying is that until the NFL makes an official statement, we don't have any concrete facts to proceed with. A lot of the reporting has been contradicted. I think it's fair to say that the balls were under inflated, but until we know what the NFL has found we don't actually know how they got that way. Schefter reported the other day that the NFL was having trouble linking the Patriots to anything. There are reports that the NFL set up a sting operation, which, if true, would be fucking ridiculous.
And my personal opinion on the matter isn't fact. Neither is yours. Having said that, I have a hard time believing that Brady and Belichick would deny it so vehemently if there was any chance they would be proven wrong. This is a team known for stonewalling the media at every turn. Keeping their mouths shut might not have endeared the media toward them, but it would've been par for the course. IIRC, during Spygate Belichick never claimed he didn't do it, just that he believed it was within the rules, which the NFL disagreed with.
Official or unofficial statement does not mean we cannot express an opinion. My point is there is an argument that is an actual fallacy that it had nothing to do with the result of the AFC Championship game.
That seems to be the JUSTIFICATION for the violation of the rule. Deliberate violation btw. There is no justification.
The NFL will not make official statement until AFTER the super bowl. The NFL is a business, and that is the way it will be handled. I cannot stand Goodell, but his job to be the guy to take arrows for the owners.
Now, there were elements of spygate that were not within the rules. The fact the Mangini is the one that reported it is also telling, considering he knew what the effects of the taping was. He took part in it after all when he was with the Pats staff. If, it was not really a big deal and it had no effect at all, then I doubt Mangini would have cared all that much.
The Pats right now have a reputation that they brought in themselves. I certainly do not buy into the notion that they had no idea. I also do not think they only did it against the Colts.
Is it a big giant deal? No. It really isn't. Then again, it is a violation, and something will need to be done.
Make no mistake, this will effect the Pats in the SB one of two ways. Either the distraction will be so great that they will be playing a horrific game. Or, it will really inspire Brady to have a great game, ala when people were writing him off after the Chiefs game this year.
Mangini made a big deal about it because he was the coach of the Jets at that point and wanted to harm the Patriots. It's a testament to the kind of person that Mangini "is".