Did the Liberation of Iraq SAVE hundreds of thousands of children's lives???

That's almost 100,000 American children that Bush killed, and that number never stops growing.

:eusa_eh:

You realise Obama won in 2008, right?

:eusa_hand:

Wild accusations were effective then; They're no less absurd now.

I realize that foreigners spell realise with an 's'. Mind your own business.

You accuse Bush of "killing" 100,000 American Children. I spell realise with an "s."

:cool:
I'm pretty comfortable with the relative level of absurdity.
 
Did the Liberation of Iraq SAVE hundreds of thousands of children's lives???


Uhhh...no, it didn't. zturning a country into a terrorist breeding ground doesn't save children's lives.

How much is the Bush family paying you to post this crap day in and day out?
 
The 4000 Americans who were killed were not able to have any more children. If 3/4's of them would have had children,

at an average 2 children per person, that's 6000 American children that were denied life. And because they never lived, they were never able to have their children, so that's another 9000 children deprived of life by Bush. 15,000 so far. 14,000 in the next generation, 22,000 in the next, 36,000 in the next.

That's almost 100,000 American children that Bush killed, and that number never stops growing.

Right. And there would have been another 100,000 children a year that died of malnutrition due to the SANCTIONS that SADDAM refused to follow!
100,000 minimum from 2003 to 2013 if Saddam wasn't removed that would be 1 million. At average of 2 children per person that's 2 million. and the next generation is 4 million... NOT counting how many Iraqis of the 28 million would have been murdered by Saddam!

So I totally topped your inane number by 10 times x 10... because I'm right when it comes to saving lives!
PLUS traitors like you actually encouraged the additional 3,000 troops that were killed after military operations were declared over in May 2003.
When traitors like you ENCOURAGED and recruited terrorists to prolong the conflict YOU are directly responsible for those 3,000 additional deaths!
YOU by NOT sanctioning these kinds of statements loudly and frequently repeated by the biased MSM..

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid(D) "The war is lost, the surge is not accomplishing anything "

U.S. Rep. John Murtha(D) "Our troops killed innocent civilians in cold blood,”

Senator Kerry (D) "American soldiers going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children."

Durbin (D) "must have been done by Nazis, Soviets"--action of Americans in the treatment of their prisoners.
Senator Obama said "troops are air-raiding villages and killing civilians,"

These statements recruited more terrorists prolonging the war then anything else!
MY god... are people so f...king stupid not to see when you tell the enemy "war is Lost" "our troops are the terrorists"!
the enemy loves to hear that! They were ENCOURAGED to bomb more, put more bombs on little kids who blew when getting candy from the troops!
AND YOU the f...king idiot you are BLAME the soldiers for handing out the candy!
Just like you vilified Bush for terminating Saddam's dictatorship!
AND Today.. YOU kiss the behind of OUR dictator!

This is a sick and bizarre world you live in and totally totally detached from reality!
Reality is there are more people in Iraq that are happy Saddam is gone and glad Bush/Americans saved their butts!
 
"Some persons, such as Walter Russell Mead, accepted a large estimate of casualties due to sanctions, but argued that invading Iraq was better than continuing the sanctions regime, since "Each year of containment is a new Gulf War." Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, in his testimony to the Chilcot Inquiry, also argued that ending sanctions was one benefit of the war."

On May 12, 1996, Madeleine Albright (then U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations) appeared on a 60 Minutes segment in which Lesley Stahl asked her "We have heard that half a million children have died. I mean, that's more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?" and Albright replied "we think the price is worth it." Albright wrote later that Saddam Hussein, not the sanctions, was to blame."

Ah, yes.....Preemptively Striking Iraq was....


handjob.gif
 
.

They keep bringing up Iraq.

Unbelievable.

.
When we first went into Iraq....Lil' Dumbya insisted THEN "...wasn't the time to talk-about..." how much of a need, there was, to MAKE that move....and, he was given that "pass"....by "real Americans".

We STILL can't talk-about-it??? When DOES that moment arrive?

318.gif
 
Did Obama save the US from a Depression? Who knows and who cares......

January 13, 2008

"The recession-deniers were muzzled by a horrendous last two weeks of December, and the gloom-and-doomers are now out in force. Their key arguments:

* Plummeting housing will now drag down the rest of the economy.

*The "bad debt" problem is not just "sub-prime" folks who should never have have taken out mortgages in the first place. It includes credit card debt, "high quality" mortgages, car loans, and other leverage that have recently become a consumer way of life.

*Pressure on consumers is leading to a reduction in consumer spending (70% of economy), which, in turn, will lead to a reduction in spending by companies that sell stuff to consumers.

*The question now is not "will there be a recession?" but "how bad will it get?"

*The most optimistic forecasts in a NYT gloom-and-doom round-up are for three crappy quarters, regardless of what the Fed does. Less optimistic forecasts suggest that we are, well, screwed.

After blowing the last downturn, we've been worried this one since last summer. We also suspect that, given the importance of housing to the economy and debt to consumer spending, the recession will be deeper and more prolonged than people think."



:eusa_whistle:
 
"[E]ach generation should be made to bear the burden of its own wars, instead of carrying them on, at the expence of other generations... that each generation should not only bear its own burdens, but that the taxes composing them, should include a due proportion of such as by their direct operation keep the people awake, along with those, which being wrapped up in other payments, may leave them asleep, to misapplications of their money."

-- James Madison, from 'Universal Peace' (February 2, 1792)

repubcard.jpg
 
"[E]ach generation should be made to bear the burden of its own wars, instead of carrying them on, at the expence of other generations... that each generation should not only bear its own burdens, but that the taxes composing them, should include a due proportion of such as by their direct operation keep the people awake, along with those, which being wrapped up in other payments, may leave them asleep, to misapplications of their money."

-- James Madison, from 'Universal Peace' (February 2, 1792)

The great guru of capitalism, Adam Smith, was a strong advocate of paying for one's wars.
I think it's probably safe-to-say that Adam Smith wasn't all that heavily-invested in....

 
The 4000 Americans who were killed were not able to have any more children. If 3/4's of them would have had children,

at an average 2 children per person, that's 6000 American children that were denied life. And because they never lived, they were never able to have their children, so that's another 9000 children deprived of life by Bush. 15,000 so far. 14,000 in the next generation, 22,000 in the next, 36,000 in the next.

That's almost 100,000 American children that Bush killed, and that number never stops growing.
And, your stance on abortion would be?:eusa_whistle:
 
"[E]ach generation should be made to bear the burden of its own wars, instead of carrying them on, at the expence of other generations... that each generation should not only bear its own burdens, but that the taxes composing them, should include a due proportion of such as by their direct operation keep the people awake, along with those, which being wrapped up in other payments, may leave them asleep, to misapplications of their money."

-- James Madison, from 'Universal Peace' (February 2, 1792)

repubcard.jpg

Hey, all those big religious families needed more tax refunds (even during wartime) so that Romney could call them "victims" and Ryan can call them "takers"
 
Reality is there are more people in Iraq that are happy Saddam is gone and glad Bush/Americans saved their butts!

Yeah.....we heard.....


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3fHGCZC6EQs]Iraq War Profiteers: Part 1 of 2 - YouTube[/ame]
*
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awbC_bXwEWg]Iraq War Profiteers - Part 2 of 2 - YouTube[/ame]​
 

Forum List

Back
Top