- Thread starter
- #61
And while I realize adult language is difficult for leftards Dershowitz didn't make a determination but rather has the temerity to publicly state that trump would have had to commit a crime to be guilty of obstruction. Can you name the crime any sitting prez would be guilty of for firing his subordinates?Harvard Law prof Alan Dershowitz says the case for obstruction must be based on the commission of or attempt to commit an illegal act. As of today Trump has done neither. Firing or threatening to fire subordinates is within his authority as POTUS.
As far as the findings within the Mueller report in regard to obstruction are concerned, it is the function of The US Congress to determine, not some two bit attorney named Dershowitz
Last edited: