Donald Trump vs. Hillary Clinton

52j8ma.jpg
 
There isn't a genuine bone in her miserable body. She patronizes people, lies, and manipulates because of her pathological desire for power and wealth:

 
And the bombshells just keep on coming! First radical left-winger Susan Sarandon said that Hitlery Clinton as more dangerous than Donald Trump. Then radical left-winger Michael Moore echoed her sentiments and predicted Donald Trump will win big. And now we have radical left-winger Jill Stein of the Green Party declaring that Hitlery Clinton is more dangerous than Donald Trump.

Had Republicans nominated anyone other than Donald Trump, they would have won with 98% of the vote.

Jill Stein: Trump Is Less Dangerous; Clinton Will Start Nuclear War With Russia
 
I hate Donald Trump - but I hope he wins for 3 reasons:

As awful as he is, he's still an exponentially better choice than Hitlery Clinton

Since #1 is true - it's going to be a LOT of fun watching him go off the deep end in every press conference when he's challenged. Donald Trump has a very fragile ego and can't handle being challenged (at all).

Watching progressives lose their tiny little fuck'n minds will be one of the greatest moments of my life. These people are so insane, so violent, so bat-shit crazy about Trump (and others) just running for office. To see what these emotionally unstable progressives are going to do if Trump wins will be worth the price of admission alone.
 
I hate Donald Trump - but I hope he wins for 3 reasons:

As awful as he is, he's still an exponentially better choice than Hitlery Clinton

Since #1 is true - it's going to be a LOT of fun watching him go off the deep end in every press conference when he's challenged. Donald Trump has a very fragile ego and can't handle being challenged (at all).

Watching progressives lose their tiny little fuck'n minds will be one of the greatest moments of my life. These people are so insane, so violent, so bat-shit crazy about Trump (and others) just running for office. To see what these emotionally unstable progressives are going to do if Trump wins will be worth the price of admission alone.

And it seems both the establishment reps and dems absolutely HATE him. Lol. :2up: That's the best thing, if you ask me.
 
Look at Hillary's twitter today.

The bitch is unhinged.

vxhsaa.jpg

veukz.jpg


I don't know why she thinks she'll accomplish anything by accusing Trump of being friends with Putin. She just makes her seem more demented and itching to fight with Russia for no reason.
 
Last edited:
Leftists are utterly BTFO since Friday.
Hillary campaign is dropping like a rock, while Trump surging.

"Hillary for prison" looks closer every day.

 
When the definitive post mortem of this dismal election is finally published, it should go something like this: The Republican establishment was foolish; the Democratic establishment was ruthless. The Republicans fumbled around incompetently and spinelessly in the face of an unforeseen challenge; the Democrats willfully and intentionally did all they could to carry a corrupt politician over the finish line, forcing the American public to choose between one known liar and another. Let’s review the facts:
  • The FBI continues to investigate Hillary Clinton’s maybe-criminal abuse of the Clinton Foundation as a front for systematic influence-peddling and her maybe-criminal mishandling of our nation’s secrets. Neither of these scandals is new. They both predate the launch of her presidential campaign.
  • Questions have swirled around the Clinton Foundation since Hillary was confirmed as secretary of state. Damaging evidence of outright influence-peddling — including evidence of large-scale donations made to the foundation as the State Department considered a crucial uranium deal — broke less than two weeks after her campaign announcement.
  • On April 23, 2015, the New York Times published an extraordinary story detailing the amount of money that was funneled to the Clinton Foundation (and to Bill Clinton directly) as the State Department considered whether to sign off on the sale of “one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States” to a Russian-controlled corporation. The chairman of the corporation donated $2.35 million to the Clinton Foundation, and a Russian investment bank promoting Uranium One stock paid Bill Clinton a whopping $500,000 to give a speech in Moscow. The Clintons violated an agreement with the White House to “publicly identify all donors” by failing to disclose the Uranium One contributions. Hillary’s State Department approved the deal.
  • One month before the Uranium One story, as Clinton was preparing to announce her candidacy, the Times broke the news that still dominates the campaign today: Hillary “exclusively used a personal email account to conduct government business.” Given the Clintons’ longstanding history of personal corruption, it should have been obvious to Democrats then that Hillary’s scandals were going to dog the party throughout the campaign, and, if she won, throughout her presidency. It would be a repeat of the 1990s, when an entire party was hijacked into relentlessly defending conduct that they would loudly condemn if it were attributed to any Republican.
  • Instead, the party did far more than merely acquiesce in Hillary’s decision to run. It did virtually everything it could to guarantee her victory. Scandal-free progressive politicians such as Elizabeth Warren and Joe Biden stood aside. Superdelegates signed on with Hillary en masse. The DNC put its thumb on the scales to such an extent that Debbie Wasserman Schultz was ultimately fired to appease the Sanders holdouts. When angry Trump voters were accusing incompetent Republicans of “rigging” the system against their man, ruthless Democrats were were actually rigging the system for Hillary.
The Democratic Establishment Has Enabled Hillary’s Corruption at Every Turn
 

Forum List

Back
Top