Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It was presented as real.None of us know that.Of course not. But this wasn't a legal gun. It was an illegal 30 round magazine, you idiot.
It could very well have been a fake empty prop.
Wow, all this but hurt over "Meet the Press"...
Because LaPierre got caught foaming at the mouth like Old Yeller...
Wow, all this but hurt over "Meet the Press"...
Because LaPierre got caught foaming at the mouth like Old Yeller...
when someone is shaking a 30 rnd magazine in the manner gregory was...who's foaming at the mouth like a baby calf with pneumonia.
Gregory is probably realizing how stupid the ban is by now. If not, he will if or when he gets tossed in jail.
Well he is under investigation...Gregory is probably realizing how stupid the ban is by now. If not, he will if or when he gets tossed in jail.
I don't think the ATF is going to get right on that. Nor do I think anyone else with a brain will.
Well he is under investigation...Gregory is probably realizing how stupid the ban is by now. If not, he will if or when he gets tossed in jail.
I don't think the ATF is going to get right on that. Nor do I think anyone else with a brain will.
Well he is under investigation...I don't think the ATF is going to get right on that. Nor do I think anyone else with a brain will.
Yeah, sure he is...
Well he is under investigation...I don't think the ATF is going to get right on that. Nor do I think anyone else with a brain will.
Yeah, sure he is...
Well he is under investigation...
Yeah, sure he is...
He is.
DC Police Investigating NBC's Gregory for Brandishing Illegal Magazine
Well he is under investigation...
Yeah, sure he is...
NBCs David Gregory Displays 30-Round Magazine On TV, Matter Is Under Investigation By Police | Mediaite
It's truly dumbfounding, the depths to which the gun nuts will go to silence voices in an effort to control the dialogue...
Bob Costas should be "fired"...
Piers Morgan should be "deported"...
David Gregory should be "arrested"...
Anybody not see the pattern?
It's truly dumbfounding, the depths to which the gun nuts will go to silence voices in an effort to control the dialogue...
Bob Costas should be "fired"...
Piers Morgan should be "deported"...
David Gregory should be "arrested"...
Anybody not see the pattern?
Yeah yeah, blame everyone and anyone but the idiot who didnt even respect the laws he wants in place. You are such pitiful creatures.
- when I wrote "anyone not see the pattern" I thought it was a rhetorical question. Here's a guy who seems to volunteer that he actually doesn't see it.It's truly dumbfounding, the depths to which the gun nuts will go to silence voices in an effort to control the dialogue...
Bob Costas should be "fired"...
Piers Morgan should be "deported"...
David Gregory should be "arrested"...
Anybody not see the pattern?
Yeah yeah, blame everyone and anyone but the idiot who didnt even respect the laws he wants in place. You are such pitiful creatures.
Wow
It's peculiar how some of y'all want to jump all in front of the Second Amendment as Constitutionally sacrosanct, yet say absolutely nothing about this abuse of the First Amendment going on at the same time.
Even more interesting that the attacks on the First Amendment came before those of the Second, the same order as the Bill of Rights -- when Bob Costas put his commentary out on Sunday Night Football, two weeks before Newtown, he was immediately pounced upon with calls from the knee jerks for his firing, even though he said nothing about gun control or the Second Amendment. Even Rupert Murdoch can see that.
Hypocrisy is rampant.
No under the law possession is ownership.
If the Cop who legally owns it is sitting right off camera he is the owner.
Letting someone touch what he owns is NOT illeagal.....mmmmkay
Wrong again dumbass, The legal defintion of possession is having control of
POSSESSION. A person has possession of something if the person knows of its presence and has physical control of it,
There are two types of possession: actual possession and constructive possession.
Actual possession (or physical possession) means you have the item on your person.
Constructive possession is when the item is in an area you control, such as inside your car, or in a drawer in your house. This type of possession requires knowledge. This means you either knew or should have known you had the item.
Run along now, it's obvious you have absolutley nothing intelligent to add to this conversation.
I think the judge would accept the cops assertion that he was in possession of the clip you complete fucking partisan hack
where is your proof that this clip was illeagal for the reporter to touch?NOWHERE!
you just got led by the nose by some partisan asshole reporter
Wrong again dumbass, The legal defintion of possession is having control of
POSSESSION. A person has possession of something if the person knows of its presence and has physical control of it,
There are two types of possession: actual possession and constructive possession.
Actual possession (or physical possession) means you have the item on your person.
Constructive possession is when the item is in an area you control, such as inside your car, or in a drawer in your house. This type of possession requires knowledge. This means you either knew or should have known you had the item.
Run along now, it's obvious you have absolutley nothing intelligent to add to this conversation.
I think the judge would accept the cops assertion that he was in possession of the clip you complete fucking partisan hack
If it was in the newscasters hands, and not in this mythical cop of yours hands, then the newscaster is in possesion of it and guilty and the cop is also guilty of giving the item to a person not legally allowed to posses it, you complete freaklng dumbass. THAT SON IS THE LAW. And cops are not exempt from following the law.
