Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wouldn't it make even more sense to repudiate the drones and illegal invasions/occupations we've seen since 1945?? Why should eight year-olds living in countries which pose no threat to your skies need to watch theirs?Drones are horrible. Truly horrendous.
And, I will happily take them over the massive slaughter we saw in Iraq.
A few dead innocents or hundreds of thousands of innocents?
And, I don't mind that other countries are watching the skies.
Why don't we just end all wars?
I agree with you but there will always be conflict. Isn't it better to mitigate the damage all we can? And, as I hinted at, drones are scaring the crap out of our enemies.
President Obama is no where near as lib-rule as some would like but he has turned out to be a bit of a hawk. Him taking out terrorists with drones has got to be terrifying to other terrorists.
Pathic, flag-flaps feel good all over when 68 year-old grandmothers are dismembered in front of their eight year-old grandaughters, yet seldom find the stones or syllables to justify the arbitrary nature of war crimes:The US must do no such thing."...'The US must explain why these people have been killed - people who are clearly civilians. It must provide justice to these people, compensation and it must investigate those responsible for those killings,' Mustafa Qadri, the Amnesty researcher who wrote the report, says.'..."
And Mustafa Qadra can suck donkey <bleep>.
Who gives a damn what he says?
Or Muslim-Arab apologists and fifth-columnists, for that matter...
Perhaps there will always be conflict, but there's no reason to economically subsidize warfare. For example, a 100% war crimes tax on all conflict-related profits after the first civilian death would provide a powerful incentive to investment bankers to look elsewhere for their seven figure lifestyles. The drones aren't scaring away as many terrorists as they are creating, and this is probably by design since the one thing you can not afford to run out of in a Long Was is enemies (and their grandmothers)Wouldn't it make even more sense to repudiate the drones and illegal invasions/occupations we've seen since 1945?? Why should eight year-olds living in countries which pose no threat to your skies need to watch theirs?Drones are horrible. Truly horrendous.
And, I will happily take them over the massive slaughter we saw in Iraq.
A few dead innocents or hundreds of thousands of innocents?
And, I don't mind that other countries are watching the skies.
Why don't we just end all wars?
I agree with you but there will always be conflict. Isn't it better to mitigate the damage all we can? And, as I hinted at, drones are scaring the crap out of our enemies.
President Obama is no where near as lib-rule as some would like but he has turned out to be a bit of a hawk. Him taking out terrorists with drones has got to be terrifying to other terrorists.
Pathic, flag-flaps feel good all over when 68 year-old grandmothers are dismembered in front of their eight year-old grandaughters, yet seldom find the stones or syllables to justify the arbitrary nature of war crimes:The US must do no such thing. And Mustafa Qadra can suck donkey <bleep>. Who gives a damn what he says? Or Muslim-Arab apologists and fifth-columnists, for that matter..."...'The US must explain why these people have been killed - people who are clearly civilians. It must provide justice to these people, compensation and it must investigate those responsible for those killings,' Mustafa Qadri, the Amnesty researcher who wrote the report, says.'..."
What planet are you living on?"...For example, a 100% war crimes tax on all conflict-related profits after the first civilian death would provide a powerful incentive to investment bankers to look elsewhere for their seven figure lifestyles..."
Perhaps there will always be conflict, but there's no reason to economically subsidize warfare. For example, a 100% war crimes tax on all conflict-related profits after the first civilian death would provide a powerful incentive to investment bankers to look elsewhere for their seven figure lifestyles. The drones aren't scaring away as many terrorists as they are creating, and this is probably by design since the one thing you can not afford to run out of in a Long Was is enemies (and their grandmothers)Wouldn't it make even more sense to repudiate the drones and illegal invasions/occupations we've seen since 1945?? Why should eight year-olds living in countries which pose no threat to your skies need to watch theirs?
Why don't we just end all wars?
I agree with you but there will always be conflict. Isn't it better to mitigate the damage all we can? And, as I hinted at, drones are scaring the crap out of our enemies.
President Obama is no where near as lib-rule as some would like but he has turned out to be a bit of a hawk. Him taking out terrorists with drones has got to be terrifying to other terrorists.
Proof?The drones aren't scaring away as many terrorists as they are creating ...
Wouldn't it make even more sense to repudiate the drones and illegal invasions/occupations we've seen since 1945?? Why should eight year-olds living in countries which pose no threat to your skies need to watch theirs?
Why don't we just end all wars?
I agree with you but there will always be conflict. Isn't it better to mitigate the damage all we can? And, as I hinted at, drones are scaring the crap out of our enemies.
President Obama is no where near as lib-rule as some would like but he has turned out to be a bit of a hawk. Him taking out terrorists with drones has got to be terrifying to other terrorists.
Obama is doing something about the terrorist and the right can't stand it. SO they attack him until they get their guy in so they can kill more terrorist themselves.
This is a power play.
Rather than swallowing every pig-shit laced load Wall Street and the Pentagon cascade over your tonsils...Pathic, flag-flaps feel good all over when 68 year-old grandmothers are dismembered in front of their eight year-old grandaughters, yet seldom find the stones or syllables to justify the arbitrary nature of war crimes:The US must do no such thing. And Mustafa Qadra can suck donkey <bleep>. Who gives a damn what he says? Or Muslim-Arab apologists and fifth-columnists, for that matter...
Horseshit.
However, pragmatic Americans feel VERY good when we make drone strikes on North Waziristan and we kill al-Qaeda and Taliban leadership and operatives.
We feel even better when we nail a whole bunch of 'em simultaneously.
We feel even better than that when we consider that we did not lose one soldier in such strikes.
It's unfortunate that the occasional 68-year-old grandmother gets clobbered.
None of that would have been necessary had the Pakistani government been able (or willing) to clear the province of al-Qaeda and Taliban.
But they did not clear them out.
And al-Qaeda and Taliban operations will continue to be interdicted and their personnel killed as often as may be practicable.
To make omelettes, ya gotta break a few eggs.
Civilian casualties alongside a missle-strike (drone-launched or not) are always possible.
We may take comfort from the fact that far fewer casualties result from smart missile strikes than formerly died from older techniques such as carpet bombing.
Far fewer.
Small consolation to those bystanders who die, and their families.
But, in the bigger picture, far preferable to either (a) allowing al-Qaeda and the Taliban to operate in an open and unrestricted manner or (b) carpet bombing and killing 10,000 68-year-old grandmothers.
War is a bitch.
But it's far more fun to be on the winning side.
Rather than propagandizing for and giving aid and comfort to the enemy.
Only one side is killing, maiming, and displacing millions of civilians on the opposite side of the planet from its homeland for PROFIT$. I would suggest the ideology responsible for the lion's share of global terror is American Exceptionalism.Why don't we just end all wars?
I agree with you but there will always be conflict. Isn't it better to mitigate the damage all we can? And, as I hinted at, drones are scaring the crap out of our enemies.
President Obama is no where near as lib-rule as some would like but he has turned out to be a bit of a hawk. Him taking out terrorists with drones has got to be terrifying to other terrorists.
Obama is doing something about the terrorist and the right can't stand it. SO they attack him until they get their guy in so they can kill more terrorist themselves.
This is a power play.
I think they are fighting an ideology. They have been at this too long and there seems to be no shortage of terrorists so I am not so sure either side is being truthful. They are at war and terms like terror are just an excuse for what either side is doing.
It ain't Planet Halliburton, what about you?What planet are you living on?"...For example, a 100% war crimes tax on all conflict-related profits after the first civilian death would provide a powerful incentive to investment bankers to look elsewhere for their seven figure lifestyles..."
It sure-as-hell isn't Earth.
Here are some results of US drone strikes in Yemen which have helped al-Qa'ida recruitment in the Arabian peninsula like nothing else:Perhaps there will always be conflict, but there's no reason to economically subsidize warfare. For example, a 100% war crimes tax on all conflict-related profits after the first civilian death would provide a powerful incentive to investment bankers to look elsewhere for their seven figure lifestyles. The drones aren't scaring away as many terrorists as they are creating, and this is probably by design since the one thing you can not afford to run out of in a Long Was is enemies (and their grandmothers)Why don't we just end all wars?
I agree with you but there will always be conflict. Isn't it better to mitigate the damage all we can? And, as I hinted at, drones are scaring the crap out of our enemies.
President Obama is no where near as lib-rule as some would like but he has turned out to be a bit of a hawk. Him taking out terrorists with drones has got to be terrifying to other terrorists.
After WWII, other countries invested in their own recovery. The US invested in more war machines and, even now, the Rs want more tanks even though we will never use the ones we already have.
Proof?The drones aren't scaring away as many terrorists as they are creating ...
My question is to those who are against drones - WHAT is your alternative?
It is utter stupidity to let your people starve or go without housing or medical care in favor of piling up more guns.
Rather than swallowing every pig-shit laced load Wall Street and the Pentagon cascade over your tonsils...Pathic, flag-flaps feel good all over when 68 year-old grandmothers are dismembered in front of their eight year-old grandaughters, yet seldom find the stones or syllables to justify the arbitrary nature of war crimes:
Horseshit.
However, pragmatic Americans feel VERY good when we make drone strikes on North Waziristan and we kill al-Qaeda and Taliban leadership and operatives.
We feel even better when we nail a whole bunch of 'em simultaneously.
We feel even better than that when we consider that we did not lose one soldier in such strikes.
It's unfortunate that the occasional 68-year-old grandmother gets clobbered.
None of that would have been necessary had the Pakistani government been able (or willing) to clear the province of al-Qaeda and Taliban.
But they did not clear them out.
And al-Qaeda and Taliban operations will continue to be interdicted and their personnel killed as often as may be practicable.
To make omelettes, ya gotta break a few eggs.
Civilian casualties alongside a missle-strike (drone-launched or not) are always possible.
We may take comfort from the fact that far fewer casualties result from smart missile strikes than formerly died from older techniques such as carpet bombing.
Far fewer.
Small consolation to those bystanders who die, and their families.
But, in the bigger picture, far preferable to either (a) allowing al-Qaeda and the Taliban to operate in an open and unrestricted manner or (b) carpet bombing and killing 10,000 68-year-old grandmothers.
War is a bitch.
But it's far more fun to be on the winning side.
Rather than propagandizing for and giving aid and comfort to the enemy.
Will the Real Terrorist Please Stand Up.
Oh wait, IT just did.
Your big war bitch endorsement of the terror inflicted by the Greatest Purveyor of Violence in the World would be much funnier if you were pounding out your pathic keystrokes from Pakistan.
Reported for over-the-top filthy language and over-reaction to what was written."..."
Anytime.Reported for over-the-top filthy language and over-reaction to what was written."..."
If you have a problem with me, set something up in the flame zone, and then bring it, you nasty little creature.
Oh, and, by the way, none of what you wrote does anything whatsoever, to negate the accuracy of what I'd written, in order to trigger such a juvenile outburst on your part.
Punk.
Not lately.Rather than swallowing every pig-shit laced load Wall Street and the Pentagon cascade over your tonsils...Horseshit.
However, pragmatic Americans feel VERY good when we make drone strikes on North Waziristan and we kill al-Qaeda and Taliban leadership and operatives.
We feel even better when we nail a whole bunch of 'em simultaneously.
We feel even better than that when we consider that we did not lose one soldier in such strikes.
It's unfortunate that the occasional 68-year-old grandmother gets clobbered.
None of that would have been necessary had the Pakistani government been able (or willing) to clear the province of al-Qaeda and Taliban.
But they did not clear them out.
And al-Qaeda and Taliban operations will continue to be interdicted and their personnel killed as often as may be practicable.
To make omelettes, ya gotta break a few eggs.
Civilian casualties alongside a missle-strike (drone-launched or not) are always possible.
We may take comfort from the fact that far fewer casualties result from smart missile strikes than formerly died from older techniques such as carpet bombing.
Far fewer.
Small consolation to those bystanders who die, and their families.
But, in the bigger picture, far preferable to either (a) allowing al-Qaeda and the Taliban to operate in an open and unrestricted manner or (b) carpet bombing and killing 10,000 68-year-old grandmothers.
War is a bitch.
But it's far more fun to be on the winning side.
Rather than propagandizing for and giving aid and comfort to the enemy.
Will the Real Terrorist Please Stand Up.
Oh wait, IT just did.
Your big war bitch endorsement of the terror inflicted by the Greatest Purveyor of Violence in the World would be much funnier if you were pounding out your pathic keystrokes from Pakistan.
Are you on LSD, boy?
If I was a miserable little snitch, I would have simply reported your post behind-the-scenes, with you never the wiser...Anytime.Reported for over-the-top filthy language and over-reaction to what was written."..."
If you have a problem with me, set something up in the flame zone, and then bring it, you nasty little creature.
Oh, and, by the way, none of what you wrote does anything whatsoever, to negate the accuracy of what I'd written, in order to trigger such a juvenile outburst on your part.
Punk.
Anywhere.
Chicken-shit.
(report that you miserable little snitch)
