Democrats Dont You Dare...

[JimBowie1958]

You get punished for not having kids. What's the difference.

Allowing some other guy to keep more of his money while you get to also keep more of yours, but less than the first guy, is not to punish anyone.

They BOTH WIN.

one wins MORE

one gets to keep more of their own money

one pays less for our gvt, one pays more for our gvt even if both have the same earnings

And so you base your complaint on the ENVY of the man who got more?

Please.

 

[Lakhota]

Dont you dare give Trump any crap about whatever Executive orders he may issue.

You have been defending the most egregious usurpation of power in American history in peace time.

You have not one leg to stand on in criticizing any EOs that Trump puts out and he is going to bring a hailstorm of changes to EOs and the executive branch.

Now it is time for you to understand WHY allowing the President so much power is a very foolish thing to do even if you think he is your President.

Obama issued LESS EOs than Bush. So, what's your point?

 

[Care4all]

And the federal government has NO business trying to mandate health care. That is totally out of their jurisdiction! This is what is so upsetting to people, democrats! LISTEN.

but it's ok for the states to make it mandatory, like Romneycare was mandatory in Mass?

Yes, the states have jurisdiction.

but do they really have jurisdiction to make buying health insurance MANDATORY?

 

[RealDave]

And the federal government has NO business trying to mandate health care. That is totally out of their jurisdiction! This is what is so upsetting to people, democrats! LISTEN.

but it's ok for the states to make it mandatory, like Romneycare was mandatory in Mass?

Yes, the states have jurisdiction.

So, you disagree with Trump's plan to buy insurance across State Lines where States no longer can regulate who sells insurance in their State.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Dont you dare give Trump any crap about whatever Executive orders he may issue.

You have been defending the most egregious usurpation of power in American history in peace time.

You have not one leg to stand on in criticizing any EOs that Trump puts out and he is going to bring a hailstorm of changes to EOs and the executive branch.

Now it is time for you to understand WHY allowing the President so much power is a very foolish thing to do even if you think he is your President.

Please learn some history! FDR wrote 4 times as many and even Reagan used more. It makes you look funny when you don't understand this.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Dont you dare give Trump any crap about whatever Executive orders he may issue.

You have been defending the most egregious usurpation of power in American history in peace time.

You have not one leg to stand on in criticizing any EOs that Trump puts out and he is going to bring a hailstorm of changes to EOs and the executive branch.

Now it is time for you to understand WHY allowing the President so much power is a very foolish thing to do even if you think he is your President.

Obama issued LESS EOs than Bush. So, what's your point?

Well it is not that Obama wrote more EOs, as I agree that is not what he did.

The problem is him working around the constitutional powers of Congress and usurping more power than he is supposed to have.


But that is as much the Republicans fault as Obamas as they are led by spineless cowards.

 

[Iceweasel]

And the federal government has NO business trying to mandate health care. That is totally out of their jurisdiction! This is what is so upsetting to people, democrats! LISTEN.

but it's ok for the states to make it mandatory, like Romneycare was mandatory in Mass?

Yes. I wouldn't like it but you can move if a state forces it on you, or vote it out. Even recall the governor. That can't happen on a federal level, which is supposed to let states handle what states can handle.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Dont you dare give Trump any crap about whatever Executive orders he may issue.

You have been defending the most egregious usurpation of power in American history in peace time.

You have not one leg to stand on in criticizing any EOs that Trump puts out and he is going to bring a hailstorm of changes to EOs and the executive branch.

Now it is time for you to understand WHY allowing the President so much power is a very foolish thing to do even if you think he is your President.

Please learn some history! FDR wrote 4 times as many and even Reagan used more.

Please read my posts, dude, I am not arguing that there were too many EOs by Obama, but that he abused them.

 

[jknowgood]

Dont you dare give Trump any crap about whatever Executive orders he may issue.

You have been defending the most egregious usurpation of power in American history in peace time.

You have not one leg to stand on in criticizing any EOs that Trump puts out and he is going to bring a hailstorm of changes to EOs and the executive branch.

Now it is time for you to understand WHY allowing the President so much power is a very foolish thing to do even if you think he is your President.

Interesting. The RWnuts are now suddenly FOR executive orders. Magically they're not considered unconstitutional anymore?

lol, so it begins...

No, but if it happens you should keep your mouth shut.

 

[Care4all]

You get punished for not having kids. What's the difference.

Allowing some other guy to keep more of his money while you get to also keep more of yours, but less than the first guy, is not to punish anyone.

They BOTH WIN.

one wins MORE

one gets to keep more of their own money

one pays less for our gvt, one pays more for our gvt even if both have the same earnings

And so you base your complaint on the ENVY of the man who got more?

Please.

that's not envy, for goodness sake....

that's being JUST and Fair....

if they both earn the same, they should pay the same.... making one person pay more in taxes than the other person earning the same exact money is unjust, unfair to the person who has to pay more, period.

maybe we all decide it's ok for the guy with kids to pay less in taxes than the single guy with no family, even though the guy with family uses all gvt services more than the single guy....

but it in no way, is fair for the single guy.

 

[depotoo]

Yes, when they themselves voted for it.

And the federal government has NO business trying to mandate health care. That is totally out of their jurisdiction! This is what is so upsetting to people, democrats! LISTEN.

but it's ok for the states to make it mandatory, like Romneycare was mandatory in Mass?

 

[JimBowie1958]

You get punished for not having kids. What's the difference.

Allowing some other guy to keep more of his money while you get to also keep more of yours, but less than the first guy, is not to punish anyone.

They BOTH WIN.

one wins MORE

one gets to keep more of their own money

one pays less for our gvt, one pays more for our gvt even if both have the same earnings

And so you base your complaint on the ENVY of the man who got more?

Please.

that's not envy, for goodness sake....

that's being JUST and Fair....

if they both earn the same, they should pay the same.... making one person pay more in taxes than the other person earning the same exact money is unjust, unfair to the person who has to pay more, period.

maybe we all decide it's ok for the guy with kids to pay less in taxes than the single guy with no family, even though the guy with family uses all gvt services more than the single guy....

but it in no way, is fair for the single guy.

Jesus said in a parable that if He hired laborers in the morning, some in the afternoon and some in the evening, and paid them all the same, the ones hired in the morning have no complaint about the ones hired in the evening as both got paid what they had agreed to.

If person A gains $X and is happy with it, it is only envy if he becomes dissatisfied upon learning that person B is getting 1.5 x $X.

If he is happy with $X, what others make should be of no concern to him.

 

[BlindBoo]

Dont you dare give Trump any crap about whatever Executive orders he may issue.

You have been defending the most egregious usurpation of power in American history in peace time.

You have not one leg to stand on in criticizing any EOs that Trump puts out and he is going to bring a hailstorm of changes to EOs and the executive branch.

Now it is time for you to understand WHY allowing the President so much power is a very foolish thing to do even if you think he is your President.

Depends on the situation. He is entitled to reverse any EO he wants too. Congress is entitled to challenge any EO he issues that they want to.

 

[Care4all]

Yes, when they themselves voted for it.

And the federal government has NO business trying to mandate health care. That is totally out of their jurisdiction! This is what is so upsetting to people, democrats! LISTEN.

but it's ok for the states to make it mandatory, like Romneycare was mandatory in Mass?

when the citizens voted for it or the representatives voted for it?

cuz our representatives voted for it at the federal level

same as reps at the state level

it wasn't we the people voting in the state or federal levels

 

[ChrisL]

You get punished for not having kids. What's the difference.

Allowing some other guy to keep more of his money while you get to also keep more of yours, but less than the first guy, is not to punish anyone.

They BOTH WIN.

one wins MORE

one gets to keep more of their own money

one pays less for our gvt, one pays more for our gvt even if both have the same earnings

And so you base your complaint on the ENVY of the man who got more?

Please.

that's not envy, for goodness sake....

that's being JUST and Fair....

if they both earn the same, they should pay the same.... making one person pay more in taxes than the other person earning the same exact money is unjust, unfair to the person who has to pay more, period.

maybe we all decide it's ok for the guy with kids to pay less in taxes than the single guy with no family, even though the guy with family uses all gvt services more than the single guy....

but it in no way, is fair for the single guy.

Interesting. This could be applied to many things, like liberals wanting to increase taxes for certain people.

 

[ChrisL]

And the federal government has NO business trying to mandate health care. That is totally out of their jurisdiction! This is what is so upsetting to people, democrats! LISTEN.

but it's ok for the states to make it mandatory, like Romneycare was mandatory in Mass?

Yes, the states have jurisdiction.

So, you disagree with Trump's plan to buy insurance across State Lines where States no longer can regulate who sells insurance in their State.

States have the right to do it. The feds do not have the right to make health insurance mandatory.

 

[ChrisL]

And the federal government has NO business trying to mandate health care. That is totally out of their jurisdiction! This is what is so upsetting to people, democrats! LISTEN.

but it's ok for the states to make it mandatory, like Romneycare was mandatory in Mass?

Yes, the states have jurisdiction.

So, you disagree with Trump's plan to buy insurance across State Lines where States no longer can regulate who sells insurance in their State.

That is not mandating that we buy health insurance.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Let's assume that another Justice (I pick Ginsburg) leaves the bench very soon. That gives the clown 2 appointments.

Trump has been the only candidate to have never won an election or even have run one ever before in his life, walk into the PResidential election stone cold and win it against all the expert opinions, all the polls and all the odds. That is like some amateur walking into a professional chess tournament and winning first prize in his first ever tournament.

And yet you still call Trump a "clown"?

Dude, you are not making Trump look like the clown here.

He has stunned the world, and deserves credit for that, but you can't look at all the things he said along the campaign trail and believe he didn't act like a clown.....mocking people with disabilities, talking about how ugly women are....seriously? He was in tune with the mood of the electorate, and had the good fortune of running against the worst canidate in history, but had he been able to hold his tongue just a bit, the race would have been over in August. You deserve great acknowledgement for your bold and steadfast insistence that he would win.

He didnt mock people with disabilities.
100% 'proof' Donald Trump did NOT mock a reporter with a disability

The only proof you provided was what a poor excuse for a human being you are. What, Trump was not mocking a handicapped person because he got the hand motions wrong?

So why would he use the same exact gesture on people who are not handicapped?
It's pretty obvious he uses it as a universal gesture to show the idiocy of the left.
And I'm quite sure he would use it in your case as well.
Ya fucken retard.

 

[Care4all]

You get punished for not having kids. What's the difference.

Allowing some other guy to keep more of his money while you get to also keep more of yours, but less than the first guy, is not to punish anyone.

They BOTH WIN.

one wins MORE

one gets to keep more of their own money

one pays less for our gvt, one pays more for our gvt even if both have the same earnings

And so you base your complaint on the ENVY of the man who got more?

Please.

that's not envy, for goodness sake....

that's being JUST and Fair....

if they both earn the same, they should pay the same.... making one person pay more in taxes than the other person earning the same exact money is unjust, unfair to the person who has to pay more, period.

maybe we all decide it's ok for the guy with kids to pay less in taxes than the single guy with no family, even though the guy with family uses all gvt services more than the single guy....

but it in no way, is fair for the single guy.

Jesus said in a parable that if He hired laborers in the morning, some in the afternoon and some in the evening, and paid them all the same, the ones hired in the morning have no complaint about the ones hired in the evening as both got paid what they had agreed to.

If person A gains $X and is happy with it, it is only envy if he becomes dissatisfied upon learning that person B is getting 1.5 x $X.

If he is happy with $X, what others make should be of no concern to him.

did the single guy AGREE to pay more than the guy with kids?

or did he agree to the pay?

 

[ChrisL]

Let's assume that another Justice (I pick Ginsburg) leaves the bench very soon. That gives the clown 2 appointments.

Trump has been the only candidate to have never won an election or even have run one ever before in his life, walk into the PResidential election stone cold and win it against all the expert opinions, all the polls and all the odds. That is like some amateur walking into a professional chess tournament and winning first prize in his first ever tournament.

And yet you still call Trump a "clown"?

Dude, you are not making Trump look like the clown here.

He has stunned the world, and deserves credit for that, but you can't look at all the things he said along the campaign trail and believe he didn't act like a clown.....mocking people with disabilities, talking about how ugly women are....seriously? He was in tune with the mood of the electorate, and had the good fortune of running against the worst canidate in history, but had he been able to hold his tongue just a bit, the race would have been over in August. You deserve great acknowledgement for your bold and steadfast insistence that he would win.

He didnt mock people with disabilities.
100% 'proof' Donald Trump did NOT mock a reporter with a disability

The only proof you provided was what a poor excuse for a human being you are. What, Trump was not mocking a handicapped person because he got the hand motions wrong?

So why would he use the same exact gesture on people who are not handicapped?
It's pretty obvious he uses it as a universal gesture to show the idiocy of the left.
And I'm quite sure he would use it in your case as well.
Ya fucken retard.

I think it's rather humorous when these rotten individuals act all "offended" by Trump, when they seem like much angrier people. Lol. As if this guy CARES that Trump mocked some reporter or not?