Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Go back to the early August time frame and look up their spanking of Attila over his remarks about a Gold Star family.Hmmm, he hasn't lost them, dunce.Attila the Hun (Donald) lost me, the moment he lost the American Legion and the VFW.
Hence we understand the motive behind the victory dance her minions have been performing this week in the forum:
A website called Real. True. News. (RTN) published an interview on August 7, between RTN‘s Max Insider and an unnamed source within the Democratic National Committee (DNC). The source says Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign is imploding because every weapon they’ve deployed against Donald Trump has failed, and Hillary may soon drop out of the race.
Note: Max Insider describes himself as having “20+ years of reporting for liberal news outlets in the Main Stream Media. Fed up with the lies, the manipulation, and the outright criminality, he is undertaking a crusade to bring truth, righteousness, and vigilance back to America. This is where the revolution starts.”
Here’s what the DNC source said:
1) Trump is polling far better than what the MSM say
“Not only is Trump’s polling far better than the media narrative shows but the even more predictive Social Media scene has collapsed to ‘landslide’ proportions in favor of Donald Trump.”
2) Trump’s campaign is more adept at using social media than Hillary’s
“Hillary inherited Obama’s ‘Victory Lab’ and analytics–but that was all geared to 2012 which was still pretty primitive by today’s standards–and to Mitt Romney who might as well have been a caveman by today’s standards. Things . . . changed. [quietly] Hillary didn’t…. Trump is what changed.”
3) None of the Democratic Party’s tried-and-true attack methods works against Trump
“None of the old strategies work on him [Trump]…. We called our opponents racist. It worked–like, 93-98 times out of a hundred–people would back down. Run. Back then there was zero counter-narrative. McCain played it soft-ball. Romney was pretty clean but he wasn’t ready to get nasty and take the heat. All their surrogates? Allies? Only Sarah Palin had the woman-card. That was it. We crushed them. Their online-portion of the vote? It was smaller than today–but they were demoralized. Shut down…. None of our focus groups were Trump voters. We just didn’t bring any of them in at the start. We tried racist. We tried misogynist. We tried anti-Islam. It worked on our focus people. On Trump voters? No effect–reverse even…. It made them stronger–more committed. I’ve never seen anything like it. It’s like Trump didn’t collapse when we tired it on him and suddenly it didn’t work any more…. Right now tests have shown that attack-ads almost never have any lasting impact. Events like conventions? Like debates? They determine who answers the phone–not who changed their vote. The social media front might be the biggest deal going…. We have our response team go hard–racist. Sexist. Social Justice up the ass. It just pisses everyone off. It changes nobody’s mind.”
4) Hillary campaign has fake followers and the media’s collusion
“We bought fake followers. That used to be what everyone did. Trump? His guys are all real. We’ve got media-established narratives. Our coms-team works with the major outlets to shape the stories. That’s traditional. He doesn’t even have a Coms [Communications] Team–he just fires off tweets and they all go viral. Every last damn one…. We’ve paid like–like 300k for Politico. They [Trump campaign] paid nothing and they’ve got Breitbart. You know who Trump voters trust? Brietbart. Look at the numbers.”
On Hillary’s fake followers, see “Get ready for a $1M army of social media trolls for Hillary” and “DNC advertises on CraigsList for 700 actors to fill empty Convention seats”.
On the media’s collusion with Hillary’s campaign, see “CNN anchor Chris Cuomo admits media are Hillary Clinton’s bitch” and “Blatant media bias: MSNBC’s Joy Reid is a whore for Hillary”.
On the collusion between Hillary’s campaign and Politico, see “DNC advertises on CraigsList for 700 actors to fill empty Convention seats”.
Khan may very well BE a piece of shit.I'm well aware of the media generated brouhaha over Mr Khan, the douche bag Hillary crony. Only a true stooge would imagine veterans are upset with Trump about that. They all think Khan is a piece of shit.Go back to the early August time frame and look up their spanking of Attila over his remarks about a Gold Star family.Hmmm, he hasn't lost them, dunce.Attila the Hun (Donald) lost me, the moment he lost the American Legion and the VFW.
ROFL! No he didn't. You imagine that a few Hillary supporting douche bag political hacks represent all veterans. They don't. No self respecting veteran supports Hillary. They despise Obama, and Hillary would be more of the same. She's the piece of shit who lied to the parents of the Benghazi victims.Then you should be well aware that Trump lost a vast proportion of veteran support at that time; both individuals and fraternal organizations.I'm well aware of the media generated brouhaha over Mr Khan, the douche bag Hillary crony.Go back to the early August time frame and look up their spanking of Attila over his remarks about a Gold Star family.Hmmm, he hasn't lost them, dunce.Attila the Hun (Donald) lost me, the moment he lost the American Legion and the VFW.
Given that most veterans are rather Conservative by nature, a Republican has to be a genuine asshole, to bring on that sort of reaction.
"Your Honor... the Defense rests."
Hence we understand the motive behind the victory dance her minions have been performing this week in the forum:
A website called Real. True. News. (RTN) published an interview on August 7, between RTN‘s Max Insider and an unnamed source within the Democratic National Committee (DNC). The source says Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign is imploding because every weapon they’ve deployed against Donald Trump has failed, and Hillary may soon drop out of the race.
Note: Max Insider describes himself as having “20+ years of reporting for liberal news outlets in the Main Stream Media. Fed up with the lies, the manipulation, and the outright criminality, he is undertaking a crusade to bring truth, righteousness, and vigilance back to America. This is where the revolution starts.”
Here’s what the DNC source said:
1) Trump is polling far better than what the MSM say
“Not only is Trump’s polling far better than the media narrative shows but the even more predictive Social Media scene has collapsed to ‘landslide’ proportions in favor of Donald Trump.”
2) Trump’s campaign is more adept at using social media than Hillary’s
“Hillary inherited Obama’s ‘Victory Lab’ and analytics–but that was all geared to 2012 which was still pretty primitive by today’s standards–and to Mitt Romney who might as well have been a caveman by today’s standards. Things . . . changed. [quietly] Hillary didn’t…. Trump is what changed.”
3) None of the Democratic Party’s tried-and-true attack methods works against Trump
“None of the old strategies work on him [Trump]…. We called our opponents racist. It worked–like, 93-98 times out of a hundred–people would back down. Run. Back then there was zero counter-narrative. McCain played it soft-ball. Romney was pretty clean but he wasn’t ready to get nasty and take the heat. All their surrogates? Allies? Only Sarah Palin had the woman-card. That was it. We crushed them. Their online-portion of the vote? It was smaller than today–but they were demoralized. Shut down…. None of our focus groups were Trump voters. We just didn’t bring any of them in at the start. We tried racist. We tried misogynist. We tried anti-Islam. It worked on our focus people. On Trump voters? No effect–reverse even…. It made them stronger–more committed. I’ve never seen anything like it. It’s like Trump didn’t collapse when we tired it on him and suddenly it didn’t work any more…. Right now tests have shown that attack-ads almost never have any lasting impact. Events like conventions? Like debates? They determine who answers the phone–not who changed their vote. The social media front might be the biggest deal going…. We have our response team go hard–racist. Sexist. Social Justice up the ass. It just pisses everyone off. It changes nobody’s mind.”
4) Hillary campaign has fake followers and the media’s collusion
“We bought fake followers. That used to be what everyone did. Trump? His guys are all real. We’ve got media-established narratives. Our coms-team works with the major outlets to shape the stories. That’s traditional. He doesn’t even have a Coms [Communications] Team–he just fires off tweets and they all go viral. Every last damn one…. We’ve paid like–like 300k for Politico. They [Trump campaign] paid nothing and they’ve got Breitbart. You know who Trump voters trust? Brietbart. Look at the numbers.”
On Hillary’s fake followers, see “Get ready for a $1M army of social media trolls for Hillary” and “DNC advertises on CraigsList for 700 actors to fill empty Convention seats”.
On the media’s collusion with Hillary’s campaign, see “CNN anchor Chris Cuomo admits media are Hillary Clinton’s bitch” and “Blatant media bias: MSNBC’s Joy Reid is a whore for Hillary”.
On the collusion between Hillary’s campaign and Politico, see “DNC advertises on CraigsList for 700 actors to fill empty Convention seats”.
You support radical Islamic terrorists....we,get it already.....Khan may very well BE a piece of shit.I'm well aware of the media generated brouhaha over Mr Khan, the douche bag Hillary crony. Only a true stooge would imagine veterans are upset with Trump about that. They all think Khan is a piece of shit.Go back to the early August time frame and look up their spanking of Attila over his remarks about a Gold Star family.Hmmm, he hasn't lost them, dunce.Attila the Hun (Donald) lost me, the moment he lost the American Legion and the VFW.
Don't know... and, in this narrow context... don't care.
What DOES signify is that Attila shot off his big phukking mouth without thinking, again, for the thousandth time, and went overboard, in counterpointing Khan.
Attila was "set up"... the Dems knew that Khan would push Attila's buttons... and they knew just as well that Attila would stick his foot in his mouth again, and hugely.
Attila is easy to "play" in that respect... way toooooo easy... predictable, emotional, narcissistic, easy to press his buttons... and the Dems and Khan did just that.
The VFW and other veterans groups bitch-slapped Attila over that one, and, once bitch-slapped, you don't recover, within that organization's membership.
Like I've already said... a Republican really has to be an asshole, to lose such vast support, from veterans... but your boy managed to do just that.
'Nuff said.
Hence we understand the motive behind the victory dance her minions have been performing this week in the forum:
A website called Real. True. News. (RTN) published an interview on August 7, between RTN‘s Max Insider and an unnamed source within the Democratic National Committee (DNC). The source says Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign is imploding because every weapon they’ve deployed against Donald Trump has failed, and Hillary may soon drop out of the race.
Note: Max Insider describes himself as having “20+ years of reporting for liberal news outlets in the Main Stream Media. Fed up with the lies, the manipulation, and the outright criminality, he is undertaking a crusade to bring truth, righteousness, and vigilance back to America. This is where the revolution starts.”
Here’s what the DNC source said:
1) Trump is polling far better than what the MSM say
“Not only is Trump’s polling far better than the media narrative shows but the even more predictive Social Media scene has collapsed to ‘landslide’ proportions in favor of Donald Trump.”
2) Trump’s campaign is more adept at using social media than Hillary’s
“Hillary inherited Obama’s ‘Victory Lab’ and analytics–but that was all geared to 2012 which was still pretty primitive by today’s standards–and to Mitt Romney who might as well have been a caveman by today’s standards. Things . . . changed. [quietly] Hillary didn’t…. Trump is what changed.”
3) None of the Democratic Party’s tried-and-true attack methods works against Trump
“None of the old strategies work on him [Trump]…. We called our opponents racist. It worked–like, 93-98 times out of a hundred–people would back down. Run. Back then there was zero counter-narrative. McCain played it soft-ball. Romney was pretty clean but he wasn’t ready to get nasty and take the heat. All their surrogates? Allies? Only Sarah Palin had the woman-card. That was it. We crushed them. Their online-portion of the vote? It was smaller than today–but they were demoralized. Shut down…. None of our focus groups were Trump voters. We just didn’t bring any of them in at the start. We tried racist. We tried misogynist. We tried anti-Islam. It worked on our focus people. On Trump voters? No effect–reverse even…. It made them stronger–more committed. I’ve never seen anything like it. It’s like Trump didn’t collapse when we tired it on him and suddenly it didn’t work any more…. Right now tests have shown that attack-ads almost never have any lasting impact. Events like conventions? Like debates? They determine who answers the phone–not who changed their vote. The social media front might be the biggest deal going…. We have our response team go hard–racist. Sexist. Social Justice up the ass. It just pisses everyone off. It changes nobody’s mind.”
4) Hillary campaign has fake followers and the media’s collusion
“We bought fake followers. That used to be what everyone did. Trump? His guys are all real. We’ve got media-established narratives. Our coms-team works with the major outlets to shape the stories. That’s traditional. He doesn’t even have a Coms [Communications] Team–he just fires off tweets and they all go viral. Every last damn one…. We’ve paid like–like 300k for Politico. They [Trump campaign] paid nothing and they’ve got Breitbart. You know who Trump voters trust? Brietbart. Look at the numbers.”
On Hillary’s fake followers, see “Get ready for a $1M army of social media trolls for Hillary” and “DNC advertises on CraigsList for 700 actors to fill empty Convention seats”.
On the media’s collusion with Hillary’s campaign, see “CNN anchor Chris Cuomo admits media are Hillary Clinton’s bitch” and “Blatant media bias: MSNBC’s Joy Reid is a whore for Hillary”.
On the collusion between Hillary’s campaign and Politico, see “DNC advertises on CraigsList for 700 actors to fill empty Convention seats”.
Something doesn't add up that's for certain. I know Hillary's supporters and the news media try to suppress and spin the numbers but Trump does continue to draw far more folks to his rallies than does Hillary. That fact cannot be hidden.
Hitlery only has weeks to live I heard....Do you guys actually believe this bullshit? If so I don't know whether to laugh at you or feel sorry for you.
ROFL! No he didn't. You imagine that a few Hillary supporting douche bag political hacks represent all veterans. They don't. No self respecting veteran supports Hillary. They despise Obama, and Hillary would be more of the same. She's the piece of shit who lied to the parents of the Benghazi victims.Then you should be well aware that Trump lost a vast proportion of veteran support at that time; both individuals and fraternal organizations.I'm well aware of the media generated brouhaha over Mr Khan, the douche bag Hillary crony.Go back to the early August time frame and look up their spanking of Attila over his remarks about a Gold Star family.Hmmm, he hasn't lost them, dunce.
Given that most veterans are rather Conservative by nature, a Republican has to be a genuine asshole, to bring on that sort of reaction.
"Your Honor... the Defense rests."
I am a vet an I would hate to see the war monger Hillary win. I also didn't hear where the American Legion made a statement. But I would like to know if they did, cause if they did then I will send back my 25 year member card.
Well you're an idiot. I know that I'll laugh at you.Hitlery only has weeks to live I heard....Do you guys actually believe this bullshit? If so I don't know whether to laugh at you or feel sorry for you.
Then you should be well aware that Trump lost a vast proportion of veteran support at that time; both individuals and fraternal organizations.I'm well aware of the media generated brouhaha over Mr Khan, the douche bag Hillary crony.Go back to the early August time frame and look up their spanking of Attila over his remarks about a Gold Star family.Hmmm, he hasn't lost them, dunce.Attila the Hun (Donald) lost me, the moment he lost the American Legion and the VFW.
Given that most veterans are rather Conservative by nature, a Republican has to be a genuine asshole, to bring on that sort of reaction.
A real asshole.
"Your Honor... the Defense rests."
You are correct....I am a vet an I would hate to see the war monger Hillary win. I also didn't hear where the American Legion made a statement. But I would like to know if they did, cause if they did then I will send back my 25 year member card.
Yes, of course. It's all in the news about Mrs. Clinton: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/14/us/politics/donald-trump-campaign-gop.html?_r=0
'In private, Mr. Trump’s mood is often sullen and erratic, his associates say. He veers from barking at members of his staff to grumbling about how he was better off following his own instincts during the primaries and suggesting he should not have heeded their calls for change.
He broods about his souring relationship with the news media, calling Mr. Manafort several times a day to talk about specific stories. Occasionally, Mr. Trump blows off steam in bursts of boyish exuberance: At the end of a fund-raiser on Long Island last week, he playfully buzzed the crowd twice with his helicopter.'
The New York Times is the source. I'm sure the reporter interviewed "unnamed sources" for this information.
Enough said.
I guess you don't understand how the free press works. These sources are later referred to as whistle-blowers. A reporter always protects their sources.
i.e.: Watergate, when Woodard and Bernstein had to carefully approach the DNC break-in after their sources informed them that President Nixon was behind the burglary. And we all know how that ended, don't we?
Yes, I do know how the New York Times works. Whenever they want to make stuff up, they just use an "unnamed source."
Hitlery only has weeks to live I heard....Do you guys actually believe this bullshit? If so I don't know whether to laugh at you or feel sorry for you.
Most troops are little more than children, and really don't understand the world yet.Then you should be well aware that Trump lost a vast proportion of veteran support at that time; both individuals and fraternal organizations.I'm well aware of the media generated brouhaha over Mr Khan, the douche bag Hillary crony.Go back to the early August time frame and look up their spanking of Attila over his remarks about a Gold Star family.Hmmm, he hasn't lost them, dunce.Attila the Hun (Donald) lost me, the moment he lost the American Legion and the VFW.
Given that most veterans are rather Conservative by nature, a Republican has to be a genuine asshole, to bring on that sort of reaction.
A real asshole.
"Your Honor... the Defense rests."
Military Times survey: Troops prefer Trump to Clinton by a huge margin
What a fucking douche bag. Do you actually imagine that anyone believes you ever had any intention of voting for Trump?You are correct....I am a vet an I would hate to see the war monger Hillary win. I also didn't hear where the American Legion made a statement. But I would like to know if they did, cause if they did then I will send back my 25 year member card.
My Post No. 3 was inaccurate.
The American Legion did not spank Attila over the Khan incident.
Although they should have.
It was the VFW.
And a half-dozen other veterans organizations.
Including "Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans" and "Gold Star Wives" and others of substance and significance.
I have corrected Post No. 3 to reflect the truth of the matter.
And I continue to stand by my remarks; that Attila lost me, when the VFW spanked him.
Not that I wasn't leaning against him already, by then, but I had had some vague and distant hope, that they guy might not prove to be such an asshole, after all.
In this hope, I was young, naive and foolish.
His lack of filters is sufficient in its own right, to render him unfit for the highest office in the land.
If you're a Republican, and the VFW, and Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans, and Gold Star Wives, come out against you, you've really got to be a bona fide asshole.
You boy, apparently, meets that sniff test.
