protectionist
Diamond Member
- Oct 20, 2013
- 56,993
- 18,296
- 2,250
- Thread starter
- #141
The mere fact that you are asking for evidence of the illegal alien vote is a laughingstock. Have you no shame ?I think you were in combat too long….last year.
![slap :slap: :slap:](/styles/smilies/slap.gif)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
The mere fact that you are asking for evidence of the illegal alien vote is a laughingstock. Have you no shame ?I think you were in combat too long….last year.
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is why we ended up with Lord Dampnuts as President. Because we have dumbed down America to the point where "Because I said so" is actually considered viable evidence to support the "alternative facts" of the clueless, the uneducated, and the idiotic, who know they are angry, and need an excuse, however irrational, illogical, and evidence-free their excuse may be.1. Sez you.All of your "proofs" have been exposed for nonsense. You are dismissed. Thank you for playing. Do feel free to pick up your parting gifts on the way out."Dismissed" only within YOUR laughingstock definition of what constitutes proof. I think I'm still waiting for an answer to the question about how you came to think we all would accept that.
2. The mere fact that you are asking for evidence of the illegal alien vote is a laughingstock. Have you no shame ?The whole world isn't watching you...They are laughing at you.
![]()
It's not just because I said so. I gave two perfectly valid proofs You're just too programmed into your little, narrow confines, to be able to comprehend. That's YOUR problem.And this, ladies and gentlemen, is why we ended up with Lord Dampnuts as President. Because we have dumbed down America to the point where "Because I said so" is actually considered viable evidence to support the "alternative facts" of the clueless, the uneducated, and the idiotic, who know they are angry, and need an excuse, however irrational, illogical, and evidence-free their excuse may be.
That's a lie. I dissected your first proof, and your second proof is a 40-year-old alleged self-conducted study with no notes, no data, no report. In effect, "Because I said so,"It's not just because I said so. I gave two perfectly valid proofs You're just too programmed into your little, narrow confines, to be able to comprehend. That's YOUR problem.And this, ladies and gentlemen, is why we ended up with Lord Dampnuts as President. Because we have dumbed down America to the point where "Because I said so" is actually considered viable evidence to support the "alternative facts" of the clueless, the uneducated, and the idiotic, who know they are angry, and need an excuse, however irrational, illogical, and evidence-free their excuse may be.
No lie. I gave 2 valid proofs. LOL. They just don't fit YOUR little narrow conception of proof (some liberal, laughabl study) As for what I demonstrate of education, that's just your subjectivity, with no attachment to any objectivity and the whole conversation is RELATIVE.That's a lie. I dissected your first proof, and your second proof is a 40-year-old alleged self-conducted study with no notes, no data, no report. In effect, "Because I said so,"
As to your alleged education, you are demonstrating no evidence of such an education, either.
You forgot the 4th dimension: Proof.HA HA. Liberals amuse me. They define "proof" as a link to some LIBERAL university study, some LIBERAL think tank study, some LIBERAL media report, etc. But common sense ? They never heard of it.You provided zero evidence. I mine as well fall asleep, at least then your dream might come true.
You provided not a single link backing up your claim, not a single iota of proof.
Your definition of proof doesn't rate.
Proof A is all that is necessary. Nothing more.
Proof A
1 Trump said he would deport illegal aliens.
2. Illegal aliens do things illegally. (a way of life for them)
3. There are virtually no barriers to voting illegally.
Note: this is called INTELLIGENCE & Common Sense (conservative evidence)
A second point to consider is the mere fact that you are asking for evidence of illegal aliens voting.
That's a laughingstock. Have you no shame ? LOL. The whole world isn't just watching you. They areat you.
![]()
You forgot the 4th dimension: Proof.
You forgot to use your brain.You forgot the 4th dimension: Proof.
To the BOLD: That's because "proof" requires evidence that is true, accurate, and verifiable. I demonstrated that neither of your fake "proofs" were any of those things. Thus they only constitute "proof" to the uneducated for whom "Because I said so" is good enough.No lie. I gave 2 valid proofs. LOL. They just don't fit YOUR little narrow conception of proof (some liberal, laughabl study) As for what I demonstrate of education, that's just your subjectivity, with no attachment to any objectivity and the whole conversation is RELATIVE.That's a lie. I dissected your first proof, and your second proof is a 40-year-old alleged self-conducted study with no notes, no data, no report. In effect, "Because I said so,"
As to your alleged education, you are demonstrating no evidence of such an education, either.
So now can you show us some proof that fish can swim ?![]()
I don't really need to when dealing with elementary level reasoning such as yours.You forgot to use your brain.You forgot the 4th dimension: Proof.![]()
No that's not the only proof. The "listen to me" "proof" is the stuff from liberal think tanks, universities, media etc who laughably strut themselves off as authorities that we all must believe.Ok so its readily apparent the only proof you have is "Listen to me."
If I did that, then liberals have proof that Bush was behind 9/11, that Clinton had a surplus, that the stains on Monicas dress were ice cream....
Thats what konservatives do when cornered. They play the" liberal" card.You forgot the 4th dimension: Proof.
He lost all credibility when he referred to me as a liberal.![]()
"Elementary" ? HA HA. Is that what your liberal media/university masters are programming you to say, now ? How pathetic.I don't really need to when dealing with elementary level reasoning such as yours.
If it walks and talks like a liberal, .........it's a liberal.Thats what konservatives do when cornered. They play the" liberal" card.
obviously you have never attended a university...glad to see you man up and admit that."Elementary" ? HA HA. Is that what your liberal media/university masters are programming you to say, now ? How pathetic.I don't really need to when dealing with elementary level reasoning such as yours.
I'm just glad you aren't the final authority to determine THAT!If it walks and talks like a liberal, .........it's a liberal.Thats what konservatives do when cornered. They play the" liberal" card.![]()
NO, you did NOT demonstrate that. Not at all. Quite the contrary i demonstrated that my Proof A is 100% true, accurate, verifiable,and UNDENIABLE. By objective people that is. One doesn't expect a liberal robot to say anything other than what his his university masters have programmed him to say.To the BOLD: That's because "proof" requires evidence that is true, accurate, and verifiable. I demonstrated that neither of your fake "proofs" were any of those things. Thus they only constitute "proof" to the uneducated for whom "Because I said so" is good enough.
YOU admitted it. I didn't.obviously you have never attended a university...glad to see you man up and admit that.