'Disgusting': AP torn to shreds for dismissing illegal immigrant murder suspect in Laken Riley killing, blaming toxic masculinity

[Mikeoxenormous]

'Disgusting': AP torn to shreds for dismissing illegal immigrant murder suspect in Laken Riley killing, blaming toxic masculinity | Blaze Media

The Associated Press was obliterated online for a recent article that attempted to dismiss the illegal immigrant murder suspect in the brutal killing of Laken Hope Riley, and instead tried to blame toxic masculinity for the brutal slaying. On Saturday, the AP published an article titled: "The...

www.theblaze.com

The Left-wing media was torn to shreds after putting out an article about a girl murdered by a Venezuelan illegal immigrant. Not one time did the article say that the murderer was an illegal immigrant, but instead demonized him for his evil masculine aggressiveness because demonizing the male sex is PC as where demonizing an illegal is not.

There needs to be a class action lawsuit not only against the DNC but Mayorkas and Biden. I say for each plaintiff a charge of 355 million dollars in damages should be sought for aiding and abetting the murder of that young college girl. Then go after Chuckie Schumer also for not allowing the funds to be put into law by not pushing HR-2 through and seek 500 million dollars from him. Start playing hard ball with the DNC bankrupt them into oblivion...

 

[iamwhatiseem]

With more people the problem grows but the problem has been with us for a very long time.




Excuses for what? I agree what the woman says is a problem is a problem. Why are you dismissing that?

Me? The one dismissing?
Now you are just being ridiculous.

 

[pknopp]

Me? The one dismissing?
Now you are just being ridiculous.

If you aren't dismissing her argument, why condemn it?

You are doing so because it's not all about politics and well, for far too many that is all they care about sadly.

 

[Votto]

Are you trying to argue it happened because he was here illegally? That was the reason?

Just commenting on the partisan propaganda.

Why leave out the part about him being an illegal alien and then suggest it was because he was a toxic male?

 

[JoeB131]

Just commenting on the partisan propaganda.

Why leave out the part about him being an illegal alien and then suggest it was because he was a toxic male?

Because his national origin wasn't a cause of the crime, his toxic masculinity was.

 

[pknopp]

Just commenting on the partisan propaganda.

Why leave out the part about him being an illegal alien and then suggest it was because he was a toxic male?

You know it gets old when you answer a question but you get asked it over and over again.

It wasn't mentioned because that was not the reason for the article. The article was about how women do not feel safe alone.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

If you aren't dismissing her argument, why condemn it?

You are doing so because it's not all about politics and well, for far too many that is all they care about sadly.

Nope.
You just described what you are doing.
And everyone here, but you, sees it

 

[Votto]

Men commit 90% of murders. Illegal aliens less than 1%.

The overwhelming majority of extremist and violent terrorist incidents occur in largely Muslim states, yet the media around the world goes out of their way to avoid using the term "Islamic terrorist" so as not to demonize them.

Why? Because it is not PC. Here is Obama being an apologist for this approach as he never used the term either.

Obama: Why I won't say 'Islamic terrorism' | CNN Politics

President Barack Obama has taken a lot of criticism from political opponents over his rhetoric when it comes to terrorism. But on Wednesday at a CNN presidential town hall, he was asked to defend why he refuses to say "Islamic" terrorism to a Gold Star mother.

www.cnn.com

 

[pknopp]

The overwhelming majority of extremist and violent terrorist incidents occur in largely Muslim states, yet the media around the world goes out of their way to avoid using the term "Islamic terrorist" so as not to demonize them.

Why? Because it is not PC. Here is Obama being an apologist for this approach as he never used the term either.

Obama: Why I won't say 'Islamic terrorism' | CNN Politics

President Barack Obama has taken a lot of criticism from political opponents over his rhetoric when it comes to terrorism. But on Wednesday at a CNN presidential town hall, he was asked to defend why he refuses to say "Islamic" terrorism to a Gold Star mother.

www.cnn.com

This article is about how women do not feel safe alone.

 

[Votto]

You know it gets old when you answer a question but you get asked it over and over again.

It wasn't mentioned because that was not the reason for the article. The article was about how women do not feel safe alone.

I've seen this elsewhere.

For example, Reuters had an article about a white guy shooting up an Asian massage parlor, and the article focused on the fact he was white and the women were Asian, commenting on probably racism despite the shooter never suggesting it was.

Then, during that same time, you had a man from the middle east shoot up a crowd of white folk, yet the article failed to identify the race of the shooter as being from the middle east and the fact his victims were all white. The article, instead, focused on the need for gun control. Keep in mind he was from Syria, and at that time, the US had just bombed Syria. There was not even a mention of a suspected link in terms of being retaliatory, but they felt OK speculation about white racism.

 

[citygator]

The overwhelming majority of extremist and violent terrorist incidents occur in largely Muslim states, yet the media around the world goes out of their way to avoid using the term "Islamic terrorist" so as not to demonize them.

Why? Because it is not PC. Here is Obama being an apologist for this approach as he never used the term either.

Obama: Why I won't say 'Islamic terrorism' | CNN Politics

President Barack Obama has taken a lot of criticism from political opponents over his rhetoric when it comes to terrorism. But on Wednesday at a CNN presidential town hall, he was asked to defend why he refuses to say "Islamic" terrorism to a Gold Star mother.

www.cnn.com

Random thoughts from Votto. Ok. Thanks for letting me know you have no response to my post.

 

[DGS49]

There is a Latin expression of which some lawyers are fond: Sine qua non.

The import of the expression ("without which not") is that without a certain condition or act, the event in question would not have occurred. That is to say, while you might not prove that the event was the direct result of the condition, it would not have happened without a certain precondition. It is apropos here because without Biden's open border policies, this murder would not have happened. Did Biden kill this young woman? No. But without his policy she would still be alive.

 

[pknopp]

I've seen this elsewhere.

For example, Reuters had an article about a white guy shooting up an Asian massage parlor, and the article focused on the fact he was white and the women were Asian, commenting on probably racism despite the shooter never suggesting it was.

Then, during that same time, you had a man from the middle east shoot up a crowd of white folk, yet the article failed to identify the race of the shooter as being from the middle east and the fact his victims were all white. The article, instead, focused on the need for gun control. Keep in mind he was from Syria, and at that time, the US had just bombed Syria. There was not even a mention of a suspected link in terms of being retaliatory, but they felt OK speculation about white racism.

This happens to women from all types of men.

 

[Natural Citizen]

This article is about how women do not feel safe alone.

Toxic femininity...

 

[iamwhatiseem]

This article is about how women do not feel safe alone.

Because there are a bunch of aimless, homeless young males hanging around where they are.
But let's pretend bringing millions of them into those cities is not any problem.

 

[pknopp]

Because there are a bunch of aimless, homeless young males hanging around where they are.
But let's pretend bringing millions of them into those cities is not any problem.

No, it's because they do not feel safe, period.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

No, it's because they do not feel safe, period.

Less criminals and aimless young males around they will not only feel safer, but DRAMATICALLY decrease any chance of them ever getting harmed.

 

[FranklinRoosevelt_FTW]

There is some kind of problem with South America and Central America when it comes to crime it’s really unfortunate because these are Catholic brothers …. There’s safety issues in South America and Brazil. There is poverty. But this doesn’t exist in Southeast Asia where there’s the same if not more poverty.

There’s also crime surges in America of our citizens, mostly young black, committing crimes almost all young whites hooked on marijuana, committing mass shooting… this is what happens when we have poisonous BLM feminist policy

 

[Polishprince]

Are you trying to argue it happened because he was here illegally? That was the reason?

Absolutely. If Sleepy Joe hadn't let him in, Senor Ibarra would have been killing Venezuelan chicas. That isn't good, but America already has its fair share of creeps. We don't need Biden encouraging those from abroad to come here.

 

[pknopp]

Absolutely. If Sleepy Joe hadn't let him in, Senor Ibarra would have been killing Venezuelan chicas. That isn't good, but America already has its fair share of creeps. We don't need Biden encouraging those from abroad to come here.

Simsbury jogger's killer sentenced to 35 years in prison for 2014 death

The article is about the big picture.