Dem 2020 Presidential platform: Ban 'assault weapons'!!!!'

[francoHFW]

The dems always whine about guns, and then nothing happens, they are banned in Chicago, how is that working?
It's not the guns, the US always had guns, and no mass shootings, what's different now?

Nut jobs with military weapons that seems
to go right along with their insanity.... They seem to like buying them at stores or gun shows.

One of these days, you will add sometihng meaningful to a conversation.
Today is not that day.

Tell it to the 68 people killed in Las Vegas. The insane who are Mass killers seem to love military style weapons....

 

[francoHFW]

Their whole platform wouldn't even benefit a third world country.

would sure as hell help the middle class and your friends and family, brainwashed functional moron....

 

[miketx]

No surprise, right?
Every Dem who spoke on guns in the 2 nights of debate declared the need to ban 'assault weapon' - to save our schools, to save our kids, shopping malls, movie theaters, gay bars, etc. It's almost as if this little bit of leftist dogma is chiseled into their souls.

A question for those who agree with the candidates:
If there is, as they claim, a NEED to ban these guns, if banning these guns is, as they say, NECESSARY for the safety of whomever - what does a ban on the manufacturer and sale of new 'assault weapons' accomplish?

Alright, ban the bullets instead.

You should take that act on the road!!!!

But, good of you to admit banning the manufacturer and sale of new 'assault weapons' will do noting to meet the necessities claimed by the Democrats.
Given this, why do you think the Democrats are lock-step on this policy point?

I think it's a good idea and I guess I'm not the only one. I think the assault weapons should also be confiscated/bought back and if anyone is caught with one after a certain point, they get a fine that will take years to settle.
I'd vote for that.

As a commie traitor I'm sure you would.

 

[francoHFW]

But, good of you to admit banning the manufacturer and sale of new 'assault weapons' will do noting to meet the necessities claimed by the Democrats.
Given this, why do you think the Democrats are lock-step on this policy point?

I think it's a good idea and I guess I'm not the only one.

But, you agree - it won't do anything to stop mass shootings - and thus, nothing to meet the necessities claimed by the Democrats.
Why, then do the Democrats want the ban?

I think the assault weapons should also be confiscated/bought back and if anyone is caught with one after a certain point, they get a fine that will take years to settle.

Why do you suppose exactly zero of the 20 Democrats in the recent debates suggested this?

Buy-Back they all like, confiscation would be insane LOL

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Their whole platform wouldn't even benefit a third world country.

would sure as hell help the middle class and your friends and family, brainwashed functional moron....

No, it wouldn't. The entire Dem platform is a disaster.

 

[francoHFW]

Their whole platform wouldn't even benefit a third world country.

would sure as hell help the middle class and your friends and family, brainwashed functional moron....

No, it wouldn't. The entire Dem platform is a disaster.

as if you have any clue what it is. LOL

 

[miketx]

Their whole platform wouldn't even benefit a third world country.

would sure as hell help the middle class and your friends and family, brainwashed functional moron....

No, it wouldn't. The entire Dem platform is a disaster.

as if you have any clue what it is. LOL

We saw the debates moron, that was a disaster.

 

[Timmy]

No surprise, right?
Every Dem who spoke on guns in the 2 nights of debate declared the need to ban 'assault weapon' - to save our schools, to save our kids, shopping malls, movie theaters, gay bars, etc. It's almost as if this little bit of leftist dogma is chiseled into their souls.

A question for those who agree with the candidates:
If there is, as they claim, a NEED to ban these guns, if banning these guns is, as they say, NECESSARY for the safety of whomever - what does a ban on the manufacturer and sale of new 'assault weapons' accomplish?

Have to start somewhere .

What’s the point of assault weapons ? Other than to kill lots Of people quickly.

 

[francoHFW]

Their whole platform wouldn't even benefit a third world country.

would sure as hell help the middle class and your friends and family, brainwashed functional moron....

No, it wouldn't. The entire Dem platform is a disaster.

as if you have any clue what it is. LOL

The only disaster has been the propaganda garbage GOP the last 35 years. A giant giveaway to the rich and the screw job for the rest, allowing 911 through sheer incompetence, the stupidest Wars in our history, a corrupt recession in 1989 and a corrupt World depression in 2008. Only pure garbage propaganda and ignoramuses like you make it possible...

 

[Flash]

[Q


I think it's a good idea

You would.

You also think it is a good idea to turn the US into a socialist shithole.

 

[Polishprince]

The left always seems to believe that crimminals will somehow magically decide to follow a gun ban. They will stop using guns and somehow stop selling guns.
.

There is no reason to think that at all.

In fact I'd expect an assault weapon ban to cause more shootings. Those who are committed to committing Mayhem, will do as they have done in Chicago for generations. Buy their weapons on the black market in the back rooms of bars, out of guy's trunks, etc. And there will be ZERO background checks.

In NewYork City, there is a ban on this kind of firearms too. But it didn't stop men like John Wick from carrying and using all kinds of weaponry.

lastly, those who are targeting the general population will see law abiders as soft touches who can, and WILL be slaughtered at will.

 

[Polishprince]

Their whole platform wouldn't even benefit a third world country.

would sure as hell help the middle class and your friends and family, brainwashed functional moron....

No, it wouldn't. The entire Dem platform is a disaster.

as if you have any clue what it is. LOL

The only disaster has been the propaganda garbage GOP the last 35 years. A giant giveaway to the rich and the screw job for the rest, allowing 911 through sheer incompetence, the stupidest Wars in our history, a corrupt recession in 1989 and a corrupt World depression in 2008. Only pure garbage propaganda and ignoramuses like you make it possible...

Over the last 35 years, we had 8 years of Clintonism, and 8 years of Obama as autocrat.

 

[rightwinger]

We would be safer with a ban on handguns

 

[Flash]

Their whole platform wouldn't even benefit a third world country.

would sure as hell help the middle class and your friends and family, brainwashed functional moron....

No, it wouldn't. The entire Dem platform is a disaster.

as if you have any clue what it is. LOL

The only disaster has been the propaganda garbage GOP the last 35 years. A giant giveaway to the rich and the screw job for the rest, allowing 911 through sheer incompetence, the stupidest Wars in our history, a cover-up to recession in 1989 and a corrupt World depression in 2008. Only pure garbage propaganda and ignoramuses like you make it possible...

Obama gave away taxpayer's money to the big banks, failing auto industry and to Environmental Wacko firms like Solyndra. That is in additon to the welfare queens and Illegals. He also gave money to the filthy ass Iranian Mullah.

In doing all these worthless giveaways he ran up the national debt $10 trillion.

Let me hear you condemn the Neggra for giveaways that fucked the American people.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Have to start somewhere .

What’s the point of assault weapons ? Other than to kill lots Of people quickly.

to make folks thinking of passing laws abridging the right to owning them, think again...[in fact getting them to think once is no easy task without assault weapons]

 

[Cellblock2429]

The dems always whine about guns, and then nothing happens, they are banned in Chicago, how is that working?
It's not the guns, the US always had guns, and no mass shootings, what's different now?

Nut jobs with military style weapons that seems
to go right along with their insanity.... They seem to like buying them at stores or gun shows.

/——/ Virtually every weapon developed was military style. And WTF does it mean any way?

 

[Timmy]

Have to start somewhere .

What’s the point of assault weapons ? Other than to kill lots Of people quickly.

to make folks thinking of passing laws abridging the right to owning them, think again...[in fact getting them to think once is no easy task without assault weapons]

Great . You what an AR to shoot police and or military cause you are mad at the politicians . Well that’s a shit reason to allow them.

 

[francoHFW]

Their whole platform wouldn't even benefit a third world country.

would sure as hell help the middle class and your friends and family, brainwashed functional moron....

No, it wouldn't. The entire Dem platform is a disaster.

as if you have any clue what it is. LOL

The only disaster has been the propaganda garbage GOP the last 35 years. A giant giveaway to the rich and the screw job for the rest, allowing 911 through sheer incompetence, the stupidest Wars in our history, a corrupt recession in 1989 and a corrupt World depression in 2008. Only pure garbage propaganda and ignoramuses like you make it possible...

Over the last 35 years, we had 8 years of Clintonism, and 8 years of Obama as autocrat.

Hilarious rendition, super duper. and the only thing they wanted that they could pass in Congress was Obamacare, and not a very good version of that... With the GOP reconciliation and filibuster, the GOP can
pass everything they want with 51 votes, cutting taxes on the rich and giant corporations, while the Democrats need 60 votes for reform..next time they should use the nuclear option and pass all they want. The GOP wouldn't dare cut them again. That would be a living wage universal Health Care daycare paid parental leave cheap college and training ID card to end illegal immigration and mainly taxing the rich and giant corporations their fair share and cutting taxes on the rest. This is ridiculous....

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Great . You what an AR to shoot police and or military cause you are mad at the politicians . Well that’s a shit reason to allow them.

An awful lot of fantasy there timmy.

 

[Polishprince]

We would be safer with a ban on handguns

How you figger?

Do you really think that disarming law abiders of handguns will help?

I'm a senior citizen, right now I stand a chance with an equalizer if some young thug tries to hold me up. Disarm the law abiders, we're going to have to increase the size of the police force by 10 fold