Did a right winger kill Kennedy???

[healthmyths]

MOST of YOU MISSED the point of the THREAD!!!
Why did the MSM jump to conclusions that a RIGHT WINGNUT killed Kennedy?
Again Rather jumped to conclusions... entire MSM jumped!

And even today the first group to be painted in any shooting from Kennedy till Gabby Giffords... RIGHT WINGER DID IT!!!

Isn't the MSM suppose to get the facts STRAIGHT first rather then jump to conclusions??

Even today the MSM blames EVERYTHING on Bush and nothing on Obama!
Even the simple turkey that Bush picked up in Sept 2003 visiting the troops... today MSM can't believe it was a real turkey!
Just once again how idiots who bashed Bush support Obama are primarily from the MSM!

 

[daws101]

MOST of YOU MISSED the point of the THREAD!!!
Why did the MSM jump to conclusions that a RIGHT WINGNUT killed Kennedy?
Again Rather jumped to conclusions... entire MSM jumped!

And even today the first group to be painted in any shooting from Kennedy till Gabby Giffords... RIGHT WINGER DID IT!!!

Isn't the MSM suppose to get the facts STRAIGHT first rather then jump to conclusions??

Even today the MSM blames EVERYTHING on Bush and nothing on Obama!
Even the simple turkey that Bush picked up in Sept 2003 visiting the troops... today MSM can't believe it was a real turkey!
Just once again how idiots who bashed Bush support Obama are primarily from the MSM!

this might have a little something to do with it:

 

[healthmyths]

MOST of YOU MISSED the point of the THREAD!!!
Why did the MSM jump to conclusions that a RIGHT WINGNUT killed Kennedy?
Again Rather jumped to conclusions... entire MSM jumped!

And even today the first group to be painted in any shooting from Kennedy till Gabby Giffords... RIGHT WINGER DID IT!!!

Isn't the MSM suppose to get the facts STRAIGHT first rather then jump to conclusions??

Even today the MSM blames EVERYTHING on Bush and nothing on Obama!
Even the simple turkey that Bush picked up in Sept 2003 visiting the troops... today MSM can't believe it was a real turkey!
Just once again how idiots who bashed Bush support Obama are primarily from the MSM!

this might have a little something to do with it:

Had something to do with piss poor journalism? Something to do with the FACT there has ALWAYS been a bias against people of principle by the MSM!
They and their ilk are like junior high kids. They jump to conclusions. Make rash decisions and judgements.
What would you say were the perpetrators then of this picture?


They left wing radicals???

 

[gipper]

MOST of YOU MISSED the point of the THREAD!!!
Why did the MSM jump to conclusions that a RIGHT WINGNUT killed Kennedy?
Again Rather jumped to conclusions... entire MSM jumped!

And even today the first group to be painted in any shooting from Kennedy till Gabby Giffords... RIGHT WINGER DID IT!!!

Isn't the MSM suppose to get the facts STRAIGHT first rather then jump to conclusions??

Even today the MSM blames EVERYTHING on Bush and nothing on Obama!
Even the simple turkey that Bush picked up in Sept 2003 visiting the troops... today MSM can't believe it was a real turkey!
Just once again how idiots who bashed Bush support Obama are primarily from the MSM!

The MSM is the propaganda machine for the establishment. They will lie whenever it is necessary to protect the establishment.

Look at the reporting of the JFK 50th anniversary. Almost all of it promoted the government's conclusion....lone nut shooter...what a bunch of BS. They are protecting the State.

But also, the MSM is almost entirely leftist. As such, they will resort to presenting the news with their left wing bias.

If the MSM reported only the FACTS, this nation would not be in the terrible condition it is in. The MSM is NOT the Fourth Estate...it is the Fifth Column.

 

[Politico]

A nut killed Kennedy.

 

[editec]

Rightwinger killed Kennedy??

Calling them (or JFK for that matter) RIGHTESTS or LEFTESTS is dumbing down the issue.


Is the mafia left or right?

Is the street mugger left or right?

See?

That's really asking the wrong question.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Rightwinger killed Kennedy??

the bastard.

 

[healthmyths]

Rightwinger killed Kennedy??

Calling them (or JFK for that matter) RIGHTESTS or LEFTESTS is dumbing down the issue.


Is the mafia left or right?

Is the street mugger left or right?

See?

That's really asking the wrong question.

Obviously it was a rhetorical question to set up the premise that the MSM will present EVERY time that a right wing nut did it!

All the mass shootings, etc. and NOW TV shows are finding yup.. right wing groups plotting to destroy the country!

NOT one major TV show has shown images much less a plot where the bad guys are white right wing terrorists!

Right-wing extremist individuals over the past decade in the United States were as likely to use violence as a means to express their political or social beliefs as those motivated by Osama bin Laden's ideology. Even more worryingly, during the same time period, right-wing and left-wing extremist groups and individuals have been far more likely to acquire toxins and to assemble the makings of radiological weapons than al Qaeda sympathizers.
Right-wing extremist terrorism as deadly a threat as al Qaeda? - CNN.com

But when it comes to LEFT WING TERRORISTS???

Realistically speaking, then, there were a grand total of 2 killings over the last 12 years by “right-wing extremists.”

The study lists just four Islamic terrorist attacks in that period:
Hesham Mohamed Hadayet (2): He shot two at the El-Al counter at Los Angeles International Airport in 2002.
Naveed Afzal Haq (1): He shot up the Jewish Federation building in Seattle, Washington in 2006.
Nidal Malik Hasan (13): The perpetrator of the Fort Hood terrorist attack.
Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad (1): He shot up a Little Rock recruitment office in 2009.

The list does not include the Beltway snipers (11 killed, including a 2002 shooting of a Tucson man);
Mohammed Ali Alayed, who slashed a Jewish friend’s throat after reportedly undergoing a religious revival;
Mohammed Reza Taheri-azar, who used his SUV to attack students (9 injured) at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in revenge for “the deaths of Muslims worldwide”; the list goes on.
The list also does not include honor killings (the equivalent to the George Tiller assassination), or random murders involving Muslims (the equivalent of half the items on the “rightwing terrorist attacks” list.
Naturally, the study does not bother to list left-wing terrorists.

 

[rightwinger]

I didn't kill Kennedy

 

[daws101]

I didn't kill Kennedy

then why were you on the grassy knoll?

 

[rightwinger]

I didn't kill Kennedy

then why were you on the grassy knoll?

Wasn't me.....I have an alibi

 

[daws101]

I didn't kill Kennedy

then why were you on the grassy knoll?

Wasn't me.....I have an alibi

so do I ..I was only four and would have needed a box to stand on.

 

[gipper]

So many people want to romanticize the slaying of Kennedy, they just refuse to believe a plain little insignificant man could do in this great leader.
If you read the whole background of Oswald, you will come away with little doubt that he acted alone and managed to murder JFK.

The conspiratists do nothing but add confusion to this sad tragic story.

Oswald did it, get over it, move on.

That is just what the State wants you to believe. You like many have chosen to ignore the facts and accept the BS. Educate yourself rather than run with the herd...this will help you greatly...

So, what’s different about the Kennedy assassination? Why have so many people over the years, including brilliant researchers and analysts, concluded that the national-security state orchestrated and carried out Kennedy’s assassination?

Among the reasons are:

The countless anomalies in the Kennedy case, anomalies that make absolutely no sense at all except in the context of a national-security state assassination.
The large body of circumstantial evidence pointing to a national-security state operation in the Kennedy assassination.
The manifest evidence of fraud in the autopsy, which was controlled by the the national-security state.
The fact that the national-security state had the motive to kill Kennedy, on grounds of national security.
The fact that the assassination fits within the pattern of regime-change operations, including assassination, in which the national-security state apparatus has been involved since its inception in 1947.
Consider some of the many anomalies.

1. The medical personnel at Parkland Hospital, FBI agent Clint Hill, and the FBI agents who attended the autopsy at Bethesda, all stated that the president had a large hole in the back of his head, indicating an exit wound, which means that a shot was fired from the front.

Yet, the official autopsy photographs show the back of Kennedy’s head to be intact.

We’re just supposed to ignore that. Or we’re expected to believe that all those people just made a mistake, independently of each other. The last thing we’re supposed to do is to conclude that the government falsified the evidence to cover up shots having been fired from the front. We’re supposed to just defer to authority and meekly accept the official version of events.

2. What about all the military personnel who stated that Kennedy’s body was secretly brought in early to the Bethesda morgue in a cheap shipping casket, unbeknownst to the public? Well, we’re expected to assume that they’re mistaken too or just lying. Never mind how improbable it is that a group of enlisted military men, along with the most prestigious funeral home in Washington, conspired to concoct a fake and false story about how Kennedy’s body was brought into the Bethesda morgue. We’re just supposed to meekly defer to authority and conclude that that they were just, for some unknown reason, engaged in a conspiracy with each other to concoct a fake and false story as to how JFK’s body was brought early into the morgue.

Otherwise, we might be tempted to conclude that national-security state officials were up to no good that night by bringing the body into the morgue earlier than everyone thought in order to make the necessary arrangements to hide the fact that shots had been fired from the front.

3. What about the two different brains that were examined after the autopsy? One brain exam session included the official autopsy photographer, who stated that the brain was sectioned or cut during the session, which is standard procedure to discover the direction of a gunshot.

But there is a problem. That official photographer denied that the photographs of the brain that are in the official record today were taken by him. That means that, unless he was lying, they were taken by some other, unknown photographer who attended a second brain exam session, one that included an autopsy pathologist who said that the brain wasn’t sectioned or cut at all.

Oh, and there’s another problem. The photographs of the brain in the official records show an almost complete brain, one with disrupted tissue but with all the mass still present, a brain that actually weighs more than an average brain, notwithstanding the fact that everyone agrees that at a large portion of Kennedy’s brain was blown out by the gun shot that hit him in the head.

But we are just supposed to passively accept all this and move on. After all, it’s just inconceivable that the U.S. military would be up to no good during the president’s autopsy.

4. Indeed, we’re not even supposed to think that anything was unusual when a team of Secret Service agents brandished guns and forced their way out of Parkland Hospital with the president’s body, implicitly threatening to kill the official Dallas medical examiner who was just doing his job by insisting that the body remain at Parkland to undergo an autopsy, as required by state law. We’re just supposed to accept the idea that federal agents would violate the law, threaten to kill hospital personnel, and jeopardize a criminal prosecution, all on their own initiative, rather than cooperate with state officials in the investigation of a very serious crime, as we would ordinarily expect them to do.

In fact, we’re not supposed to think that anything is unusual in the fact that Lyndon Johnson was patiently awaiting the delivery of Kennedy’s body at Dallas Love Field. After all, supposedly the assassination could have been the first step in a Soviet nuclear attack on the United States. But who are we to wonder why the new president, LBJ, would supposedly put chivalry toward Mrs. Kennedy ahead of the survival of the nation, especially given the deep hatred and antipathy he had for the Kennedy family?

5. Indeed, who are we question the fact that the feds took no adverse action whatsoever against an American citizen and former U.S. Marine who had supposedly given top-secret information to the Soviets, America’s official enemy throughout the Cold War?

Sure, we know how the feds treat people like Daniel Ellsberg, Chelsey (Bradley) Manning, John Walker Lindh, and Edward Snowden. They arrest them, they torture them, they abuse them, they prosecute them, and they incarcerate them.

And we also know how the CIA and the FBI viewed communist sympathizers during the Cold War, such as those in the U.S. Communist Party, the Fair Play for Cuba Committee, and, according to national-security state officials, even the American civil-rights movement. They spied on them, they harassed them, they prosecuted them, they blackmailed them, they incarcerated them, and they ruined them.

But hey, Lee Harvey Oswald was different, right? He was only a guy who supposedly had shamed the Marines by becoming a communist, supposedly betrayed his country by supposedly delivering top-secret information he had acquired as a Marine to the Soviets, and supposedly defected to America’s official Cold War enemy (and World War II partner and ally), the Soviet Union.

Oh well, everyone makes mistakes, right? So, let’s just let bygones be bygones and even lend Oswald the money to get back home. And when he later asks for a new passport so he can go to Mexico, let’s rush and give him one-day urgent service.

And let’s not even think of harassing him, torturing him, abusing him, arresting him, or even subpoenaing him to testify before a federal grand jury about his supposed betrayal of his country.

And above all, let’s not think to ourselves that any of this is anything but normal behavior on the part of the feds, even when they are busy ferreting out and destroying communists in the State Department, the army, Hollywood, the Communist Party, the Fair Play for Cuba Committee, the ACLU, and the civil-rights movement at the height of the Cold War.

6. Let’s also not ask where Oswald acquired his spy-craft skills, including getting post office boxes registered to bogus names, or even how he learned to speak fluent Russian while in the military. Those are things that we just shouldn’t think about it.

7. Or why Oswald would stamp “544 Camp Street” as the return address on his Fair Play for Cuba Committee pamphlets in New Orleans, which just happened to be an entrance to the offices of a retired FBI agent named Guy Bannister, who had close ties to anti-Castro Cubans and whose office just happened to be situated within walking distance of the FBI, CIA, Office of Naval Intelligence, and the fiercely anti-communist Reily Coffee Company, which had hired as an employee a supposed fierce pro-communist named Lee Harvey Oswald.

But we’re just not supposed to wonder about such things. We’re supposed to defer to authority and just move on.

8. Indeed, we’re not even supposed to wonder why the magic bullet that supposedly went through Kennedy’s neck and broke Gov. Connally’s rib and wrist bone was still in pristine condition and why it didn’t have one even tiny bit of flesh or blood on it. After all, what’s the alternative — that it was planted to frame an innocent man? Why, that’s just inconceivable. Everyone knows that the law-enforcement officials never frame innocent people.

9. Or what about those people on the grassy knoll who displayed Secret Service badges to keep people away immediately after the shooting when, in fact, there were no Secret Service agents on the grassy knoll? Well, that’s just something that we need to ignore too. It just couldn’t have happened. Those people must have been mistaken too or are also conspiring to establish a false conspiracy.

10. Indeed, Malcolm Perry, the Dallas emergency physician who performed a tracheotomy on Kennedy, and who stated three times at a press conference immediately after the assassination that the bullet hole in the front of Kennedy’s neck, which Perry obviously examined closely, was an entry wound, most assuredly must have been mistaken too. We should just defer to those military pathologists at Bethesda, who claim that they didn’t even notice the bullet wound in the front of the neck during the autopsy and instead concluded, after the autopsy was over and the body released, that the bullet wound in the front of the neck (that they hadn’t noticed) had to be an exit wound, one from which the magic bullet supposedly exited.

please read the entire column here: The National-Security State?s Assassination of John F. Kennedy The Future of Freedom Foundation

There are numerous excellent completely documented books on the subject. Please read some...once you do, you realize a coup d'etat occurred and the entire fraud that is the American government, is exposed.

I notice the magic bullet theorists have no answers for these facts.

I would guess that many Americans choose to believe the government's story on the assassination because they can't accept that their government was involved in the murder of a president. It is a hard thing to accept.

 

[daws101]

That is just what the State wants you to believe. You like many have chosen to ignore the facts and accept the BS. Educate yourself rather than run with the herd...this will help you greatly...



please read the entire column here: The National-Security State?s Assassination of John F. Kennedy The Future of Freedom Foundation

There are numerous excellent completely documented books on the subject. Please read some...once you do, you realize a coup d'etat occurred and the entire fraud that is the American government, is exposed.

I notice the magic bullet theorists have no answers for these facts.

I would guess that many Americans choose to believe the government's story on the assassination because they can't accept that their government was involved in the murder of a president. It is a hard thing to accept.

actually it's the other way around. conspiracy theorist cannot or will not accept that not everything that happens in the world is controlled or planned and executed by nwo.
my guess is, it gives you the warm fuzzes to believe that the world is not a random and dangerous place..

 

[gipper]

I notice the magic bullet theorists have no answers for these facts.

I would guess that many Americans choose to believe the government's story on the assassination because they can't accept that their government was involved in the murder of a president. It is a hard thing to accept.

actually it's the other way around. conspiracy theorist cannot or will not accept that not everything that happens in the world is controlled or planned and executed by nwo.
my guess is, it gives you the warm fuzzes to believe that the world is not a random and dangerous place..

Very typical foolish response.

Because one sees a conspiracy in the JFK murder (loads of evidence indicate conspiracy), you conclude I see a conspiracy in everything. That is pure unadulterated ignorance. I see no conspiracy in Lincoln's murder, McKinley's murder, Reagan's shooting, Lennon's murder, etc.............

 

[daws101]

I would guess that many Americans choose to believe the government's story on the assassination because they can't accept that their government was involved in the murder of a president. It is a hard thing to accept.

actually it's the other way around. conspiracy theorist cannot or will not accept that not everything that happens in the world is controlled or planned and executed by nwo.
my guess is, it gives you the warm fuzzes to believe that the world is not a random and dangerous place..

Very typical foolish response.

Because one sees a conspiracy in the JFK murder (loads of evidence indicate conspiracy), you conclude I see a conspiracy in everything. That is pure unadulterated ignorance. I see no conspiracy in Lincoln's murder, McKinley's murder, Reagan's shooting, Lennon's murder, etc.............

then you've just proven your idiocy , only someone in denial would claim Lincoln's murder was not a conspiracy!
that's gotta go on the dumbest remarks ever made list!
thanks for the laugh!

 

[gipper]

actually it's the other way around. conspiracy theorist cannot or will not accept that not everything that happens in the world is controlled or planned and executed by nwo.
my guess is, it gives you the warm fuzzes to believe that the world is not a random and dangerous place..

Very typical foolish response.

Because one sees a conspiracy in the JFK murder (loads of evidence indicate conspiracy), you conclude I see a conspiracy in everything. That is pure unadulterated ignorance. I see no conspiracy in Lincoln's murder, McKinley's murder, Reagan's shooting, Lennon's murder, etc.............

then you've just proven your idiocy , only someone in denial would claim Lincoln's murder was not a conspiracy!
that's gotta go on the dumbest remarks ever made list!
thanks for the laugh!

You are a fool.

Lincoln's murder was fully and justly defined and prosecuted. JFK's was not. See the difference? guess not...

 

[daws101]

Very typical foolish response.

Because one sees a conspiracy in the JFK murder (loads of evidence indicate conspiracy), you conclude I see a conspiracy in everything. That is pure unadulterated ignorance. I see no conspiracy in Lincoln's murder, McKinley's murder, Reagan's shooting, Lennon's murder, etc.............

then you've just proven your idiocy , only someone in denial would claim Lincoln's murder was not a conspiracy!
that's gotta go on the dumbest remarks ever made list!
thanks for the laugh!

You are a fool.

Lincoln's murder was fully and justly defined and prosecuted. JFK's was not. See the difference? guess not...

nice dodge! sorry but that's effect not cause...

 

[candycorn]

conspiracy crap

Oswald was a commie, he did Kennedy

end of story

Not to go conspiracy whackjob on you but if you were going to kill the POTUS, wouldn't you have had a better plan than he had immediately after the shooting?

I have no doubt Oswald was the lone gunman. But the actions after the killing leave me wondering about his motivations/motivators. That and he was able to defect from the US to the USSR, then back again. He had to be one of a very few who was ever able to do that during the cold war. And THEN the presidential motorcade just happens to go buy a building where he worked?

Seems incredible to me.

 

[Indeependent]

So a Right-Wing group wanted LBJ to be president?