Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The minority should be made subject to the will of the majority at some point or another. So what I get here is that the will of the majority no longer matters.
We'll have to bookmark this one for the next time a state decides to ignore one of the left's pet laws and regulations.Not arguing that, but by not hearing the case and since it was already ruled unconstitutional...it's over. Prop 8 is DONE.
bingo. from heros ( obamacare) to goats (section 4 voters rights act) to heroes again ( gay rights per se) .........
.....the hypocrisy meter is pinned
The minority should be made subject to the will of the majority at some point or another. So what I get here is that the will of the majority no longer matters.
That's basically what they're saying, and the supreme court is also saying that no other branch of government is equal to them, they're top dog, which is wrong as hell. The supreme court is getting a little more power than it supposed to have here. Newt Gingrich was right.
Avatar is correct. Polygamy should now be defensible under the law and permitted. How that will shake things up here in the beehive state will be interesting.
I don't think so. One can point to negative effects upon young women AND young men, which justify state police power. Historically, same sex marriage was disfavored because we thought it somehow harmful to children, yet that was proven untrue.
The decision comes with MANY ramifications and will have untold effects on our society... THAT is what I eluded to. Odd that you decided to play games with that.This is no time for games... the court just decided that HOMOS are to get FULL MARRIAGE BENEFITS in the states that ALLOW HOMO marriage... they just STRUCK DOWN the DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT. So don't act cute and play games here.You stated, and I quote: "Didn't this SCOTUS decision JUST SAY that wasn't anyone's business, and no one should be discriminated against?"
Where in the SCOTUS decision does it say that, 007? You made the claim. Where does it say that?
THEY STRUCK DOWN THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT.
What fucking part of that do YOU want to DENY?
That opens the door for every other fucking PERVERT ON THE PLANET that wants to MARRY.
Actually, I believe they struck down PART of DOMA. And that is a wonderful day for equal rights for law-abiding, tax-paying citizens in this country.
(Odd that you could not prove your assertion about what the Supreme Court said.)
Avatar is correct. Polygamy should now be defensible under the law and permitted. How that will shake things up here in the beehive state will be interesting.
I don't think so. One can point to negative effects upon young women AND young men, which justify state police power. Historically, same sex marriage was disfavored because we thought it somehow harmful to children, yet that was proven untrue.
It hasn't been proven untrue because we don't know yet. I remember when divorce was considered beneficial to children. It took 30 years before we finally figured out how destructive divorce was to children.
We'll have to bookmark this one for the next time a state decides to ignore one of the left's pet laws and regulations.
bingo. from heros ( obamacare) to goats (section 4 voters rights act) to heroes again ( gay rights per se) .........
.....the hypocrisy meter is pinned
Interesting. I have already stated elsewhere that I don't have any problems with what the Supreme Court rules on the the Voters Rights Act.
The minority should be made subject to the will of the majority at some point or another. So what I get here is that the will of the majority no longer matters.
That's basically what they're saying, and the supreme court is also saying that no other branch of government is equal to them, they're top dog, which is wrong as hell. The supreme court is getting a little more power than it supposed to have here. Newt Gingrich was right.
How is the Supreme Court getting "a little more power that it supposed to have here" in this case?
Are you saying they do not have the power of Judicial Review?
The decision comes with MANY ramifications and will have untold effects on our society... THAT is what I eluded to. Odd that you decided to play games with that.This is no time for games... the court just decided that HOMOS are to get FULL MARRIAGE BENEFITS in the states that ALLOW HOMO marriage... they just STRUCK DOWN the DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT. So don't act cute and play games here.
THEY STRUCK DOWN THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT.
What fucking part of that do YOU want to DENY?
That opens the door for every other fucking PERVERT ON THE PLANET that wants to MARRY.
Actually, I believe they struck down PART of DOMA. And that is a wonderful day for equal rights for law-abiding, tax-paying citizens in this country.
(Odd that you could not prove your assertion about what the Supreme Court said.)
DOMA is GONE... let the games begin... POLYGAMISTS... YOU'RE UP. STRIKE WHILE THE IRONS HOT.
Wonder why so many people who claim to be defending "God's Law" do it with so much hate, name-calling, and vulgarity??????
I don't think so. One can point to negative effects upon young women AND young men, which justify state police power. Historically, same sex marriage was disfavored because we thought it somehow harmful to children, yet that was proven untrue.
It hasn't been proven untrue because we don't know yet. I remember when divorce was considered beneficial to children. It took 30 years before we finally figured out how destructive divorce was to children.
your pt would be valid assumig one chose to ignore the Pediatrics Assoc., the Psychological Assoc, the Psychiatric Assoc., and on and on. But continue whistling Dixie. It's working well for conservatism these days.
That's basically what they're saying, and the supreme court is also saying that no other branch of government is equal to them, they're top dog, which is wrong as hell. The supreme court is getting a little more power than it supposed to have here. Newt Gingrich was right.
How is the Supreme Court getting "a little more power that it supposed to have here" in this case?
Are you saying they do not have the power of Judicial Review?
I'm saying that your liberal shit bag lezbo judges are GOVERNING FROM THE BENCH... they're fucking LEFTIST ACTIVISTS, and they're DECISIONS are TAINTED.
Are you saying they have MORE POWER than the other two branches of government?
Who made the SC the LAST WORD on EVERYTHING?
That's basically what they're saying, and the supreme court is also saying that no other branch of government is equal to them, they're top dog, which is wrong as hell. The supreme court is getting a little more power than it supposed to have here. Newt Gingrich was right.
How is the Supreme Court getting "a little more power that it supposed to have here" in this case?
Are you saying they do not have the power of Judicial Review?
I'm saying that your liberal shit bag lezbo judges are GOVERNING FROM THE BENCH... they're fucking LEFTIST ACTIVISTS, and they're DECISIONS are TAINTED.
Are you saying they have MORE POWER than the other two branches of government?
Who made the SC the LAST WORD on EVERYTHING?
Wonder why so many people who claim to be defending "God's Law" do it with so much hate, name-calling, and vulgarity??????
The minority should be made subject to the will of the majority at some point or another. So what I get here is that the will of the majority no longer matters.
That's basically what they're saying, and the supreme court is also saying that no other branch of government is equal to them, they're top dog, which is wrong as hell. The supreme court is getting a little more power than it supposed to have here. Newt Gingrich was right.
How is the Supreme Court getting "a little more power that it supposed to have here" in this case?
Are you saying they do not have the power of Judicial Review?
VERY BIG DECISION -- all federal rights have just been granted to same-sex couples.
The wording of this decision puts all anti-gay laws into jeopardy.
Federal benefits and protections! A big day for us and our other veteran friends!
That's basically what they're saying, and the supreme court is also saying that no other branch of government is equal to them, they're top dog, which is wrong as hell. The supreme court is getting a little more power than it supposed to have here. Newt Gingrich was right.
How is the Supreme Court getting "a little more power that it supposed to have here" in this case?
Are you saying they do not have the power of Judicial Review?
Judicial review is controversial at best, technically they aren't supposed to use it. What we are saying here, is that the will of the voting majority no longer holds any weight in our "democracy". All you need is a court decision, and you wipe out millions of votes of people, essentially silencing their voice.
