Does a liberal have the IQ to understand how Republican capitalist health care.....

[Toronado3800]

capitalism is the miracle, just like when capitalism made the cost of lasik surgery come down by 90% as quality went way way up!!

or like when China switched to capitalism and instead of slowly starving to death in the millions people started buying cars in the millions

Simply really but a liberal will lack the IQ to understand

Just asking. Is the current Chinese system the one you want to emulate, since you brought it up as an example.

Oh and hey, slow down on the name calling. It makes ppl think u are 12.

why so stupidly trying to change the subject when I have a student here learning the fundamental differences between capitalism and socialism?

I'm talking life and death and you're splitting hairs like an ass.

Now the name calling I did hassle you on, but if you are done with that I am done giving you a hard time about it.

About the Chinese system. I asked because YOU keep bringing it up as an example. So, is the current Chinese economic model that you KEEP bragging on the ideal form of whatever you support?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Just asking. Is the current Chinese system the one you want to emulate, since you brought it up as an example.

Oh and hey, slow down on the name calling. It makes ppl think u are 12.

why so stupidly trying to change the subject when I have a student here learning the fundamental differences between capitalism and socialism?

I'm talking life and death and you're splitting hairs like an ass.

Now the name calling I did hassle you on, but if you are done with that I am done giving you a hard time about it.

About the Chinese system. I asked because YOU keep bringing it up as an example. So, is the current Chinese economic model that you KEEP bragging on the ideal form of whatever you support?

you idiot liberal there is probably not a person in the west who would think of that as ideal!

See why we are positive a liberal will be slow??? What other conclusion is possible??

 

[expatriate]

Sick people are NOT equally preferred because they use more insurance dollars than the size of their premiums.

of course you cant buy more car than you pay for
in a free market

in a free insurance market, you certainly can. And THAT is how health insurance markets WORK. They accept the fact that some of their customers will get "more car than they pay for" because they KNOW that the bulk of their customers will get significantly LESS car than they pay for. That does NOT, however, mean that they PREFER the sick ones... as you have stupidly asserted here. They PREFER the customers who pay their premiums every year and NEVER get sick. Those people pay for a car, but the insurance companies never has to give it to them.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Sick people are NOT equally preferred because they use more insurance dollars than the size of their premiums.

of course you cant buy more car than you pay for
in a free market

in a free insurance market, you certainly can. And THAT is how health insurance markets WORK. They accept the fact that some of their customers will get "more car than they pay for" because they KNOW that the bulk of their customers will get significantly LESS car than they pay for. That does NOT, however, mean that they PREFER the sick ones... as you have stupidly asserted here. They PREFER the customers who pay their premiums every year and NEVER get sick. Those people pay for a car, but the insurance companies never has to give it to them.

I know you get confused but just think of it like life insurance. You pay based on how long your life is likely to be. They don't care if you are 10 or 90 as long as libturds leave them free to charge the true cost of insuring you.

Not so hard is it??

 

[expatriate]

of course you cant buy more car than you pay for
in a free market

in a free insurance market, you certainly can. And THAT is how health insurance markets WORK. They accept the fact that some of their customers will get "more car than they pay for" because they KNOW that the bulk of their customers will get significantly LESS car than they pay for. That does NOT, however, mean that they PREFER the sick ones... as you have stupidly asserted here. They PREFER the customers who pay their premiums every year and NEVER get sick. Those people pay for a car, but the insurance companies never has to give it to them.

I know you get confused but just think of it like life insurance. You pay based on how long your life is likely to be. They don't care if you are 10 or 90 as long as libturds leave them free to charge the true cost of insuring you.

Not so hard is it??

you really are dumb as a box of rocks. Health insurance is NOT like life insurance. Everyone dies, but not everyone gets sick. But everyone WORRIES about what would happen if they DID get sick.... so, even though they may be healthy as a horse, they STILL buy health insurance... and THEY are the absolute PREFERRED customers for health insurance companies. THey KNOW that they majority of healthy people in any given year will remain healthy and they get to pocket the premiums without ever having to pay a claim... it is THAT shared risk that allows them to be able to pay the costs of health care for the folks who DO get sick and still be able to make a profit. But AGAIN... you are absolutely DEAD WRONG when you say that sick people are the PREFERRED customers of health insurance companies... and the fact that you can even say that with a straight face means that you don't have a fucking clue what the concept of a shared risk pool is and how it relates to the health insurance marketplace.

 

[Toronado3800]

why so stupidly trying to change the subject when I have a student here learning the fundamental differences between capitalism and socialism?

I'm talking life and death and you're splitting hairs like an ass.

Now the name calling I did hassle you on, but if you are done with that I am done giving you a hard time about it.

About the Chinese system. I asked because YOU keep bringing it up as an example. So, is the current Chinese economic model that you KEEP bragging on the ideal form of whatever you support?

you idiot liberal there is probably not a person in the west who would think of that as ideal!

See why we are positive a liberal will be slow??? What other conclusion is possible??

Ok......so you find what about this Chinese economic system that you are bragging on less than ideal?

Is it less government controlled than our economy? Or is the more government controlled system rising faster?

Be nice Edward. Your insults remind me of things a 12 year old girl says when she gets grounded.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Everyone dies, but not everyone gets sick.

actually dear we all get sick before we die. Sorry!!

 

[Toronado3800]

Everyone dies, but not everyone gets sick.

actually dear we all get sick before we die. Sorry!!

I know a guy who died in a car crash. And a gal who just "pop" had an anuerysn..

 

[expatriate]

Everyone dies, but not everyone gets sick.

actually dear we all get sick before we die. Sorry!!

as I said, in any given year, health insurance companies know that the vast majority of healthy people will stay healthy and THEY, therefore, unlike your moronic assertions to the contrary, are the PREFERRED customers.

And lots of people die without getting sick first. Bing Crosby.... out walking on the golf course, BANG... dead of a heart attack. No health insurance payout there. Jayne Mansfield.... driving down the road and runs up under a stopped semi truck. No health insurance payout there.

and don't you dare call me dear. Are you a flaming faggot trolling on the internet?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Everyone dies, but not everyone gets sick.

actually dear we all get sick before we die. Sorry!!

I know a guy who died in a car crash. And a gal who just "pop" had an anuerysn..

too stupid health insurance is based on the high probability that you will get sick before you die. Why not just read instead of comment??

 

[expatriate]

actually dear we all get sick before we die. Sorry!!

I know a guy who died in a car crash. And a gal who just "pop" had an anuerysn..

too stupid health insurance is based on the high probability that you will get sick before you die. Why not just read instead of comment??

and AGAIN, you prove time and time again how dumb you really are. Health insurance premiums are paid year upon year upon year upon year by young, healthy customers who are scared of the costs of catastrophic illness. Of course they will die sometime, and, probably, they will get sick, perhaps, before they do finally die, but the health insurance companies have been pocketing their premiums for decades... AGAIN.... YOU were the one who said that sick people are the health insurance company's PREFERRED customers and you have YET to admit that that is bass-ackwards from reality. YOU are a moron.

 

[Toronado3800]

actually dear we all get sick before we die. Sorry!!

I know a guy who died in a car crash. And a gal who just "pop" had an anuerysn..

too stupid health insurance is based on the high probability that you will get sick before you die. Why not just read instead of comment??

No need to bet $10,000 a fella didn't say everyone gets sick THEN dies.

Back tothe economic model you hold so high, the Chinese......

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

. Health insurance premiums are paid year upon year upon year upon year by young, healthy customers who are scared of the costs of catastrophic illness.

1) except we know the young are now called invincibles because they frequently don't buy insurance


2) and we know that in a free market if one insurance company put 20 year olds and 90 year olds in the same risk pool it would cost the 20 year olds a fortune to pay for someone elses ill health. So, a competitor would group 20-30 year olds together and drive the other company out of business!!


See why we are positve a liberal will be slow, so very very slow.

 

[expatriate]

. Health insurance premiums are paid year upon year upon year upon year by young, healthy customers who are scared of the costs of catastrophic illness.

1) except we know the young are now called invincibles because they frequently don't buy insurance


2) and we know that in a free market if one insurance company put 20 year olds and 90 year olds in the same risk pool it would cost the 20 year olds a fortune to pay for someone elses ill health. So, a competitor would group 20-30 year olds together and drive the other company out of business!!


See why we are positve a liberal will be slow, so very very slow.

you clearly have never worked in the insurance industry. Health insurance companies do not only sell insurance to 20-30 year olds... they insure most everyone. Actuaries tell them how much they can charge and they do so accordingly. Certainly, a younger person will pay less than an older person will, but the POINT is that, UNLIKE YOUR PREVIOUS STUPID ASSERTION TO THE CONTRARY..... health insurance companies do NOT prefer to insure sick people, they PREFER healthy people... and the fact that it has been weeks and weeks since you made that ridiculous assertion and have still not admitted that it was idiotic PROVES just how very very slow YOU are.

 

[Toronado3800]

Now the name calling I did hassle you on, but if you are done with that I am done giving you a hard time about it.

About the Chinese system. I asked because YOU keep bringing it up as an example. So, is the current Chinese economic model that you KEEP bragging on the ideal form of whatever you support?

you idiot liberal there is probably not a person in the west who would think of that as ideal!

See why we are positive a liberal will be slow??? What other conclusion is possible??

Ok......so you find what about this Chinese economic system that you are bragging on less than ideal?

Is it less government controlled than our economy? Or is the more government controlled system rising faster?

Be nice Edward. Your insults remind me of things a 12 year old girl says when she gets grounded.

So now you are not bragging on the Chinese big government folks? I thought you were talking about how great big government capitalism is? Ya know, with central plans and government picked winners? Kinda like in the time of Lincoln over here.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

I thought you were talking about how great big government capitalism is?

too stupid Jobs picked the Iphone not Chinese big governemt!!

See why we are positive a liberal will be slow???

 

[Toronado3800]

I thought you were talking about how great big government capitalism is?

too stupid Jobs picked the Iphone not Chinese big governemt!!

See why we are positive a liberal will be slow???

Think big picture Edward not slogans.

Unless you are saying the Chinese have less government involvement and more freedom in their "capitalism" than we do.

Maybe they do, do they?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

I thought you were talking about how great big government capitalism is?

too stupid Jobs picked the Iphone not Chinese big governemt!!

See why we are positive a liberal will be slow???

Think big picture Edward not slogans.

Unless you are saying the Chinese have less government involvement and more freedom in their "capitalism" than we do.

Maybe they do, do they?

who cares, the point is, it's capitalist, the market rules in the end.

 

[Dorkazoid_Jones]

too stupid Jobs picked the Iphone not Chinese big governemt!!

See why we are positive a liberal will be slow???

Think big picture Edward not slogans.

Unless you are saying the Chinese have less government involvement and more freedom in their "capitalism" than we do.

Maybe they do, do they?

who cares, the point is, it's capitalist, the market rules in the end.

Edward my brother, you're hilarious. Keep up the good fight. I like your responses to convoluted liberal rationalization that somehow government run health care will be cost effective and an improvement on existing health care.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Think big picture Edward not slogans.

Unless you are saying the Chinese have less government involvement and more freedom in their "capitalism" than we do.

Maybe they do, do they?

who cares, the point is, it's capitalist, the market rules in the end.

Edward my brother, you're hilarious. Keep up the good fight. I like your responses to convoluted liberal rationalization that somehow government run health care will be cost effective and an improvement on existing health care.

gibberish I'm afraid I'm sure you thought that meant something