Does Mankind Deserve Continued Existence? Does Desire Equal Deserve?

[RandomVariable]

And God used clay. What's your point. I have to turn in my blue ribbon?

Irony alert.

God? What God? Where is the physical proof a god even exists except outside the warped minds of people like the Hebdo terrorists?

God is another name for the engineer. Your inability to see the physical clues left by this engineer is a testament to your blindness.

religious speak for : na, na, na, na? good gawd, have a nice short sad life. just don't be surprised that at the very end you realize "Oh shit!" "I was so wrong...there's nothing"

Does no one read my stuff? I am the one who talks to God, remember? There will be no 'surprise there is no God' at the end. I may get dumped in the burn pile but I know there is a God. He said so.

btw, I only take credit for the bad posts.

your stuff gets read randomly. sorry

You ever tried to read the bible lately. Wow, talk about grabbing stuff out of thin air. It is like he has everything on his mind at the same time.

 

[Asclepias]

Who told you the fact that they come together shows no intent? On the contrary it shows all types of intent. You see creation is planned. Whatever force planned this left clues. I have an engineering background and we frequently leave clues. Whoever created the universe left clues all around us. Your inability to see those clues only speaks to your lack of intelligence. Thats why you resort to snide remarks instead of addressing my post with intelligence. You simply cant deal.

a manifold of things are formed/created without intent. a lab tech drops a chemical into some mix by accident.

what is sad about some religious people is they have to believe that when their god created the universe, everything later was planned with intent. Otherwise some things are come into being without intent and then the circle jerk starts all over again -- but does it? The circle never stops. It juts goes round and a round...

what a sad small world some religious people live in. If life is about experiences, religious people shut out so much. And to make it worse -- most religious books were written back when mankind was only a few generations removed from swinging in trees

Who told you it was an accident and not planned? You still haven't cited any evidence there is not a creator. Your opinions dont matter. I want to see the evidence. I can show you mathematical evidence there is an engineer to all this.

it is you who have to show evidence for your claim. but don't bother. Dante will not entertain you with this thread of imbecility

You dont have to entertain me. You have to prove me wrong. Here is my proof. Where is yours?

The Fibonacci Numbers and Golden section in Nature - 1

on the way out, but...easily refuted Fibonacci Flim-Flam.

Of course much of this is patently nonsense. Mathematics doesn't "explain" anything in nature, but mathematical models are very powerful for describing patterns and laws found in nature. I think it's safe to say that the Fibonacci sequence, golden mean, and golden rectangle have never, not even once, directly led to the discovery of a fundamental law of nature. When we see a neat numeric or geometric pattern in nature, we realize we must dig deeper to find the underlying reason why these patterns arise.

Basically you just admitted there was a pattern, a law that nature follows. What or who made these laws? Thats the work of an engineer.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Irony alert.

God? What God? Where is the physical proof a god even exists except outside the warped minds of people like the Hebdo terrorists?

God is another name for the engineer. Your inability to see the physical clues left by this engineer is a testament to your blindness.

religious speak for : na, na, na, na? good gawd, have a nice short sad life. just don't be surprised that at the very end you realize "Oh shit!" "I was so wrong...there's nothing"

Does no one read my stuff? I am the one who talks to God, remember? There will be no 'surprise there is no God' at the end. I may get dumped in the burn pile but I know there is a God. He said so.

btw, I only take credit for the bad posts.

your stuff gets read randomly. sorry

You ever tried to read the bible lately. Wow, talk about grabbing stuff out of thin air. It is like he has everything on his mind at the same time.

"In times of weakness, loneliness, or fear, remember that the Lord is always with"

Dante is neither weak, nor lonely, nor fearful. No thanks

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

a manifold of things are formed/created without intent. a lab tech drops a chemical into some mix by accident.

what is sad about some religious people is they have to believe that when their god created the universe, everything later was planned with intent. Otherwise some things are come into being without intent and then the circle jerk starts all over again -- but does it? The circle never stops. It juts goes round and a round...

what a sad small world some religious people live in. If life is about experiences, religious people shut out so much. And to make it worse -- most religious books were written back when mankind was only a few generations removed from swinging in trees

Who told you it was an accident and not planned? You still haven't cited any evidence there is not a creator. Your opinions dont matter. I want to see the evidence. I can show you mathematical evidence there is an engineer to all this.

it is you who have to show evidence for your claim. but don't bother. Dante will not entertain you with this thread of imbecility

You dont have to entertain me. You have to prove me wrong. Here is my proof. Where is yours?

The Fibonacci Numbers and Golden section in Nature - 1

on the way out, but...easily refuted Fibonacci Flim-Flam.

Of course much of this is patently nonsense. Mathematics doesn't "explain" anything in nature, but mathematical models are very powerful for describing patterns and laws found in nature. I think it's safe to say that the Fibonacci sequence, golden mean, and golden rectangle have never, not even once, directly led to the discovery of a fundamental law of nature. When we see a neat numeric or geometric pattern in nature, we realize we must dig deeper to find the underlying reason why these patterns arise.

Basically you just admitted there was a pattern, a law that nature follows. What or who made these laws? Thats the work of an engineer.

disingenuousness mixed with ignorance?

you suck at sophistry. you excel on stubborn ignorance

 

[Asclepias]

Who told you it was an accident and not planned? You still haven't cited any evidence there is not a creator. Your opinions dont matter. I want to see the evidence. I can show you mathematical evidence there is an engineer to all this.

it is you who have to show evidence for your claim. but don't bother. Dante will not entertain you with this thread of imbecility

You dont have to entertain me. You have to prove me wrong. Here is my proof. Where is yours?

The Fibonacci Numbers and Golden section in Nature - 1

on the way out, but...easily refuted Fibonacci Flim-Flam.

Of course much of this is patently nonsense. Mathematics doesn't "explain" anything in nature, but mathematical models are very powerful for describing patterns and laws found in nature. I think it's safe to say that the Fibonacci sequence, golden mean, and golden rectangle have never, not even once, directly led to the discovery of a fundamental law of nature. When we see a neat numeric or geometric pattern in nature, we realize we must dig deeper to find the underlying reason why these patterns arise.

Basically you just admitted there was a pattern, a law that nature follows. What or who made these laws? Thats the work of an engineer.

you suck at sophistry. you excel on stubborn ignorance

You are stuck at denial and willful ignorance. You excel at the mundane. Thats why you have ran out of answers.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

it is you who have to show evidence for your claim. but don't bother. Dante will not entertain you with this thread of imbecility

You dont have to entertain me. You have to prove me wrong. Here is my proof. Where is yours?

The Fibonacci Numbers and Golden section in Nature - 1

on the way out, but...easily refuted Fibonacci Flim-Flam.

Of course much of this is patently nonsense. Mathematics doesn't "explain" anything in nature, but mathematical models are very powerful for describing patterns and laws found in nature. I think it's safe to say that the Fibonacci sequence, golden mean, and golden rectangle have never, not even once, directly led to the discovery of a fundamental law of nature. When we see a neat numeric or geometric pattern in nature, we realize we must dig deeper to find the underlying reason why these patterns arise.

Basically you just admitted there was a pattern, a law that nature follows. What or who made these laws? Thats the work of an engineer.

you suck at sophistry. you excel on stubborn ignorance

You are stuck at denial and willful ignorance. You excel at the mundane. Thats why you have ran out of answers.

you must be a very lonely individual

 

[Asclepias]

You dont have to entertain me. You have to prove me wrong. Here is my proof. Where is yours?

The Fibonacci Numbers and Golden section in Nature - 1

on the way out, but...easily refuted Fibonacci Flim-Flam.

Of course much of this is patently nonsense. Mathematics doesn't "explain" anything in nature, but mathematical models are very powerful for describing patterns and laws found in nature. I think it's safe to say that the Fibonacci sequence, golden mean, and golden rectangle have never, not even once, directly led to the discovery of a fundamental law of nature. When we see a neat numeric or geometric pattern in nature, we realize we must dig deeper to find the underlying reason why these patterns arise.

Basically you just admitted there was a pattern, a law that nature follows. What or who made these laws? Thats the work of an engineer.

you suck at sophistry. you excel on stubborn ignorance

You are stuck at denial and willful ignorance. You excel at the mundane. Thats why you have ran out of answers.

you must be a very lonely individual

You must be a very insecure individual.

 

[RandomVariable]

And God used clay. What's your point. I have to turn in my blue ribbon?

Irony alert.

God? What God? Where is the physical proof a god even exists except outside the warped minds of people like the Hebdo terrorists?

God is another name for the engineer. Your inability to see the physical clues left by this engineer is a testament to your blindness.

religious speak for : na, na, na, na? good gawd, have a nice short sad life. just don't be surprised that at the very end you realize "Oh shit!" "I was so wrong...there's nothing"

Does no one read my stuff? I am the one who talks to God, remember? There will be no 'surprise there is no God' at the end. I may get dumped in the burn pile but I know there is a God. He said so.

btw, I only take credit for the bad posts.

your stuff gets read randomly. sorry

No, the problem is that you can not reconcile between my posts, what you think someone who claimed to talk to God would post like, and the existence of a god that would actually talk with me. Trust me on this one, me neither.

 

[Iceweasel]

Does Mankind Deserve Continued Existence? Does Desire Equal Deserve?

How can anyone make a reasoned and honest argument than mankind 'deserves' to exist? It just doesn't seem possible. there is no proof that mankind has to or deserves to exist outside of a genetic desire to.

Deservin's got nothin' to do with it, boy.

wow!

the depth of your analysis is stunning

It is. Think about it for a year or three.

 

[Iceweasel]

creation supposes a creator.

come into being does not

Come into being requires more faith than most people have.

 

[RandomVariable]

At the moment I would say it is not looking so good.

 

[ninja007]

Does Mankind Deserve Continued Existence? Does Desire Equal Deserve?

How can anyone make a reasoned and honest argument than mankind 'deserves' to exist? It just doesn't seem possible. there is no proof that mankind has to or deserves to exist outside of a genetic desire to.

read the Bible, specifically the Book of Revelation. Study good commentaries about it also.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Does Mankind Deserve Continued Existence? Does Desire Equal Deserve?

How can anyone make a reasoned and honest argument than mankind 'deserves' to exist? It just doesn't seem possible. there is no proof that mankind has to or deserves to exist outside of a genetic desire to.

read the Bible, specifically the Book of Revelation. Study good commentaries about it also.

not all christians believe that shit

 

[Politico]

Does Mankind Deserve Continued Existence?

No.

 

[Asclepias]

Does Mankind Deserve Continued Existence? Does Desire Equal Deserve?

How can anyone make a reasoned and honest argument than mankind 'deserves' to exist? It just doesn't seem possible. there is no proof that mankind has to or deserves to exist outside of a genetic desire to.

read the Bible, specifically the Book of Revelation. Study good commentaries about it also.

What good would that do?

 

[Taz]

We should get rid of all the retards and ugly people.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Does Mankind Deserve Continued Existence?

No.

an informed and intelligent reply. also honest