did david gregory break the law on meet the press holding up that magazine

[GuyPinestra]

Well there's nothing Rightyloon at this point at all.

You're right...

 

[tyroneweaver]

Yeah, sure he is...

He is.
DC Police Investigating NBC's Gregory for Brandishing Illegal Magazine

That's Breitbart, they never get anything right.

actually it's being pushed by 20k gun owners over at ar15.com They're the ones pushing it. And they're on the prosecuting attorney about it also

 

[bripat9643]

It's truly dumbfounding, the depths to which the gun nuts will go to silence voices in an effort to control the dialogue...

Bob Costas should be "fired"...
Piers Morgan should be "deported"...
David Gregory should be "arrested"...

Anybody not see the pattern?

Yeah yeah, blame everyone and anyone but the idiot who didnt even respect the laws he wants in place. You are such pitiful creatures.

Wow - when I wrote "anyone not see the pattern" I thought it was a rhetorical question. Here's a guy who seems to volunteer that he actually doesn't see it.

It's peculiar how some of y'all want to jump all in front of the Second Amendment as Constitutionally sacrosanct, yet say absolutely nothing about this abuse of the First Amendment going on at the same time.

Even more interesting that the attacks on the First Amendment came before those of the Second, the same order as the Bill of Rights -- when Bob Costas put his commentary out on Sunday Night Football, two weeks before Newtown, he was immediately pounced upon with calls from the knee jerks for his firing, even though he said nothing about gun control or the Second Amendment. Even Rupert Murdoch can see that.

Hypocrisy is rampant.

This is no attack on the First Amendment, ding dong. He broke the law. End of story. If he molested a 5-year-old boy on his show to make some point, would you call prosecuting him a violation of the First Amendment?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

There's absolutely no reason to think that it was a "real" magazine. TV props rarely are.

Should we investigate Law and Order too, in case those guns are real?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

There's absolutely no reason to think that it was a "real" magazine. TV props rarely are.

Should we investigate Law and Order too, in case those guns are real?

Sure defend a anti gun nazi we understand.

 

[saveliberty]

There's absolutely no reason to think that it was a "real" magazine. TV props rarely are.

Should we investigate Law and Order too, in case those guns are real?

Law and Order is in NYC dumbass.

 

[LockeJaw]

Yeah yeah, blame everyone and anyone but the idiot who didnt even respect the laws he wants in place. You are such pitiful creatures.

Wow - when I wrote "anyone not see the pattern" I thought it was a rhetorical question. Here's a guy who seems to volunteer that he actually doesn't see it.

It's peculiar how some of y'all want to jump all in front of the Second Amendment as Constitutionally sacrosanct, yet say absolutely nothing about this abuse of the First Amendment going on at the same time.

Even more interesting that the attacks on the First Amendment came before those of the Second, the same order as the Bill of Rights -- when Bob Costas put his commentary out on Sunday Night Football, two weeks before Newtown, he was immediately pounced upon with calls from the knee jerks for his firing, even though he said nothing about gun control or the Second Amendment. Even Rupert Murdoch can see that.

Hypocrisy is rampant.

This is no attack on the First Amendment, ding dong. He broke the law. End of story. If he molested a 5-year-old boy on his show to make some point, would you call prosecuting him a violation of the First Amendment?

He probably would call it that. These people are known to want to turn América into Canadá, where adults can legally have sex with 15 year olds. I would not be surprised if he was infact a NAMBLA supporter.

 

[bripat9643]

There's absolutely no reason to think that it was a "real" magazine. TV props rarely are.

Should we investigate Law and Order too, in case those guns are real?

There's absolutely every reason to think it was a real magazine. Making a fake one might cost $10,000. Why make a fake when he could just buy a real one an eBay? Furthermore, it looked real enough.

 

[saveliberty]

Where is Gregory's outrage about guns in schools, when his own kids attend a school protected by guns? Gregory wants you and I to be defenseless, not himself or his family.

 

[bripat9643]

There's absolutely no reason to think that it was a "real" magazine. TV props rarely are.

Should we investigate Law and Order too, in case those guns are real?

TV props generally are the real thing unless that would be prohibitively expensive.

 

[saveliberty]

Point is, if DC wants things so safe, why aren't they following up on Gregory?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The magazine is not a prop. I know what an empty magazine sounds like when you drop it,

[ame=http://youtu.be/yRjS2l0B7pM]Meet The Press David Gregory Violates DC Gun Law On National TV (Sign Petition To Have Him Arrested) - YouTube[/ame]

 

[theDoctorisIn]

There's absolutely no reason to think that it was a "real" magazine. TV props rarely are.

Should we investigate Law and Order too, in case those guns are real?

TV props generally are the real thing unless that would be prohibitively expensive.

So is Law and Order breaking the law when they show bad guys with automatic weapons?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

The magazine is not a prop. I know what an empty magazine sounds like when you drop it,

Meet The Press David Gregory Violates DC Gun Law On National TV (Sign Petition To Have Him Arrested) - YouTube

That's your "evidence"?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

There's absolutely no reason to think that it was a "real" magazine. TV props rarely are.

Should we investigate Law and Order too, in case those guns are real?

There's absolutely every reason to think it was a real magazine. Making a fake one might cost $10,000. Why make a fake when he could just buy a real one an eBay? Furthermore, it looked real enough.

Actually, all they would need to do to make a "prop" one would be to buy a real one, and deactivate it.

 

[LockeJaw]

The magazine is not a prop. I know what an empty magazine sounds like when you drop it,

Meet The Press David Gregory Violates DC Gun Law On National TV (Sign Petition To Have Him Arrested) - YouTube

Leftists are just plain liars and 100% ideological. Theyll make up things to try to save their ass or their Fellow traveler's ass.TM flat out made up that a cop brought it there, fabricated this crap out of a thin air, for example. The ends always justify the means when it comes to them.

 

[bripat9643]

There's absolutely no reason to think that it was a "real" magazine. TV props rarely are.

Should we investigate Law and Order too, in case those guns are real?

TV props generally are the real thing unless that would be prohibitively expensive.

So is Law and Order breaking the law when they show bad guys with automatic weapons?

It depends on whether they have real automatic weapons. The answer would be "yes" if they do. Generally, any "automatic weapons" you see in the movies or on TV are fakes.

 

[bripat9643]

There's absolutely no reason to think that it was a "real" magazine. TV props rarely are.

Should we investigate Law and Order too, in case those guns are real?

There's absolutely every reason to think it was a real magazine. Making a fake one might cost $10,000. Why make a fake when he could just buy a real one an eBay? Furthermore, it looked real enough.

Actually, all they would need to do to make a "prop" one would be to buy a real one, and deactivate it.

They would still be guilty of "transferring" a 30 round clip, which is illegal.

 

[thereisnospoon]

David Gregory lost that debate by a mile today. He was spotlighted on NBC news the night before. NBC really expect Gregory to mop the floor with the NRA. Total fail.

Not really. Lapierre looked like a giant asshole gun nut all over again.

What were you watching. Because the consensus is Gregory got melted by La Pierre.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

There's absolutely every reason to think it was a real magazine. Making a fake one might cost $10,000. Why make a fake when he could just buy a real one an eBay? Furthermore, it looked real enough.

Actually, all they would need to do to make a "prop" one would be to buy a real one, and deactivate it.

They would still be guilty of "transferring" a 30 round clip, which is illegal.

Only if they did it in DC.

You seem to be assuming that they purchased that clip specifically for that episode of "Meet the Press". Why wouldn't they just call the NBC prop department?