Campbell
Gold Member
- Aug 20, 2015
- 3,866
- 646
- 255
I'm talking in circles??No, for many, they want the people to determine that.Two special committees are busy gathering evidence that Putin slanted the election to Trump. The sad thing is that Hillary still got nearly three million more votes than Trump.
So you want to live in a country where a dozen cities determine the election for the whole country?
We are a republic of 50 states. That is what our forefathers upheld with the electoral college.You realize that is exactly why our brilliant forefathers made the electoral voting system to prevent from happening?
As usual you talk in circles, in the end - you are saying you agree with what I said...but trying not to.
Without an electoral, Hillary Clinton would have won. However she would have won because of a handful of heavily populated cities. Without an electoral system, non urban areas would have no voice.
I'm stating facts.
Also a fact -- Hillary won the popular vote because a plurality of voters voted for her, not because many of them live in a few big cities.
According to the independent, non-partisan Cook Political Report, Clinton's final tally came in at 65,844,610, compared to Donald Trump's 62,979,636, with a difference of 2,864,974.