Democrats in Pennsylvania Plan to Ignore SCOTUS in a True Act of Lawlessness aka Insurrection

[excalibur]

It is the history of the Democratic Party since the 1830s.

In response to Acting Pennsylvania Secretary of State Leigh Chapman decision to not follow the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling on undated ballots, Rep. Seth Grove (R-York), chairman of the House State Government Committee, issued the following statement:

“This is just another example of Democrats picking and choosing which laws and court rulings they want to follow and enforce. Just as we’ve seen in Philadelphia with District Attorney Larry Krasner, who has opted to not enforce certain gun laws, Chapman has chosen to turn a blind eye to the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on undated mail-in ballots.

“The Wolf administration has continually relied on the state Supreme Court to alter the state’s election laws and happily followed their rulings when it suits his needs. But when a ruling for the nation’s highest court doesn’t fit his narrative, the administration opts to simply ignore it. This is not how our system of government works.

“I am calling on Chapman to follow the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling on the Lehigh County case.

“Under the latest guidelines, each of the state’s 67 counties will decide if problematic ballots will be counted. As we have seen in the past, having different sets of rules for a single race for an elected office that spans at least two counties causes massive problems. This patchwork of how election are conducted continues to sow problems and doubt in the entire election system. It could be easily rectified if Chapman would simply following the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling and issue guidance that counties do the same.”


Representative Seth Grove
196th District
Pennsylvania House of Representatives ​

Grove Responds to Chapman Ignoring U.S. Supreme Court Ruling

Grove Responds to Chapman Ignoring U.S. Supreme Court Ruling

pahousegop.com

 

[1srelluc]

Well it's not like Tater is going to send in troops to enforce it.

A reckoning is coming.

 

[BULLDOG]

Seems it's legal for Chapman to do as he is doing. Quit whining or vote to change the law. That's how it works.

 

[excalibur]

Seems it's legal for Chapman to do as he is doing. Quit whining or vote to change the law. That's how it works.

The Supreme Court tossed this out. What part of that are you having difficulty comprehending?

 

[BULLDOG]

It is the history of the Democratic Party since the 1830s.

In response to Acting Pennsylvania Secretary of State Leigh Chapman decision to not follow the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling on undated ballots, Rep. Seth Grove (R-York), chairman of the House State Government Committee, issued the following statement:​

​

“This is just another example of Democrats picking and choosing which laws and court rulings they want to follow and enforce. Just as we’ve seen in Philadelphia with District Attorney Larry Krasner, who has opted to not enforce certain gun laws, Chapman has chosen to turn a blind eye to the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on undated mail-in ballots.​

​

“The Wolf administration has continually relied on the state Supreme Court to alter the state’s election laws and happily followed their rulings when it suits his needs. But when a ruling for the nation’s highest court doesn’t fit his narrative, the administration opts to simply ignore it. This is not how our system of government works.​

​

“I am calling on Chapman to follow the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling on the Lehigh County case.​

​

“Under the latest guidelines, each of the state’s 67 counties will decide if problematic ballots will be counted. As we have seen in the past, having different sets of rules for a single race for an elected office that spans at least two counties causes massive problems. This patchwork of how election are conducted continues to sow problems and doubt in the entire election system. It could be easily rectified if Chapman would simply following the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling and issue guidance that counties do the same.”​

​

​

Representative Seth Grove ​

196th District ​

Pennsylvania House of Representatives ​

Grove Responds to Chapman Ignoring U.S. Supreme Court Ruling

Grove Responds to Chapman Ignoring U.S. Supreme Court Ruling

pahousegop.com

Which SC ruling? You got a case name?

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

It is the history of the Democratic Party since the 1830s.

In response to Acting Pennsylvania Secretary of State Leigh Chapman decision to not follow the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling on undated ballots, Rep. Seth Grove (R-York), chairman of the House State Government Committee, issued the following statement:​

​

“This is just another example of Democrats picking and choosing which laws and court rulings they want to follow and enforce. Just as we’ve seen in Philadelphia with District Attorney Larry Krasner, who has opted to not enforce certain gun laws, Chapman has chosen to turn a blind eye to the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on undated mail-in ballots.​

​

“The Wolf administration has continually relied on the state Supreme Court to alter the state’s election laws and happily followed their rulings when it suits his needs. But when a ruling for the nation’s highest court doesn’t fit his narrative, the administration opts to simply ignore it. This is not how our system of government works.​

​

“I am calling on Chapman to follow the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling on the Lehigh County case.​

​

“Under the latest guidelines, each of the state’s 67 counties will decide if problematic ballots will be counted. As we have seen in the past, having different sets of rules for a single race for an elected office that spans at least two counties causes massive problems. This patchwork of how election are conducted continues to sow problems and doubt in the entire election system. It could be easily rectified if Chapman would simply following the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling and issue guidance that counties do the same.”​

​

​

Representative Seth Grove ​

196th District ​

Pennsylvania House of Representatives ​

Grove Responds to Chapman Ignoring U.S. Supreme Court Ruling

Grove Responds to Chapman Ignoring U.S. Supreme Court Ruling

pahousegop.com

Right.
And freedom was always "free"

 

[excalibur]

Which SC ruling? You got a case name?

Troll.

 

[Roudy]

It is the history of the Democratic Party since the 1830s.

In response to Acting Pennsylvania Secretary of State Leigh Chapman decision to not follow the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling on undated ballots, Rep. Seth Grove (R-York), chairman of the House State Government Committee, issued the following statement:​

​

“This is just another example of Democrats picking and choosing which laws and court rulings they want to follow and enforce. Just as we’ve seen in Philadelphia with District Attorney Larry Krasner, who has opted to not enforce certain gun laws, Chapman has chosen to turn a blind eye to the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on undated mail-in ballots.​

​

“The Wolf administration has continually relied on the state Supreme Court to alter the state’s election laws and happily followed their rulings when it suits his needs. But when a ruling for the nation’s highest court doesn’t fit his narrative, the administration opts to simply ignore it. This is not how our system of government works.​

​

“I am calling on Chapman to follow the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling on the Lehigh County case.​

​

“Under the latest guidelines, each of the state’s 67 counties will decide if problematic ballots will be counted. As we have seen in the past, having different sets of rules for a single race for an elected office that spans at least two counties causes massive problems. This patchwork of how election are conducted continues to sow problems and doubt in the entire election system. It could be easily rectified if Chapman would simply following the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling and issue guidance that counties do the same.”​

​

​

Representative Seth Grove ​

196th District ​

Pennsylvania House of Representatives ​

Grove Responds to Chapman Ignoring U.S. Supreme Court Ruling

Grove Responds to Chapman Ignoring U.S. Supreme Court Ruling

pahousegop.com

But how would Democrats win if they can't cheat and steal, as they do in almost every major election.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Democrats in NY NJ and CA are ignoring the USSC in Bruen
They know they can violate the constitution faster than the USSC can overturn those violations.
They -do- have plenty of practice.

 

[struth]

demafasict undermine the republic by simply ignoring the law

 

[WorldWatcher]

Which SC ruling? You got a case name?

Search

I believe the case is David Ritter, Petitioner v. Linda Migliori, et al.

WW

 

[Dragonlady]

It is the history of the Democratic Party since the 1830s.

In response to Acting Pennsylvania Secretary of State Leigh Chapman decision to not follow the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling on undated ballots, Rep. Seth Grove (R-York), chairman of the House State Government Committee, issued the following statement:​

​

“This is just another example of Democrats picking and choosing which laws and court rulings they want to follow and enforce. Just as we’ve seen in Philadelphia with District Attorney Larry Krasner, who has opted to not enforce certain gun laws, Chapman has chosen to turn a blind eye to the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on undated mail-in ballots.​

​

“The Wolf administration has continually relied on the state Supreme Court to alter the state’s election laws and happily followed their rulings when it suits his needs. But when a ruling for the nation’s highest court doesn’t fit his narrative, the administration opts to simply ignore it. This is not how our system of government works.​

​

“I am calling on Chapman to follow the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling on the Lehigh County case.​

​

“Under the latest guidelines, each of the state’s 67 counties will decide if problematic ballots will be counted. As we have seen in the past, having different sets of rules for a single race for an elected office that spans at least two counties causes massive problems. This patchwork of how election are conducted continues to sow problems and doubt in the entire election system. It could be easily rectified if Chapman would simply following the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling and issue guidance that counties do the same.”​

​

​

Representative Seth Grove ​

196th District ​

Pennsylvania House of Representatives ​

Grove Responds to Chapman Ignoring U.S. Supreme Court Ruling

Grove Responds to Chapman Ignoring U.S. Supreme Court Ruling

pahousegop.com

What does dating the ballots have to do with anything? I've been voting since I was 21 and not once ever have I been required to date a ballot. The whole point seems to be to find ways to toss out votes you don't like.

Laws with no purpose, should be disregarded.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Laws with no purpose, should be disregarded.

Just like laws that create unnecessary and ineffective restrictions on the exercise of constitutional rights.
You know - like all the gun control laws you support.

 

[struth]

What does dating the ballots have to do with anything? I've been voting since I was 21 and not once ever have I been required to date a ballot. The whole point seems to be to find ways to toss out votes you don't like.

Laws with no purpose, should be disregarded.

because there are deadlines. We don’t let people vote whenever they want…there is an election day…votes need to be in by then.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

It is the history of the Democratic Party since the 1830s.

In response to Acting Pennsylvania Secretary of State Leigh Chapman decision to not follow the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling on undated ballots, Rep. Seth Grove (R-York), chairman of the House State Government Committee, issued the following statement:​

​

“This is just another example of Democrats picking and choosing which laws and court rulings they want to follow and enforce. Just as we’ve seen in Philadelphia with District Attorney Larry Krasner, who has opted to not enforce certain gun laws, Chapman has chosen to turn a blind eye to the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on undated mail-in ballots.​

​

“The Wolf administration has continually relied on the state Supreme Court to alter the state’s election laws and happily followed their rulings when it suits his needs. But when a ruling for the nation’s highest court doesn’t fit his narrative, the administration opts to simply ignore it. This is not how our system of government works.​

​

“I am calling on Chapman to follow the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling on the Lehigh County case.​

​

“Under the latest guidelines, each of the state’s 67 counties will decide if problematic ballots will be counted. As we have seen in the past, having different sets of rules for a single race for an elected office that spans at least two counties causes massive problems. This patchwork of how election are conducted continues to sow problems and doubt in the entire election system. It could be easily rectified if Chapman would simply following the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling and issue guidance that counties do the same.”​

​

​

Representative Seth Grove ​

196th District ​

Pennsylvania House of Representatives ​

Grove Responds to Chapman Ignoring U.S. Supreme Court Ruling

Grove Responds to Chapman Ignoring U.S. Supreme Court Ruling

pahousegop.com

The People of PA need to step up this time!

 

[marvin martian]

It is the history of the Democratic Party since the 1830s.

In response to Acting Pennsylvania Secretary of State Leigh Chapman decision to not follow the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling on undated ballots, Rep. Seth Grove (R-York), chairman of the House State Government Committee, issued the following statement:​

​

“This is just another example of Democrats picking and choosing which laws and court rulings they want to follow and enforce. Just as we’ve seen in Philadelphia with District Attorney Larry Krasner, who has opted to not enforce certain gun laws, Chapman has chosen to turn a blind eye to the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on undated mail-in ballots.​

​

“The Wolf administration has continually relied on the state Supreme Court to alter the state’s election laws and happily followed their rulings when it suits his needs. But when a ruling for the nation’s highest court doesn’t fit his narrative, the administration opts to simply ignore it. This is not how our system of government works.​

​

“I am calling on Chapman to follow the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling on the Lehigh County case.​

​

“Under the latest guidelines, each of the state’s 67 counties will decide if problematic ballots will be counted. As we have seen in the past, having different sets of rules for a single race for an elected office that spans at least two counties causes massive problems. This patchwork of how election are conducted continues to sow problems and doubt in the entire election system. It could be easily rectified if Chapman would simply following the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling and issue guidance that counties do the same.”​

​

​

Representative Seth Grove ​

196th District ​

Pennsylvania House of Representatives ​

Grove Responds to Chapman Ignoring U.S. Supreme Court Ruling

Grove Responds to Chapman Ignoring U.S. Supreme Court Ruling

pahousegop.com

This is a threat to our democracy.