🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Despite letters of apology from admin, congress furious over Bergdahl deal

So not any time soon, I didn't think so.

That you don't take responsibility for your own actions doesn't mean no one else can hold you to responsibility for them.

We'll be living with the consequences of President Bushes decisions for decades to come. The clean up crew doesn't own that. But don't you worry none, the statist again lifted the rug and swept all the dirt under it for you. As a bonus you get to Carter'ize' Obama. Yippie.

So if Hillary does follow Obama we can still look forward to W being blamed for every problem. Why am I not surprised?

What's funniest about your sheepdom is that Obama has most of the same policies that W did. Yet you see him doing the same things as fixing the problems caused by the same policies.

Oh I'm sure we'll still be able to find things we can blame on Raygun.........:lol:

Cleaning up the mess is not fixing the problem. It's like our vacation to the beautiful white sandy beaches of Destin Fla in June of 2010. When they were bulldozing the line of tarballs every morning on the beach, they were just cleaning up the mess, not fixing the problem.
 
"...and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States"

I don't see anywhere in the Constitution that says he needs Congressional approval for any of what you claim. No 30 day waiting period, no having to get Congress to approve of the transportation funds, zero, nada.
You can't pardon POW's.

And?????

But this is really about Republicrats trying "to shield the Bush presidency and legacy from being held accountable for the torture and inhumane acts it perpetrated in the name of security. That is why trials for detainees in federal courts have been blocked and why transfers out of Guantanamo have been all but shut down."



:D

No they have been blocked because they are POW's not criminals. Liberals don't seem to understand the difference.
 
We'll be living with the consequences of President Bushes decisions for decades to come. The clean up crew doesn't own that. But don't you worry none, the statist again lifted the rug and swept all the dirt under it for you. As a bonus you get to Carter'ize' Obama. Yippie.

So if Hillary does follow Obama we can still look forward to W being blamed for every problem. Why am I not surprised?

What's funniest about your sheepdom is that Obama has most of the same policies that W did. Yet you see him doing the same things as fixing the problems caused by the same policies.

Oh I'm sure we'll still be able to find things we can blame on Raygun.........:lol:

Cleaning up the mess is not fixing the problem. It's like our vacation to the beautiful white sandy beaches of Destin Fla in June of 2010. When they were bulldozing the line of tarballs every morning on the beach, they were just cleaning up the mess, not fixing the problem.

So Obama is using the same policies not to fix the problems, just to clean up the mess. That makes so much more sense, thanks for clarifying.
 
Including top dems:

"I think that they expected everybody just to fall in line," said Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee and one of those who received a personal apology from a senior White House aide.

"Feinstein said the White House failed to anticipate that bypassing Congress would provoke anger on both sides of the aisle. The discovery that the five Afghans were top-ranking Taliban commanders has fueled concerns that the trade may endanger U.S. security.

""This is an issue that certainly those of us on the Intelligence Committee care a great deal about," Feinstein said. "Because we believe that there is potential danger from certain of these five people."


White House faces growing fury in Congress over Bowe Bergdahl deal*-*Los Angeles Times

apparently, reality didn't reach the righwitngnut blogosphere yet....

the "story" is a lie.

Obama: Congress Consulted on Bergdahl Exchange - ABC News

You asshole! Even that scumbag leftist Diane Feinstein confirms...

Feinstein: Congress Should Have Been Consulted on Bergdahl Exchange

Senate Democrat Says Administration Took Too Long to Loop In Lawmakers Over POW Swap


Feinstein: Congress Should Have Been Consulted on Bergdahl Exchange - WSJ

they didnt need consulted..
 
We aren't talking about *need* peeballs. We're talking about the law.

We don't NEED your dumb ass on the planet, for example.

But legally, we can't remove you from it.

Do you understand?
 
You can't pardon POW's.

And?????

But this is really about Republicrats trying "to shield the Bush presidency and legacy from being held accountable for the torture and inhumane acts it perpetrated in the name of security. That is why trials for detainees in federal courts have been blocked and why transfers out of Guantanamo have been all but shut down."



:D

No they have been blocked because they are POW's not criminals. Liberals don't seem to understand the difference.

POW's can be charged with criminal offenses. Just being a POW doesn't give automatic amnesty. But the Taliban being held at Guantanamo are not POW's. Nor have they been charged by the US or any other authority of crimes.
 
apparently, reality didn't reach the righwitngnut blogosphere yet....

the "story" is a lie.

Obama: Congress Consulted on Bergdahl Exchange - ABC News

You asshole! Even that scumbag leftist Diane Feinstein confirms...

Feinstein: Congress Should Have Been Consulted on Bergdahl Exchange

Senate Democrat Says Administration Took Too Long to Loop In Lawmakers Over POW Swap


Feinstein: Congress Should Have Been Consulted on Bergdahl Exchange - WSJ

they didnt need consulted..

And Congress said they did!
 
apparently, reality didn't reach the righwitngnut blogosphere yet....

the "story" is a lie.

Obama: Congress Consulted on Bergdahl Exchange - ABC News

Republicans in Congress criticized the agreement and complained about not having been consulted, citing a law that requires that Congress be notified 30 days before a prisoner is released from Guantanamo. Republicans on the House Armed Services Committee said the Pentagon notified the panel by phone on Saturday that the exchange was occurring in the next five hours.

once again allie is wrong

They notified them FIVE HOURS ahead of time?

Okay, you realize the law requires 30 days. Right?

Oh wait, it's jill and what's his face. Of course you don't know what the law says.

your link

Lawmakers said Obama ignored a provision in the 2014 defense authorization bill that requires the president to give Congress 30 days' notice before moving any detainees from Guantanamo Bay.

But Obama gave himself a legal loophole when he signed the bill in December. In what's known as a signing statement, he said he would exercise authority as commander in chief, if necessary, "to act swiftly in conducting negotiations with foreign countries regarding the circumstances of detainee transfers."

eat shit twat
 
You asshole! Even that scumbag leftist Diane Feinstein confirms...

Feinstein: Congress Should Have Been Consulted on Bergdahl Exchange

Senate Democrat Says Administration Took Too Long to Loop In Lawmakers Over POW Swap


Feinstein: Congress Should Have Been Consulted on Bergdahl Exchange - WSJ

they didnt need consulted..

And Congress said they did!

Lawmakers said Obama ignored a provision in the 2014 defense authorization bill that requires the president to give Congress 30 days' notice before moving any detainees from Guantanamo Bay.

But Obama gave himself a legal loophole when he signed the bill in December. In what's known as a signing statement, he said he would exercise authority as commander in chief, if necessary, "to act swiftly in conducting negotiations with foreign countries regarding the circumstances of detainee transfers."

congress is ignorant
 
Taliban Commanders Say They Found Bergdahl Cursing His Countrymen

*6*/*5*/*2014* NBC News ^ ...Even the leftist media KNOWS when to turn on the Mess...iah!


The Taliban found Pfc. Bowe Bergdahl walking alone, acting abnormally and cursing his countrymen before they captured him in Afghanistan in 2009, two men who were Taliban commanders at the time told NBC News on Thursday. They said that Afghan locals first informed fighters about the soldier, and then the fighters rushed to capture him. “Our people at the time couldn’t understand his language, but it was after he was shifted to a safe location, he said he wasn’t happy with his countrymen, but he didn’t intend to convert to Islam or join mujahideen (holy warriors),” one of the commanders...
 
they didnt need consulted..

And Congress said they did!

Lawmakers said Obama ignored a provision in the 2014 defense authorization bill that requires the president to give Congress 30 days' notice before moving any detainees from Guantanamo Bay.

But Obama gave himself a legal loophole when he signed the bill in December. In what's known as a signing statement, he said he would exercise authority as commander in chief, if necessary, "to act swiftly in conducting negotiations with foreign countries regarding the circumstances of detainee transfers."
congress is ignorant


Dimwit, a signing statement IS NOT THE LAW which HE SIGNED. That would be a LINE ITEM VETO and that is LONG PAST being relevant!
 
Bergdahl declared jihad in 2010, secret documents show

*6*/*5*/*2014* Fox News ^


U.S. Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl at one point during his captivity converted to Islam, fraternized openly with his captors and declared himself a "mujahid," or warrior for Islam, according to secret documents prepared on the basis of a purported eyewitness account and obtained by Fox News. The reports indicate that Bergdahl's relations with his Haqqani captors morphed over time, from periods of hostility, where he was treated very much like a hostage, to periods where, as one source told Fox News, "he became much more of an accepted fellow" than is popularly understood. He even reportedly was allowed to carry...
 
And Congress said they did!

Lawmakers said Obama ignored a provision in the 2014 defense authorization bill that requires the president to give Congress 30 days' notice before moving any detainees from Guantanamo Bay.

But Obama gave himself a legal loophole when he signed the bill in December. In what's known as a signing statement, he said he would exercise authority as commander in chief, if necessary, "to act swiftly in conducting negotiations with foreign countries regarding the circumstances of detainee transfers."
congress is ignorant


Dimwit, a signing statement IS NOT THE LAW which HE SIGNED. That would be a LINE ITEM VETO and that is LONG PAST being relevant!

uh huh partisan hack....This is amusing...
 
congress is ignorant


Dimwit, a signing statement IS NOT THE LAW which HE SIGNED. That would be a LINE ITEM VETO and that is LONG PAST being relevant!

uh huh partisan hack....This is amusing...

It is amusing, I accept your surrender!

jgr2vr.jpg
 
I wonder who Conservatives are going to explain this in 20-30 years.

"We wanted to Impeach Obama"

"Why?"

"Because he made a deal to bring an American soldier home"

Seriously Conservatives, THINK about this for the future. You want to impeach the President over making a deal to bring an American home. THINK about how that will make you look. Quit being 100% against Obama all the time. Sometimes to bring an American home, you have to make a deal. It's been 5 years and no luck finding him. If he was a deserter, let him have his day in court but we don't leave an American in a foreign prison because of what he might think about a War.
 

Forum List

Back
Top