Did Hillarys Unsecured Email Server Get ProAmerican Spies Killed?

[Lucy Hamilton]

Hillary cant be trusted..

According to one major CIA analyst former Secretary Hillary Clinton’s use of a private server may have directly led to people’s death.

Ray McGovern, CIA analyst and a trusted confidant of Presidents Nixon, Ford and Reagan, believes it is entirely possible that Clinton’s unsecure server was hacked. If that is indeed what happened, McGovern believes it may have tipped off our enemies about Ambassador Stevens’ lack of security in Benghazi and led to the now infamous attack that killed four Americans.

Writing for Consortium News, McGovern points out, “If there is any indication that Clinton’s belatedly classified emails contained information about internal State Department discussions regarding the consulate’s security shortcomings, questions may be raised about whether that information was somehow compromised by a foreign intelligence agency and shared with the attackers.”

Former CIA Analyst Just Made Bombshell Claim About Hillary And Benghazi That Could Change Everything

"Hillary cant be trusted.."

Or Bill, I mean who would trust the Clinton's?

 

[Care4all]

Why is Senator Cotton discussing these emails with the media if the content of these emails was CLASSIFIED, and something Hillary's Aides should not have been discussing?

I don't get it?

Didnt Comey rule that none of them were classified because Hillary didnt mean to do it, or something like that?

BUT....
Were these emails discussing the Scientist EVER UP-Classified emails...were they public unclassified emails that were released and this is why Senator Cotton is able to bring them up with the media? Or is Cotton making things worse and breaking the law by discussing them with the Public?

If the emails on the Scientist contained no classified information and were not classified before the release of them, then what is Sen. Cotton's beef?

People like you are pathetic really

Why?

Were these emails on Hillary's server about the Scientist, classified emails or not?

Many of Hillary's emails were UP Classified before they were released to the public on the FOIA requests, so some were redacted emails and some were held back altogether from the Public.

IF these Emails from Hillary's server are being discussed by Sen Cotton, then one can ONLY presume the content of the emails about the Scientist WERE NEVER CLASSIFIED and did NOT contain any classified information.

And if these emails contained no classified information then WHY OH WHY is Sen Cotton making a beef about emails on hillary's server about the scientist, that were NEVER Classified and never contained classified information...??? Her aides could have used trump's favorite media and tweeted them, if they felt liked it...since it was not classified info...

And if it was classified info and dangerous for hillary to have these emails on her server because they contained classified info, THEN WHY IS Sen Cotton discussing this with the media and public?

ALL OF THESE QUESTIONS are pertinent...

 

[Care4all]

So scooter libby went to jail. Never outed a soul and know one was harmed.
Now we have the possible link to the death of a nuclear scientist and Hillary emails.

Remember the left's battle cry: "The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it's the seriousness of the charge that matters."

Cotton: Clinton discussed executed Iranian scientist on email

Scooter Libby did not go to jail.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Why is Senator Cotton discussing these emails with the media if the content of these emails was CLASSIFIED, and something Hillary's Aides should not have been discussing?

I don't get it?

Didnt Comey rule that none of them were classified because Hillary didnt mean to do it, or something like that?

BUT....
Were these emails discussing the Scientist EVER UP-Classified emails...were they public unclassified emails that were released and this is why Senator Cotton is able to bring them up with the media? Or is Cotton making things worse and breaking the law by discussing them with the Public?

If the emails on the Scientist contained no classified information and were not classified before the release of them, then what is Sen. Cotton's beef?

People like you are pathetic really

Why?

Were these emails on Hillary's server about the Scientist, classified emails or not?

Many of Hillary's emails were UP Classified before they were released to the public on the FOIA requests, so some were redacted emails and some were held back altogether from the Public.

IF these Emails from Hillary's server are being discussed by Sen Cotton, then one can ONLY presume the content of the emails about the Scientist WERE NEVER CLASSIFIED and did NOT contain any classified information.

And if these emails contained no classified information then WHY OH WHY is Sen Cotton making a beef about emails on hillary's server about the scientist, that were NEVER Classified and never contained classified information...??? Her aides could have used trump's favorite media and tweeted them, if they felt liked it...since it was not classified info...

And if it was classified info and dangerous for hillary to have these emails on her server because they contained classified info, THEN WHY IS Sen Cotton discussing this with the media and public?

ALL OF THESE QUESTIONS are pertinent...

But in this case, the dude was talking about the docs in a generic way and the damage has already been done anyway.

 

[Jroc]

Why is Senator Cotton discussing these emails with the media if the content of these emails was CLASSIFIED, and something Hillary's Aides should not have been discussing?

I don't get it?

Didnt Comey rule that none of them were classified because Hillary didnt mean to do it, or something like that?

BUT....
Were these emails discussing the Scientist EVER UP-Classified emails...were they public unclassified emails that were released and this is why Senator Cotton is able to bring them up with the media? Or is Cotton making things worse and breaking the law by discussing them with the Public?

If the emails on the Scientist contained no classified information and were not classified before the release of them, then what is Sen. Cotton's beef?

People like you are pathetic really

Why?

Were these emails on Hillary's server about the Scientist, classified emails or not?

Many of Hillary's emails were UP Classified before they were released to the public on the FOIA requests, so some were redacted emails and some were held back altogether from the Public.

IF these Emails from Hillary's server are being discussed by Sen Cotton, then one can ONLY presume the content of the emails about the Scientist WERE NEVER CLASSIFIED and did NOT contain any classified information.

And if these emails contained no classified information then WHY OH WHY is Sen Cotton making a beef about emails on hillary's server about the scientist, that were NEVER Classified and never contained classified information...??? Her aides could have used trump's favorite media and tweeted them, if they felt liked it...since it was not classified info...

And if it was classified info and dangerous for hillary to have these emails on her server because they contained classified info, THEN WHY IS Sen Cotton discussing this with the media and public?

ALL OF THESE QUESTIONS are pertinent...

What a bunch of Gibberish

 

[idb]

I wonder why everyone's complaining now?

An explosion on Wednesday killed Mostafa Ahmadi Roshan, a top official at the Natanz uranium enrichment plant, Iranian officials said.
He is the third man identified as a nuclear scientist to be killed in Iran in a mysterious explosion in the past two years. A fourth survived an assassination attempt.

The killings of Iranian scientists have come up on the campaign trail in the United States among contenders for the Republican presidential nomination. Newt Gingrich, at a debate in November, expressed support for the idea of "taking out their scientists." Rick Santorum, at an event in October, referred to the scientists turning up dead as "a wonderful thing."
Who's killing Iranian nuclear scientists? - CNN.com

Just say "thank you Hillary".

 

[flacaltenn]

You have zero proof of that

Don't need because there is no proof one was executed. That is on the OP, which is pwnd at this point.

Well -- maybe you'd just sleep better that Obama turned him over KNOWING that he would be executed for suspicions of working with us. He either DID or he didn't. But Obama would be stupid to believe that this guy didn't dump a bunch of stuff on us in exchange for political protection or asylum..

That make you "feel better" Jakey???

If his NAME was in her emails, what do THINK they were discussing?

2 questions -- GO !!! KISS...

Are you simply stupid? Show me the unquestionable link that actions by the admin led to his execution. Do that, and I will support the OP. Until then, sod off.

Hey jakey --- The admin EXTRADITED this guy KNOWING he would be suspect of helping us. Do you need a LINK for that? They officially signed his death warrant..

So ---- did he HELP US and we REFUSED to keep him in protective custody? OR -- did he not and we neglected to inform the Iranians of that?

The timing and characters is PERFECT for the Stuxnet event. This guy was caught on a Silicon Valley shopping spree for parts. Most likely had the knowledge to help create that virus. .

If he is a bad guy to us, then he got what he deserved.

I am not tearing up over an Iranian scientist. Just not agonna do it.

Press is reporting that he INDEED help us. Shouldn't you be tearing up over the morals of pumping him for info and then signing his death warrant? You don't see a lack of ethics in that?

Iranians probably said --"that one you can shoot yourselves, or send him back and we'll shoot him" After they torture him for days to find out HOW he helped us..

C'mon Jakey --- doesn't that suck a whole lot???

 

[PK1]

Don't need because there is no proof one was executed. That is on the OP, which is pwnd at this point.

Well -- maybe you'd just sleep better that Obama turned him over KNOWING that he would be executed for suspicions of working with us. He either DID or he didn't. But Obama would be stupid to believe that this guy didn't dump a bunch of stuff on us in exchange for political protection or asylum..

That make you "feel better" Jakey???

If his NAME was in her emails, what do THINK they were discussing?

2 questions -- GO !!! KISS...

Are you simply stupid? Show me the unquestionable link that actions by the admin led to his execution. Do that, and I will support the OP. Until then, sod off.

Hey jakey --- The admin EXTRADITED this guy KNOWING he would be suspect of helping us. Do you need a LINK for that? They officially signed his death warrant..

So ---- did he HELP US and we REFUSED to keep him in protective custody? OR -- did he not and we neglected to inform the Iranians of that?

The timing and characters is PERFECT for the Stuxnet event. This guy was caught on a Silicon Valley shopping spree for parts. Most likely had the knowledge to help create that virus. .

If he is a bad guy to us, then he got what he deserved.

I am not tearing up over an Iranian scientist. Just not agonna do it.

Press is reporting that he INDEED help us. Shouldn't you be tearing up over the morals of pumping him for info and then signing his death warrant? You don't see a lack of ethics in that?

Iranians probably said --"that one you can shoot yourselves, or send him back and we'll shoot him" After they torture him for days to find out HOW he helped us..

C'mon Jakey --- doesn't that suck a whole lot???

Doesn't your lack of comprehension that he WANTED to return to Iran to save his family suck?
.

 

[flacaltenn]

Here is the raw email from WikiLeaks:
Cable: 10VIENNA138_a

S E C R E T VIENNA 000138 SIPDIS DEPARTMENT FOR U/S BURNS, NEA (AMBASSADOR LIMBERT), CA, SCA/A AND S/SRAP E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/05/2020 TAGS: CASC, PREL, IR, AF, AU SUBJECT: AHMADINEJAD ADVISOR TELLS AUSTRIAN DIPLOMAT AMCIT HIKERS WILL BE RELEASED; IRAN MAY JOIN AFGHANISTAN CONFERENCE REF: A. VIENNA 46 B. VIENNA 100 Classified by: DCM Christopher Hoh for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).

1. (S) Summary: Michael Postl, former Austrian Ambassador to Iran, gave Embassy Vienna and UNVIE Poloffs a readout February 5 of his meeting in Geneva with Esfandiar Rahim Mashaie, chief of staff to Iranian President Ahmadinejad, on February 1. Postl said Mashaie told him the three Amcit hikers detained in Iran would be released soon. In the meantime, Mashaie said, it could take two weeks to arrange for the Amcits to contact relatives and have access to lawyers and consular officials. Mashaie also said he would consider recommending that the Government of Iran send a representative to an Afghanistan conference to be held in late February near Vienna. End Summary. Amcit Detainees ---------------

2. (S) Postl told Mashaie that the Amcit hikers were important to him, as he had raised the issue frequently with Iranian officials in Teheran before leaving post. He noted that Mashaie had told him in September that the Amcits would be released by mid-October. Mashaie assured Postl that the Amcits would be released, and would tell the world that they had been treated well. He averred that there were two reasons for Iran's failure to release the detainees in October: 1) The USG raised the issue in the Geneva talks October, which, in the Iranian view, linked the case to the nuclear issue, and to Iranian nuclear physicist Shahram Amiri, who Iran claims was captured by the U.S. in Saudi Arabia; and 2) the Note Verbale delivered by the Swiss Ambassador in Teheran on the case contained "harsh language" and the Swiss Ambassador's handling of the matter was "not constructive."

3. (S) Postl said he pressed Mashaie to move quickly to allow the Amcits to contact their families and to have access to their lawyers and Swiss consular officials. Mashaie said he would "look into it." Mashaie then asserted that there were 11 Iranians in U.S. prisons, "Just to let you know that Iran has similar problems." Postl asked whether he was trying to link the two issues, and whether he had evidence that the U.S. was denying the Iranian prisoners access to lawyers and relatives. Mashaie said there was no linkage, and that he did not have information indicating the Iranians were being denied their rights. However, he said, he was under pressure from the prisoners' families, who claim they are not aware of the charges against their relatives.

4. (S) Mashaie refused to guarantee the near-term release of the hikers, but reiterated that he would follow up and is hopeful that there will be a "sign" within two weeks. Postl recommended that the USG not take any actions or make any "big noises" on the Amcit case for the next two weeks to allow time for Mashaie to follow through. Poloffs said they would make Washington aware of Postl's views. Afghanistan -----------

5. (C) Postl argued that Iran should play a more constructive role in Afghanistan, and argued that it was a mistake not to participate in the London Conference. Mashaie said Iran does not trust the British government and asserted that conference participants would not have listened to Iran's viewpoints. Postl noted that there will be another Afghanistan conference outside of Vienna February 25-28 (reftel B) and urged Iran to send a representative. Mashaie appeared to reject the idea at first, noting that Iran had never supported the Taliban and implying that the U.S. was responsible for the problems in Afghanistan, "So why should we help solve it?" He also griped that if Iran held an Afghanistan conference in Tehran, "Who would come?" Nevertheless, he said he would consider recommending participation in the February conference. Postl suggested to Poloffs that if Iran were to send a representative, U.S. participants might want to arrange a side meeting.

6. (C) Other subjects covered during Postl's readout will be reported UNVIE septel. EACHO

WikiLeaks is leaking the SECRET STUFF? That's another ball game. Never should have gone there.

Anybody have DOUBTS NOW --- about Secret material on Clinton's server if that is an actual email??

 

[PK1]

So, the answer to the thread's Q is NO.

In the courts of law & science, if one makes a CLAIM, that party needs to provide sufficient evidence to confirm the claim.

Verdict: not guilty.

All the partisan crap thrown into the ring only shows how stupid or desperate the anti-Clinton players are.

 

[tyroneweaver]

So scooter libby went to jail. Never outed a soul and know one was harmed.
Now we have the possible link to the death of a nuclear scientist and Hillary emails.

Remember the left's battle cry: "The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it's the seriousness of the charge that matters."

Cotton: Clinton discussed executed Iranian scientist on email

Scooter Libby did not go to jail.

thankfully Bush commuted the sentence that had nothing to with Plame.

 

[tyroneweaver]

Why is Senator Cotton discussing these emails with the media if the content of these emails was CLASSIFIED, and something Hillary's Aides should not have been discussing?

I don't get it?

Didnt Comey rule that none of them were classified because Hillary didnt mean to do it, or something like that?

BUT....
Were these emails discussing the Scientist EVER UP-Classified emails...were they public unclassified emails that were released and this is why Senator Cotton is able to bring them up with the media? Or is Cotton making things worse and breaking the law by discussing them with the Public?

If the emails on the Scientist contained no classified information and were not classified before the release of them, then what is Sen. Cotton's beef?

People like you are pathetic really

Why?

Were these emails on Hillary's server about the Scientist, classified emails or not?

Many of Hillary's emails were UP Classified before they were released to the public on the FOIA requests, so some were redacted emails and some were held back altogether from the Public.

IF these Emails from Hillary's server are being discussed by Sen Cotton, then one can ONLY presume the content of the emails about the Scientist WERE NEVER CLASSIFIED and did NOT contain any classified information.

And if these emails contained no classified information then WHY OH WHY is Sen Cotton making a beef about emails on hillary's server about the scientist, that were NEVER Classified and never contained classified information...??? Her aides could have used trump's favorite media and tweeted them, if they felt liked it...since it was not classified info...

And if it was classified info and dangerous for hillary to have these emails on her server because they contained classified info, THEN WHY IS Sen Cotton discussing this with the media and public?

ALL OF THESE QUESTIONS are pertinent...

Comey would rip this post to threads.

 

[flacaltenn]

Well -- maybe you'd just sleep better that Obama turned him over KNOWING that he would be executed for suspicions of working with us. He either DID or he didn't. But Obama would be stupid to believe that this guy didn't dump a bunch of stuff on us in exchange for political protection or asylum..

That make you "feel better" Jakey???

If his NAME was in her emails, what do THINK they were discussing?

2 questions -- GO !!! KISS...

Are you simply stupid? Show me the unquestionable link that actions by the admin led to his execution. Do that, and I will support the OP. Until then, sod off.

Hey jakey --- The admin EXTRADITED this guy KNOWING he would be suspect of helping us. Do you need a LINK for that? They officially signed his death warrant..

So ---- did he HELP US and we REFUSED to keep him in protective custody? OR -- did he not and we neglected to inform the Iranians of that?

The timing and characters is PERFECT for the Stuxnet event. This guy was caught on a Silicon Valley shopping spree for parts. Most likely had the knowledge to help create that virus. .

If he is a bad guy to us, then he got what he deserved.

I am not tearing up over an Iranian scientist. Just not agonna do it.

Press is reporting that he INDEED help us. Shouldn't you be tearing up over the morals of pumping him for info and then signing his death warrant? You don't see a lack of ethics in that?

Iranians probably said --"that one you can shoot yourselves, or send him back and we'll shoot him" After they torture him for days to find out HOW he helped us..

C'mon Jakey --- doesn't that suck a whole lot???

Doesn't your lack of comprehension that he WANTED to return to Iran to save his family suck?
.

I don't know who told you that. And you have no brain if you can't figure out the possibilities.

A) A nuclear scientist is an idiot and actually BELIEVED he could literally walk back into Iran and "save his family"....

B) Or the IRANIANS had to THREATEN his family in order to get him, torture him, and kill him..

Did I miss any possibilities there PK1? And why does that make it right to "provide" him to the Iranians?

 

[tyroneweaver]

So, the answer to the thread's Q is NO.

In the courts of law & science, if one makes a CLAIM, that party needs to provide sufficient evidence to confirm the claim.

Verdict: not guilty.

All the partisan crap thrown into the ring only shows how stupid or desperate the anti-Clinton players are.

I give you 4 pinocchios.

 

[PK1]

Are you simply stupid? Show me the unquestionable link that actions by the admin led to his execution. Do that, and I will support the OP. Until then, sod off.

Hey jakey --- The admin EXTRADITED this guy KNOWING he would be suspect of helping us. Do you need a LINK for that? They officially signed his death warrant..

So ---- did he HELP US and we REFUSED to keep him in protective custody? OR -- did he not and we neglected to inform the Iranians of that?

The timing and characters is PERFECT for the Stuxnet event. This guy was caught on a Silicon Valley shopping spree for parts. Most likely had the knowledge to help create that virus. .

If he is a bad guy to us, then he got what he deserved.

I am not tearing up over an Iranian scientist. Just not agonna do it.

Press is reporting that he INDEED help us. Shouldn't you be tearing up over the morals of pumping him for info and then signing his death warrant? You don't see a lack of ethics in that?

Iranians probably said --"that one you can shoot yourselves, or send him back and we'll shoot him" After they torture him for days to find out HOW he helped us..

C'mon Jakey --- doesn't that suck a whole lot???

Doesn't your lack of comprehension that he WANTED to return to Iran to save his family suck?
.

I don't know who told you that. And you have no brain if you can't figure out the possibilities.

A) A nuclear scientist is an idiot and actually BELIEVED he could literally walk back into Iran and "save his family"....

B) Or the IRANIANS had to THREATEN his family in order to get him, torture him, and kill him..

Did I miss any possibilities there PK1? And why does that make it right to "provide" him to the Iranians?

Why don't you read this OLD WSJ article that i already provided in this thread:

The Wall Street Journal claims that his return was under threat of retaliation to his family. ...

Iran Scientist Returns to Tehran
.

 

[flacaltenn]

lol

Humiliating 1995 Video Captures Hillary Spoofing Retarded Man for Laughs

Aw C'Mon man. Forrest Gump wasn't retarded. He was an American Hero and a political prophet..

 

[flacaltenn]

Why is Senator Cotton discussing these emails with the media if the content of these emails was CLASSIFIED, and something Hillary's Aides should not have been discussing?

I don't get it?

Didnt Comey rule that none of them were classified because Hillary didnt mean to do it, or something like that?

Nope. It was her job to KNOW exactly what was classified on sight.

 

[flacaltenn]

Why is Senator Cotton discussing these emails with the media if the content of these emails was CLASSIFIED, and something Hillary's Aides should not have been discussing?

I don't get it?

Didnt Comey rule that none of them were classified because Hillary didnt mean to do it, or something like that?

BUT....
Were these emails discussing the Scientist EVER UP-Classified emails...were they public unclassified emails that were released and this is why Senator Cotton is able to bring them up with the media? Or is Cotton making things worse and breaking the law by discussing them with the Public?

If the emails on the Scientist contained no classified information and were not classified before the release of them, then what is Sen. Cotton's beef?

People like you are pathetic really

Why?

Were these emails on Hillary's server about the Scientist, classified emails or not?

Many of Hillary's emails were UP Classified before they were released to the public on the FOIA requests, so some were redacted emails and some were held back altogether from the Public.

IF these Emails from Hillary's server are being discussed by Sen Cotton, then one can ONLY presume the content of the emails about the Scientist WERE NEVER CLASSIFIED and did NOT contain any classified information.

And if these emails contained no classified information then WHY OH WHY is Sen Cotton making a beef about emails on hillary's server about the scientist, that were NEVER Classified and never contained classified information...??? Her aides could have used trump's favorite media and tweeted them, if they felt liked it...since it was not classified info...

And if it was classified info and dangerous for hillary to have these emails on her server because they contained classified info, THEN WHY IS Sen Cotton discussing this with the media and public?

ALL OF THESE QUESTIONS are pertinent...

THey were recently MADE public by WikiLeaks. Like it or not -- now EVERYONE can see the sensitivity of the material and WHY they were classified. Sources and statements like that are OBVIOUSLY classified.

Which means that your other leg is no longer available for standing on..

 

[JimBowie1958]

Nope. It was her job to KNOW exactly what was classified on sight.

Not according to the FBI Director.....

 

[flacaltenn]

Moderator Note:

You WOULD THINK when a moderator is in thread --- there wouldn't be any one liner sniping.. 4 posts deleted..

Don't make me work when I'm trying to relax.. And frankly --- don't be that stupid...