Monk-Eye
Gold Member
- Feb 3, 2018
- 3,229
- 793
- 140
"Does Non Violence Principles Correct Non Aggression Principles Lexicon ? "
* Definition Buy Explanation *
Social systems include allowable limits of aggression ; thus , by definition , violence is illegitimate aggression .
This is a call to correctly annotate an understanding for terms .
A non violence principle would be defined as a tenet of creed ceding that any subjected to violence be entitled to self defense sufficient to abate the illegitimate aggression .
A non aggression principle would be defined as a tenet of creed not ceding that any subjected to violence is entitled to issue self defense sufficient to abate the illegitimate aggression .
This opening post seeks to persuade that the contemporary definition and lexicon are broken , as some posit an equivalence between non violence and pacifism , as some posit an equivalence between any aggression and violence .
* Poll Question *
Should contemporary definitions of non aggression principles versus non violence principles be corrected ?
* Definition Buy Explanation *
Social systems include allowable limits of aggression ; thus , by definition , violence is illegitimate aggression .
This is a call to correctly annotate an understanding for terms .
A non violence principle would be defined as a tenet of creed ceding that any subjected to violence be entitled to self defense sufficient to abate the illegitimate aggression .
A non aggression principle would be defined as a tenet of creed not ceding that any subjected to violence is entitled to issue self defense sufficient to abate the illegitimate aggression .
This opening post seeks to persuade that the contemporary definition and lexicon are broken , as some posit an equivalence between non violence and pacifism , as some posit an equivalence between any aggression and violence .
* Poll Question *
Should contemporary definitions of non aggression principles versus non violence principles be corrected ?
