Did Trump admit on video he knew of hacking crimes?

[iceberg]

when people go out of their way to pin bad things on the left, you mock them (and usually rightfully so) because of how willing they are to chase fantasies.

yet, here we are chasing ones that are important to you because you *want* them to be true. but for them to be true, you have to go through the same "hoops" you mock the other side for going through.

i'll never understand why one side mocks the other for believing in a reach and then turns around and does it themselves, but they're right, the other side so very wrong.

it all just seems so convenient to the point someone is trying to make but pretty void of reality. if we had such a video, do you really think the left would ignore it while russia blew up in their face? for this to happen:

1) trump had to know russia was helping (if they were) him.
2) mueller couldn't find that link in 2 years. is the video the ONLY elusive link? hardly.
3) someone had to video it
4) that someone would have to support trump and work to keep it from public eye
5) if kept from public eye, how does the public know about it?
6) given they know about it, then it must not be locked away in a secret sky-drive
7) pelosi, mueller, and the entire left trying to get rid of trump for 2+ years would have to now go "well that's the bullet we need but no, let's not ever bring it up.

how much of that is actually likely vs. a pipe dream for those who hate trump?

Its certainly not a reach. Stone tweeted that Podesta would have “his turn in the barrel” right after the DNC e-mails were released. What do you think Stone was talking about…a carnival ride?

As for this video, this post was the first I heard about it. I doubt there is a video. This sort of thing would not happen in person unless the conspirators were especially stupid.

Trump’s advisor knew about the felonies being committed. Unless you want to posit that Stone was acting on his own…and why would he…you’d have to assume he was in contact with these felons on the Trump Campaign’s behalf.

You "assume" a lot, Candy and you know what they say about those that assume...

No assumptions.

"Trump’s advisor knew about the felonies being committed. Unless you want to posit that Stone was acting on his own…and why would he…you’d have to assume he was in contact with these felons on the Trump Campaign’s behalf."

First you assumed, Candy and then when you got called out on it...you lied about assuming. Typical for you...

The phraseology would force one to otherwise take the absurd position that Stone was working with hackers for no reason. Its called making an argument.

dude - you simply can't say you assume something then say "no assumptions".

you'd not allow it your way, stop selling that dogshit.

 

[jc456]

A friend claims there is a video showing Trump had knowledge of hacking crimes.
That he either knew or instructed Russians to go after the Democrats and that this was illegal.
And he either encouraged it or wanted it. And didn't report or stop it.

Is this true?

Why isn't the video anywhere when I search for it?

Does ANYONE have the source or link that meets this description.
If it was THAT obvious he had knowledge, wouldn't the opposition have USED it?

My friend says the information is out there, and people "don't care."
But the people who DO CARE about impeaching Trump would make
sure this footage got on the national news and everyone had access, right?

Stone knew about it. Its a pretty sure bet that Trump knew.
But apparently having someone working for you who works with felons is not a crime on Barr's watch.

when people go out of their way to pin bad things on the left, you mock them (and usually rightfully so) because of how willing they are to chase fantasies.

yet, here we are chasing ones that are important to you because you *want* them to be true. but for them to be true, you have to go through the same "hoops" you mock the other side for going through.

i'll never understand why one side mocks the other for believing in a reach and then turns around and does it themselves, but they're right, the other side so very wrong.

it all just seems so convenient to the point someone is trying to make but pretty void of reality. if we had such a video, do you really think the left would ignore it while russia blew up in their face? for this to happen:

1) trump had to know russia was helping (if they were) him.
2) mueller couldn't find that link in 2 years. is the video the ONLY elusive link? hardly.
3) someone had to video it
4) that someone would have to support trump and work to keep it from public eye
5) if kept from public eye, how does the public know about it?
6) given they know about it, then it must not be locked away in a secret sky-drive
7) pelosi, mueller, and the entire left trying to get rid of trump for 2+ years would have to now go "well that's the bullet we need but no, let's not ever bring it up.

how much of that is actually likely vs. a pipe dream for those who hate trump?

Its certainly not a reach. Stone tweeted that Podesta would have “his turn in the barrel” right after the DNC e-mails were released. What do you think Stone was talking about…a carnival ride?

As for this video, this post was the first I heard about it. I doubt there is a video. This sort of thing would not happen in person unless the conspirators were especially stupid.

Trump’s advisor knew about the felonies being committed. Unless you want to posit that Stone was acting on his own…and why would he…you’d have to assume he was in contact with these felons on the Trump Campaign’s behalf.

On Aug. 21, 2016, President Trump's adviser Roger Stone published a cryptic tweet: "It will soon [be John] Podesta's time in the barrel," he wrote, referring to Hillary Clinton's campaign chairman. By September, Stone was telling Boston Herald Radio that "Julian Assange and the WikiLeaks people [are ready] to drop a payload of new documents on a weekly basis fairly soon.

he knew wikileaks had the emails. so what? your timing isn't good.

 

[NoVote]

"A meticulous analysis of online activity during the 2016 campaign makes a powerful case that targeted cyberattacks by hackers and trolls were decisive...."

This is ripe, pure and unwatered horseshit. Think about it. Would any russkie been able to change your vote? Not no, but hell no. We were either all against Canckles Clinton, and would have voted for Clarabelle the Clown first, or, we Did vote for the Canckles Bitch and nothing, not a russian or Uncle Sam himself, would have changed our minds. Now, GET OVER IT.

 

[Oldstyle]

You've got Democratic politicians

You've got liberal celebrity icons like Matt Lauer, Harvey Weinstein and Charlie Rose getting canned for sexually harassing women for decades...do you have an issue with THAT!

Certainly Have an issue with all molesters

So you're calling for the resignations of all members of Congress that have been accused of sexual harassment?

Throw the president in and we have a deal

That's what it's ALL about...isn't it, Eddie? Getting Trump? What's amusing is the more you on the left go after Trump...the more liberals bite the dust...yet Donnie is still sitting in the Oval Office tweeting merrily away!

 

[edward37]

You've got Democratic politicians

You've got liberal celebrity icons like Matt Lauer, Harvey Weinstein and Charlie Rose getting canned for sexually harassing women for decades...do you have an issue with THAT!

Certainly Have an issue with all molesters

So you're calling for the resignations of all members of Congress that have been accused of sexual harassment?

Throw the president in and we have a deal

That's what it's ALL about...isn't it, Eddie? Getting Trump? What's amusing is the more you on the left go after Trump...the more liberals bite the dust...yet Donnie is still sitting in the Oval Office tweeting merrily away!

He's sick not normal tweeting away making up names for his enemies etc etc

 

[jc456]

You've got Democratic politicians

You've got liberal celebrity icons like Matt Lauer, Harvey Weinstein and Charlie Rose getting canned for sexually harassing women for decades...do you have an issue with THAT!

Certainly Have an issue with all molesters

So you're calling for the resignations of all members of Congress that have been accused of sexual harassment?

Throw the president in and we have a deal

That's what it's ALL about...isn't it, Eddie? Getting Trump? What's amusing is the more you on the left go after Trump...the more liberals bite the dust...yet Donnie is still sitting in the Oval Office tweeting merrily away!

He's sick not normal tweeting away making up names for his enemies etc etc

it's called strategic. made up names means, he disguises those he needs to. What lie was that again? still waiting old man!!!

 

[Oldstyle]

You've got Democratic politicians

You've got liberal celebrity icons like Matt Lauer, Harvey Weinstein and Charlie Rose getting canned for sexually harassing women for decades...do you have an issue with THAT!

Certainly Have an issue with all molesters

So you're calling for the resignations of all members of Congress that have been accused of sexual harassment?

Throw the president in and we have a deal

That's what it's ALL about...isn't it, Eddie? Getting Trump? What's amusing is the more you on the left go after Trump...the more liberals bite the dust...yet Donnie is still sitting in the Oval Office tweeting merrily away!

He's sick not normal tweeting away making up names for his enemies etc etc

Making up names for his enemies? Oh you mean like calling some people "deplorables" because they don't support you? Is that the kind of name calling you deplore, Eddie?

 

[Oldstyle]

In case you haven't figured it out yet...Donald Trump is NOT George W. Bush! When he's attacked...he returns the favor and does so with relish! You on the left are used to having people you attack turn the other cheek! Trump is SO not that guy!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

A friend claims there is a video showing Trump had knowledge of hacking crimes.
That he either knew or instructed Russians to go after the Democrats and that this was illegal.
And he either encouraged it or wanted it. And didn't report or stop it.

Is this true?

Why isn't the video anywhere when I search for it?

Does ANYONE have the source or link that meets this description.
If it was THAT obvious he had knowledge, wouldn't the opposition have USED it?

My friend says the information is out there, and people "don't care."
But the people who DO CARE about impeaching Trump would make
sure this footage got on the national news and everyone had access, right?

Stone knew about it. Its a pretty sure bet that Trump knew.
But apparently having someone working for you who works with felons is not a crime on Barr's watch.

it is known.

Moron

 

[edward37]

You've got Democratic politicians

Certainly Have an issue with all molesters

So you're calling for the resignations of all members of Congress that have been accused of sexual harassment?

Throw the president in and we have a deal

That's what it's ALL about...isn't it, Eddie? Getting Trump? What's amusing is the more you on the left go after Trump...the more liberals bite the dust...yet Donnie is still sitting in the Oval Office tweeting merrily away!

He's sick not normal tweeting away making up names for his enemies etc etc

Making up names for his enemies? Oh you mean like calling some people "deplorables" because they don't support you? Is that the kind of name calling you deplore, Eddie?

I give up old Between you Oddone, bs jc ,pc I've had enough for the day

 

[jc456]

You've got Democratic politicians
So you're calling for the resignations of all members of Congress that have been accused of sexual harassment?

Throw the president in and we have a deal

That's what it's ALL about...isn't it, Eddie? Getting Trump? What's amusing is the more you on the left go after Trump...the more liberals bite the dust...yet Donnie is still sitting in the Oval Office tweeting merrily away!

He's sick not normal tweeting away making up names for his enemies etc etc

Making up names for his enemies? Oh you mean like calling some people "deplorables" because they don't support you? Is that the kind of name calling you deplore, Eddie?

I give up old Between you Oddone, bs jc ,pc I've had enough for the day

still no lie have you provided, in my quality Yoda voice.

 

[Oldstyle]

You've got Democratic politicians
So you're calling for the resignations of all members of Congress that have been accused of sexual harassment?

Throw the president in and we have a deal

That's what it's ALL about...isn't it, Eddie? Getting Trump? What's amusing is the more you on the left go after Trump...the more liberals bite the dust...yet Donnie is still sitting in the Oval Office tweeting merrily away!

He's sick not normal tweeting away making up names for his enemies etc etc

Making up names for his enemies? Oh you mean like calling some people "deplorables" because they don't support you? Is that the kind of name calling you deplore, Eddie?

I give up old Between you Oddone, bs jc ,pc I've had enough for the day

Didn't have a response for the "deplorables" thing...did ya? Like I said, Eddie...everything you on the left accuse us conservatives of...you've usually done ten times over! Go get some rest, little buddy and try again tomorrow!

 

[Siete]

You've got Democratic politicians
So you're calling for the resignations of all members of Congress that have been accused of sexual harassment?

Throw the president in and we have a deal

That's what it's ALL about...isn't it, Eddie? Getting Trump? What's amusing is the more you on the left go after Trump...the more liberals bite the dust...yet Donnie is still sitting in the Oval Office tweeting merrily away!

He's sick not normal tweeting away making up names for his enemies etc etc

Making up names for his enemies? Oh you mean like calling some people "deplorables" because they don't support you? Is that the kind of name calling you deplore, Eddie?

I give up old Between you Oddone, bs jc ,pc I've had enough for the day

the day?
I've had enough for a fucking lifetime - If Trump said it, he didnt say it - if he didnt say it, he said it.

take the op - couldnt find a link to a tape with Trump running his yap - I provided the EXACT LINK the idiot couldn't seem to find .... so the op says its the WRONG LINK.

nothing, and I mean nothing can budge Trumps Cucks out of their slipstream of lies and horseshit spin.

Fuck Trump & his drones.

 

[jc456]

Throw the president in and we have a deal

That's what it's ALL about...isn't it, Eddie? Getting Trump? What's amusing is the more you on the left go after Trump...the more liberals bite the dust...yet Donnie is still sitting in the Oval Office tweeting merrily away!

He's sick not normal tweeting away making up names for his enemies etc etc

Making up names for his enemies? Oh you mean like calling some people "deplorables" because they don't support you? Is that the kind of name calling you deplore, Eddie?

I give up old Between you Oddone, bs jc ,pc I've had enough for the day

Didn't have a response for the "deplorables" thing...did ya? Like I said, Eddie...everything you on the left accuse us conservatives of...you've usually done ten times over! Go get some rest, little buddy and try again tomorrow!

he needs new material.

 

[edward37]

Throw the president in and we have a deal

That's what it's ALL about...isn't it, Eddie? Getting Trump? What's amusing is the more you on the left go after Trump...the more liberals bite the dust...yet Donnie is still sitting in the Oval Office tweeting merrily away!

He's sick not normal tweeting away making up names for his enemies etc etc

Making up names for his enemies? Oh you mean like calling some people "deplorables" because they don't support you? Is that the kind of name calling you deplore, Eddie?

I give up old Between you Oddone, bs jc ,pc I've had enough for the day

the day?
I've had enough for a fucking lifetime - If Trump said it, he didnt say it - if he didnt say it, he said it.

take the op - couldnt find a link to a tape with Trump running his yap - I provided the EXACT LINK the idiot couldn't seem to find .... so the op says its the WRONG LINK.

nothing, and I mean nothing can budge Trumps Cucks out of their slipstream of lies and horseshit spin.

Fuck Trump & his drones.

600 and counting
It's grown to 600...


About this website

NEWS.VICE.COM

600 Ex-Federal Prosecutors (and Counting) Say Being President Is The Only Thing That Saved Trump
Attorney General William Barr handling of the Mueller report has drawn outrage from Democrats.

 

[jc456]

That's what it's ALL about...isn't it, Eddie? Getting Trump? What's amusing is the more you on the left go after Trump...the more liberals bite the dust...yet Donnie is still sitting in the Oval Office tweeting merrily away!

He's sick not normal tweeting away making up names for his enemies etc etc

Making up names for his enemies? Oh you mean like calling some people "deplorables" because they don't support you? Is that the kind of name calling you deplore, Eddie?

I give up old Between you Oddone, bs jc ,pc I've had enough for the day

the day?
I've had enough for a fucking lifetime - If Trump said it, he didnt say it - if he didnt say it, he said it.

take the op - couldnt find a link to a tape with Trump running his yap - I provided the EXACT LINK the idiot couldn't seem to find .... so the op says its the WRONG LINK.

nothing, and I mean nothing can budge Trumps Cucks out of their slipstream of lies and horseshit spin.

Fuck Trump & his drones.

600 and counting
It's grown to 600...


About this website

NEWS.VICE.COM

600 Ex-Federal Prosecutors (and Counting) Say Being President Is The Only Thing That Saved Trump
Attorney General William Barr handling of the Mueller report has drawn outrage from Democrats.

and what? without a sealed indictment in the mueller report you got bumpkis. Trump exonerated baby!!!!! make it ten thousand, they all have zip in authority and only get air time.

 

[georgephillip]

"A meticulous analysis of online activity during the 2016 campaign makes a powerful case that targeted cyberattacks by hackers and trolls were decisive...."

This is ripe, pure and unwatered horseshit. Think about it. Would any russkie been able to change your vote? Not no, but hell no. We were either all against Canckles Clinton, and would have voted for Clarabelle the Clown first, or, we Did vote for the Canckles Bitch and nothing, not a russian or Uncle Sam himself, would have changed our minds. Now, GET OVER IT.

This is ripe, pure and unwatered horseshit. Think about it. Would any russkie been able to change your vote? Not no, but hell no. We were either all against Canckles Clinton, and would have voted for Clarabelle the Clown first, or, we Did vote for the Canckles Bitch and nothing, not a russian or Uncle Sam himself, would have changed our minds. Now, GET OVER IT

Since most of us who voted cast their POTUS ballot for someone other than the Red Don, maybe you should read enough of my link to understand what's being argued here?

How Russia Helped Swing the Election for Trump

"Jamieson said that, as an academic, she hoped that the public would challenge her arguments.

"Yet she expressed confidence that unbiased readers would accept her conclusion that it is not just plausible that Russia changed the outcome of the 2016 election—it is 'likely that it did.'

"An airtight case, she acknowledges, may never be possible.

"In the introduction to her new book, she writes that any case for influence will likely be similar to that in a civil legal trial, 'in which the verdict is rendered not with the certainty that e=mc2 but rather based on the preponderance of evidence.'

"But, she points out, 'we do make most of life’s decisions based on less-than-rock-solid, incontrovertible evidence.'

"In Philadelphia, she noted to me that 'we convict people on probabilities rather than absolute certainty, and we’ve executed people based on inferences from available evidence.'

"She argued that 'the standard of proof being demanded' by people claiming it’s impossible to know whether Russia delivered the White House to Trump is 'substantially higher than the standard of proof we ordinarily use in our lives.'"

 

[edward37]

He's sick not normal tweeting away making up names for his enemies etc etc

Making up names for his enemies? Oh you mean like calling some people "deplorables" because they don't support you? Is that the kind of name calling you deplore, Eddie?

I give up old Between you Oddone, bs jc ,pc I've had enough for the day

the day?
I've had enough for a fucking lifetime - If Trump said it, he didnt say it - if he didnt say it, he said it.

take the op - couldnt find a link to a tape with Trump running his yap - I provided the EXACT LINK the idiot couldn't seem to find .... so the op says its the WRONG LINK.

nothing, and I mean nothing can budge Trumps Cucks out of their slipstream of lies and horseshit spin.

Fuck Trump & his drones.

600 and counting
It's grown to 600...


About this website

NEWS.VICE.COM

600 Ex-Federal Prosecutors (and Counting) Say Being President Is The Only Thing That Saved Trump
Attorney General William Barr handling of the Mueller report has drawn outrage from Democrats.

and what? without a sealed indictment in the mueller report you got bumpkis. Trump exonerated baby!!!!! make it ten thousand, they all have zip in authority and only get air time.

I'm through with you people who find no problem with this vile crook in our WH ,for the day Tomorrow doesn't look good either

 

[jc456]

Making up names for his enemies? Oh you mean like calling some people "deplorables" because they don't support you? Is that the kind of name calling you deplore, Eddie?

I give up old Between you Oddone, bs jc ,pc I've had enough for the day

the day?
I've had enough for a fucking lifetime - If Trump said it, he didnt say it - if he didnt say it, he said it.

take the op - couldnt find a link to a tape with Trump running his yap - I provided the EXACT LINK the idiot couldn't seem to find .... so the op says its the WRONG LINK.

nothing, and I mean nothing can budge Trumps Cucks out of their slipstream of lies and horseshit spin.

Fuck Trump & his drones.

600 and counting
It's grown to 600...


About this website

NEWS.VICE.COM

600 Ex-Federal Prosecutors (and Counting) Say Being President Is The Only Thing That Saved Trump
Attorney General William Barr handling of the Mueller report has drawn outrage from Democrats.

and what? without a sealed indictment in the mueller report you got bumpkis. Trump exonerated baby!!!!! make it ten thousand, they all have zip in authority and only get air time.

I'm through with you people who find no problem with this vile crook in our WH ,for the day Tomorrow doesn't look good either

dude, again, from previous discussions, I thought you were through bitching about trump and waiting until he was elected out of office, and yet you keep pronouncing shit as if that isn't your position. did you lie?

 

[jc456]

"A meticulous analysis of online activity during the 2016 campaign makes a powerful case that targeted cyberattacks by hackers and trolls were decisive...."

This is ripe, pure and unwatered horseshit. Think about it. Would any russkie been able to change your vote? Not no, but hell no. We were either all against Canckles Clinton, and would have voted for Clarabelle the Clown first, or, we Did vote for the Canckles Bitch and nothing, not a russian or Uncle Sam himself, would have changed our minds. Now, GET OVER IT.

This is ripe, pure and unwatered horseshit. Think about it. Would any russkie been able to change your vote? Not no, but hell no. We were either all against Canckles Clinton, and would have voted for Clarabelle the Clown first, or, we Did vote for the Canckles Bitch and nothing, not a russian or Uncle Sam himself, would have changed our minds. Now, GET OVER IT

Since most of us who voted cast their POTUS ballot for someone other than the Red Don, maybe you should read enough of my link to understand what's being argued here?

How Russia Helped Swing the Election for Trump

"Jamieson said that, as an academic, she hoped that the public would challenge her arguments.

"Yet she expressed confidence that unbiased readers would accept her conclusion that it is not just plausible that Russia changed the outcome of the 2016 election—it is 'likely that it did.'

"An airtight case, she acknowledges, may never be possible.

"In the introduction to her new book, she writes that any case for influence will likely be similar to that in a civil legal trial, 'in which the verdict is rendered not with the certainty that e=mc2 but rather based on the preponderance of evidence.'

"But, she points out, 'we do make most of life’s decisions based on less-than-rock-solid, incontrovertible evidence.'

"In Philadelphia, she noted to me that 'we convict people on probabilities rather than absolute certainty, and we’ve executed people based on inferences from available evidence.'

"She argued that 'the standard of proof being demanded' by people claiming it’s impossible to know whether Russia delivered the White House to Trump is 'substantially higher than the standard of proof we ordinarily use in our lives.'"