- Thread starter
- #21
Harvard Law prof Alan Dershowitz says the case for obstruction must be based on the commission of or attempt to commit an illegal act. As of today Trump has done neither. Firing or threatening to fire subordinates is within his authority as POTUS.
Its hard for people who back Tramp to admit he is guilty of obstruction, but you must admit the facts. Denial is not the answer for all of you trampers. You must face the truth.
Fuck boot licking Dershowitz.
And y'all had the same highly predictable knee-jerk reaction. I understand you're still struggling to digest the news that no member of the Trump fam or aides was indicted for colluding with the Russian meddlers but perhaps you should just do all the heavy lifting at one time and get it over with. You know ... No collusion, No obstruction."Dershowitz says: No Obstruction" lol
And?