Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Liberals are the most information-deprived individuals on earth. Of course. They watch CNN, MSNBC, PBS, and read the New York Times. When I ask the airheads if they would like to take my Islamization Quiz, they ask me >> "Islamization. What's that ?"They keep saying the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor and the Earth orbits the sun. Damn libruls.
They must have been time travelers since the list was first published in 1919, before either had been born yet.So, Cloward, and Piven were inspired, in 1966, by a book that Saul Alinsky wouldn't even write until 1971? What were they? Time travellers?Notice how the Right, like Tramp, tries to bluff you when they are caught lying!!just the familiar FAKE QUOTE from the FAKE NEWS Right!!!View attachment 125549
Sound familiar
If the Right couldn't lie, the Right couldn't breathe.
Learn a little history dumbass and maybe you can detach from the dumbed down public side of uniformed sheeple.
View attachment 125631
Author Saul Alinsky
Country U.S.A.
Language English
Subject Grassroots, community organizing
Publisher Random House
Publication date
1971
Pages 196 pp
The list you posted earlier does NOT appear anywhere in the book "Rules For Radicals." Which, of course, is why you gave no Chapter or page number for the fake quote.
The book does have a "list" in it and so to the moronic "logic" of the Right, having ONE list means that it contains ALL lists the Right can IMAGINE!!!!
BTW, the Communist list you posted earlier originated in 1919 when Alinsky was but 10 years old and had not yet published anything!!!
The first is the 8 point plan to implement Socialism. This plan was not enumerated in Alinsky’s book, but Alinsky inspired two Columbia University sociologists Richard Andrew Cloward and Frances Fox Piven to devise the “Cloward-Piven Strategy” which seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse. This strategy is often attributed to Alinsky and left wing websites like Snopes have tried to discredit the plan by declaring it false because Alinsky didn’t actually write the 8 steps in his book. But Snopes conveniently fails to correctly attribute the work to Cloward and Piven.
Section 1:
How to create a social state – The Cloward-Piven Strategy:
There are eight levels of control that must be obtained before you are able to create a social state.
- Healthcare– Control healthcare and you control the people.
- Poverty – Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.
- Debt – Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.
- Gun Control – Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state
- Welfare – Take control of every aspect of their lives. (Food, Housing, and Income)
- Education – Take control of what people read and listen to us“ take control of what children learn in school.
- Religion – Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools.
- Class Warfare – Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.
No. that is called supposition. That isn't evidence.Oh brother! Like your Cook report number for Hillary doesn't include millions of illegal alien votes, right ? You expect us to buy that ?Per The Cook Report:
Damn those libruls for pushing a narrative based on actual, verifiable, demonstrable facts. Illegals voted? How many? And what demonstrable, verifiable evidence is there to support the number you offer?[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Clinton Trump Others Clinton % Trump % Others % Dem '12 Margin Dem '16 Margin Margin Shift Total '12 Votes Total '16 Votes Raw Votes vs. '12 Total 65,844,610 62,979,636 48.20% 46.10% 5.70% 3.90% 2.10% -1.80% 129,075,630 136,628,459 2,573,165 11.9%
"Demonstrable ?" "Verifiable ?" HA HA HA. You mean according to liberal definitions of "evidence" don't you ? Well of course. Liberals always laughably expect everyone to conform to THEIR definitions of proof (LIBERAL reports from LIBERAL universities, LIBERAL think tanks, LIBERAL media, etc)
Now that we've got that out of the way, let's look at the REAL evidence (which I've already posted many times before) >>
Proof A
1 Trump said he would deport illegal aliens.
2. Illegal aliens do things illegally. (a way of life for them)
3. There are virtually no barriers to voting illegally.
Note: this is called INTELLIGENCE
Proof B
Great. Post that survey, your methodology, and the results, for us to look at, and verify.I have done a 40 year survey on illegal aliens, in 4 states of the US, and 12 counties. They consistently tell me (in Spanish of course) that they vote (among other illegal things they do), and I have been WATCHING them vote, for decades
Can your liberal sources provide "proof" that fish can swim ?
Yes it certainly IS evidence. BOTH A & B. Best evidence there is. Better than the FAKE liberal reportersThat's speculation. There's not much value there. It's certainly NOT evidence.
That's exacty the problem information-deprived liberals have. They don't know how much they don't know.Because you 'just know' the Earth doesn't orbit the sun right? LOL
Ignorance does not recognize itself.
It isn't evidence according to LIBERALS definition of evidence. BUt we need not adhere to that absurd definiton (university studies, think tanks, media reports, etc ) - ALL BY LIBERALS.Great. Post that survey, your methodology, and the results, for us to look at, and verify.
I've shown my evidence. If you choose to deny, that's YOUR problem.Yes, he did, and you have zero evidence showing otherwise
NO, I did NOT post the stupidest possible crap. The stupidest possible crap is expecting the American people to believe that illegal aliens haven't been voting (by the millions) for 70 years now. Liberals have a great talent.>> Insulting peoples' intelligence.GREAT.....You post the stupidest possible crap, and label it intelligence. Irony is at explosive levels.
NO, I did NOT post the stupidest possible crap. The stupidest possible crap is expecting the American people to believe that illegal aliens haven't been voting (by the millions) for 70 years now. Liberals have a great talent.>> Insulting peoples' intelligence.GREAT.....You post the stupidest possible crap, and label it intelligence. Irony is at explosive levels.
I don't know whether it fits into my methodology. I haven't seen your data.. A scientifiically conducted survey has writen questions, recorded answers, and statistically varifiable data. You claim to have conducted this "40-year survey", so surely you have the questions you asked, the number of respondents, and the data of how those respondents answered the questions, right? Share that data. Or are you just bullshitting us, and your "survey" consisted of bitching at the local bar for the last forty years?It isn't evidence according to LIBERALS definition of evidence. BUt we need not adhere to that absurd definiton (university studies, think tanks, media reports, etc ) - ALL BY LIBERALS.Great. Post that survey, your methodology, and the results, for us to look at, and verify.
As for yiour >> "Post that survey, your methodology, and the results, for us to look at, and verify", I just DID,
Here it is again >> I have done a 40 year survey on illegal aliens, in 4 states of the US, and 12 counties. They consistently tell me (in Spanish of course) that they vote (among other illegal things they do), and I have been WATCHING them vote, for decades
What's the matter ? Doesn't fit into YOUR methodolgy, that you've been programmed to require ? This is your deprogramming. You're welcome.
Your definition of survey is not necessarily what is necessary to be accurate and valid. Not necessary to have written questions, recorded answers, and the data IS statistically verifiable. All on eneed do to verify it is the a=same thing I did. Go around and ask the illegal aliens if they voted or not. Can't be sure they're illegal ? No problem. Just give the a couple of beers. Then they'll tell you EVERYTHING. I know thi sbetter than your university boys and think tanks. i really do.I don't know whether it fits into my methodology. mI haven't seen your data.. A scientifiically conducted survey has writen questions, recorded answers, and statistically varifiable data. You claim to have conducted this "40-year survey", so surely you have the questions you asked, the number of respondents, and the data of how those respondents answered the questions, right? Share that data. Or are you just bullshitting us, and your "survey" consisted of bitching at the local bar for the last forty years?
That's exacty the problem information-deprived liberals have. They don't know how much they don't know.Because you 'just know' the Earth doesn't orbit the sun right? LOL
Ignorance does not recognize itself.
Because you just know who Lina Morales and Peter DiGangi are, right ? Right Issac ? Right? Right ?
Really? Let's look at that "proof" under "A", shall we?Yes it certainly IS evidence. BOTH A & B. Best evidence there is. Better than the FAKE liberal reportersThat's speculation. There's not much value there. It's certainly NOT evidence.
Well, yes he did claim that. Unfortunately, according to the data, while Trump is arresting more people than Obama did, actual deprtaions is down by 1.2%, so he's not actually living up to that promise, now is he? This is called separating fact from rhetoric. I understand if that is a concept that seems a bit complicated to you.Proof A
1 Trump said he would deport illegal aliens.
See? This is the popular myth. Unfortunately it simply isn't supported by actual data, and evidence. That makes this opinion, not fact. And opinion, as much as you might like it to be so, is not "proof" of anything beyond your own personal biases.2. Illegal aliens do things illegally. (a way of life for them)
Now this is, arguably, a true statement. However, again, the vast body of actual evidence indicates that this is because they aren't needed, as in person voter fraud is so rare as to be almost statistically non-existant. Note that statistically non-existant does not mean that it never happens; rather it means that it is so rare that, statistically, it has absolutely no effect on elections.3. There are virtually no barriers to voting illegally.
Note: this is called INTELLIGENCE
Wait...you mean "Because Trump said so," isn't evidence?!?! Really???? colour me shocked.Unless new evidence comes out otherwise, Trump lost the popular vote.
