Democrats want to give school kids 3 meals a day YEAR ROUND!!!

PLEASE keep showing why the GOP is the party for the minority's. Much appreciated


mudpeople.jpg
Ironic statement and picture. I guess you don't know the KKK was started by the Democrats. The joke is on you. LoL


Ironic YOU don't know it was the SOUTHERN CONServative CONfederate States of AmeriKKKa that had/is the KKK , you know TODAY'S GOP BASE!!


Hint Dems and GOP switched several times since 1900, you know??? lol
 
Those who monopolize the majority of wealth and income pay the most taxes.......not nearly as much as they used to

That burden has been shifted to the middle class
Pay attention. Half of this country escapes all liability for federal income tax. So how is it that those who do pay taxes are not paying their "fair share" when so many pay nothing at all?

BTW, a fair tax that replaces the income tax is a good way to make sure everyone has skin in the game. The rich buy more, so they pay more taxes, but nobody dodges their part in paying taxes.
Half the country makes so little fucking money that they don't even reach the threshold to pay taxes

THAT should be your gripe....not how to we soak more money out of these people


The loserterians are evil and their plan is to make these people as poor as the asian workers in order for their not to be a need for outsourcing. Truly evil people that don't give a two damns about this country.

Waaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

:crybaby::crybaby::crybaby::crybaby:


This is how little you give a shit about what your side has done to our own country...You won't be happy until the rich have all the wealth and the workers that pound the nails into the wall get shit.

You won't be happy until we look like Vietnam or some of the poorer parts of china.

What side is that junior ?

I don't recall taking a side.

I've complained long and bitterly about the way we let the wealthy continue to amass their fortunes.

I have no interest in the moronic solutions the far left or the far right have to offer in return. The rich will use both to keep screwing us.
 
Those who monopolize the majority of wealth and income pay the most taxes.......not nearly as much as they used to

That burden has been shifted to the middle class
Pay attention. Half of this country escapes all liability for federal income tax. So how is it that those who do pay taxes are not paying their "fair share" when so many pay nothing at all?

BTW, a fair tax that replaces the income tax is a good way to make sure everyone has skin in the game. The rich buy more, so they pay more taxes, but nobody dodges their part in paying taxes.
Half the country makes so little fucking money that they don't even reach the threshold to pay taxes

THAT should be your gripe....not how to we soak more money out of these people
That's because half the country are lazy Democrats that want us to support them...

Obamanomics work real well, don't they???
What we are seeing is the end result of Supply Side economics......the lasting legacy of Ronald Reagan

A situation where money has been focused on the wealthiest Americans while working Americans were left to whither on the vine
No. What we are seeing is socialist economics. The lasting legacy of lazy ass Americans that get paid to sit on their asses and bitch about what other people are forced to give them for doing nothing. A country where one used to be proud to work... has been turned into a country where people who work are ridiculed by the people who don't.

I don't agree.

Labor no longer carries the value it once did. That has been a tough pill to swallow.

People are not lazy. They don't, however, seem to be to adaptable.

America is to caught up on getting more of what others have.

Consequently, we are throwing away the things (like family) that really are important.
 
did you forget stats.....in the womb must be protected at all costs..out of the womb let em starve...the conservative way.....o my wwjd
. Conservatives give more to charity than liberals ever do. You people think "caring" is giving.
That has proven to be bullshit

Conservatives give to their church....very little ends up in the hands of the needy
What's it like living in a fog and lying about shit all the time?
did you forget stats.....in the womb must be protected at all costs..out of the womb let em starve...the conservative way.....o my wwjd
. Conservatives give more to charity than liberals ever do. You people think "caring" is giving.
That has proven to be bullshit

Conservatives give to their church....very little ends up in the hands of the needy
Smack down time again. Click to open the followin:

For example, the “redder” a particular state is (i.e., the more its voters support Republican candidates in elections), the likelier its residents are to be charitable. According to Brooks, fully 24 of the 25 most generous states were red ones (only Maryland was a charitably minded blue, or Democrat-supporting, state). Residents of the five states that cast more than 60 percent of their ballots for President Bush in 2004 gave 3.5 percent of their incomes to charity, nearly twice as much per person as residents of the five states (including the District of Columbia) where Democrat John Kerry received 60 percent of the vote or better. This, says Brooks, occurred even though residents of the deep-blue pro-Kerry states earned, on average, 38 percent more per household than their red-state counterparts.

Brooks also cites a 2004 survey conducted by Syracuse University, which compared the charitable giving habits of people who were identical in age, income, education, gender, religion, race, and political views -- and whose only disagreement was that one group of subjects thought it was the government's job to redistribute income from the rich to the poor, while the other thought that income redistribution was none of the state's business. Those who opposed government income-redistribution contributed, on average, $267 more to charity each year than the income-redistribution advocates. "In other words," Brooks writes, "people in favor of forced income redistribution are privately less charitable than those who oppose it, regardless of how much money they earn."
 
Those who monopolize the majority of wealth and income pay the most taxes.......not nearly as much as they used to

That burden has been shifted to the middle class
Pay attention. Half of this country escapes all liability for federal income tax. So how is it that those who do pay taxes are not paying their "fair share" when so many pay nothing at all?

BTW, a fair tax that replaces the income tax is a good way to make sure everyone has skin in the game. The rich buy more, so they pay more taxes, but nobody dodges their part in paying taxes.
Half the country makes so little fucking money that they don't even reach the threshold to pay taxes

THAT should be your gripe....not how to we soak more money out of these people
That's because half the country are lazy Democrats that want us to support them...

Obamanomics work real well, don't they???
What we are seeing is the end result of Supply Side economics......the lasting legacy of Ronald Reagan

A situation where money has been focused on the wealthiest Americans while working Americans were left to whither on the vine
No. What we are seeing is socialist economics. The lasting legacy of lazy ass Americans that get paid to sit on their asses and bitch about what other people are forced to give them for doing nothing. A country where one used to be proud to work... has been turned into a country where people who work are ridiculed by the people who don't.




Contrary to "Entitlement Society" Rhetoric, Over Nine-Tenths of Entitlement Benefits Go to Elderly, Disabled, or Working Households

Moreover, the vast bulk of that 9 percent goes for medical care, unemployment insurance benefits (which individuals must have a significant work history to receive), Social Security survivor benefits for the children and spouses of deceased workers, and Social Security benefits for retirees between ages 62 and 64. Seven out of the 9 percentage points go for one of these four purposes.



Contrary to "Entitlement Society" Rhetoric, Over Nine-Tenths of Entitlement Benefits Go to Elderly, Disabled, or Working Households | Center on Budget and Policy Priorities





586.jpg

00-02g-12-10-11-political-cartoons-gop.jpg
 
Pay attention. Half of this country escapes all liability for federal income tax. So how is it that those who do pay taxes are not paying their "fair share" when so many pay nothing at all?

BTW, a fair tax that replaces the income tax is a good way to make sure everyone has skin in the game. The rich buy more, so they pay more taxes, but nobody dodges their part in paying taxes.
Half the country makes so little fucking money that they don't even reach the threshold to pay taxes

THAT should be your gripe....not how to we soak more money out of these people
That's because half the country are lazy Democrats that want us to support them...

Obamanomics work real well, don't they???
What we are seeing is the end result of Supply Side economics......the lasting legacy of Ronald Reagan

A situation where money has been focused on the wealthiest Americans while working Americans were left to whither on the vine
No. What we are seeing is socialist economics. The lasting legacy of lazy ass Americans that get paid to sit on their asses and bitch about what other people are forced to give them for doing nothing. A country where one used to be proud to work... has been turned into a country where people who work are ridiculed by the people who don't.

I don't agree.

Labor no longer carries the value it once did. That has been a tough pill to swallow.

People are not lazy. They don't, however, seem to be to adaptable.

America is to caught up on getting more of what others have.

Consequently, we are throwing away the things (like family) that really are important.

Sure, it's NOT Gov't policy that favors the "job creators", just lazy people!
 
Half the country makes so little fucking money that they don't even reach the threshold to pay taxes

THAT should be your gripe....not how to we soak more money out of these people
That's because half the country are lazy Democrats that want us to support them...

Obamanomics work real well, don't they???
What we are seeing is the end result of Supply Side economics......the lasting legacy of Ronald Reagan

A situation where money has been focused on the wealthiest Americans while working Americans were left to whither on the vine
No. What we are seeing is socialist economics. The lasting legacy of lazy ass Americans that get paid to sit on their asses and bitch about what other people are forced to give them for doing nothing. A country where one used to be proud to work... has been turned into a country where people who work are ridiculed by the people who don't.

I don't agree.

Labor no longer carries the value it once did. That has been a tough pill to swallow.

People are not lazy. They don't, however, seem to be to adaptable.

America is to caught up on getting more of what others have.

Consequently, we are throwing away the things (like family) that really are important.

Sure, it's NOT Gov't policy that favors the "job creators", just lazy people!
Then why can't you feed your kids???
 
Pay attention. Half of this country escapes all liability for federal income tax. So how is it that those who do pay taxes are not paying their "fair share" when so many pay nothing at all?

BTW, a fair tax that replaces the income tax is a good way to make sure everyone has skin in the game. The rich buy more, so they pay more taxes, but nobody dodges their part in paying taxes.
Half the country makes so little fucking money that they don't even reach the threshold to pay taxes

THAT should be your gripe....not how to we soak more money out of these people


The loserterians are evil and their plan is to make these people as poor as the asian workers in order for their not to be a need for outsourcing. Truly evil people that don't give a two damns about this country.

Waaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

:crybaby::crybaby::crybaby::crybaby:


This is how little you give a shit about what your side has done to our own country...You won't be happy until the rich have all the wealth and the workers that pound the nails into the wall get shit.

You won't be happy until we look like Vietnam or some of the poorer parts of china.

What side is that junior ?

I don't recall taking a side.

I've complained long and bitterly about the way we let the wealthy continue to amass their fortunes.

I have no interest in the moronic solutions the far left or the far right have to offer in return. The rich will use both to keep screwing us.

Let me guess, a Randian fetish?
 
That's because half the country are lazy Democrats that want us to support them...

Obamanomics work real well, don't they???
What we are seeing is the end result of Supply Side economics......the lasting legacy of Ronald Reagan

A situation where money has been focused on the wealthiest Americans while working Americans were left to whither on the vine
No. What we are seeing is socialist economics. The lasting legacy of lazy ass Americans that get paid to sit on their asses and bitch about what other people are forced to give them for doing nothing. A country where one used to be proud to work... has been turned into a country where people who work are ridiculed by the people who don't.

I don't agree.

Labor no longer carries the value it once did. That has been a tough pill to swallow.

People are not lazy. They don't, however, seem to be to adaptable.

America is to caught up on getting more of what others have.

Consequently, we are throwing away the things (like family) that really are important.

Sure, it's NOT Gov't policy that favors the "job creators", just lazy people!
Then why can't you feed your kids???


So no, YOU can't think beyond a bumper sticker. Got it
 
What we are seeing is the end result of Supply Side economics......the lasting legacy of Ronald Reagan

A situation where money has been focused on the wealthiest Americans while working Americans were left to whither on the vine
No. What we are seeing is socialist economics. The lasting legacy of lazy ass Americans that get paid to sit on their asses and bitch about what other people are forced to give them for doing nothing. A country where one used to be proud to work... has been turned into a country where people who work are ridiculed by the people who don't.

I don't agree.

Labor no longer carries the value it once did. That has been a tough pill to swallow.

People are not lazy. They don't, however, seem to be to adaptable.

America is to caught up on getting more of what others have.

Consequently, we are throwing away the things (like family) that really are important.

Sure, it's NOT Gov't policy that favors the "job creators", just lazy people!
Then why can't you feed your kids???


So no, YOU can't think beyond a bumper sticker. Got it
So you can't discuss the fact that my tax dollars go to failed programs...

Got it.
 
Pay attention. Half of this country escapes all liability for federal income tax. So how is it that those who do pay taxes are not paying their "fair share" when so many pay nothing at all?

BTW, a fair tax that replaces the income tax is a good way to make sure everyone has skin in the game. The rich buy more, so they pay more taxes, but nobody dodges their part in paying taxes.
Half the country makes so little fucking money that they don't even reach the threshold to pay taxes

THAT should be your gripe....not how to we soak more money out of these people
That's because half the country are lazy Democrats that want us to support them...

Obamanomics work real well, don't they???
What we are seeing is the end result of Supply Side economics......the lasting legacy of Ronald Reagan

A situation where money has been focused on the wealthiest Americans while working Americans were left to whither on the vine
People are so polarized that they dont realize that a hybrid Socialism/Capitalism concept is the best model.

Best model for what ?

That is the issue.....not everybody wants the same thing.

The one thing I will give the far left credit for is being able to be arrogant against a backdrop of blatant stupidity.
Doesnt matter if everyone doesnt want the same thing. Its the best model because its a compromise. The one thing I can give you credit for is amazing stupidity in your effort to play both sides of the fence.
 
No. What we are seeing is socialist economics. The lasting legacy of lazy ass Americans that get paid to sit on their asses and bitch about what other people are forced to give them for doing nothing. A country where one used to be proud to work... has been turned into a country where people who work are ridiculed by the people who don't.

I don't agree.

Labor no longer carries the value it once did. That has been a tough pill to swallow.

People are not lazy. They don't, however, seem to be to adaptable.

America is to caught up on getting more of what others have.

Consequently, we are throwing away the things (like family) that really are important.

Sure, it's NOT Gov't policy that favors the "job creators", just lazy people!
Then why can't you feed your kids???


So no, YOU can't think beyond a bumper sticker. Got it
So you can't discuss the fact that my tax dollars go to failed programs...

Got it.

True, Iraq and tax cuts for the rich, failed MISERABLY

corporate-profits-and-wages.jpg


income-inequality-oecd.jpg


federal-budget-deficit-percent-of-gdp.jpg
 
PLEASE keep showing why the GOP is the party for the minority's. Much appreciated


mudpeople.jpg
Ironic statement and picture. I guess you don't know the KKK was started by the Democrats. The joke is on you. LoL


Ironic YOU don't know it was the SOUTHERN CONServative CONfederate States of AmeriKKKa that had/is the KKK , you know TODAY'S GOP BASE!!


Hint Dems and GOP switched several times since 1900, you know??? lol
Another fool we need to educate. Racists democrats switching to the party that was founded in order to free the slaves would never do that. Democrats were liberals. Do you claim Al Gore Sr was not a liberal. J William Fulbright, Clinton's mentor, Dixiecrat and opposed the Vietnam War wasn't a liberal? Republicans, conservative or otherwise, were never supportive of Slavery or against Civil Rights like the two Democrat liberal's I just mentioned.

Slavery, KKK and Jim Crow are your heritage. Own up Ito it and work to change the nature of your party that wants to control the lives of others...like coming up with Obamacare. See...your party hasn't changed in 100s of years.
 
Schools should not provide ANY food for kids. The kids should get breakfast at home and the parents should give them a sack lunch to take to school. White parents are fine with that but minority parents don't want the hassle and expense of feeding their own kids.

Federal Government Looking to Feed Public School Students 3 Meals Per Day Year Round

sep 4 2015Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said on Tuesday that his agency is looking for “creative ways” to give public school students access to more meals, including a way to provide them breakfast, lunch and dinner year round.

“We have focused on efforts to try to figure out ways in which we can expand in those time periods when youngsters may not have access to school meals,” Vilsack said in remarks at the liberal Center for American Progress in Washington, D.C. That includes giving students access to meals “across the school day, across the school year and across the calendar year,” he said
Those kids need a lunch.

But 3 meals??? Nope......it's like the Democrat think that the parents aren't feeding them.

I remember the Dems saying the kids are too fat at the same time.

Jesus Christ!!!
 
Half the country makes so little fucking money that they don't even reach the threshold to pay taxes

THAT should be your gripe....not how to we soak more money out of these people
That's because half the country are lazy Democrats that want us to support them...

Obamanomics work real well, don't they???
What we are seeing is the end result of Supply Side economics......the lasting legacy of Ronald Reagan

A situation where money has been focused on the wealthiest Americans while working Americans were left to whither on the vine
People are so polarized that they dont realize that a hybrid Socialism/Capitalism concept is the best model.

Best model for what ?

That is the issue.....not everybody wants the same thing.

The one thing I will give the far left credit for is being able to be arrogant against a backdrop of blatant stupidity.
Doesnt matter if everyone doesnt want the same thing. Its the best model because its a compromise. The one thing I can give you credit for is amazing stupidity in your effort to play both sides of the fence.

We all know how compromise works for both sides.

We are living in a world of compromise.

I don't play either side.....moron.

And thanks for pointing out that it's really the best model for you. You can't defend it.
 
PLEASE keep showing why the GOP is the party for the minority's. Much appreciated


mudpeople.jpg
Ironic statement and picture. I guess you don't know the KKK was started by the Democrats. The joke is on you. LoL


Ironic YOU don't know it was the SOUTHERN CONServative CONfederate States of AmeriKKKa that had/is the KKK , you know TODAY'S GOP BASE!!


Hint Dems and GOP switched several times since 1900, you know??? lol
Another fool we need to educate. Racists democrats switching to the party that was founded in order to free the slaves would never do that. Democrats were liberals. Do you claim Al Gore Sr was not a liberal. J Willia. Fulbright, Clinton's mentor, Dixiecrat and opposed the Vietnam War wasn't a liberal? Republicans, conservative or otherwise, were never supportive of Slavery or against Civil Rights like the two Democrat liberal's I just mentioned.

Slavery, KKK and Jim Crow are your heritage. Own up Ito it and work to change the nature of your party that wants to control the lives of others...like coming up with Obamacare. See...your party hasn't changed in 100s of years.

Really? So you saying the SOUTHERN CONServastive CONfederate States was PROGRESSIVE/LIBERAL? Really? lol

ABE WAS CONservative NOT PROGRESSIVE? lol


Hint the SLAVERS, WERE./ARE CONservatives!
 
I don't agree.

Labor no longer carries the value it once did. That has been a tough pill to swallow.

People are not lazy. They don't, however, seem to be to adaptable.

America is to caught up on getting more of what others have.

Consequently, we are throwing away the things (like family) that really are important.

Sure, it's NOT Gov't policy that favors the "job creators", just lazy people!
Then why can't you feed your kids???


So no, YOU can't think beyond a bumper sticker. Got it
So you can't discuss the fact that my tax dollars go to failed programs...

Got it.

True, Iraq and tax cuts for the rich, failed MISERABLY

corporate-profits-and-wages.jpg


income-inequality-oecd.jpg


federal-budget-deficit-percent-of-gdp.jpg
Thank you for demonstrating that your war on poverty is failing.

Can I assist you?
Welfare Hits Record Levels After 50 Years of War on Poverty
 
Schools should not provide ANY food for kids. The kids should get breakfast at home and the parents should give them a sack lunch to take to school. White parents are fine with that but minority parents don't want the hassle and expense of feeding their own kids.

Federal Government Looking to Feed Public School Students 3 Meals Per Day Year Round

sep 4 2015Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said on Tuesday that his agency is looking for “creative ways” to give public school students access to more meals, including a way to provide them breakfast, lunch and dinner year round.

“We have focused on efforts to try to figure out ways in which we can expand in those time periods when youngsters may not have access to school meals,” Vilsack said in remarks at the liberal Center for American Progress in Washington, D.C. That includes giving students access to meals “across the school day, across the school year and across the calendar year,” he said
Those kids need a lunch.

But 3 meals??? Nope......it's like the Democrat think that the parents aren't feeding them.

I remember the Dems saying the kids are too fat at the same time.

Jesus Christ!!!

The OP, like the link from the "Christian News Service" is a distortion, try reading it with honesty!
 
Those who monopolize the majority of wealth and income pay the most taxes.......not nearly as much as they used to

That burden has been shifted to the middle class
Pay attention. Half of this country escapes all liability for federal income tax. So how is it that those who do pay taxes are not paying their "fair share" when so many pay nothing at all?

BTW, a fair tax that replaces the income tax is a good way to make sure everyone has skin in the game. The rich buy more, so they pay more taxes, but nobody dodges their part in paying taxes.
Half the country makes so little fucking money that they don't even reach the threshold to pay taxes

THAT should be your gripe....not how to we soak more money out of these people
That's because half the country are lazy Democrats that want us to support them...

Obamanomics work real well, don't they???
What we are seeing is the end result of Supply Side economics......the lasting legacy of Ronald Reagan

A situation where money has been focused on the wealthiest Americans while working Americans were left to whither on the vine
No. What we are seeing is socialist economics. The lasting legacy of lazy ass Americans that get paid to sit on their asses and bitch about what other people are forced to give them for doing nothing. A country where one used to be proud to work... has been turned into a country where people who work are ridiculed by the people who don't.

Oh yes...typical conservative claim that half of America is dumb and lazy

Meanwhile our productivity is among the highest levels in the world, American workers work more hours, have less vacation and retire later

And have less to show for it
 
No. What we are seeing is socialist economics. The lasting legacy of lazy ass Americans that get paid to sit on their asses and bitch about what other people are forced to give them for doing nothing. A country where one used to be proud to work... has been turned into a country where people who work are ridiculed by the people who don't.

I don't agree.

Labor no longer carries the value it once did. That has been a tough pill to swallow.

People are not lazy. They don't, however, seem to be to adaptable.

America is to caught up on getting more of what others have.

Consequently, we are throwing away the things (like family) that really are important.

Sure, it's NOT Gov't policy that favors the "job creators", just lazy people!
Then why can't you feed your kids???


So no, YOU can't think beyond a bumper sticker. Got it
So you can't discuss the fact that my tax dollars go to failed programs...

Got it.

Uh...oh...Dumbass Dad is in the thread.

I wondered why I could not see your replies (even though I got an alert).

I've got DumbassDad (a.k.a. "The Spammer") on ignore.
 

Forum List

Back
Top