Donald Trump had more votes against him than he did for him.

No why would I be?

Perhaps you should look up the definition of VOTE....DAMN!
Lol so if I voted for fiorina, that means I voted against trump?
But what if I loved trump too?


Ikr? Little bit of a dilemma with that one track mind, ey?

The very definition is you vote for YOUR FAVORITE....I liked both Ted and Donald...I only voted for one!
It's actually o make a choice or something like that.
To say "voting against" for simply picking someone else is disingenuous
Bullshit!

No, he's right. If it were a referendum that read, say, "shall the Republican Party throw away all semblance of sanity by nominating a giant orange version of P.T. Barnum, yes or no", then you would have "votes against".
 
Perhaps you should look up the definition of VOTE....DAMN!
Lol so if I voted for fiorina, that means I voted against trump?
But what if I loved trump too?









Ikr? Little bit of a dilemma with that one track mind, ey?

The very definition is you vote for YOUR FAVORITE....I liked both Ted and Donald...I only voted for one!
It's actually o make a choice or something like that.
To say "voting against" for simply picking someone else is disingenuous
Bullshit!
What is?
Quit sounding like a dummy and Splain something

I did, apparently you're too stupid to understand it!
 
Perhaps you should look up the definition of VOTE....DAMN!
Lol so if I voted for fiorina, that means I voted against trump?
But what if I loved trump too?


Ikr? Little bit of a dilemma with that one track mind, ey?

The very definition is you vote for YOUR FAVORITE....I liked both Ted and Donald...I only voted for one!
It's actually o make a choice or something like that.
To say "voting against" for simply picking someone else is disingenuous
Bullshit!

No, he's right. If it were a referendum that read, say, "shall the Republican Party throw away all semblance of sanity by nominating a giant orange version of P.T. Barnum, yes or no", then you would have "votes against".
Your side already has that...

8yggh2.jpg
 
You don't have a television where you work? You don't have a car radio? Can you not read the numerous threads on this forum about that particular subject?

Why the fuck would I have a television where I work? What kind of work would get done?

Yes I have car radios but I didn't have them on. And yes I can read "numerous threads" if I'm interested in them, and I do.
But you brought it up, Sparkles.


As for my username, you will have to find that in one of the other threads where I explained it.

Ah, embarrassed I see. Well not to worry, I already know the answer because I already looked it up when you first got here. It told me all I needed to know.
You don't have a break room in the dungeon you work in? Just how oblivious to the world are you?

Why would I be embarrassed? Do you really think I want to explain my username to yet another moron on here?

I believe the jernt does have a break room of a sort. It doesn't have a TV. Why the fuck would it?

See if you can answer that, since you can't think of an answer for your own name.
Because nearly every break room has a tv?


"Nearly every break room has a TV", does it? :rofl:

Link?
Actually I asked you why it would have a TV. Whether it has one or not. You don't have an answer.

Why should every break room "have a TV", Winston?

If that room did have a TV I wouldn't be watching it. Why the fuck would I piss away my time like that?

See? That's the same question, and you have no answer.

If I thought "TV" was worth anything more than the propaganda hypnosis device designed to sell me shit I don't need that it is, I might own one. But I already know that, so I have no use for it. NOR, to return to the original point, do I need to know everything about everything instantly. If it's important, I'll find out in due time. As it happened you were the first one to mention it at all, so don't ass-ume I have the same addictions you do. K?

Why do you think I would be afraid of talking about my username on a forum in which I have already talked about it extensively? Do you have a problem with white people who have a high self esteem?

Who said anything about "self-esteem"? You didn't even answer the question. In the absence of that info I'm assuming it stands for "Pusillanimous Twerp Bhongs Weed"-- Forever.
 
Yes the TOTAL of SIXTEEN other candidates added together to make it appear that The Donald LOST by 2 million votes..... OP is smoking some HARD SHIT AGAIN!
Great, another rightard who moronically thinks there were 16 other candidates to draw votes. :cuckoo:

Rightarded moron...

5 of those 16 dropped out before the first primary and 3 more dropped out after it.

By New Hampshire, half of the 16 you idiotically thought were pulling votes from Trump were no longer even running. 3 more dropped out after NH and Jeb withdraw after SC.

After the first 3 states, there were only 4 remaining + Trump.

Carson dropped out after Super Tuesday and Rubio was done 2 weeks later -- leaving only Cruz and Kasich.

Number of states/other ... opponents:

9 ........ 0
11 ...... 2
18 ...... 3
15 ...... 4
1......... 5
1 ........ 8
1 ...... 11

Through 53 out of 56 states & territories, Trump faced no more than 4 opponents.

See why you look like such a flaming idiot?
 
Yes the TOTAL of SIXTEEN other candidates added together to make it appear that The Donald LOST by 2 million votes..... OP is smoking some HARD SHIT AGAIN!
Great, another rightard who moronically thinks there were 16 other candidates to draw votes. :cuckoo:

Rightarded moron...

5 of those 16 dropped out before the first primary and 3 more dropped out after it.

By New Hampshire, half of the 16 you idiotically thought were pulling votes from Trump were no longer even running. 3 more dropped out after NH and Jeb withdraw after SC.

After the first 3 states, there were only 4 remaining + Trump.

Carson dropped out after Super Tuesday and Rubio was done 2 weeks later -- leaving only Cruz and Kasich.

Number of states/other ... opponents:

9 ........ 0
11 ...... 2
18 ...... 3
21 ...... 4
1......... 5
1 ........ 8
1 ...... 11

Through 59 out of 62 states & territories, Trump faced no more than 4 opponents.

See why you look like such a flaming idiot?

Ok Pawned Again...first primary he had 11 candidates to vote against and went down from that...Hildebeast had Bernie and some other goober that dropped out almost immediately...BUT you ride with your mental masturbation if it continues to quench your OCD over insignificant details!
 
Yes the TOTAL of SIXTEEN other candidates added together to make it appear that The Donald LOST by 2 million votes..... OP is smoking some HARD SHIT AGAIN!
Great, another rightard who moronically thinks there were 16 other candidates to draw votes. :cuckoo:

Rightarded moron...

5 of those 16 dropped out before the first primary and 3 more dropped out after it.

By New Hampshire, half of the 16 you idiotically thought were pulling votes from Trump were no longer even running. 3 more dropped out after NH and Jeb withdraw after SC.

After the first 3 states, there were only 4 remaining + Trump.

Carson dropped out after Super Tuesday and Rubio was done 2 weeks later -- leaving only Cruz and Kasich.

Number of states/other ... opponents:

9 ........ 0
11 ...... 2
18 ...... 3
21 ...... 4
1......... 5
1 ........ 8
1 ...... 11

Through 59 out of 62 states & territories, Trump faced no more than 4 opponents.

See why you look like such a flaming idiot?

Ok Pawned Again...first primary he had 11 candidates to vote against and went down from that...Hildebeast had Bernie and some other goober that dropped out almost immediately...BUT you ride with your mental masturbation if it continues to quench your OCD over insignificant details!
I'm embarrassed for you.
 
Yes the TOTAL of SIXTEEN other candidates added together to make it appear that The Donald LOST by 2 million votes..... OP is smoking some HARD SHIT AGAIN!
Great, another rightard who moronically thinks there were 16 other candidates to draw votes. :cuckoo:

Rightarded moron...

5 of those 16 dropped out before the first primary and 3 more dropped out after it.

By New Hampshire, half of the 16 you idiotically thought were pulling votes from Trump were no longer even running. 3 more dropped out after NH and Jeb withdraw after SC.

After the first 3 states, there were only 4 remaining + Trump.

Carson dropped out after Super Tuesday and Rubio was done 2 weeks later -- leaving only Cruz and Kasich.

Number of states/other ... opponents:

9 ........ 0
11 ...... 2
18 ...... 3
21 ...... 4
1......... 5
1 ........ 8
1 ...... 11

Through 59 out of 62 states & territories, Trump faced no more than 4 opponents.

See why you look like such a flaming idiot?

Ok Pawned Again...first primary he had 11 candidates to vote against and went down from that...Hildebeast had Bernie and some other goober that dropped out almost immediately...BUT you ride with your mental masturbation if it continues to quench your OCD over insignificant details!
I'm embarrassed for you.

I'm sorry you have such a severe case of OCD!
 
Let's boil this down to the basics.

1. Did Trump receive more votes than that of the other candidates combined?

2. Does that mean more people were for him or against him?

3. Did you fail 4th grade?

4. Former Presidential candidates Romney and Cain. Former US President Bush and Bush...... Will not support Trump.
5. Supreme Court justice Ginsburg blasted Trump.
6. Independent well known economist and chamber of commerce blasted trump economic plan but no one is blasting Hillary.
7. Trump is being compared to Adolf Hitler here and abroad.
 
Let's boil this down to the basics.

1. Did Trump receive more votes than that of the other candidates combined?

2. Does that mean more people were for him or against him?

3. Did you fail 4th grade?

4. Former Presidential candidates Romney and Cain. Former US President Bush and Bush...... Will not support Trump.
5. Supreme Court justice Ginsburg blasted Trump.
6. Independent well known economist and chamber of commerce blasted trump economic plan but no one is blasting Hillary.
7. Trump is being compared to Adolf Hitler here and abroad.
Obama is hilter here and abroad....
 
Yes the TOTAL of SIXTEEN other candidates added together to make it appear that The Donald LOST by 2 million votes..... OP is smoking some HARD SHIT AGAIN!
Great, another rightard who moronically thinks there were 16 other candidates to draw votes. :cuckoo:

Rightarded moron...

5 of those 16 dropped out before the first primary and 3 more dropped out after it.

By New Hampshire, half of the 16 you idiotically thought were pulling votes from Trump were no longer even running. 3 more dropped out after NH and Jeb withdraw after SC.

After the first 3 states, there were only 4 remaining + Trump.

Carson dropped out after Super Tuesday and Rubio was done 2 weeks later -- leaving only Cruz and Kasich.

Number of states/other ... opponents:

9 ........ 0
11 ...... 2
18 ...... 3
21 ...... 4
1......... 5
1 ........ 8
1 ...... 11

Through 59 out of 62 states & territories, Trump faced no more than 4 opponents.

See why you look like such a flaming idiot?

Ok Pawned Again...first primary he had 11 candidates to vote against and went down from that...Hildebeast had Bernie and some other goober that dropped out almost immediately...BUT you ride with your mental masturbation if it continues to quench your OCD over insignificant details!
I'm embarrassed for you.

I'm sorry you have such a severe case of OCD!
What a shame that really is the best you can muster. :itsok:
 
Let's boil this down to the basics.

1. Did Trump receive more votes than that of the other candidates combined?

2. Does that mean more people were for him or against him?

3. Did you fail 4th grade?

4. Former Presidential candidates Romney and Cain. Former US President Bush and Bush...... Will not support Trump.
5. Supreme Court justice Ginsburg blasted Trump.
6. Independent well known economist and chamber of commerce blasted trump economic plan but no one is blasting Hillary.
7. Trump is being compared to Adolf Hitler here and abroad.
Obama is hilter here and abroad....

Do you anything to back up your well admired opinion?
 
Let's boil this down to the basics.

1. Did Trump receive more votes than that of the other candidates combined?

2. Does that mean more people were for him or against him?

3. Did you fail 4th grade?

4. Former Presidential candidates Romney and Cain. Former US President Bush and Bush...... Will not support Trump.
5. Supreme Court justice Ginsburg blasted Trump.
6. Independent well known economist and chamber of commerce blasted trump economic plan but no one is blasting Hillary.
7. Trump is being compared to Adolf Hitler here and abroad.
Obama is hilter here and abroad....

Do you anything to back up your well admired opinion?
Sure...Obama....

And thank you....
 
Sanders isn't a Democrat either. And his voters have nothing whatsoever in common with Rump. The two candidates could not possibly be more opposite of each other.

Being "not a traditional Democrat/Republican" is not a trait per se. It's simply the absence of something. Neither one has a tail either but that doesn't make them 'similar'.
If he isn't a Democrat, then why did he enthusiastically endorse Hillary today?

That doesn't make sense. You don't have to be part of a political party to make an endorsement. Don't you know that?
Why isn't he endorsing Johnson, or some other more independent candidate?

He is a hack moron.
He's a Socialist, that makes him a moron by default.
Bernie or Pogo?
Bernie. I don't know what Pogo is other than Liberal.
 
Is that why he is getting 20% of the Sanders supporters even today?

He got a lot of Democrat votes because he isn't a traditional Republican. Democrats actually like him almost as much as Republicans do.

Sanders isn't a Democrat either. And his voters have nothing whatsoever in common with Rump. The two candidates could not possibly be more opposite of each other.

Being "not a traditional Democrat/Republican" is not a trait per se. It's simply the absence of something. Neither one has a tail either but that doesn't make them 'similar'.
If he isn't a Democrat, then why did he enthusiastically endorse Hillary today?

That doesn't make sense. You don't have to be part of a political party to make an endorsement. Don't you know that?
Why isn't he endorsing Johnson, or some other more independent candidate?

He is a hack moron.
Because Johnson is a mindless drug addict.
oh here we go.....the pot expert speaks....hey tipsy?.....how much you wanna bet your buddy trump not only has smoked pot but did cocaine too.....
 
An OP devoid of historical perspective, among other problems.

First off, Trump DID in fact set the record for most votes received in a GOP primary.

As for the silly argument that Trump's opponents got more votes combined than he did in the GOP primary, well, gee, Dwight Eisenhower's opponents got more votes combined than he did in the 1952 GOP primary, and Ike had half as many opponents as Trump had.
 
An OP devoid of historical perspective, among other problems.

First off, Trump DID in fact set the record for most votes received in a GOP primary.

As for the silly argument that Trump's opponents got more votes combined than he did in the GOP primary, well, gee, Dwight Eisenhower's opponents got more votes combined than he did in the 1952 GOP primary, and Ike had half as many opponents as Trump had.
I'd hope so, Ike had no idea how the economy works. As expected of a Regressive.
 
Sanders isn't a Democrat either. And his voters have nothing whatsoever in common with Rump. The two candidates could not possibly be more opposite of each other.

Being "not a traditional Democrat/Republican" is not a trait per se. It's simply the absence of something. Neither one has a tail either but that doesn't make them 'similar'.
If he isn't a Democrat, then why did he enthusiastically endorse Hillary today?

That doesn't make sense. You don't have to be part of a political party to make an endorsement. Don't you know that?
Why isn't he endorsing Johnson, or some other more independent candidate?

He is a hack moron.
Because Johnson is a mindless drug addict.
oh here we go.....the pot expert speaks....hey tipsy?.....how much you wanna bet your buddy trump not only has smoked pot but did cocaine too.....
You will have no trouble proving that will you?
 
If he isn't a Democrat, then why did he enthusiastically endorse Hillary today?

That doesn't make sense. You don't have to be part of a political party to make an endorsement. Don't you know that?
Why isn't he endorsing Johnson, or some other more independent candidate?

He is a hack moron.
Because Johnson is a mindless drug addict.
oh here we go.....the pot expert speaks....hey tipsy?.....how much you wanna bet your buddy trump not only has smoked pot but did cocaine too.....
You will have no trouble proving that will you?
if you dont believe that he did drugs with all his rich buddies than you are as naive as i thought you were.....a 20 something millionaire did not do pot or coke to impress the girls he is trying to fuck.....yea right.....
 

Forum List

Back
Top