Diversity Is Not A Strength

[Unkotare]

LOL @ the stormfront 'scientists' shitting from their mouths.

 

[Uncensored2008]

LOL @ the stormfront 'scientists' shitting from their mouths.

Didn't Stormfront get shut down for "badthought wrongthink?" I was pretty sure that Google declared ideas not consistent with party goals verbotten.

Diversity it seems is not allowed when it comes to thought or speech...

 

[Vastator]

LOL @ the stormfront 'scientists' shitting from their mouths.

Didn't Stormfront get shut down for "badthought wrongthink?" I was pretty sure that Google declared ideas not consistent with party goals verbotten.

Diversity it seems is not allowed when it comes to thought or speech...

And that is a rather obvious contradiction in the "diversity" philosophy as currently practiced by those who most passionately promote it. It leads directly to the elimination of diversity. None of their ideas or practices, actually serve to preserve diversity. None. The hypocrisy would be laughable if it weren't so dangerous.

 

[bodecea]

And in sociology diversity is a liability.

America is, and always has been a melting pot. Even the indigenous Americans had a wide-variety of cultures. Even those societies who pride themselves on racial purity, such as Japan and China, are much more racially diverse than they care to admit.

America wouldn't exist today without the contributions of immigrants from many cultures.

What your assertion fails to make note of; is that at the founding of our nation; what amounted to diversity, was the various Europeans, who flocked to our shores. And as more arrived our nation became stronger. Then... When the shift occured to the mass immigration of nonwhites that unprecedented rise to greatness, ground to a stand still. Today globally, and at home, America is recognized as a nation in decline.

What has been consistent throughout the history of our country is the nativist movement. Their targets of derision have changed again and again, but the nativists will always be with us. The Irish weren't "white"...the Italians weren't "white"...the Jews weren't "white"...the Chinese weren't "white"...the Mexicans weren't "white"...White meaning "not like us" and really not having anything to do with skin color.

 

[Unkotare]

LOL @ the stormfront 'scientists' shitting from their mouths.

Didn't Stormfront get shut down for "badthought wrongthink?" I was pretty sure that Google declared ideas not consistent with party goals verbotten.

Diversity it seems is not allowed when it comes to thought or speech...

And that is a rather obvious contradiction in the "diversity" philosophy as currently practiced by those who most passionately promote it. It leads directly to the elimination of diversity. None of their ideas or practices, actually serve to preserve diversity. None. The hypocrisy would be laughable if it weren't so dangerous.

You fail segregationist semantics.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

What follows is a rather simple explaination, as to why the perpetuated lie that "diversity is our strength"; is not a strength at all. But rather a liability.


You have power over your mind - not outside events. Realize this, and you will find strength.
Marcus Aurelius

He talks about diversity causing so many racial and religious problems.

Well the source of those racial or religious problems are down to systems of inequality that are put in place by the dominant group that comes to dominate a particular geographic space, a particular nation-state.

Another problem with his argument is that he ignores that white Europeans, spent the vast majority of history killing each other even though they were of “one race”

What's he talking about ?

And if it were so natural for white folks to separate then why would it be necessary to encourage whites to do this or to form groups to push that notion?

If it was natural, it would be impossible to move whites or any other group from that natural species instinct.

Whites wouldn’t have needed segregation laws to force separation

Whites wouldn’t have needed anti-miscegenation laws to require separation.

Those laws were passed because white people weren’t so sure that they weren’t prepared to stray, weren’t so sure that it was natural to separate.

Questions ?

“What about white flight ? Surely that shows that whites have a natural instinct to separate”

White flight demonstrates the effectiveness of several hundred years of racial propaganda saying that black people are going to be criminal, they’re going to rob you, they don’t make good neighbours.

If you have years and generations of people picking up those kinds of messages and they do pick them up, from several different sources.

If you go to Russia, Serbia, Bosnia, Poland places were there hardly any black people and you talk to white folks who have never even been around black folks, they will come forth with many of these negative stereotypes in spite of no first-hand experience. They’re getting it from somewhere, not from their own reality.

And finally whites will become half or roughly maybe 48% of the USA nation’s population by the latter part of the twenty-first century.

But this idea that whites will be able to have no influence on the culture.

Whites would still be the largest single group by far of any group in the United States.

This idea that white people can’t hang on at 45-50% when these other groups have managed to survive and thrive at 4% in the case of Asians in this country, 12% in the case of blacks, 12% in the case of Latinos, their cultures are doing quite well at being manifested and celebrated and the idea that whites can’t do that at 45%

I mean, whites must be an incredibly weak-willed or genetically defective or culturally retarded group of people if they can’t maintain their own influence at 45%, that just seems insane.

Ironically the intramural rivalry between competing european states during medieval times, and through the renaissance, was the crucible that developed white culture to the point that it became the envy of the world. On the whole... That was white politics.

There is no "white culture" you fucking cretin. There are many different cultures in Europe and vast differences between ,for example, the UK and Poland, or even between different parts of the UK. Language,food,religion,music and so on.
Only a weirdo would think otherwise.

 

[Vastator]

What follows is a rather simple explaination, as to why the perpetuated lie that "diversity is our strength"; is not a strength at all. But rather a liability.


You have power over your mind - not outside events. Realize this, and you will find strength.
Marcus Aurelius

He talks about diversity causing so many racial and religious problems.

Well the source of those racial or religious problems are down to systems of inequality that are put in place by the dominant group that comes to dominate a particular geographic space, a particular nation-state.

Another problem with his argument is that he ignores that white Europeans, spent the vast majority of history killing each other even though they were of “one race”

What's he talking about ?

And if it were so natural for white folks to separate then why would it be necessary to encourage whites to do this or to form groups to push that notion?

If it was natural, it would be impossible to move whites or any other group from that natural species instinct.

Whites wouldn’t have needed segregation laws to force separation

Whites wouldn’t have needed anti-miscegenation laws to require separation.

Those laws were passed because white people weren’t so sure that they weren’t prepared to stray, weren’t so sure that it was natural to separate.

Questions ?

“What about white flight ? Surely that shows that whites have a natural instinct to separate”

White flight demonstrates the effectiveness of several hundred years of racial propaganda saying that black people are going to be criminal, they’re going to rob you, they don’t make good neighbours.

If you have years and generations of people picking up those kinds of messages and they do pick them up, from several different sources.

If you go to Russia, Serbia, Bosnia, Poland places were there hardly any black people and you talk to white folks who have never even been around black folks, they will come forth with many of these negative stereotypes in spite of no first-hand experience. They’re getting it from somewhere, not from their own reality.

And finally whites will become half or roughly maybe 48% of the USA nation’s population by the latter part of the twenty-first century.

But this idea that whites will be able to have no influence on the culture.

Whites would still be the largest single group by far of any group in the United States.

This idea that white people can’t hang on at 45-50% when these other groups have managed to survive and thrive at 4% in the case of Asians in this country, 12% in the case of blacks, 12% in the case of Latinos, their cultures are doing quite well at being manifested and celebrated and the idea that whites can’t do that at 45%

I mean, whites must be an incredibly weak-willed or genetically defective or culturally retarded group of people if they can’t maintain their own influence at 45%, that just seems insane.

Ironically the intramural rivalry between competing european states during medieval times, and through the renaissance, was the crucible that developed white culture to the point that it became the envy of the world. On the whole... That was white politics.

There is no "white culture" you fucking cretin. There are many different cultures in Europe and vast differences between ,for example, the UK and Poland, or even between different parts of the UK. Language,food,religion,music and so on.
Only a weirdo would think otherwise.

All of the aforementioned are part of the greatness that comprises western civilization. So as you can plainly see, ; we have quite enough diversity.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Wrong. Cultures stand upon the accomplishment of their people, and the legacy they offer into the world, that other look to emulate. No one waxes nostalgic about the merits of the Egyptians. They are admired for their works.

you said "wrong" and then professed exactly what i had said.

gjob!

I highlighted precisely what makes your assertion wrong.

i said cultures stand on merit, and you went forth to say this same exact sentiment in a larger paragraph

its rocket science is it?

Your comprehension has failed you. I said works. Pyramids, complex religion, and law. Things observable and admirable to this day. Not their opinions on social matters...

The Pyramids were built by slaves. Any admiration for the structure has to be tempered by the knowledge that they were built under duress.Not a great example.

"The Pyramids were built by slaves."

As you are ignorant and uneducated of course you would make such a comment. The Pyramids were not built by slaves it's Hollyweird who pushed that they were and recent archaeological evidence says that they were not built by slaves, that they were built by Free Men and were also very well fed each day.

Here's the rest of the article from Reuters:

Egypt tombs suggest pyramids not built by slaves

From the BBC also:

BBC News - Egypt tombs suggest free men built pyramids, not slaves

From The Daily Telegraph:

Pyramids 'not built by slaves'

From The Associated Press:

Egypt: New Find Shows Slaves Didn't Build Pyramids

 

[Vastator]

you said "wrong" and then professed exactly what i had said.

gjob!

I highlighted precisely what makes your assertion wrong.

i said cultures stand on merit, and you went forth to say this same exact sentiment in a larger paragraph

its rocket science is it?

Your comprehension has failed you. I said works. Pyramids, complex religion, and law. Things observable and admirable to this day. Not their opinions on social matters...

The Pyramids were built by slaves. Any admiration for the structure has to be tempered by the knowledge that they were built under duress.Not a great example.

"The Pyramids were built by slaves."

As you are ignorant and uneducated of course you would make such a comment. The Pyramids were not built by slaves it's Hollyweird who pushed that they were and recent archaeological evidence says that they were not built by slaves, that they were built by Free Men and were also very well fed each day.

View attachment 149501
View attachment 149502

Here's the rest of the article from Reuters:

Egypt tombs suggest pyramids not built by slaves

View attachment 149503
View attachment 149504

From the BBC also:

BBC News - Egypt tombs suggest free men built pyramids, not slaves

From The Daily Telegraph:

Pyramids 'not built by slaves'

From The Associated Press:

Egypt: New Find Shows Slaves Didn't Build Pyramids

Nor does the historical record bear out the biblical portrayal of the Jews enslavement by Egypt.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

I highlighted precisely what makes your assertion wrong.

i said cultures stand on merit, and you went forth to say this same exact sentiment in a larger paragraph

its rocket science is it?

Your comprehension has failed you. I said works. Pyramids, complex religion, and law. Things observable and admirable to this day. Not their opinions on social matters...

The Pyramids were built by slaves. Any admiration for the structure has to be tempered by the knowledge that they were built under duress.Not a great example.

"The Pyramids were built by slaves."

As you are ignorant and uneducated of course you would make such a comment. The Pyramids were not built by slaves it's Hollyweird who pushed that they were and recent archaeological evidence says that they were not built by slaves, that they were built by Free Men and were also very well fed each day.

View attachment 149501
View attachment 149502

Here's the rest of the article from Reuters:

Egypt tombs suggest pyramids not built by slaves

View attachment 149503
View attachment 149504

From the BBC also:

BBC News - Egypt tombs suggest free men built pyramids, not slaves

From The Daily Telegraph:

Pyramids 'not built by slaves'

From The Associated Press:

Egypt: New Find Shows Slaves Didn't Build Pyramids

Nor does the historical record bear out the biblical portrayal of the Jews enslavement by Egypt.

"Nor does the historical record bear out the biblical portrayal of the Jews enslavement by Egypt."

Haaretz in April 2017 published an article also about this.

From the article:

The article is from Josh Mintz.

Here is the rest of the article:

Were Jews ever really slaves in Egypt, or is Passover a myth?

 

[Tommy Tainant]

What follows is a rather simple explaination, as to why the perpetuated lie that "diversity is our strength"; is not a strength at all. But rather a liability.


You have power over your mind - not outside events. Realize this, and you will find strength.
Marcus Aurelius

He talks about diversity causing so many racial and religious problems.

Well the source of those racial or religious problems are down to systems of inequality that are put in place by the dominant group that comes to dominate a particular geographic space, a particular nation-state.

Another problem with his argument is that he ignores that white Europeans, spent the vast majority of history killing each other even though they were of “one race”

What's he talking about ?

And if it were so natural for white folks to separate then why would it be necessary to encourage whites to do this or to form groups to push that notion?

If it was natural, it would be impossible to move whites or any other group from that natural species instinct.

Whites wouldn’t have needed segregation laws to force separation

Whites wouldn’t have needed anti-miscegenation laws to require separation.

Those laws were passed because white people weren’t so sure that they weren’t prepared to stray, weren’t so sure that it was natural to separate.

Questions ?

“What about white flight ? Surely that shows that whites have a natural instinct to separate”

White flight demonstrates the effectiveness of several hundred years of racial propaganda saying that black people are going to be criminal, they’re going to rob you, they don’t make good neighbours.

If you have years and generations of people picking up those kinds of messages and they do pick them up, from several different sources.

If you go to Russia, Serbia, Bosnia, Poland places were there hardly any black people and you talk to white folks who have never even been around black folks, they will come forth with many of these negative stereotypes in spite of no first-hand experience. They’re getting it from somewhere, not from their own reality.

And finally whites will become half or roughly maybe 48% of the USA nation’s population by the latter part of the twenty-first century.

But this idea that whites will be able to have no influence on the culture.

Whites would still be the largest single group by far of any group in the United States.

This idea that white people can’t hang on at 45-50% when these other groups have managed to survive and thrive at 4% in the case of Asians in this country, 12% in the case of blacks, 12% in the case of Latinos, their cultures are doing quite well at being manifested and celebrated and the idea that whites can’t do that at 45%

I mean, whites must be an incredibly weak-willed or genetically defective or culturally retarded group of people if they can’t maintain their own influence at 45%, that just seems insane.

Ironically the intramural rivalry between competing european states during medieval times, and through the renaissance, was the crucible that developed white culture to the point that it became the envy of the world. On the whole... That was white politics.

There is no "white culture" you fucking cretin. There are many different cultures in Europe and vast differences between ,for example, the UK and Poland, or even between different parts of the UK. Language,food,religion,music and so on.
Only a weirdo would think otherwise.

All of the aforementioned are part of the greatness that comprises western civilization. So as you can plainly see, ; we have quite enough diversity.

So you accept that there is no white culture ?
There is no black culture either . There are a lot of different black cultures.

 

[Vastator]

What follows is a rather simple explaination, as to why the perpetuated lie that "diversity is our strength"; is not a strength at all. But rather a liability.


You have power over your mind - not outside events. Realize this, and you will find strength.
Marcus Aurelius

He talks about diversity causing so many racial and religious problems.

Well the source of those racial or religious problems are down to systems of inequality that are put in place by the dominant group that comes to dominate a particular geographic space, a particular nation-state.

Another problem with his argument is that he ignores that white Europeans, spent the vast majority of history killing each other even though they were of “one race”

What's he talking about ?

And if it were so natural for white folks to separate then why would it be necessary to encourage whites to do this or to form groups to push that notion?

If it was natural, it would be impossible to move whites or any other group from that natural species instinct.

Whites wouldn’t have needed segregation laws to force separation

Whites wouldn’t have needed anti-miscegenation laws to require separation.

Those laws were passed because white people weren’t so sure that they weren’t prepared to stray, weren’t so sure that it was natural to separate.

Questions ?

“What about white flight ? Surely that shows that whites have a natural instinct to separate”

White flight demonstrates the effectiveness of several hundred years of racial propaganda saying that black people are going to be criminal, they’re going to rob you, they don’t make good neighbours.

If you have years and generations of people picking up those kinds of messages and they do pick them up, from several different sources.

If you go to Russia, Serbia, Bosnia, Poland places were there hardly any black people and you talk to white folks who have never even been around black folks, they will come forth with many of these negative stereotypes in spite of no first-hand experience. They’re getting it from somewhere, not from their own reality.

And finally whites will become half or roughly maybe 48% of the USA nation’s population by the latter part of the twenty-first century.

But this idea that whites will be able to have no influence on the culture.

Whites would still be the largest single group by far of any group in the United States.

This idea that white people can’t hang on at 45-50% when these other groups have managed to survive and thrive at 4% in the case of Asians in this country, 12% in the case of blacks, 12% in the case of Latinos, their cultures are doing quite well at being manifested and celebrated and the idea that whites can’t do that at 45%

I mean, whites must be an incredibly weak-willed or genetically defective or culturally retarded group of people if they can’t maintain their own influence at 45%, that just seems insane.

Ironically the intramural rivalry between competing european states during medieval times, and through the renaissance, was the crucible that developed white culture to the point that it became the envy of the world. On the whole... That was white politics.

There is no "white culture" you fucking cretin. There are many different cultures in Europe and vast differences between ,for example, the UK and Poland, or even between different parts of the UK. Language,food,religion,music and so on.
Only a weirdo would think otherwise.

All of the aforementioned are part of the greatness that comprises western civilization. So as you can plainly see, ; we have quite enough diversity.

So you accept that there is no white culture ?
There is no black culture either . There are a lot of different black cultures.

No. I do not.

 

[Vastator]

What follows is a rather simple explaination, as to why the perpetuated lie that "diversity is our strength"; is not a strength at all. But rather a liability.


You have power over your mind - not outside events. Realize this, and you will find strength.
Marcus Aurelius

He talks about diversity causing so many racial and religious problems.

Well the source of those racial or religious problems are down to systems of inequality that are put in place by the dominant group that comes to dominate a particular geographic space, a particular nation-state.

Another problem with his argument is that he ignores that white Europeans, spent the vast majority of history killing each other even though they were of “one race”

What's he talking about ?

And if it were so natural for white folks to separate then why would it be necessary to encourage whites to do this or to form groups to push that notion?

If it was natural, it would be impossible to move whites or any other group from that natural species instinct.

Whites wouldn’t have needed segregation laws to force separation

Whites wouldn’t have needed anti-miscegenation laws to require separation.

Those laws were passed because white people weren’t so sure that they weren’t prepared to stray, weren’t so sure that it was natural to separate.

Questions ?

“What about white flight ? Surely that shows that whites have a natural instinct to separate”

White flight demonstrates the effectiveness of several hundred years of racial propaganda saying that black people are going to be criminal, they’re going to rob you, they don’t make good neighbours.

If you have years and generations of people picking up those kinds of messages and they do pick them up, from several different sources.

If you go to Russia, Serbia, Bosnia, Poland places were there hardly any black people and you talk to white folks who have never even been around black folks, they will come forth with many of these negative stereotypes in spite of no first-hand experience. They’re getting it from somewhere, not from their own reality.

And finally whites will become half or roughly maybe 48% of the USA nation’s population by the latter part of the twenty-first century.

But this idea that whites will be able to have no influence on the culture.

Whites would still be the largest single group by far of any group in the United States.

This idea that white people can’t hang on at 45-50% when these other groups have managed to survive and thrive at 4% in the case of Asians in this country, 12% in the case of blacks, 12% in the case of Latinos, their cultures are doing quite well at being manifested and celebrated and the idea that whites can’t do that at 45%

I mean, whites must be an incredibly weak-willed or genetically defective or culturally retarded group of people if they can’t maintain their own influence at 45%, that just seems insane.

Ironically the intramural rivalry between competing european states during medieval times, and through the renaissance, was the crucible that developed white culture to the point that it became the envy of the world. On the whole... That was white politics.

There is no "white culture" you fucking cretin. There are many different cultures in Europe and vast differences between ,for example, the UK and Poland, or even between different parts of the UK. Language,food,religion,music and so on.
Only a weirdo would think otherwise.

All of the aforementioned are part of the greatness that comprises western civilization. So as you can plainly see, ; we have quite enough diversity.

So you accept that there is no white culture ?
There is no black culture either . There are a lot of different black cultures.

If there were no white culture; someone failed to forward the memo to the third world. Because it is almost exclusively white founded nations that these people flock to. Incidentally it is only white founded nations who are being pressured to accept these people into their countries as well.

 

[defcon4]

What follows is a rather simple explaination, as to why the perpetuated lie that "diversity is our strength"; is not a strength at all. But rather a liability.


You have power over your mind - not outside events. Realize this, and you will find strength.
Marcus Aurelius

He talks about diversity causing so many racial and religious problems.

Well the source of those racial or religious problems are down to systems of inequality that are put in place by the dominant group that comes to dominate a particular geographic space, a particular nation-state.

Another problem with his argument is that he ignores that white Europeans, spent the vast majority of history killing each other even though they were of “one race”

What's he talking about ?

And if it were so natural for white folks to separate then why would it be necessary to encourage whites to do this or to form groups to push that notion?

If it was natural, it would be impossible to move whites or any other group from that natural species instinct.

Whites wouldn’t have needed segregation laws to force separation

Whites wouldn’t have needed anti-miscegenation laws to require separation.

Those laws were passed because white people weren’t so sure that they weren’t prepared to stray, weren’t so sure that it was natural to separate.

Questions ?

“What about white flight ? Surely that shows that whites have a natural instinct to separate”

White flight demonstrates the effectiveness of several hundred years of racial propaganda saying that black people are going to be criminal, they’re going to rob you, they don’t make good neighbours.

If you have years and generations of people picking up those kinds of messages and they do pick them up, from several different sources.

If you go to Russia, Serbia, Bosnia, Poland places were there hardly any black people and you talk to white folks who have never even been around black folks, they will come forth with many of these negative stereotypes in spite of no first-hand experience. They’re getting it from somewhere, not from their own reality.

And finally whites will become half or roughly maybe 48% of the USA nation’s population by the latter part of the twenty-first century.

But this idea that whites will be able to have no influence on the culture.

Whites would still be the largest single group by far of any group in the United States.

This idea that white people can’t hang on at 45-50% when these other groups have managed to survive and thrive at 4% in the case of Asians in this country, 12% in the case of blacks, 12% in the case of Latinos, their cultures are doing quite well at being manifested and celebrated and the idea that whites can’t do that at 45%

I mean, whites must be an incredibly weak-willed or genetically defective or culturally retarded group of people if they can’t maintain their own influence at 45%, that just seems insane.

Ironically the intramural rivalry between competing european states during medieval times, and through the renaissance, was the crucible that developed white culture to the point that it became the envy of the world. On the whole... That was white politics.

There is no "white culture" you fucking cretin. There are many different cultures in Europe and vast differences between ,for example, the UK and Poland, or even between different parts of the UK. Language,food,religion,music and so on.
Only a weirdo would think otherwise.

You are a moron Mr. Tainted. White Europeans do have common heritage and culture. The philosophical giants are taught or at least were taught in the halls of higher education (what you know nothing about) regardless of the country they were located such as Plato, Aristoteles, Pyhtagoras, Socrates, Lucretius, Cicero enumerating just a few. From their philosophy later giants emerged in Christianity, Metaphysics...Then, Composers, Play Writers, Scientists... etc...just look into it you imbecile. That's common heritage that's European Culture.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

What follows is a rather simple explaination, as to why the perpetuated lie that "diversity is our strength"; is not a strength at all. But rather a liability.


You have power over your mind - not outside events. Realize this, and you will find strength.
Marcus Aurelius

He talks about diversity causing so many racial and religious problems.

Well the source of those racial or religious problems are down to systems of inequality that are put in place by the dominant group that comes to dominate a particular geographic space, a particular nation-state.

Another problem with his argument is that he ignores that white Europeans, spent the vast majority of history killing each other even though they were of “one race”

What's he talking about ?

And if it were so natural for white folks to separate then why would it be necessary to encourage whites to do this or to form groups to push that notion?

If it was natural, it would be impossible to move whites or any other group from that natural species instinct.

Whites wouldn’t have needed segregation laws to force separation

Whites wouldn’t have needed anti-miscegenation laws to require separation.

Those laws were passed because white people weren’t so sure that they weren’t prepared to stray, weren’t so sure that it was natural to separate.

Questions ?

“What about white flight ? Surely that shows that whites have a natural instinct to separate”

White flight demonstrates the effectiveness of several hundred years of racial propaganda saying that black people are going to be criminal, they’re going to rob you, they don’t make good neighbours.

If you have years and generations of people picking up those kinds of messages and they do pick them up, from several different sources.

If you go to Russia, Serbia, Bosnia, Poland places were there hardly any black people and you talk to white folks who have never even been around black folks, they will come forth with many of these negative stereotypes in spite of no first-hand experience. They’re getting it from somewhere, not from their own reality.

And finally whites will become half or roughly maybe 48% of the USA nation’s population by the latter part of the twenty-first century.

But this idea that whites will be able to have no influence on the culture.

Whites would still be the largest single group by far of any group in the United States.

This idea that white people can’t hang on at 45-50% when these other groups have managed to survive and thrive at 4% in the case of Asians in this country, 12% in the case of blacks, 12% in the case of Latinos, their cultures are doing quite well at being manifested and celebrated and the idea that whites can’t do that at 45%

I mean, whites must be an incredibly weak-willed or genetically defective or culturally retarded group of people if they can’t maintain their own influence at 45%, that just seems insane.

Ironically the intramural rivalry between competing european states during medieval times, and through the renaissance, was the crucible that developed white culture to the point that it became the envy of the world. On the whole... That was white politics.

There is no "white culture" you fucking cretin. There are many different cultures in Europe and vast differences between ,for example, the UK and Poland, or even between different parts of the UK. Language,food,religion,music and so on.
Only a weirdo would think otherwise.

All of the aforementioned are part of the greatness that comprises western civilization. So as you can plainly see, ; we have quite enough diversity.

So you accept that there is no white culture ?
There is no black culture either . There are a lot of different black cultures.

"So you accept that there is no white culture ?"

White Culture = Western Culture = Western Civilisation.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/terms/western_culture.htm

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

What follows is a rather simple explaination, as to why the perpetuated lie that "diversity is our strength"; is not a strength at all. But rather a liability.


You have power over your mind - not outside events. Realize this, and you will find strength.
Marcus Aurelius

He talks about diversity causing so many racial and religious problems.

Well the source of those racial or religious problems are down to systems of inequality that are put in place by the dominant group that comes to dominate a particular geographic space, a particular nation-state.

Another problem with his argument is that he ignores that white Europeans, spent the vast majority of history killing each other even though they were of “one race”

What's he talking about ?

And if it were so natural for white folks to separate then why would it be necessary to encourage whites to do this or to form groups to push that notion?

If it was natural, it would be impossible to move whites or any other group from that natural species instinct.

Whites wouldn’t have needed segregation laws to force separation

Whites wouldn’t have needed anti-miscegenation laws to require separation.

Those laws were passed because white people weren’t so sure that they weren’t prepared to stray, weren’t so sure that it was natural to separate.

Questions ?

“What about white flight ? Surely that shows that whites have a natural instinct to separate”

White flight demonstrates the effectiveness of several hundred years of racial propaganda saying that black people are going to be criminal, they’re going to rob you, they don’t make good neighbours.

If you have years and generations of people picking up those kinds of messages and they do pick them up, from several different sources.

If you go to Russia, Serbia, Bosnia, Poland places were there hardly any black people and you talk to white folks who have never even been around black folks, they will come forth with many of these negative stereotypes in spite of no first-hand experience. They’re getting it from somewhere, not from their own reality.

And finally whites will become half or roughly maybe 48% of the USA nation’s population by the latter part of the twenty-first century.

But this idea that whites will be able to have no influence on the culture.

Whites would still be the largest single group by far of any group in the United States.

This idea that white people can’t hang on at 45-50% when these other groups have managed to survive and thrive at 4% in the case of Asians in this country, 12% in the case of blacks, 12% in the case of Latinos, their cultures are doing quite well at being manifested and celebrated and the idea that whites can’t do that at 45%

I mean, whites must be an incredibly weak-willed or genetically defective or culturally retarded group of people if they can’t maintain their own influence at 45%, that just seems insane.

Ironically the intramural rivalry between competing european states during medieval times, and through the renaissance, was the crucible that developed white culture to the point that it became the envy of the world. On the whole... That was white politics.

There is no "white culture" you fucking cretin. There are many different cultures in Europe and vast differences between ,for example, the UK and Poland, or even between different parts of the UK. Language,food,religion,music and so on.
Only a weirdo would think otherwise.

You are a moron Mr. Tainted. White Europeans do have common heritage and culture. The philosophical giants are taught or at least were taught in the halls of higher education (what you know nothing about) regardless of the country they were located such as Plato, Aristoteles, Pyhtagoras, Socrates, Lucretius, Cicero enumerating just a few. From their philosophy later giants emerged in Christianity, Metaphysics...Then, Composers, Play Writers, Scientists... etc...just look into it you imbecile. That's common heritage that's European Culture.

He is an ignorant Armchair Historical Negationist ie. Armchair Historical Revisionism and in such fashion attempts to illegitimately distort ALL historical records PROVIDED they pertain to White people, White history while at the same time pushing an inflated narrative regarding Africans and Muslims. He also probably hates Chinese and will deny Chinese Culture going back thousands of years IF it means Africans and Muslims can benefit from the trashing of Chinese Culture to further artificially inflate Africans and Muslims.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

What follows is a rather simple explaination, as to why the perpetuated lie that "diversity is our strength"; is not a strength at all. But rather a liability.


You have power over your mind - not outside events. Realize this, and you will find strength.
Marcus Aurelius

He talks about diversity causing so many racial and religious problems.

Well the source of those racial or religious problems are down to systems of inequality that are put in place by the dominant group that comes to dominate a particular geographic space, a particular nation-state.

Another problem with his argument is that he ignores that white Europeans, spent the vast majority of history killing each other even though they were of “one race”

What's he talking about ?

And if it were so natural for white folks to separate then why would it be necessary to encourage whites to do this or to form groups to push that notion?

If it was natural, it would be impossible to move whites or any other group from that natural species instinct.

Whites wouldn’t have needed segregation laws to force separation

Whites wouldn’t have needed anti-miscegenation laws to require separation.

Those laws were passed because white people weren’t so sure that they weren’t prepared to stray, weren’t so sure that it was natural to separate.

Questions ?

“What about white flight ? Surely that shows that whites have a natural instinct to separate”

White flight demonstrates the effectiveness of several hundred years of racial propaganda saying that black people are going to be criminal, they’re going to rob you, they don’t make good neighbours.

If you have years and generations of people picking up those kinds of messages and they do pick them up, from several different sources.

If you go to Russia, Serbia, Bosnia, Poland places were there hardly any black people and you talk to white folks who have never even been around black folks, they will come forth with many of these negative stereotypes in spite of no first-hand experience. They’re getting it from somewhere, not from their own reality.

And finally whites will become half or roughly maybe 48% of the USA nation’s population by the latter part of the twenty-first century.

But this idea that whites will be able to have no influence on the culture.

Whites would still be the largest single group by far of any group in the United States.

This idea that white people can’t hang on at 45-50% when these other groups have managed to survive and thrive at 4% in the case of Asians in this country, 12% in the case of blacks, 12% in the case of Latinos, their cultures are doing quite well at being manifested and celebrated and the idea that whites can’t do that at 45%

I mean, whites must be an incredibly weak-willed or genetically defective or culturally retarded group of people if they can’t maintain their own influence at 45%, that just seems insane.

Ironically the intramural rivalry between competing european states during medieval times, and through the renaissance, was the crucible that developed white culture to the point that it became the envy of the world. On the whole... That was white politics.

There is no "white culture" you fucking cretin. There are many different cultures in Europe and vast differences between ,for example, the UK and Poland, or even between different parts of the UK. Language,food,religion,music and so on.
Only a weirdo would think otherwise.

You are a moron Mr. Tainted. White Europeans do have common heritage and culture. The philosophical giants are taught or at least were taught in the halls of higher education (what you know nothing about) regardless of the country they were located such as Plato, Aristoteles, Pyhtagoras, Socrates, Lucretius, Cicero enumerating just a few. From their philosophy later giants emerged in Christianity, Metaphysics...Then, Composers, Play Writers, Scientists... etc...just look into it you imbecile. That's common heritage that's European Culture.

"The philosophical giants are taught or at least were taught in the halls of higher education (what you know nothing about) regardless of the country they were located such as Plato, Aristoteles, Pyhtagoras, Socrates, Lucretius, Cicero enumerating just a few. From their philosophy later giants emerged in Christianity, Metaphysics...Then, Composers, Play Writers, Scientists... etc...just look into it you imbecile."

To deny the above illustrates an entire new definition of absolute ignorance, not only of History but also of Logic.

"That's common heritage that's European Culture."

Yes and according to the absolutely ignorant and uneducated it does not exist They are never going to convince or brainwash us into hating ourselves as much as they hate themselves, the hate for themselves is displayed in their complete denial that our Ancestors did NOT build on EVERY LEVEL Western Civilisation.

Western Civilisation = Judeo-Greco-Christian there is NOTHING African or Islamic involved despite what the Paid Propagandists attempt to convince people that Western Civilisation was built ENTIRELY by Africans and Muslims and that Judeo-Greco-Christian's were just a FOOTNOTE and an IRRELEVANCE.

 

[defcon4]

What follows is a rather simple explaination, as to why the perpetuated lie that "diversity is our strength"; is not a strength at all. But rather a liability.


You have power over your mind - not outside events. Realize this, and you will find strength.
Marcus Aurelius

He talks about diversity causing so many racial and religious problems.

Well the source of those racial or religious problems are down to systems of inequality that are put in place by the dominant group that comes to dominate a particular geographic space, a particular nation-state.

Another problem with his argument is that he ignores that white Europeans, spent the vast majority of history killing each other even though they were of “one race”

What's he talking about ?

And if it were so natural for white folks to separate then why would it be necessary to encourage whites to do this or to form groups to push that notion?

If it was natural, it would be impossible to move whites or any other group from that natural species instinct.

Whites wouldn’t have needed segregation laws to force separation

Whites wouldn’t have needed anti-miscegenation laws to require separation.

Those laws were passed because white people weren’t so sure that they weren’t prepared to stray, weren’t so sure that it was natural to separate.

Questions ?

“What about white flight ? Surely that shows that whites have a natural instinct to separate”

White flight demonstrates the effectiveness of several hundred years of racial propaganda saying that black people are going to be criminal, they’re going to rob you, they don’t make good neighbours.

If you have years and generations of people picking up those kinds of messages and they do pick them up, from several different sources.

If you go to Russia, Serbia, Bosnia, Poland places were there hardly any black people and you talk to white folks who have never even been around black folks, they will come forth with many of these negative stereotypes in spite of no first-hand experience. They’re getting it from somewhere, not from their own reality.

And finally whites will become half or roughly maybe 48% of the USA nation’s population by the latter part of the twenty-first century.

But this idea that whites will be able to have no influence on the culture.

Whites would still be the largest single group by far of any group in the United States.

This idea that white people can’t hang on at 45-50% when these other groups have managed to survive and thrive at 4% in the case of Asians in this country, 12% in the case of blacks, 12% in the case of Latinos, their cultures are doing quite well at being manifested and celebrated and the idea that whites can’t do that at 45%

I mean, whites must be an incredibly weak-willed or genetically defective or culturally retarded group of people if they can’t maintain their own influence at 45%, that just seems insane.

Ironically the intramural rivalry between competing european states during medieval times, and through the renaissance, was the crucible that developed white culture to the point that it became the envy of the world. On the whole... That was white politics.

There is no "white culture" you fucking cretin. There are many different cultures in Europe and vast differences between ,for example, the UK and Poland, or even between different parts of the UK. Language,food,religion,music and so on.
Only a weirdo would think otherwise.

You are a moron Mr. Tainted. White Europeans do have common heritage and culture. The philosophical giants are taught or at least were taught in the halls of higher education (what you know nothing about) regardless of the country they were located such as Plato, Aristoteles, Pyhtagoras, Socrates, Lucretius, Cicero enumerating just a few. From their philosophy later giants emerged in Christianity, Metaphysics...Then, Composers, Play Writers, Scientists... etc...just look into it you imbecile. That's common heritage that's European Culture.

"The philosophical giants are taught or at least were taught in the halls of higher education (what you know nothing about) regardless of the country they were located such as Plato, Aristoteles, Pyhtagoras, Socrates, Lucretius, Cicero enumerating just a few. From their philosophy later giants emerged in Christianity, Metaphysics...Then, Composers, Play Writers, Scientists... etc...just look into it you imbecile."

To deny the above illustrates an entire new definition of absolute ignorance, not only of History but also of Logic.

"That's common heritage that's European Culture."

Yes and according to the absolutely ignorant and uneducated it does not exist They are never going to convince or brainwash us into hating ourselves as much as they hate themselves, the hate for themselves is displayed in their complete denial that our Ancestors did NOT build on EVERY LEVEL Western Civilisation.

Western Civilisation = Judeo-Greco-Christian there is NOTHING African or Islamic involved despite what the Paid Propagandists attempt to convince people that Western Civilisation was built ENTIRELY by Africans and Muslims and that Judeo-Greco-Christian's were just a FOOTNOTE and an IRRELEVANCE.

Europe is getting diversified.
WhiteIdentityPolitix on Twitter

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Diversity can be hell on Earth, look at the Balkans, where the term "Balkanization" came from.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Europe developed in different ways and at different speeds.

It is simplistic to believe that there was a unified coherent civilisation. The only thing that could be seen as unifying was the Church. However its manifest corruption caused splits and countries went their own ways.

The Romans brought roads and central heating to the UK but 1000 years later the British were still living in mud huts.

So,for example, could Martin Luther be held responsible for the excesses of Pizarro or the Spanish Inquisition ? Or could he claim credit for it ?

Sweden never bothered anybody. Are the Swedes a party to the slaughter of the Aborigines in Australia and New Zealand or the actions of the British Empire ?

Nope, they came from a different culture, had different values,ate different food and spoke a different language.

My culture is working class Welsh culture. Its working class,chapel and has its own language,music and mythology.A few miles across the border my friends are English, they are C of E, they speak a different language, support an hereditary system and buy in to a thousand years of English hype.

Bu when it rains we all get pissed on.

What I find truly ironic is this. The white supremacists who are promoting the "white culture" myth are the same frothing wankers who decry the EU for destroying "national cultures".