Donald Trump had more votes against him than he did for him.

[Katzndogz]

Every other candidate has more people who didn't vote for them than voted for them. More people didn't vote for Hillary than voted for Hillary. That's why we only count votes that are cast.

 

[ptbw forever]

You don't have a television where you work? You don't have a car radio? Can you not read the numerous threads on this forum about that particular subject?

Why the fuck would I have a television where I work? What kind of work would get done?

Yes I have car radios but I didn't have them on. And yes I can read "numerous threads" if I'm interested in them, and I do.
But you brought it up, Sparkles.

As for my username, you will have to find that in one of the other threads where I explained it.

Ah, embarrassed I see. Well not to worry, I already know the answer because I already looked it up when you first got here. It told me all I needed to know.

You don't have a break room in the dungeon you work in? Just how oblivious to the world are you?

Why would I be embarrassed? Do you really think I want to explain my username to yet another moron on here?

 

[Vigilante]

Yes the TOTAL of SIXTEEN other candidates added together to make it appear that The Donald LOST by 2 million votes..... OP is smoking some HARD SHIT AGAIN!

 

[Pogo]

You don't have a television where you work? You don't have a car radio? Can you not read the numerous threads on this forum about that particular subject?

Why the fuck would I have a television where I work? What kind of work would get done?

Yes I have car radios but I didn't have them on. And yes I can read "numerous threads" if I'm interested in them, and I do.
But you brought it up, Sparkles.

As for my username, you will have to find that in one of the other threads where I explained it.

Ah, embarrassed I see. Well not to worry, I already know the answer because I already looked it up when you first got here. It told me all I needed to know.

You don't have a break room in the dungeon you work in? Just how oblivious to the world are you?

Why would I be embarrassed? Do you really think I want to explain my username to yet another moron on here?

I believe the jernt does have a break room of a sort. It doesn't have a TV. Why the fuck would it?

See if you can answer that, since you can't think of an answer for your own name.

 

[TNHarley]

Why is voting for someone else automatically against? Seems like silly logic and sets an unwarranted precedent.

 

[Vigilante]

Why is voting for someone else automatically against? Seems like silly logic and sets an unwarranted precedent.

Your kidding us...right?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

In Raleigh, Trump claims he received most-ever GOP votes

To be specific he received around 14 million votes but 16 million Republicans voted for SOMEONE ELSE. This is not to suggest he didn't win because he did, fair & square. This is just to educate dumbfucks who don't understand basic math.
Trump set a record for most votes received but he also set another record.....the most votes against him.

The MAJORITY of gop voters voted AGAINST DONALD TRUMP. Those FACTS are undisputed.

4th grade math should not be hard but apparently for some it is.

Too bad 4th grade math didn't calculate the fact that Trump was competing against 11 other republicans. Why can't "moderates" and lefties deal with the freaking fact that even 4th grade math indicates that Trump set a freaking record for primary elections in N.C.? If you include the "other" in the democrat primary it seems that Hill barely beat the only other democrat by 100k votes in an election that barely reached over a million votes for the combined democrat ticket.

A record number didn't vote for him.
I have no idea what you're saying about Clinton but maybe this will help.

RealClearPolitics - 2016 Republican Popular Vote

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

I see some on the right are still in panic mode. ALL HANDS ON DECK!!!

Lol some Sandy Vaginas

 

[Pumpkin Row]

Where do you suppose those 'Republicans' randomly spawned from? No, Republicans did not vote for the first time ever just to vote for Trump. To elaborate on the original post, the reason more Republicans voted for the other candidates was because the majority of "record votes" Trump was getting was from Democrats. It's why he consistently did better in open ballots, despite his lack of specifics on his policies. the Democrats were 'helping' us vote for the candidate they figured had the best chance of losing to Hillary. Yes, some Republicans did vote for Trump, but no, Republicans as a party did not nominate Trump.

Is that why he is getting 20% of the Sanders supporters even today?

He got a lot of Democrat votes because he isn't a traditional Republican. Democrats actually like him almost as much as Republicans do.

Sanders isn't a Democrat either. And his voters have nothing whatsoever in common with Rump. The two candidates could not possibly be more opposite of each other.

Being "not a traditional Democrat/Republican" is not a trait per se. It's simply the absence of something. Neither one has a tail either but that doesn't make them 'similar'.

If he isn't a Democrat, then why did he enthusiastically endorse Hillary today?

That doesn't make sense. You don't have to be part of a political party to make an endorsement. Don't you know that?

Why isn't he endorsing Johnson, or some other more independent candidate?

He is a hack moron.

He's a Socialist, that makes him a moron by default.

 

[ptbw forever]

You don't have a television where you work? You don't have a car radio? Can you not read the numerous threads on this forum about that particular subject?

Why the fuck would I have a television where I work? What kind of work would get done?

Yes I have car radios but I didn't have them on. And yes I can read "numerous threads" if I'm interested in them, and I do.
But you brought it up, Sparkles.

As for my username, you will have to find that in one of the other threads where I explained it.

Ah, embarrassed I see. Well not to worry, I already know the answer because I already looked it up when you first got here. It told me all I needed to know.

You don't have a break room in the dungeon you work in? Just how oblivious to the world are you?

Why would I be embarrassed? Do you really think I want to explain my username to yet another moron on here?

I believe the jernt does have a break room of a sort. It doesn't have a TV. Why the fuck would it?

See if you can answer that, since you can't think of an answer for your own name.

Because nearly every break room has a tv?

Why do you think I would be afraid of talking about my username on a forum in which I have already talked about it extensively? Do you have a problem with white people who have a high self esteem?

 

[ptbw forever]

Is that why he is getting 20% of the Sanders supporters even today?

He got a lot of Democrat votes because he isn't a traditional Republican. Democrats actually like him almost as much as Republicans do.

Sanders isn't a Democrat either. And his voters have nothing whatsoever in common with Rump. The two candidates could not possibly be more opposite of each other.

Being "not a traditional Democrat/Republican" is not a trait per se. It's simply the absence of something. Neither one has a tail either but that doesn't make them 'similar'.

If he isn't a Democrat, then why did he enthusiastically endorse Hillary today?

That doesn't make sense. You don't have to be part of a political party to make an endorsement. Don't you know that?

Why isn't he endorsing Johnson, or some other more independent candidate?

He is a hack moron.

He's a Socialist, that makes him a moron by default.

Bernie or Pogo?

 

[DigitalDrifter]

I see some on the right are still in panic mode. ALL HANDS ON DECK!!!

Lol some Sandy Vaginas

 

[TNHarley]

Why is voting for someone else automatically against? Seems like silly logic and sets an unwarranted precedent.

Your kidding us...right?

No why would I be?

 

[Vigilante]

Why is voting for someone else automatically against? Seems like silly logic and sets an unwarranted precedent.

Your kidding us...right?

No why would I be?

Perhaps you should look up the definition of VOTE....DAMN!

 

[TNHarley]

Why is voting for someone else automatically against? Seems like silly logic and sets an unwarranted precedent.

Your kidding us...right?

No why would I be?

Perhaps you should look up the definition of VOTE....DAMN!

Lol so if I voted for fiorina, that means I voted against trump?
But what if I loved trump too?









Ikr? Little bit of a dilemma with that one track mind, ey?

 

[Vigilante]

Why is voting for someone else automatically against? Seems like silly logic and sets an unwarranted precedent.

Your kidding us...right?

No why would I be?

Perhaps you should look up the definition of VOTE....DAMN!

Lol so if I voted for fiorina, that means I voted against trump?
But what if I loved trump too?









Ikr? Little bit of a dilemma with that one track mind, ey?

The very definition is you vote for YOUR FAVORITE....I liked both Ted and Donald...I only voted for one!

 

[TNHarley]

Why is voting for someone else automatically against? Seems like silly logic and sets an unwarranted precedent.

Your kidding us...right?

No why would I be?

Perhaps you should look up the definition of VOTE....DAMN!

Lol so if I voted for fiorina, that means I voted against trump?
But what if I loved trump too?









Ikr? Little bit of a dilemma with that one track mind, ey?

The very definition is you vote for YOUR FAVORITE....I liked both Ted and Donald...I only voted for one!

It's actually o make a choice or something like that.
To say "voting against" for simply picking someone else is disingenuous

 

[Vigilante]

Your kidding us...right?

No why would I be?

Perhaps you should look up the definition of VOTE....DAMN!

Lol so if I voted for fiorina, that means I voted against trump?
But what if I loved trump too?









Ikr? Little bit of a dilemma with that one track mind, ey?

The very definition is you vote for YOUR FAVORITE....I liked both Ted and Donald...I only voted for one!

It's actually o make a choice or something like that.
To say "voting against" for simply picking someone else is disingenuous

Bullshit!

 

[Pogo]

Is that why he is getting 20% of the Sanders supporters even today?

He got a lot of Democrat votes because he isn't a traditional Republican. Democrats actually like him almost as much as Republicans do.

Sanders isn't a Democrat either. And his voters have nothing whatsoever in common with Rump. The two candidates could not possibly be more opposite of each other.

Being "not a traditional Democrat/Republican" is not a trait per se. It's simply the absence of something. Neither one has a tail either but that doesn't make them 'similar'.

If he isn't a Democrat, then why did he enthusiastically endorse Hillary today?

That doesn't make sense. You don't have to be part of a political party to make an endorsement. Don't you know that?

Why isn't he endorsing Johnson, or some other more independent candidate?

He is a hack moron.

He's a Socialist, that makes him a moron by default.

Translation from Bubble-ese:

 

[TNHarley]

No why would I be?

Perhaps you should look up the definition of VOTE....DAMN!

Lol so if I voted for fiorina, that means I voted against trump?
But what if I loved trump too?









Ikr? Little bit of a dilemma with that one track mind, ey?

The very definition is you vote for YOUR FAVORITE....I liked both Ted and Donald...I only voted for one!

It's actually o make a choice or something like that.
To say "voting against" for simply picking someone else is disingenuous

Bullshit!

What is?
Quit sounding like a dummy and Splain something